Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
ufarn
May 30, 2009

Dan Didio posted:

Age of Ultron is crushingly, fundamentally boring at every turn, on top of being poorly made. Amazing Spider Man is bad, but it at least has some interesting visuals and auditory choices.

I'd rather not watch either of them at this point, but if you put a gun to my head, I know which one I'd pick.
[Extremely Joss Whedon voice] an extended 20 minute Thor dream sequence would have fixed it, but the studio

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

ufarn posted:

[Extremely Joss Whedon voice] an extended 20 minute Thor dream sequence would have fixed it, but the studio

A 3 hour and 15 minute cut of Ultron and the 3 hour and 10 minute cut of BvS were both terrible ideas and the movies both suffered from the necessary pruning that went on.

Comfortador
Jul 31, 2003

Just give me all the 3ggs_n_b4con you have.

Wait...wait.

I worry what you just heard was...
"Give me a lot of b4con_n_3ggs."

What I said was...
"Give me all the 3ggs_n_b4con you have"

...Do you understand?

SonicRulez posted:

The scene where he takes off the mask to get the kid to come up? That is so the opposite idea of Spider-Man that it hurt me. And it was all to set up the crane ending which was even worse. Granted, I still maintain that the Times Square Electro sequence in ASM2 alone makes it better than the first one.

You think Peter Parker who notices that a kid is terrified of him in his mask wouldn't do something to alleviate that fear and show him he's a kid just like him? The dramatization of him taking his mask completely off is of course Movie 'actor showing his face' magic, but I'm not talking about production/direction. I'm talking about Peter noticing the kid is scared and doing whatever he can to comfort that kid and save his life. Peter motivating that kid to be strong at a time that you need to bury fear and just get through the moment? That is the heart I'm referring to. That's what the essence of Spider-man is in my opinion. That and lots of guilt, but no need to traumatize the boy. :)

If you can't extract that moment and appreciate it and just see it as setup for a crane scene then that's on you. The scene itself could stand on it's own.

Rhyno
Mar 22, 2003
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
Peter using the mask to help the terrified kid find the bravery to help himself is 100% Spider-man and you're a heartless monster if you think otherwise.

Shirkelton
Apr 6, 2009

I'm not loyal to anything, General... except the dream.

ufarn posted:

[Extremely Joss Whedon voice] an extended 20 minute Thor dream sequence would have fixed it, but the studio

lmao

Arist
Feb 13, 2012

who, me?


ufarn posted:

[Extremely Joss Whedon voice] an extended 20 minute Thor dream sequence would have fixed it, but the studio

This was always the most baffling loving thing

redbackground
Sep 24, 2007

BEHOLD!
OPTIC BLAST!
Grimey Drawer

SonicRulez posted:

The scene where he takes off the mask to get the kid to come up? That is so the opposite idea of Spider-Man that it hurt me.
I haven't even seen the movie, but I can already tell that this is a Wrong Opinion.

Jonny_Rocket
Mar 13, 2007

"Inspiration, move me brightly"

Dan Didio posted:

Age of Ultron is crushingly, fundamentally boring at every turn, on top of being poorly made. Amazing Spider Man is bad, but it at least has some interesting visuals and auditory choices.

I'd rather not watch either of them at this point, but if you put a gun to my head, I know which one I'd pick.

Counterpoint - Amazing Spider-Man 2 was riddled with plot holes and felt like they patched together two completely different movies. Other choices they made in the movie are astoundingly dumb - Electro got his superpowers from electric eels that live in water but his weakness is water? Also, how was Richard Parker able to build a hidden subway car inside an abandoned subway tunnel without anyone noticing? Not to mention Richard must've had magic Wi-Fi, as there was no conceivable way he would've been able to upload information while on a plane in 2000.

The only good thing about that movie was Andrew Garfield's costume, and mayyybe Paul Giamatti hamming it up as the Rhino.

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

redbackground posted:

I haven't even seen the movie, but I can already tell that this is a Wrong Opinion.

Yes, that was by far the best scene in the film and one of the few moments it really sold the character.

