|
BarbarianElephant posted:Like the female equivalent of Wally (small, middle aged and dumpy) would get a lot of male attention. Just goes to show that when you view women as sex objects, you view them as good lookin' sex objects.
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 08:35 |
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:Like the female equivalent of Wally (small, middle aged and dumpy) would get a lot of male attention. the thing is this a perfectly normal joke if you take away the latent MRA ideas. The repressed engineers are stupid and misogynistic, but so myopic that a simple empathy exercise breaks them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
just lol if you believe Trump doesn't drink He's washing down that cocaine with smooth bud raping women is thirsty work!
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
Mister Macys posted:Just goes to show that when you view women as sex objects, you view them as good lookin' sex objects. Yep. I've seen a lot of dateless men online fantasizing that if they were women, they could just walk into a bar and walk out with a hot date. It's pretty clear that they are imagining themselves as a hot, sexy woman not the exact female equivalent of themselves.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:Yep. I've seen a lot of dateless men online fantasizing that if they were women, they could just walk into a bar and walk out with a hot date. It's pretty clear that they are imagining themselves as a hot, sexy woman not the exact female equivalent of themselves. lol, are they imagining themselves being into men in these scenarios? because i can promise you lesbians are way more selective about who they date than straight guys.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
Dilbertman is an idiot but you dont have to go so far in correcting him that you pretend dating is the same experience between sexes. The response rates on online dating sites alone proves that much.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
Mantis42 posted:Dilbertman is an idiot but you dont have to go so far in correcting him that you pretend dating is the same experience between sexes. The response rates on online dating sites alone proves that much. IKR? https://twitter.com/mikefossey/status/592169335667486720
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
Lol. Several of my friends have "I am gay" as the first line of their online dating profiles and they still get hundreds of messages from guys who either didn't bother reading or just got turned on by the fact they are gay women. And these guys typically send really horrible poo poo in response when they're told "read the first line of my profile", like rape threats and poo poo. It's heinous.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 21:06
|
|
|
Okay, fair enough. I should mention that women have to put up with creeps and sexual predators and poo poo. I don't know what the actual ratio of actual dateable men to creeps are in terms of messaging they get (probably tragically high). A better measure would be how many women actually get dates from online dating services. Or second dates, I guess, to further weed out the duds.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 21:09
|
|
|
The Dilbert man's blog having closed comments is extremely treasonous. update: IF not in the letter of the law; THEN in the spirit. (just a lil' programming joke) addendum: MORALLY treasonous, to elucidate. update: i will continue to keep you all updated. this is normal behavior from a man who is not high as hell. trust me, i'm a hypnotist sweart gliwere fucked around with this message at 21:18 on Nov 1, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 21:15
|
|
|
moths posted:This is probably a dumb newbie question, but is there a "main" right that rejects the alt-right's horrible stuff? Near as I can tell it's the same racist, xenophobic, nationalist, sexist, jingoistic, anti-intellectual, falsely patriotic, supply side economics based message it's always been only they took all the Jesus poo poo out and then MIN/MAXED and distributed the Jesus Christ skill points into those other sets.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 21:26
|
|
|
sweart gliwere posted:The Dilbert man's blog having closed comments is extremely treasonous. No see they're only temporarily closed. Maybe in 10 or 20 years they'll be reopened!
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 21:29
|
|
|
I don't understand lesbians I mean first, what are they? And second, where do they work?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
BROCK LESBIAN posted:I don't understand lesbians I mean first, what are they? And second, where do they work? we are the creature most paradoxically sought after by the heterosexual male. and typically we work the clit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
Oh boy! Look at that Hot Dog lying there on the Pavement. Delicious!
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 22:30
|
|
Deptfordx posted:Oh boy! Look at that Hot Dog lying there on the Pavement. Delicious! I had assumed that that was  .
