Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
A Winner is Jew
Feb 14, 2008

by exmarx

Instant Sunrise posted:

and yes, they did deliberately name it "Orca" because orcas are the natural predator of narwhals

Oh I know.

I just got my terminology mixed up.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tricky D
Apr 1, 2005

I love um!

Anime Schoolgirl posted:

That assumes Scandinavian and urban Mormons take over D&D

Perhaps I should have said "more superficially polite."

VikingofRock
Aug 24, 2008




Dogwood Fleet posted:

But you do. They bag your groceries, they're the nice old man who served in WWII, they're your next door neighbor, they're your kid's elementary school teacher. There's no getting away from it and there's no end to the "ick" factor.

Yeah, I mean they are my friends and family, too. It's just in previous elections I never had this same level of disgust for Republican voters. I could see how you could be a decent person and still vote Romney or McCain or even Bush. Now, with Trump's and the alt-right's hate being so incredibly blatant, that feeling is gone.

ReV VAdAUL
Oct 3, 2004

I'm WILD about
WILDMAN

JVNO posted:

Wasn't the large wave of McCain/Romney tox bans responsible for the leftward shift in the SA forums? I quite remember the forums culture being a lot more centrist/right leaning in the mid 2000s.

LF and the financial crisis were probably bigger reasons for the leftward shift.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Edible Hat posted:

Tom Waits is so good and I wish he would make another album.

Anyone who hasn't heard this is missing out. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...8jtvfnGP_UlkifA

A chorus of Tom Waits and Kieth Richards.

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

seiferguy posted:

Mel, your charts are good but I kindly request you use something besides sans

I'm more of a papyrus guy, you see

I was going for maximum obnoxious

A Fancy 400 lbs
Jul 24, 2008
I only know Nassim Taleb from his anti-GMO hard on. I don't know if he's any good at his actual discipline, but I do know he's great at talking out of his rear end while he pretends to understand poo poo he doesn't.

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!

Mel Mudkiper posted:

"Hey Sully, remember when I said that chart was my last"

"That's right Mel, you did say that"

"I lied"



If she's really behind by 7 in NC then none of VA,MI,WI or CO is a sure thing.

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009



this is an actual political ad

frankly im surprised harambe isn't on it

My Linux Rig
Mar 27, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 6 years!

Guy Goodbody posted:

So far, the only war involving nuclear weapons ended rather well, considering.

The other side didn't have nukes, you idiot

Instant Sunrise
Apr 12, 2007


The manger babies don't have feelings. You said it yourself.

Northjayhawk posted:

lol, that is just hilariously incompetent. I assume this guy has never done anything which would have ever gotten him on a GOP phone list. If they are just calling everyone in certain areas (not latinos or casino workers) where they think Republicans live, then that "GOTV" effort is stupidly inefficient.

Reminder that this was the GOP's best GOTV effort 4 years ago.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Are we sure of that? Are there a significant number of #nevertrumpers in the House?
I'm a lot more confident in Republicans favoring a SCOTUS seat or three over, you know, anything else, than I am in the moral forthrightness of House Republicans.


Instant Sunrise posted:

you were probably being flippant and making a joke there, but according to trump's FEC disclosures his campaign has literally spent more money on hats than they have on polling or direct mail.

in fact the line item that includes hats, shirts, signs, stickers, has more money spent on it than on field consulting and voter data
Oh, I know: in fact, this and their big final push plan to "get people on Talk Radio to give out talking points," is a lot of why I ain't sweating any poll tightening.

chumbler
Mar 28, 2010

Geostomp posted:

I don't get it. Why is the FBI being so blatant about trying to get Trump elected these days? What does Comey think will happen if he somehow succeeds? Is he just spiteful enough to destroy his career and office reputation for this?

He's a republican who held a prominent office. He will have plenty of career options and his reputation will be wholly irrelevant. If anything republicans will venerate him as a real patriot.

A Winner is Jew
Feb 14, 2008

by exmarx

seiferguy posted:

Mel, your charts are good but I kindly request you use something besides sans

I'm more of a papyrus guy, you see

Mel Mudkiper posted:

I was going for maximum obnoxious


Helvetica.

rscott
Dec 10, 2009

JVNO posted:

Wasn't the large wave of McCain/Romney tox bans responsible for the leftward shift in the SA forums? I quite remember the forums culture being a lot more centrist/right leaning in the mid 2000s.

The global financial crisis popping the bubble of a bunch of :shobon: college libertarians is what made D&D more left wing

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.
I mean one of the clearest signs that Nate's model might be over-estimating uncertainty is that his model is an outlier of all the other aggregates. Even Sam Wang's very high 99% is still matched by two other pollsters.

