|
Pastrymancy posted:From the people that brought you Airbnb not renting to black vacationers: There's nothing wrong with this. If you run a Facebook page and you want to advertise to a certain demographic, it's ok to get options. What if you sell skin treatments that are mostly applicable to whites than to black or Asians? Or if you're selling Ebony magazine, excluding whites and Latinos would get you more of your target demographic
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 18:19 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 06:04 |
|
Uber just got bitchslapped in the UK and I can only imagine they'll lose the appeal as well. It's being lauded as a victory for the GMB against the techno-gig economy ; https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/28/uber-uk-tribunal-self-employed-status quote:Any organisation ... resorting in its documentation to fictions, twisted language and even brand new terminology, merits, we think, a degree of scepticism.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 18:25 |
|
Non Serviam posted:There's nothing wrong with this. If you run a Facebook page and you want to advertise to a certain demographic, it's ok to get options. Problem is they also let you do that filtering when you are advertising for housing, which skates pretty close to (if not directly into) some civil rights violations.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 18:43 |
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:It's not really the laws of physics that have the spectrum divided the really dumb way that we have it divided. It's just a quirk of history that we gave smaller and worse spectrum every time a new thing was invented because no one knew ahead of time how useful radio would be for how many diffrent things. Sure, if we could magically reset all RF licenses and divide things up in smarter allocations there could be improvements. It's happening very slowly anyways, like with the digital TV changeover. Look at the allocation now, TV is still the biggest consumer. Other stuff maybe doesn't need as much as it does, but I don't know how or what the aircraft navigation bands do and suspect that even if they could be a lot smaller, replacing all the equipment that uses it would be really expensive. But the point is that even with the most efficient use possible, there's a hard maximum to how much information you can send through a medium. If we devoted the entire radio frequency to internet data, and everyone wanted to use internet at the same rates they get via current cable/dsl/fiber at home, we'd still need to build a hell of a lot more cell towers. Wireless radio transmission is just not the optimal method for high-bandwidth transmission that is unique to every person, like internet access. The air is a single wire.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 18:49 |
|
Total Meatlove posted:Uber just got bitchslapped in the UK and I can only imagine they'll lose the appeal as well. It's being lauded as a victory for the GMB against the techno-gig economy ; A clear and transparent attempt of the socialist nanny state to stifle innovation and take away our freedumb
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 19:07 |
|
I'm sure uber will release some tear-stained letter complaining that the UK is so mean and rude that they're taking their toys and going home. "We're really sad that the socialists in London want to take away x,000 jobs" etc.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 20:16 |
|
Peanut President posted:I'm sure uber will release some tear-stained letter complaining that the UK is so mean and rude that they're taking their toys and going home. "We're really sad that the socialists in London want to take away x,000 jobs" etc. Typical socialist Tory policy.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 20:34 |
|
blowfish posted:Typical socialist Tory policy. It's a company from California, literally everything bad is socialism.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 20:49 |
|
Peanut President posted:I'm sure uber will release some tear-stained letter complaining that the UK is so mean and rude that they're taking their toys and going home. "We're really sad that the socialists in London want to take away x,000 jobs" etc. And it'll be signed by an "all-star" team of SV CEOs and techbros bragging about how the UK is a dying market since Brexit is imminent.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 21:10 |
|
