|
So of the third party voters that post the most in this thread one is a sociopath and the other a Libertarian sociopath. And they're both states' rights advocates.
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 10:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 09:12 |
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:Can I ask you a serious question? Why do you hate women? I mean, Candidate Obama vs President Obama were very different things, and there's no reason to believe Hillary's any different. I'm not voting for Trump unless somehow you consider not contributing to a Democratic victory lap voting for trump.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 10:34
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:Can I ask you a serious question? Why do you hate women? America is run on corruption, as an example Obama care, although it does a lot of good, is flawed to the core as it does nothing to control costs because of the systematic corruption of the US system. Hillary is that corruption. Now that we are running into a point where rural communities are going to be losing their economic viability even more, and robotics and automated systems will be displacing the low skill workforce even more, we are to believe that someone who will certainly run in the election on the left and preside on the right will be a solution to any of these longterm problems? Getting upset by Trump being a sexist/rapey dude while ignoring hillary speculating whether to kill asaunge with drones sort of articulates that shallow love of women you care so much about. Also lmao at your unironic 'so you hate freedom' trope. Sethex fucked around with this message at 16:53 on Oct 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 14:35
|
|
|
Sethex posted:someone who will certainly run in the election on the left and preside on the right Citation needed
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 14:38
|
|
|
*gasp* Why would she drone Gulian Asaunge?!
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 14:38
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:*gasp* Why would she drone Gulian Asaunge?! Who wouldn't want to? I want to. Vote for me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 14:40
|
|
|
lmao at trying to concern troll about Assange but being completely unable to even google the actual spelling of his name.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 14:55
|
|
|
Barbe Rouge posted:So of the third party voters that post the most in this thread one is a sociopath and the other a Libertarian sociopath. And they're both states' rights advocates. thirdpartyvoters.txt
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 16:32
|
|
|
Also,  if you think a third party president would magically change the country. The Green party (or worse, Libertarians) taking the House and/or Senate would be a bigger shake up than the loving president. But that will never happen.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 16:53
|
|
|
Hitlers Gay Secret posted:Also,
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 16:55
|
|
|
The president will change nothing, except KILLary, who will lead us into WWIII!!!1!!111!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 16:58
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:The president will change nothing, except KILLary, who will lead us into WWIII!!!1!!111!! This, except all of them. Hillary starts ww3 with russia. Trump starts ww3 with Iran. Johnson starts ww3 with Mexico (only other foreign country he's actually aware of). Jill Stein starts ww3 by turning off all the nuclear reactors without understanding that they need to be actively cooled or they turn into bombs. I will say, Trump's got the best looking war out of the 4 but you have to give credit to Johnson and Stein for getting creative.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 17:00
|
|
|
Yesterday you said absolutely nothing noteworthy would happen during a Trump presidency.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
Republicans tell me voting third party is basically voting D. Democrats tell me voting third party is basically voting R. My votes count double hahaha
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 17:13
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Yesterday you said absolutely nothing noteworthy would happen during a Trump presidency. A new war isn't noteworthy in America. Like I said, you have to start two civil wars before you've even hit the curve.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:A new war isn't noteworthy in America. Like I said, you have to start two civil wars before you've even hit the curve. You called it WW3, you think it won't be noteworthy? You continue to expose yourself as the biggest moron.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:A new war isn't noteworthy in America. Like I said, you have to start two civil wars before you've even hit the curve. Good to see you concede that Hillary's hawkishness is not a real concern. See? Progress can be made!
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Good to see you concede that Hillary's hawkishness is not a real concern. See? Progress can be made! I'm embracing being a responsible American voter. WampaLord posted:You called it WW3, you think it won't be noteworthy? The only one that would really be noteworthy would be Jill going suicidal by shutting power off to the nuclear reactors around the country. Everything is is BAU from what I can tell. But yeah, I'm privileged enough to vote Hillary without fear of any consequences so 
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
Nice meltdown
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:05
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:A new war isn't noteworthy in America. Like I said, you have to start two civil wars before you've even hit the curve. So I suppose it isn't noteworthy that Obama has managed to keep us out of major ground combat? Is anything noteworthy other than maintaining an air of ignorant superiority to the detail work of politics?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
woke wedding drone posted:So I suppose it isn't noteworthy that Obama has managed to keep us out of major ground combat? No it's noteworthy. Obama's got a civil war or two on his record(curve applied) though which makes it tough to give him an A.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:28
|
|
|
Are you talking about civil wars in other countries? Is our president supposed to stop all of those?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:29
|
|
|
Apparently "a civil war happens anywhere on earth" is the metric you're using. Presumably you're also counting Captain America: Civil War as well.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:30
|
|
|