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
So, he's saying he's not only of inherently low quality compared to other men, but also literal garbage while still demanding women go for him anyway? Is it bad that I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
Oh my God it's a joke
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
Satire is dead apparently.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
Personally I didn't realize it was a joke until someone pointed it out, because I would eat a hot dog off the ground. I'm assuming that's the problem here.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
Ragnar34 posted:Personally I didn't realize it was a joke until someone pointed it out, because I would eat a hot dog off the ground. I'm assuming that's the problem here. Not a big step down from a normal hot dog.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
Geostomp posted:So, he's saying he's not only of inherently low quality compared to other men, but also literal garbage while still demanding women go for him anyway? Is it bad that I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not? https://twitter.com/mikefossey/status/793608446482472966
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 02:32
|
|
|
Geostomp posted:So, he's saying he's not only of inherently low quality compared to other men, but also literal garbage while still demanding women go for him anyway? Is it bad that I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 03:43
|
|
|
Ah, well I've spent far too much time reacting to idiocy of the alt-right to remember what humor is.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 03:56
|
|
|
Ragnar34 posted:Personally I didn't realize it was a joke until someone pointed it out, because I would eat a hot dog off the ground. I'm assuming that's the problem here. How do I submit to goons.txt ?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:Not a big step down from a normal hot dog. It's literally one step down.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 04:17
|
|
|
lmao https://twitter.com/chrylis/status/793537805943209984
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 04:43
|
|
|
Hey @google just blocked all porn. *posts picture with safe search turned on* e: hahahahaha what is this loving garbage? https://twitter.com/scrowder/status/793574125935529984 Phone fucked around with this message at 04:56 on Nov 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 04:54
|
|
|
Phone posted:what is this loving garbage? A desperate plea for Right Wing Welfare when you realize you've grown increasingly irrelevant? Help I'm being oppressed for being right wing please pay attention to me/give me money
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:21
|
|
|
so in my car tonight I got to listen to Lars Larson (I think? He's the guy that uses Thunderstruck as his intro right?) say that all of Hillary's Emails while she was at the State Department are the property of the American Public. All of them, every last one of them. And how dare she delete them rather then release them, in full, to the American people. It's not even about her having classified information on an unsecured server or anything, it's literally just straight up 'let us read all your poo poo and attempt to find something we can prosecute you for'
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
Stallion Cabana posted:so in my car tonight I got to listen to Lars Larson (I think? He's the guy that uses Thunderstruck as his intro right?) say that all of Hillary's Emails while she was at the State Department are the property of the American Public.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:38
|
|
|
I thought he was for private discrimination.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:God I wish someone would call that guy and ask him how outraged he was when the Bush White House 'lost' an even larger number of emails. You have to remember that Bush was a RINO, and no true conservative will admit to ever having supported him.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:You have to remember that Bush was a RINO, and no true conservative will admit to ever having supported him. Better then that, He just completely denied the fact that Colin Powell had his own email server by calling Hillary's thing 'never done before' instead of 'literally had been done by at least her previous predecessor if not people before that.'
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 06:20
|
|
|
Stallion Cabana posted:so in my car tonight I got to listen to Lars Larson (I think? He's the guy that uses Thunderstruck as his intro right?) say that all of Hillary's Emails while she was at the State Department are the property of the American Public. I'm curious if this applies to everyone else in the federal government, including congress. Or is there something particularly unique and special about the State Department, I wonder...
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 07:39
|
|
|
Stallion Cabana posted:so in my car tonight I got to listen to Lars Larson (I think? He's the guy that uses Thunderstruck as his intro right?) say that all of Hillary's Emails while she was at the State Department are the property of the American Public. Okay brb requesting all of Colin Powell's emails
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 07:41
|
|
|
Lars Larson is probably the most dangerous Right Wing Radio host up here in the PNW. His voice doesn't have the crazy, and if you weren't aware of the fact that he's apparently streaming in from an alternate reality you could almost believe he was sane. Almost. I wish I could find a transcript. He had someone on the other day (It was Saturday, so a rerun of some day) talking about how police in latino dominant areas are told to "not deal with cases of older men with extremely underaged women because that's part of their culture." Literally insane. He's the sort that will play an audio clip, then without batting an eye talk about how it said the exact opposite of what he played.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 07:51
|
|
|
Wait, why does the State department (and I presume anyone under the executive branch) have to make emails public, but not congress? Or the Supreme Court?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 07:53
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:Wait, why does the State department (and I presume anyone under the executive branch) have to make emails public, but not congress? Or the Supreme Court? FOIA and other open government provisions only really apply to the executive branch. Congress, because it is extraordinarily self-serving, takes the position that the communications of congressmen/senators are protected as political speech. Lower courts are created by congress so they theoretically could enact legislation that requires disclosure for those, but SCOTUS is off on its own as the only explicit piece of the judiciary created in the constitution. SCOTUS governs itself. Congress, in theory, doesn't have any control over it other than being able to reject members and may be able to remove members after impeachment(though the actual removal of a sitting justice has never been attempted). ErIog fucked around with this message at 08:06 on Nov 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 08:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 08:35 |
|
|
.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 11:39
|
|
