|
Platystemon posted:How did we learn this? They had to go to the doctor because the brother kept doing it even after his first round of infections that required medical intervention.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 18:59 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 07:14 |
|
Platystemon posted:How did we learn this? The brother in questions was 12 years old. He didn't want to stop, he wanted to shove things up his peepee. At first the goon suspicion was that it was a sounding fetish. And some goons were all "that's not too bad if it's done with clean safe equipment. If he won't stop maybe get him some proper probes that can be sterilized and . . . " trying to be sex positive or some poo poo. The the bloody bike pump was found and, "oh gently caress it's an inflation fetish there is no loving way for that to be safe, get your brother into psychiatric care tonight!!!"
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 19:13 |
|
Isn't it a lot easier to inflate your bladder by simply refraining from urination?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 20:20 |
|
DrBouvenstein posted:
WHY GOD WHY. WHYYYYY. HOWWWWW.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 20:26 |
|
god drat thats how they went out? Like, slowly drowned to death stuck under the raft??! At least waterslide kid got decapitated. this on the other hand, yeesh. It'd be like drowning on the small world ride. It's supposed to be a happy place
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 20:28 |
|
No they got mangled by the conveyor belt, which is much better.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 20:32 |
|
Not just mangled but intertwined - I believe that had to use heavy machinery to disassemble the whole thing.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 20:37 |
|
Mozi posted:Not just mangled but intertwined - I believe that had to use heavy machinery to disassemble the whole thing. "Injuries incompatible with life"
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 21:01 |
|
Good lord. So when I hear conveyor belt, I'm picturing the standard belt like affair; this isn't the case this time though I'm guess, right?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 21:39 |
|
think more like a tracked vehicle like a bulldozer
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 21:46 |
|
must have been a pretty hosed up show for the guys in the seats elevated above the raft
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:02 |
|
NewForumSoftware posted:must have been a pretty hosed up show for the guys in the seats elevated above the raft Dont worry, it was a pair of 10 and 12 year old kids, they'll be fine, kids shrug that stuff off DrBouvenstein posted:You can see where this is going: I went to find the full article and fuuuuuck http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/TubingandLuerMisconnections/ucm313275.htm
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:05 |
|
Seeing your parents turned into ground pork while you're strapped to a chair forced to watch builds character.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:08 |
|
Professor of Cats posted:Good lord. So when I hear conveyor belt, I'm picturing the standard belt like affair; this isn't the case this time though I'm guess, right? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Btmi_5bi04I&t=182s
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:10 |
|
Powershift posted:Seeing your parents turned into ground pork while you're strapped to a chair forced to watch builds character. Not to mention everyone else on the river watching the water slowly turn red I've seen horror movies, I know how this works
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:11 |
|
jesus loving christ e: My brain is thankfully not able to visualize or comprehend the possible damages here; and I'm okay with this.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:20 |
|
Professor of Cats posted:jesus loving christ Probably like the stuck in a lathe videos, only slower.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:23 |
|
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:26 |
|
Wasn't the photographer killed by a brick in this one?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:28 |
|
Professor of Cats posted:jesus loving christ well, if someone was caught between the weight of the raft and one of the longitudinal belts, ground chuck. if you were ejected and didn't get lucky and fall all the way through, any part of your body hanging below the latitudinal beams would get sheared off by the stationary frame beneath, before the rest of you got chewed up being forced past and under the raft.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 22:47 |
|
VectorSigma posted:well, if someone was caught between the weight of the raft and one of the longitudinal belts, ground chuck. if you were ejected and didn't get lucky and fall all the way through, any part of your body hanging below the latitudinal beams would get sheared off by the stationary frame beneath, before the rest of you got chewed up being forced past and under the raft. This is goddamned nightmare material. It doesn't help that I have that weird underwater+machinery phobia as well. It makes me physically ill. Not to mention to even begin to fathom what those poor kids went through. I wouldn't wish that on anyone. My heart just hurts for them.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2016 23:02 |
|
Volcott posted:I wonder who covers workplace safety at CERN? I was a safety officer at CERN when I was a grad student. It's an interesting mix of grad students, postdocs, and hourly paid staffers. Since it's either an office park aboveground or a radioactive zone in the tunnels the security is really different. Anything underground is really well regulated and maintained. That said, someone did die during the construction of the LHC (hourly construction worker) who "bent" the rules and was crushed. It was by a bunch of wiring I think.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 00:23 |
|
CASE STUDY A patient’s feeding tube was inadvertently connected to the instillation port on the ventilator in-line suction catheter Tube feeding was delivered into the patient’s lungs The patient died CASE STUDY A patient was found with her Foley catheter disconnected from its drainage bag. One end of the catheter was still in her bladder and the other end was connected to her nasogastric (NG) tube Urine was noted to be flowing into her NG tube The NG tube was connected to suction and more than 300 mL of urine drained The patient’s vital signs were stable and her laboratory results were within normal limits CASE STUDY A child had both a gastric feeding tube for nutrition and an IV for medicine and hydration When the child’s gown was changed, a family member inadvertently attached the IV tubing to the gastric feeding tube The medicine was delivered through the feeding tube into the stomach There was no patient harm since the event was noted in a timely manner yaagh
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 03:20 |
|
Case study Don't touch the tubes of those you love, let a mostly trained nurse do it.. but ask questions of what they are hooking where I guess?
