|
Well, this makes me a little less confident that 3%ers and the like will stay put comfortably in their chairs the day Hillary is declared president. God drat, I wasn't even following the story anymore because it seemed so much like a slam dunk that I got bored with it.
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 04:22 |
|
|
LGD posted:it's good to know that the change we need to make to ensure a better and less racist society is for the police to engage in more extra-judicial killings Non-serious phrasing aside, that's why we should have a legal system and the rule of law, so it's not a matter of lethal force (unlikely enough I feel I can joke about it in the case of white people) or literally letting these idiots do what they want till they decide to blow away more cops. That'd be nice. Hopefully this one isn't paid for in blood like the last one.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Ron Paul Atreides posted:what happened exactly I've been too distracted with the trumpocalypse to pay attention one of the jurors (#11) got removed after about a workweek of deliberations after the jury asked the judge whether his partiality was in question when he said "as a former BLM employee (which was known already) i'm biased". they also asked about whether they could convict some defendants on some charges and or all charges and acquit others so it wasn't exactly looking like they were going to just nullify the entire slate of charges at that time, but as criminal trial attorney itt said those kind of questions arent necessarily indicative of how they would vote ultimately
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
lol clear ur schedules and cancel your vacays judges youre basically gonna have sovcit cases jamming your courts 4eva
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:17
|
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:That's exactly how sovcit propaganda works. "Hey since X happened they jury believes Y" and this case is going to be seen as a giant loving victory for all sorts of far right insanity. Lawman 0 posted:I accept the verdict but also think that it is in fact a steaming pile of poo poo. StandardVC10 posted:So the Nevada cases are still pending right? Tayter Swift posted:At least David Fry gets to go back home to his family Not much else to say that isn't about the Michael Jackson trial.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:20
|
|
|
gosh this sure reminds me of teh scopes monkey trial i mean they both had judges and everything
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:25
|
|
|
gently caress Oregon. There are 49 states in the union. EDIT: I never in a million years thought Oregon would be worse than Texas. Not saying Texas is the worst, but it's definitely in the bottom 25 states in terms of dumb/crazy mother fuckers.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:25
|
|
|
Characteristic behavior from Oregon, famous bastion of conservatism.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:27
|
|
|
Cubey posted:outside of portland and ashland, oregon is redneck as gently caress. source: i live in rural oregon. It's really pretty at least. Cascade mountains best mountains
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
What is the over under on state charges being brought Fake edit intentional misuse of over under
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:28
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:Now for the other no brainer in 11 days that the public really needs no not gently caress up 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:30
|
|
|
new season of gravity falls lookin good
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:31
|
|
|
General Dog posted:Characteristic behavior from Oregon, famous bastion of conservatism.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:31
|
|
|
Homura and Sickle posted:one of the jurors (#11) got removed after about a workweek of deliberations after the jury asked the judge whether his partiality was in question when he said "as a former BLM employee (which was known already) i'm biased". they also asked about whether they could convict some defendants on some charges and or all charges and acquit others so it wasn't exactly looking like they were going to just nullify the entire slate of charges at that time, but as criminal trial attorney itt said those kind of questions arent necessarily indicative of how they would vote ultimately They were also supposed to disregard all earlier deliberation prior to the juror being replaced and reached not guilty on everyone in a few hours lol Jury system awesome in theory hilarious in practice
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:30
|
|
|
brugroffil posted:What is the over under on state charges being brought 6.5
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:30
|
|
|
What happens to the guns the feds confiscated and used as evidence? Do they get them back?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:34
|
|
|
Hey guys I was real busy today and didn't see the verdict, I assume they went away for decades ri- o... oh... 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:40
|
|
|
The government done fell off
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:40
|
|
|
trickybiscuits posted:My reaction in four quotes. I'm genuinely as shocked as I was when Michael Jackson was acquitted. They only compare in that MJ was an open and shut not guilty case and this one was the opposite.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:43
|
|
|
I knew when I saw nearly 700 new posts ITT that it wasn't good news e. but comparisons to Michael Jackson holy poo poo I got me some catch up
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
Cubey posted:this gay country deserves the civil war 2 that trump and morons like these guys are trying to make happen holy poo poo cubey and I agree on something
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:50
|
|
|
Jackson was able to have evidence supressed. Nobody who isn't rich is going to get away with calling blatant child porn "child artistic nudes".