Klyith posted:Sure, if we could magically reset all RF licenses and divide things up in smarter allocations there could be improvements. It's happening very slowly anyways, like with the digital TV changeover. Look at the allocation now, TV is still the biggest consumer. Other stuff maybe doesn't need as much as it does, but I don't know how or what the aircraft navigation bands do and suspect that even if they could be a lot smaller, replacing all the equipment that uses it would be really expensive. That is really different than calling it a limitation of the laws of physics. The wireless spectrum is really poorly used for the modern world because it wasn't planned ahead. Changing it now all at once is impossible but it's not like the physical properties of radio waves are what are limiting our internet speeds and coverage. Some alien on some other planet has way better internet on their space phone at our exact technology level just because they allocated spectrum better or were more aggressive about reclaiming it.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 21:09 |
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:countdown until melamine contamination joins lead and cadmium contamination for the chinese protein powder production trifecta Inevitable really. This is a product from a guy who unironically does not wash his clothes because he feels it is better to buy sweatshop crap from China by the shipping container and donate it to someone after wearing. A guy who put an unsecured shipping conailer on top of a hill in LA and called it good to live in.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 22:42 |
|
Liquid Communism posted:Inevitable really. This is a product from a guy who unironically does not wash his clothes because he feels it is better to buy sweatshop crap from China by the shipping container and donate it to someone after wearing. A guy who put an unsecured shipping conailer on top of a hill in LA and called it good to live in. hipsters and techbros have a weird fascination with forty foot containers
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 22:44 |
|
Apparently Pornhub wants to buy Vine because "six seconds is just enough": https://www.cnet.com/news/pornhub-offers-to-buy-vine-6-seconds-twitter-jack-dorsey/ Owlofcreamcheese posted:That is really different than calling it a limitation of the laws of physics. The wireless spectrum is really poorly used for the modern world because it wasn't planned ahead. Changing it now all at once is impossible but it's not like the physical properties of radio waves are what are limiting our internet speeds and coverage. Some alien on some other planet has way better internet on their space phone at our exact technology level just because they allocated spectrum better or were more aggressive about reclaiming it.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 22:49 |
|
Liquid Communism posted:Inevitable really. This is a product from a guy who unironically does not wash his clothes because he feels it is better to buy sweatshop crap from China by the shipping container and donate it to someone after wearing. A guy who put an unsecured shipping conailer on top of a hill in LA and called it good to live in. Doesn't he literally wear onesie Dr Venture-style speed suits? Yes, yes he does.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 22:55 |
|
Prism posted:Palantir is amazing commentary on what it does and the environment that allows it to exist. wealthy tech guys are already starting to see themselves as the superior patrician upperclass, even if they don't want to admit it so much
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 22:57 |
|
mobby_6kl posted:Uber probably saved my rear end from getting mugged/murdered in South Africa. A friend of mine drives for Uber (not in SA) and was quite happy with the arrangement. He even quit a corporate job for it. But let's not get into this poo poo yet again. Don't do this poo poo. If you don't want to start/continue a derail then don't try and jam in your last word in the first place. Just skip straight to your actual content. Otherwise what you're doing is "hay guys here's my thoughts, now everyone else shut up about this"
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 23:15 |
|
so speaking of startups i bought a casper mattress and for the price it seems not bad
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 23:19 |
|
Weatherman posted:Don't do this poo poo. If you don't want to start/continue a derail then don't try and jam in your last word in the first place. Just skip straight to your actual content. Otherwise what you're doing is "hay guys here's my thoughts, now everyone else shut up about this" You're right of course, but at least it seemed pretty effective at shutting down that conversation
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 23:22 |
|
Rhesus Pieces posted:Doesn't he literally wear onesie Dr Venture-style speed suits? to be fair if i could get away with this, i would
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 23:25 |
|
I'm p sure that part of the reason Thiel supports Trump is because the Trumpenreich would be a bonanza for Palantir. Gotta have good intel for that massive deportation force!