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 03:28 |
|
Sounds to me like the hoses are way too similar, even if they're only a bit similar. make them completely different, don't expect trained professionals to be competent ever. This has been Forums Safety Consultant Splode with his ~expert opinion~
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 04:04 |
|
It does seem like a pretty dumb oversight, and a solved problem in most other industries. For instance, on oxyacetylene torch rigs, the oxygen fittings use right-handed threads and the fuel fittings are left-handed, so it's physically impossible to attach the connections backwards and cause an explosion. Surely it's even more important to have some kind of non-interchangeable irreversible fitting when you're literally piping fluids in and out of a person's body?
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 04:18 |
|
Mozi posted:Not just mangled but intertwined - I believe that had to use heavy machinery to disassemble the whole thing. crikey!
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 04:21 |
|
I think people are starting to give less shits what with the economy and all the war and the lovely political parties and the economy and stuff and more and more people are starting to get ground up by the unrelenting logic of our economy
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 04:23 |
|
dookifex_maximus posted:I think people are starting to give less shits what with the economy and all the war and the lovely political parties and the economy and stuff and more and more people are starting to get ground up by the unrelenting logic of our economy What was this even supposed to mean
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 04:44 |
|
that we're in a kind of global funk and people are starting to care less, or perhaps they're coming to accept that caring less is more gainful
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 04:49 |
|
nah humans have always been pretty inattentive nonetheless, BattleMaster posted:It's weird to me that a urinary catheter and an oxygen machine have connectors that can mate
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 04:53 |
|
dookifex_maximus posted:I think people are starting to give less shits what with the economy and all the war and the lovely political parties and the economy and stuff and more and more people are starting to get ground up by the unrelenting logic of our economy There were some folks that got grounded up that other day...
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 04:55 |
|
Professor of Cats posted:I have that weird underwater+machinery phobia as well Same although I only just got mine in the last 2 days.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 10:55 |
|
Sagebrush posted:It does seem like a pretty dumb oversight, and a solved problem in most other industries. For instance, on oxyacetylene torch rigs, the oxygen fittings use right-handed threads and the fuel fittings are left-handed, so it's physically impossible to attach the connections backwards and cause an explosion. Surely it's even more important to have some kind of non-interchangeable irreversible fitting when you're literally piping fluids in and out of a person's body? Maybe the solution is to colour code the connectors, or something.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 13:50 |
|
mom and dad fight a lot posted:Maybe the solution is to colour code the connectors, or something. They almost certainly are colour-coded. Colour-coding doesn't prevent people from making mistakes, especially when they're at the end of a 48-hour shift or whatever they have medical residents doing these days. The solution is to make it physically impossible to connect the wrong ones and have stuff start flowing. That's a few cents more expensive per-unit though, which is why it doesn't happen.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 14:00 |
xergm posted:Wasn't the photographer killed by a brick in this one? Yep. I can't remember if the rush of debris crushed him or if he suffered blunt force trauma injuries, but he filmed his own death.
|
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 14:03 |
|
He was crushed by the sadness of not getting to see all the likes on the video
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 14:15 |
|
Sagebrush posted:It does seem like a pretty dumb oversight, and a solved problem in most other industries. For instance, on oxyacetylene torch rigs, the oxygen fittings use right-handed threads and the fuel fittings are left-handed, so it's physically impossible to attach the connections backwards and cause an explosion. Surely it's even more important to have some kind of non-interchangeable irreversible fitting when you're literally piping fluids in and out of a person's body?
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 14:39 |
|
Someone made this out of parts that shouldn't connect together. By comparison, cramming two tubes together should be trivial. I mean, kids do it all the time with the plastic straws at fast food places.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 15:29 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 07:14 |
|
Bees on Wheat posted:Someone made this out of parts that shouldn't connect together. By comparison, cramming two tubes together should be trivial. I mean, kids do it all the time with the plastic straws at fast food places. That requires a lot of wiresplicing and poo poo that goes way beyond the range of accident. What I'm trying to say is if someone just jams two tubes together regardless that would be homocide at that point since that's beyond accident
|
# ? Oct 27, 2016 15:48 |