Jagermonster
May 7, 2005

Hey - NIZE HAT!

ufarn posted:

[Extremely Joss Whedon voice] an extended 20 minute Thor dream sequence would have fixed it, but the studio

From what I've read the studio demanded the weird Thor cave sequence to tease the next Thor movie. Joss hated it and fought against it.

edit: http://www.avclub.com/article/corporate-drone-joss-whedon-fought-pure-artistic-i-218967

Jagermonster fucked around with this message at 17:13 on Oct 26, 2016

Rhyno
Mar 22, 2003
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Jonny_Rocket posted:

Counterpoint - Amazing Spider-Man 2 was riddled with plot holes and felt like they patched together two completely different movies. Other choices they made in the movie are astoundingly dumb - Electro got his superpowers from electric eels that live in water but his weakness is water? Also, how was Richard Parker able to build a hidden subway car inside an abandoned subway tunnel without anyone noticing? Not to mention Richard must've had magic Wi-Fi, as there was no conceivable way he would've been able to upload information while on a plane in 2000.

The only good thing about that movie was Andrew Garfield's costume, and mayyybe Paul Giamatti hamming it up as the Rhino.

Remember that they shot an entire subplot involved Peter meeting Mary Jane and she tempted his nerdy heart away from Gwen which is why she was so willing to leave NYC. They decided to cut the entire plot out of the film which makes the remaining scenes between Peter and Gwen incredibly weird and awkward.

Aphrodite
Jun 27, 2006

Mary Jane's whole appearance in the movie now is the back of her head for a second in that Rhino finale.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Jagermonster posted:

From what I've read the studio demanded the weird Thor cave sequence to tease the next Thor movie. Joss hated it and fought against it.

edit: http://www.avclub.com/article/corporate-drone-joss-whedon-fought-pure-artistic-i-218967

The cave scene in and of itself wasn't bad. They wanted to tease the next movie and they needed a way to introduce the infinity gems to the main characters so it would make sense what Ultron's plan was and why there was a gem in Loki's staff.

The problem was that Whedon filmed a 3 hour and 45 minute cut of the movie and Marvel wanted the cave scene in there. So, they cut the cave scene down from 10 minutes to about 45 seconds and they still had to cut another 50 minutes from the movie.

Grendels Dad
Mar 5, 2011

Popular culture has passed you by.
The cave scene was one of the few instances in AoU where someone took their shirt off so it absolutely had to stay.

mycot
Oct 23, 2014

"It's okay. There are other Terminators! Just give us this one!"
Hell Gem

Grendels Dad posted:

The cave scene was one of the few instances in AoU where someone took their shirt off so it absolutely had to stay.

Tony and Steve chopping wood wasn't enough?

Cael
Feb 2, 2004

I get this funky high on the yellow sun.

quote:

The reasons for director Tim Miller’s reported exit from the Deadpool sequel may be becoming more clear, as The Wrap now reports that Miller and star/producers Ryan Reynolds had wildly different concepts of the sequel to the blockbuster film - not just limited to casting.

Reynolds reportedly wanted to repeat the low budget/big earnings success of the first Deadpool, which had a $780m return on a $58m budget.Conversely, Miller wanted to create a spectacle to rival the largest Marvel Studios productions – and which would reportedly require three times the budget of the first film.

$58m times three would be $174m, making it the third largest budget for an X-Men film after X-Men: Days of Future Past's $200m and X-Men: Apocalypse's $170m.

“There were two totally different movies on the table, and one of them just wasn’t Deadpool,” an insider close to the production told The Wrap. Reynolds’ vision, which reportedly aligned with that of writers Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick, eventually won out with the studio, leading to Miller’s exit.

If that's true, it really sounds like losing Miller is the best possible direction to go in.

site
Apr 6, 2007

Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch
Yeah that seems like it's for the best, avengers-except-with-deadpool-and-negasonic doesn't sound like the greatest idea

Codependent Poster
Oct 20, 2003

When it comes to Deadpool, I trust in Ryan Reynolds.