No one is getting Nate's math except for Nate

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe
https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/793580848289353728

ReV VAdAUL
Oct 3, 2004

I'm WILD about
WILDMAN

Mel Mudkiper posted:

I mean one of the clearest signs that Nate's model might be over-estimating uncertainty is that his model is an outlier of all the other aggregates. Even Sam Wang's very high 99% is still matched by two other pollsters.

No one is getting Nate's math except for Nate

OTOH Nate is a Wizard.

Evrart Claire
Jan 11, 2008

Endorph posted:



this is an actual political ad

frankly im surprised harambe isn't on it

They should have ordered it so Stein is last.

Gorelab
Dec 26, 2006

chumbler posted:

He's a republican who held a prominent office. He will have plenty of career options and his reputation will be wholly irrelevant. If anything republicans will venerate him as a real patriot.

It's still somewhat surprising. It's pretty unprecidented, and he had a reputation as a straight shooter due to the fact that he basically stopped the Bush administration from making Ashcroft sign a bunch of bullshit while Ashcroft was hospitalized.

Duscat
Jan 4, 2009
Fun Shoe

alpha_destroy posted:

I don't think people think too critically about "nation" and capitalism. Capitalism undermines the nation's sovereignty right? Cause multinational corporations operate across borders and lobby to change laws and exist outside jurisdictions and violate the will of the people and all this loving jazz. But one of the most important things about national borders is they determine what gets taxed and by how much. So multinational corporations have a definite interest in propping up the idea of the nation because national borders help them avoid paying taxes. So I guess my point is I don't know what the gently caress to do with this knowledge except note that getting rid of the idea of the sovereign nation won't help us fight capitalism, and going all in on nationalism (besides all the baggage that comes along with it like xenophobia) won't help us. So I don't know what we do.

I'm not sure I follow your argument that more nationalism would somehow help multinationals. Multinational corporations will play nations against each other, sure, but a strong democratic government would limit their lobbying power and protect in the interests of the people. Xenophobia and jingoism are a lot less likely to erupt when people feel secure in their future and know that their vote counts.

How to get there, I don't know either, as nationalism in America these days mostly comes up in the phrase "white nationalism" and I'm not sure how you would even define "the American nation" nowadays, we've been under a divide-and-conquer policy for so long. It seems after 9/11 there was a brief flash of national unity. Maybe we can only come together against an external enemy. I hope not, since we have nukes now.

Bhaal
Jul 13, 2001
I ain't going down alone
Dr. Infant, MD
Trump's IT infrastructure definitely seems way better, it's just not used as a GOTV effort http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-27/inside-the-trump-bunker-with-12-days-to-go

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

Lead out in cuffs posted:

Hillary's website has a super-quick quiz that guides you through the various options and helps you choose:

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/page/volunteer-quiz-start/

E: This should probably be in the OP or something.

I broke my my mouse and my hand mashing "I am scared of Trump" thanks

seiferguy
Jun 9, 2005

FLAWED
INTUITION



Toilet Rascal

Mel Mudkiper posted:

I was going for maximum obnoxious

It was an Undertale joke

:dunkedon:

Northjayhawk
Mar 8, 2008

by exmarx

VikingofRock posted:

Yeah, I mean they are my friends and family, too. It's just in previous elections I never had this same level of disgust for Republican voters. I could see how you could be a decent person and still vote Romney or McCain or even Bush. Now, with Trump's and the alt-right's hate being so incredibly blatant, that feeling is gone.

We're learning the psychological limits of how far people are willing to go, what bullshit they'll eaccept and truths to ignore, to convince themselves that they are not actually voting for a monster when the supreme court is on the line. The people who are unable to bridge that gap are the #NeverTrumpers, and they are depressingly few, but good on Utah for having some morality.

I believe that if one side or the other had an unassailable large majority on the court and it was obvious that it wasn't going to change in the next decade, then the stakes would be lower and people would be less willing to rationalize voting for Trump.

Dr. Arbitrary
Mar 15, 2006

Bleak Gremlin

Does anyone have experience with the GOP equivalent to VoteBuilder? Is it any good?

rscott
Dec 10, 2009

Gorelab posted:

It's still somewhat surprising. It's pretty unprecidented, and he had a reputation as a straight shooter due to the fact that he basically stopped the Bush administration from making Ashcroft sign a bunch of bullshit while Ashcroft was hospitalized.

Why is it so surprising that a guy could be against torture but doesn't care about putting his fingers on the scale of the election?

The Little Kielbasa
Mar 29, 2001

and another thing: im not mad. please dont put in the newspaper that i got mad.
I thought a lot of the old right wingers left when 4chan formed. This place used to be a conservative wasteland where every white man was either in jail on bogus rape charges or unemployable because affirmative action kept them out of college.

A Winner is Jew
Feb 14, 2008

by exmarx

rscott posted:

Why is it so surprising that a guy could be against torture but doesn't care about putting his fingers on the scale of the election?