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:52
|
|
|
I am still flabbergasted by the verdict and want to see some goddamn explanation of how this insanity happened.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:55
|
|
|
Jury Trials Own. This is what legitimate democracy looks like
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:59
|
|
|
CaptainSarcastic posted:I am still flabbergasted by the verdict and want to see some goddamn explanation of how this insanity happened. God is great Beer is good People are crazy
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 04:58
|
|
|
I've decided this was my fault. My faith in humanity had gotten a little too high, and these fuckers had to come back with a not guilty verdict to make me properly bitter and cynical again.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
Bubbacub posted:What happens to the guns the feds confiscated and used as evidence? Do they get them back? They gave Zimmerman his gun back and he actually killed someone with it, so I'm guessing "yes."
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
Bubbacub posted:What happens to the guns the feds confiscated and used as evidence? Do they get them back? Depends on how pissy the government is (probably very).
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_child_sexual_abuse_accusations_against_Michael_Jackson Just to deal with this quick. Spent a few hours one night actually looking into the cases and came out thinking he was completely innocent. I highly suggest the read if you are at all interested in media manipulation in the 90s. Start there and go to the 2005 case. He was a weird guy but all evidence points to him being harmless. If reading ain't your thing, this is a decent breakdown. https://youtu.be/6pnoQqlygQs The Bundys had mounds of evidence that a jury chose to ignore. Michael FELT guilty but the truth was he was innocent. Sorry for derail but I had just read about this and had a change of mind once I actually read the cases. I highly suggest it. CortezFantastic has issued a correction as of 05:08 on Oct 28, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
CortezFantastic posted:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_child_sexual_abuse_accusations_against_Michael_Jackson
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Geoj posted:They gave Zimmerman his gun back and he actually killed someone with it, so I'm guessing "yes." Probably not. The government has a bunch of tool to drag out the process toward indefinite if they wanted to. Its going to be tactical decision based on a balance of goverment tears vs fear of emboldening sympathizers vs fear of angering sympathizers
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Bubbacub posted:What happens to the guns the feds confiscated and used as evidence? Do they get them back? All of these fine upstanding law abiding individuals get their property back.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:10
|
|
|
easily the most hilarious possible outcome
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:10
|
|
|
Casimir Radon posted:Except for the child porn. There was none, considering if there was that would be a new separate charge and you know, evidence.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:13
|
|
|
Kazak_Hstan posted:This was public land that belongs to all three hundred million Americans, not just dumb hicks who live close to it. Most of the people who live near it were dead set against the occupation as far as I know. These were fuckwads from elsewhere. I know a few people who have family in the region and despite being no fans of the feds generally, they thought the occupation was dumb as hell. nm has issued a correction as of 05:17 on Oct 28, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:15
|
|
|
CortezFantastic posted:There was none, considering if there was that would be a new separate charge and you know, evidence.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:16
|
|
|
can a poster, a former michael jackson enthusiast, who opens their remarks in deliberations by stating "i think michael jackson's j/o fodder is really relevant to the outcome of the malheur trial" be considered a lovely poster in this case?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:21
|
|
|
As a lovely poster, guiltyCasimir Radon posted:Yes there was. But you get away with calling it art when you're rich. You do realize this was falsified right? And if it wasn't, it would have been evidence. I mean news orgs had to update all these articles to say so, including this one. The book he had a just some 50s drawn art book out of thousands he owned. You can find images of it online. I'm done derailing though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:23
|
|
|
Not the outcome we needed, but certainly the one America deserved. Fiore is already bragging about it, too.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 04:22 |
|
|
isn't living in a decaying empire awesome
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 05:24
|
|