Sethex posted:I'm a fan of throwing your vote at a third party. Mostly because America had a lot of structural problems an Hillary is only going to make things worse by being status quo an people like trump will likely spur reform by being as lovely as Nixon if not worse. The main issue people having with many anti-Clinton folks is that they rarely specify any actual policy they disagree with. It is a fact that Clinton is more left-leaning than the average Democrat. Granted, this is far from ideal and the average Democrat is not very left-leaning at all, but the problem is that people act like Clinton is more right-wing than most Democratic politicians, which is provably false. The impression that Clinton is notably right-wing seems to be entirely based on some vague perception created by the media, rather than reality. I think the only specific thing I've seen anyone mention in this thread is US policy in the Middle East (specifically Syria*). Is there any other specific reason why you (and others) are so strongly against Clinton? Are you also as strongly against the vast majority of other Democrats? *To be fair, there is a debate to be had here, and I don't like how many people immediately turn "we shouldn't intervene" into "YOU MUST BE PRO-ASSAD". It's no different than someone claiming someone is pro-Saddam for not supporting the sanctions or war in Iraq. It is a fact that regime change does not usually improve things in these situations (and often makes them worse), so the fact that Assad is bad is not a valid argument against non-intervention.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
woke wedding drone posted:Are you talking about civil wars in other countries? Is our president supposed to stop all of those? Well yeah but we kinda caused the one in Iraq and by extension Syria, etc
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
Tbh outside of the really fringe candidates a trump win would be the most enjoyable outcome. you're all panicking about him using nukes an legalizing rape or some other nonsense while the conventional US establishment is interested in a new cold war with Russia that is simply dumb an gay. The fact that it has almost always been Russia that America looks to as a nemesis, isnt a good reason to continue wasting effort antagonizing the country with one of the largest nuke piles. it seems the US political culture that is tolerated by corporate america's administrators are out of ideas. Get set for the status quo, because the Republicans are going to have Congress until the districts are re gerrymandering. As an investor I would love to get in on a trump recession, if millenials obsessed with sexuality in politics would focus on materialistic subjects then maybe there wouldn't be such a huge industry of bloggers writing slate articles on how poor 20 somethings are. Sethex fucked around with this message at 18:50 on Oct 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:41
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:Well yeah but we kinda caused the one in Iraq and by extension Syria, etc And your assertion is that the civil wars that then took place in those countries reflect poorly on Obama's record? Sethex posted:Tbh outside of the really fringe candidates a trump win would be the most enjoyable outcome. No we get it, you love chaos and bigotry. We won't forget either.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
woke wedding drone posted:And your assertion is that the civil wars that then took place in those countries reflect poorly on Obama's record? well yeah, I think even Obama admits he hosed up the withdraw from Iraq
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:49
|
|
|
How would you have done it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
woke wedding drone posted:How would you have done it? Honestly? Probably the same, but that's why Obama doesn't really hurt from those two. Those are his curve wars, you get those for free as a President. Yemen though... I dunno tough not to feel like we're kinda causing that one too. Once you get to three it's like "dude, maybe you should stop sending weapons to Saudi Arabia"
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:56
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:Honestly? Probably the same, but that's why Obama doesn't really hurt from those two. Those are his curve wars, you get those for free as a President. Yemen though... I dunno tough not to feel like we're kinda causing that one too. Once you get to three it's like "dude, maybe you should stop sending weapons to Saudi Arabia" So what course of action could he have taken to earn an "A" grade from you?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
woke wedding drone posted:So what course of action could he have taken to earn an "A" grade from you? Cut ties with Israel and Saudi Arabia
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 19:02
|
|
|
woke wedding drone posted:
Chaos is already the path that the US govt is headed. Regarding bigotry lol at president bigotry reduction. Also the somber warning at the end, amazing feels pouring out, tastes delicious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:In the foreign policy department, That's great and I agree with that position, but do you really think there would be fewer civil wars as a result? Sethex posted:Chaos is already the path that the US govt is headed. Regarding bigotry lol at president bigotry reduction. No I already said we know, it's OK. To get a rise out of others is more important than helping others. It's good to identify you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 19:09
|
|
|
Sethex posted:Tbh outside of the really fringe candidates a trump win would be the most enjoyable outcome. 3/10, trying too hard
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
woke wedding drone posted:That's great and I agree with that position, but do you really think there would be fewer civil wars as a result? Yes. I think the war in Yemen is a good example of one that is only happening because we are empowering Saudi Arabia with the ability to do so. See also: Israel/Palestine conflict, might not be civil but it's very much a war we enable.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
woke wedding drone posted:
Saving lives From low quality posts meant to signal virtue. Lmao When your argument rests entirely on 'ur bad'.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 19:19
|
|
|
Sethex posted:Saving lives From low quality posts meant to signal virtue. I haven't done any arguing, nor would I need to. Especially when you use phrases borrowed from your real community.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 19:28
|
|
|
Sethex posted:Saving lives From low quality posts meant to signal virtue. lmao another youtube rational
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 09:12 |
|
|
Gotta say that while cutting off the house of Saud would feel good, they still have plenty of money to buy Eurofighters and so on with, so they're still gonna be supplying people with arms and propping up brutal dictatorships and inflaming civil wars.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 21:40
|
|