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

Codependent Poster posted:

When it comes to Deadpool, I trust in Ryan Reynolds.

This, it's his baby and I enjoyed the first one well enough.

Monaghan
Dec 29, 2006

yeah one of the charms of the deadpool movie was that it was sort of low key. So many superhero flicks seem to think that they have to go bigger and bigger.

I don't think deadpool as a character really needs an end of the world type of scenario.

Lurdiak
Feb 26, 2006

I believe in a universe that doesn't care, and people that do.


But one of the best Deadpool stories ever was about him stopping just that.

Grendels Dad
Mar 5, 2011

Popular culture has passed you by.
The next Deadpool movie should be about a lovely little side-quest he does while the Apocalypse movie happens in the far distance.

AngryBooch
Sep 26, 2009

Grendels Dad posted:

The next Deadpool movie should be about a lovely little side-quest he does while the Apocalypse movie happens in the far distance.

Deadpool 2 should basically be a version of The Zeppo where the XMen and/or Cable are fighting some world ending threat and dismissing Deadpool who unwittingly and unknowingly somehow saves all their asses and he never reveals it.

Roth
Jul 9, 2016

You mean like the Booster Gold episode in Justice League?

SonicRulez
Aug 6, 2013

GOTTA GO FIST

Comfortador posted:

You think Peter Parker who notices that a kid is terrified of him in his mask wouldn't do something to alleviate that fear and show him he's a kid just like him? The dramatization of him taking his mask completely off is of course Movie 'actor showing his face' magic, but I'm not talking about production/direction. I'm talking about Peter noticing the kid is scared and doing whatever he can to comfort that kid and save his life. Peter motivating that kid to be strong at a time that you need to bury fear and just get through the moment? That is the heart I'm referring to. That's what the essence of Spider-man is in my opinion. That and lots of guilt, but no need to traumatize the boy. :)

If you can't extract that moment and appreciate it and just see it as setup for a crane scene then that's on you. The scene itself could stand on it's own.

I didn't realize this was a controversial opinion, but a scene in the movie where a little kid is terrified of Spider-Man seems like a fundamentally bad idea. If the mask isn't endearing and inspirational, he prolly should do something about that. Spider-Man has a secret identity. It is essential to the character in modern Marvel in a way that does not apply to any of his colleagues anymore. PLUS THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF SPIDER-MAN FROM INCEPTION IS THAT A CHILD WOULD LOOK AT HIM AND THINK "WOW THAT'S FUCKIN COOL". So no, sorry, I didn't get giddy for Andrew Garfield saving a kid. I wanted Spider-Man. If that is supposed to be the best part of the movie, I feel confident in maintaining my opinion that it was hot trash.

Like sure, from the internal logic of the movie, I can see the character thinking that was a good idea. But I don't judge movies on their own internal logic because that doesn't make as much sense in my mind. I'm not upset at the character Peter Parker for his decision. I'm upset with the writer/producer/director/whoever that decided to include that scene.

irlZaphod
Mar 26, 2004

Kiss the Joycon to Kiss Zelda

Just back from Doctor Strange.

It is really good.

site
Apr 6, 2007

Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch

irlZaphod posted:

Just back from Doctor Strange.

It is really good.

I guess this didn't read like a joke i am looking forward to it

site fucked around with this message at 23:32 on Oct 26, 2016

irlZaphod
Mar 26, 2004

Kiss the Joycon to Kiss Zelda

Well sometimes people want to be surprised about whether a film is good or not.

site
Apr 6, 2007

Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch
Oh sorry that wasnt intended as a dig on you that was supposed to be a funny

irlZaphod
Mar 26, 2004

Kiss the Joycon to Kiss Zelda

Oh and also about the post credits (no details in spoilers but just in case)

weirdly the bit at the very end of the credits is way more plot relevant than the mid-credits scene... I think I know why they did it that way, maybe to give the "doctor strange will return" text more punch. Still seemed a little unusual.