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 23:37 |
|
mobby_6kl posted:You're right of course, but at least it seemed pretty effective at shutting down that conversation Whenever I'm in another country I always only take ubers from a mcdonalds to a different mcdonalds because I feel like if I don't use a landmark they won't find me but if I use a real landmark it'll be too spread out or there will be no place to pull in a car easily.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 23:39 |
|
boner confessor posted:to be fair if i could get away with this, i would Maybe I'd feel bad about it after a few months but I think I'm on board with it tentatively.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 23:41 |
|
Realchat Uber is nice in a foreign country because you can enter the destination in the app instead of trying to describe it in a language you don't speak (especially if you are in say China)
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 23:42 |
|
mobby_6kl posted:Oh gently caress. So how does this happen? Obviously they (and the Soylent guy) had to know enough to come up with the reference, but somehow completely miss the implication. drat. Landsknecht posted:wealthy tech guys are already starting to see themselves as the superior patrician upperclass, even if they don't want to admit it so much
|
# ? Oct 28, 2016 23:56 |
|
Gail Wynand posted:Realchat Uber is nice in a foreign country because you can enter the destination in the app instead of trying to describe it in a language you don't speak (especially if you are in say China) Seriously that, also the fact it comes up as just a regular payment and doesn't look as if it's coming from another country to the credit card company so there is no chance of getting mixed up in fraud protection. If you are outside of like, first world countries where pretty much no matter what you do and how many travel alerts you put on your card you still just get randomly hit with.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 00:28 |
|
Does anyone else think we just have too much drat technology nowadays? And not even good technology, just stupid poo poo. Like why is Twitter even a thing? Why are there so many apps? Who cares about the latest cell phone???? Its all just dumb crap. I think its because we're living in an age of technological stagnation. We arent getting any real progress in anything important, so all we've got left are cell phones and dumb internet crap.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 02:22 |
|
It's fun.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 02:45 |
|
Blue Star posted:Does anyone else think we just have too much drat technology nowadays? And not even good technology, just stupid poo poo. Like why is Twitter even a thing? Why are there so many apps? Who cares about the latest cell phone???? Its all just dumb crap. Grandpa, go back to bed.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 02:54 |
|
Klyith posted:full stop You shouldn't have stopped there at my post. I acknowledged and addressed in advance a lot of things which you said in your future post. My post could have been summarized as: "When it comes to communication capacity, fiber is king, and is the high performance option. Wireless will never upset fiber in long distance backbone communication. However, communication is primarily a cost problem. If it weren't, Google Fiber would have been a smashing success and we'd all have fiber connections to every home and apartment building in the US. We already have optical fiber communication--Google Fiber wasn't really inventing any new technology. There may be a role for wireless to play in the 'last mile' connection from communication hubs to homes." Klyith posted:You can increase the bandwidth, but there are lots of users that want RF spectrum. The FCC a couple of months ago opened up a lot of the radio spectrum at millimeter-wave frequencies. http://www.bna.com/fcc-opens-spectrum-n73014444868/ At these carrier frequencies, there is a lot of available bandwidth. Klyith posted:You can increase power, but phones work on batteries and most people don't want a big high-gain antenna sticking out the top of their smartphone. At millimeter wave frequencies, efficient antennas don't have to be very big. At high enough frequencies, they can be manufactured on chip. The increased path loss when compared to UHF frequencies is kind of a big problem, but everyone is talking about electronically steerable antenna arrays which are highly directional and the directional antennas are supposed to help make up for the path loss. Electronically steerable antenna arrays used to be an expensive military technology, but now it is becoming more commonplace and can be found in automotive radar systems in mid-range cars. Klyith posted:So the most efficient thing is to have lots and lots of little cell sites, which also can divide their capacity among fewer users. But that sounds pretty expensive. Wired connections can double capacity just by adding another wire. I wouldn't pretend like you know a lot about how much things cost. Adding another wire can be extremely expensive. This is the reason why cellular communication has exploded in developing countries. It isn't obvious to me whether fiber or wireless will be the prevailing technology to connect the 'last mile' from communication hubs to homes in the US. silence_kit fucked around with this message at 04:24 on Oct 29, 2016 |
# ? Oct 29, 2016 03:35 |
|
