Lightning Knight posted:holy poo poo Nate Silver is such an rear end in a top hat lmao The general tone of his articles indicates that he doesn't like Trump at all so he's probably voting Clinton Like, he's made multiple comparisons to the chance of a Trump victory being the same as "losing" Russian roulette, you don't do that if you're in the tank for cheeto benito
|
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:24 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 04:03 |
|
speng31b posted:Who broke Nate Silver? excess testosterone in his mother's womb
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:24 |
|
Ogmius815 posted:Source on Fox News reporting that the FBI will recommend indictment over pay to play at the Clinton foundation. HOLY loving poo poo. gently caress THIS GAY EARTH.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:24 |
|
The last time the Cubs won a world series was actually closer to the building of the pyramids than to today's date. Crazy.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:24 |
|
Donkwich posted:Is it 'to cover his rear end if he's wrong'? The way the aggregators are going, the only way Nate can be the most accurate is simply if he is the less wrong one.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:26 |
|
speng31b posted:Who broke Nate Silver? Our mutual friend, Al Co-hol.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:26 |
|
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:26 |
|
Agrajag posted:HOLY loving poo poo. gently caress THIS GAY EARTH. The source also said they are basing their entire investigation on Clinton Cash. No, I'm not joking. They used the book as the starting point for their investigation. They went to the DOJ to get warrants and the DOJ laughed them out of the room. So now they're leaking poo poo and claiming that people are protecting the Clintons in retaliation.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:26 |
|
Agrajag posted:HOLY loving poo poo. gently caress THIS GAY EARTH.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:26 |
|
Agrajag posted:HOLY loving poo poo. gently caress THIS GAY EARTH. so is this basically your gimmick you've decided on
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:27 |
|
Agrajag posted:HOLY loving poo poo. gently caress THIS GAY EARTH. Don't panic. The source is Bret Baier's rear end in a top hat and when you read the specifics of it it starts to sound extremely fake.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:27 |
Lightning Knight posted:holy poo poo Nate Silver is such an rear end in a top hat lmao
|
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:28 |
|
Extremely nice to see the rare Unshook Nate in the wild.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:28 |
|
speng31b posted:Who broke Nate Silver? I'd say about 8 beers and maybe some shots.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:29 |
|
Agrajag posted:HOLY loving poo poo. gently caress THIS GAY EARTH. It's Fox News, you dumb rear end.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:29 |
|
Worth it.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:30 |
|
NATE SATE STATE STARE STARK STORK STOCK SHOCK SHOOK
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:32 |
|
The real kicker of that "FBI indictment" bullshit is quote:Sources within the FBI have told [Baier] that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:34 |
|
So is obama just like gonna change the locks to the FBI HQ next week. Like seriously it seems like a whole bunch of people are going to get way fired for this whole mess.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:35 |
|
Quick reminder that when stations like Fox think they have a huge scoop that they'll be breaking for the first time, they become about as good at checking their sources as your grandma on Facebook. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLmoqbR3gto
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:37 |
|
Teddybear posted:NATE Trump Tromp Trombone Corncob. DO YOU SEE?
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:38 |
|
Cross posting from c-spam: https://mobile.twitter.com/RT_com/status/794042917899878400
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:38 |
|
I don't understand why so many people are throwing their careers in the trash over Trump. Or is the fear of Hillary being an actually effective president so great that they figure tanking her in advance is worth it? Maybe they gave up on Trump entirely and it's all just about 2020.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:39 |
|
Augus posted:Quick reminder that when stations like Fox think they have a huge scoop that they'll be breaking for the first time, they become about as good at checking their sources as your grandma on Facebook. My grandma is dead
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:39 |
|
Not seriously (but h*cka seriously) what would it take to abolish the FBI? Edit: Phone posted:BREAKING: Russian govt is not the source for #WikiLeaks' #Clinton emails - RT's Oh, never mind; all these words are meaningless. dont be mean to me fucked around with this message at 06:42 on Nov 3, 2016 |
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:39 |
|
Phone posted:Cross posting from c-spam: Cause you can trust Assange, like for reals.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:40 |
|
Phone posted:Cross posting from c-spam: Oh well if the Russian Times and Julian Assange say so.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:40 |
|
I'm willing to bet their "reliable source" is about as reliable as Wayne Simmons.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:40 |
|
speng31b posted:I don't understand why so many people are throwing their careers in the trash over Trump. Or is the fear of Hillary being an actually effective president so great that they figure tanking her in advance is worth it? Maybe they gave up on Trump entirely and it's all just about 2020. Fear of mandated macrame sessions can make a man do terrible things.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:42 |
|
Phone posted:Cross posting from c-spam: lol
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:42 |
|
Phone posted:Cross posting from c-spam: "It wasn't us, it was... Poland! Trust us!"
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:43 |
|
Phone posted:Cross posting from c-spam: In exclusive interview with the mouthpiece of the Russian government, Julian Assange insists he isn't getting his info from the Russian government.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:43 |
|
Phone posted:Cross posting from c-spam: It was the Belarusians all along!
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:43 |
|
Phone posted:Cross posting from c-spam:
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:43 |
|
speng31b posted:I don't understand why so many people are throwing their careers in the trash over Trump. Or is the fear of Hillary being an actually effective president so great that they figure tanking her in advance is worth it? Maybe they gave up on Trump entirely and it's all just about 2020. In theory, if Trump wins they get a conservative SCOTUS judge, probably another when RBG retires. They get influence over the redistricting in the next census. Etc. They're banking on him being a puppet and going along. So there are things at stake and that's making them cling to partly loyalty. (Also it's all they know how to do.)
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:43 |
|
Phone posted:Cross posting from c-spam: Breaking: RUSSIAN MEDIA DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO ASSANGE. INTERVIEW WITH RUSSIAN MEDIA AND ASSANGE HERE!
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:43 |
speng31b posted:I don't understand why so many people are throwing their careers in the trash over Trump. Or is the fear of Hillary being an actually effective president so great that they figure tanking her in advance is worth it? Maybe they gave up on Trump entirely and it's all just about 2020.
|
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:44 |
|
Phone posted:Cross posting from c-spam: "Russian government definitely not source of leaks," insists likely Russian mouthpiece in interview with Russian state media
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:44 |
|
Still patiently waiting for that drone strike.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 04:03 |
|
dont be mean to me posted:Not seriously (but h*cka seriously) what would it take to abolish the FBI? Actually shuttering it? I'm not sure. There's probably a way since its not a regulatory agency or constitutionally mandated org. Probably a lot of red tape about that though. But we'd likely be better off dumping the CiA before the FBI.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 06:45 |