He knows the truth that Hillary is pro torture. :tinfoil:

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

seiferguy posted:

It was an Undertale joke

:dunkedon:

gently caress

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



rscott posted:

Why is it so surprising that a guy could be against torture but doesn't care about putting his fingers on the scale of the election?
Also, that was 12 years ago, didn't involve the expectation that the republicans would lose power as a result of it, didn't involve (((HILLARY CLINTON))), and so on.

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

The Little Kielbasa posted:

I thought a lot of the old right wingers left when 4chan formed. This place used to be a conservative wasteland where every white man was either in jail on bogus rape charges or unemployable because affirmative action kept them out of college.

I remember the day years ago when I first discovered fark was exclusively the home of 30 something white male libertarian discontents

Northjayhawk
Mar 8, 2008

by exmarx

Mel Mudkiper posted:

I mean one of the clearest signs that Nate's model might be over-estimating uncertainty is that his model is an outlier of all the other aggregates. Even Sam Wang's very high 99% is still matched by two other pollsters.

No one is getting Nate's math except for Nate

Its also difficult to prove that Nate is the real outlier. That may be part of his decision, it'll take another 100 years of elections to prove that he's got too much uncertainty, but it only takes one shocking night where Trump somehow wins by +4% or something to discredit all of the 99% guys.

If this was my livelihood rather than a hobby, I'd be careful too.

TyrantWD
Nov 6, 2010
Ignore my doomerism, I don't think better things are possible

Nessus posted:

OK, now you're just making poo poo up.

I mean I am sure there isn't, like, literally nothing, but there appears to be less than Mitt Romney had, and Trump sure ain't doing much about it. That'd cost money that could be spent on hats.

Look at the data. With the exception of states that really lean blue, like CO and VA, Hillary is at best matching 2012 numbers (NV) or running behind (FL, NC, OH, IA).

Tricky D
Apr 1, 2005

I love um!

Northjayhawk posted:

We're learning the psychological limits of how far people are willing to go, what bullshit they'll eaccept and truths to ignore, to convince themselves that they are not actually voting for a monster when the supreme court is on the line. The people who are unable to bridge that gap are the #NeverTrumpers, and they are depressingly few, but good on Utah for having some morality.

I believe that if one side or the other had an unassailable large majority on the court and it was obvious that it wasn't going to change in the next decade, then the stakes would be lower and people would be less willing to rationalize voting for Trump.

To be honest, the people I know IRL who are voting for Trump aren't gritting their teeth and pulling the lever for the SCOTUS but genuinely just hate the Democrats and the leadership of their own party (for letting Obama destroy our country).

A Winner is Jew
Feb 14, 2008

by exmarx

TyrantWD posted:

Look at the data. With the exception of states that really lean blue, like CO and VA, Hillary is at best matching 2012 numbers (NV) or running behind (FL, NC, OH, IA).

Post the map.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



TyrantWD posted:

Look at the data. With the exception of states that really lean blue, like CO and VA, Hillary is at best matching 2012 numbers (NV) or running behind (FL, NC, OH, IA).
Ah, but this isn't what you were talking about. Here is what you said, in case you forgot in the fast paced world of modern posting:

TyrantWD posted:

The RNC has a GOTV campaign that is going toe to toe with whatever Hillary has.
What I have heard consistently is that Trump is putting pretty much zero effort into any GOTV efforts, and while there may well have been some RNC efforts - I am sure there isn't, like, absolutely nothing whatever anywhere in the Republican party apparatus - these do not seem to have come up nearly so much.

Do you have anything to back up this assertion, or do you wanna skip straight to the echo chamber stage in the flowchart :v:

Ready! Set! Blow!
Jun 17, 2005

Red alert.

Also relevant: this story about how the Trump campaign got a bunch of people together to try and early-vote, but sent buses to the wrong places

https://twitter.com/mattmfm/status/793451874833793024

quote:

1/ Few thoughts on GOTV and ground game – as it's the buzz of the day. A case study to illustrate how Trump, for all his talk, has none.

2/ Sunday Trump was in Vegas. The campaign planned to have buses take supporters to early vote location after rally.

3/ Now if Trump campaign actually was smart, they would've held event within walking distance of early vote location, but besides the point.

4/ Anyway, so yeah – Trump had supporters in a single place; plan ready to go. What happens? Buses don’t show up.

5/ After confusion, buses finally show up. But less than two dozen people actually go and vote after Trump rally.

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009

TyrantWD posted:

The RNC has a GOTV campaign that is going toe to toe with whatever Hillary has.
lol no

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

greatn
Nov 15, 2006

by Lowtax
Also Hillary is outperforming Obama in both Florida and north Carolina.

  • Locked thread