Landsknecht posted:wealthy tech guys are already starting to see themselves as the superior patrician upperclass, even if they don't want to admit it so much Don't forget that the media is also helping feed into this idea with not one but TWO shows this fall about tech guys "disrupting" some normal service and showing how much better it is if you just throw programmers at it. There's ]Pure Genius where a tech billionaire builds a hospital and proves that when you do stuff like "throw unlimited money at a problem" you can save lives. And APB where a tech billionaire buys a loving police precinct and turns it into his own private police force where he stops crime by throwing unlimited money at the problem.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 04:35 |
|
boner confessor posted:hipsters and techbros have a weird fascination with forty foot containers Take heart that container floors are treated with some pretty strong and persistent pesticides. Bar Ran Dun fucked around with this message at 04:38 on Oct 29, 2016 |
# ? Oct 29, 2016 04:36 |
|
boner confessor posted:to be fair if i could get away with this, i would I had a boss do it for around five years boiler suits over nothing.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 04:36 |
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:So many buses in the us are so shockingly bad that it does seen like someone could just set up buses that are just normal buses that people don't pee in as much and change everything. Someone actually tried this! It went really badly. Behind the Failure of Leap Transit’s Gentrified Buses in San Francisco Owlofcreamcheese posted:I actually wonder if an app based bus could work. One that actually stopped at people's houses and brought them to work like a school bus with routes drawn up by algorithms to split the load evenly each day (and maybe sending vans for the people that would really ruin things) A similar sort of system already exists in many third world countries, where vans and small buses that are a blend of bus and taxi are used on somewhat impromptu routes. These systems are much less efficient than the transit systems that exist in the first world with with set routes. This system is basically the utopian vision for autonomous transit that Musk and others have described. From what I've read there seems to be a great deal of skepticism from transit experts toward this sort of system, mostly focusing on the fact that small buses that aren't on set routes will never be as efficient as what we have now, which is large buses on set routes. I suspect this is another one of those situations where SV is thinking that they're outsiders disrupting the closeminded establishment, but in reality they've put absolutely zero thought into the problem and are just hand waving about efficiencies from routing using big data.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 04:41 |
|
spooky like this! posted:Don't forget that the media is also helping feed into this idea with not one but TWO shows this fall about tech guys "disrupting" some normal service and showing how much better it is if you just throw programmers at it. I keep seeing commercials for Pure Genuis during football and I can't roll my eyes hard enough.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 04:45 |
|
Rhesus Pieces posted:I keep seeing commercials for Pure Genuis during football and I can't roll my eyes hard enough. I'm the tech billionaire the in inexplicably involved in patient discussions and giving them advice also citing studies to physicians about medicine also special effects nonsense
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 05:26 |
|
If you want a good story about dudes trying and failing to Disrupt medical care, look up MetaMed. A filesharing software coder, a Yudkowky acolyte, and a Magic: The Gathering champion started a company to do medical consulting for individual rich people, and nobody bit.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 06:33 |
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:It definitely seems like the sort of thing where there has to be a balance somewhere between totally dynamic routing that would be too silly and having totally static and fixed routes that only change after major investigation by human planners. There was this Kutsuplus thing going on here for a few years, but it got shut down last December: Why Helsinki's innovative on-demand bus service failed
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 12:30 |
|
Blue Star posted:I think its because we're living in an age of technological stagnation. We arent getting any real progress in anything important, so all we've got left are cell phones and dumb internet crap. What age? Like the last 2 years or something? I think that is the best testament to how much technology is changing everything that even a few months pass without a major new development and people get antsy.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 13:18 |
|
Blue Star posted:Does anyone else think we just have too much drat technology nowadays? And not even good technology, just stupid poo poo. Like why is Twitter even a thing? Why are there so many apps? Who cares about the latest cell phone???? Its all just dumb crap. It's because you're getting old, sorry.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 15:35 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 06:04 |
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:What age? Like the last 2 years or something? I think that is the best testament to how much technology is changing everything that even a few months pass without a major new development and people get antsy. Douglas Adams posted:I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies:
|
# ? Oct 29, 2016 15:40 |