SlimGoodbody
Oct 20, 2003

I would be perfectly fine with a Deadpool sequel just doing a pretty straight adaptation of Deadpool #20, where he finds a girl about to kill herself and spends the entire issue kidnapping her into Anti-hero Hijinks so that she'll talk about her problems, ending by dropping her off at a hospital where he's texted a nurse who has prepped a room for her. I wish I could find the scans of it cause it was pretty great. They break into a revenge porn ring and take baseball bats to hackers who get into women's phones to blackmail them.

This is the cover.

SonicRulez
Aug 6, 2013

GOTTA GO FIST
Does Cable show up? Cause while I would love that, I feel any non-Cable Deadpool stories are automatically out of Reynolds' vision.

Rhyno
Mar 22, 2003
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Roth posted:

You mean like the Booster Gold episode in Justice League?

The Buffy episode came first.

SlimGoodbody
Oct 20, 2003

SonicRulez posted:

Does Cable show up? Cause while I would love that, I feel any non-Cable Deadpool stories are automatically out of Reynolds' vision.

He does not, but it's not a stretch to change "Deadpool kidnaps a suicidal girl and takes her on anti-hero duty" to "Deadpool kidnaps a suicidal girl and takes her on anti-hero time travel duty." Cable could be the Straight Man who tries to give her fatherly advice that she is completely unreceptive to while Wade is like "Life is literally an endless firehose of pain and I totally get wanting off that ride, but if you kill yourself you'll never make life worse for people who are worse than you, and that is life's only real joy."

Rhyno
Mar 22, 2003
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
Michael Massee passed away. For those unaware, Massee was the unfortunate soul who fired a prop gun at Brandon Lee during the filming of the Crow. The gun was incorrectly prepared and the round struck Lee which shortly lead to his death.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/michael-massee-dead-crow-actor-who-accidentally-shot-brandon-lee-was-61-941538

SlimGoodbody
Oct 20, 2003

Rhyno posted:

Michael Massee passed away. For those unaware, Massee was the unfortunate soul who fired a prop gun at Brandon Lee during the filming of the Crow. The gun was incorrectly prepared and the round struck Lee which shortly lead to his death.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/michael-massee-dead-crow-actor-who-accidentally-shot-brandon-lee-was-61-941538

Does this mean we can have Brandon Lee back now?

Roth
Jul 9, 2016

Rhyno posted:

The Buffy episode came first.

The problem with that is that I've never seen Buffy

SlimGoodbody
Oct 20, 2003

Roth posted:

The problem with that is that I've never seen Buffy

That's not really a problem unless you like Whedon at his most painfully twee

JT Smiley
Mar 3, 2006
Thats whats up!
It's a really good episode.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Comfortador
Jul 31, 2003

Just give me all the 3ggs_n_b4con you have.

Wait...wait.

I worry what you just heard was...
"Give me a lot of b4con_n_3ggs."

What I said was...
"Give me all the 3ggs_n_b4con you have"

...Do you understand?

SonicRulez posted:

I didn't realize this was a controversial opinion, but a scene in the movie where a little kid is terrified of Spider-Man seems like a fundamentally bad idea. If the mask isn't endearing and inspirational, he prolly should do something about that. Spider-Man has a secret identity. It is essential to the character in modern Marvel in a way that does not apply to any of his colleagues anymore. PLUS THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF SPIDER-MAN FROM INCEPTION IS THAT A CHILD WOULD LOOK AT HIM AND THINK "WOW THAT'S FUCKIN COOL". So no, sorry, I didn't get giddy for Andrew Garfield saving a kid. I wanted Spider-Man. If that is supposed to be the best part of the movie, I feel confident in maintaining my opinion that it was hot trash.

Like sure, from the internal logic of the movie, I can see the character thinking that was a good idea. But I don't judge movies on their own internal logic because that doesn't make as much sense in my mind. I'm not upset at the character Peter Parker for his decision. I'm upset with the writer/producer/director/whoever that decided to include that scene.

His costume has always freaked people out in the books. I don't know what Spider-man you are using as a basis for your opinion.

  • Locked thread