|
Natalie Portman covered in hot grits
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 20:09 |
|
|
Chalks posted:- a post on somethingawful.com in 2016
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Natalie Portman covered in hot grits and petrified
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 21:03
|
|
|
lmao work doubled the length of our support developer rotation behind my back and didn't tell me until i asked who was taking over this week. [ask] me about getting owned.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 21:08
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:im just the dumb ol' systems guy, but why is someone who can spin functional magicks as well as you on call?? i develop telephony systems, and like hell is my company going to pay for someone to do ops when they can just make me do it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:person should have discovered free sex and then he would live for the dizzying heights and subterreran lows of having lots of sex can you take your weird sex-obsessed fail aids to a different thread pls? the post you quoted was about a dude who chose euthanasia over horrible cancer ffs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
honestly nobody is impressed by your lovely pink dick or the places you put it
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
MSPain posted:honestly nobody is impressed by your lovely pink dick or the places you put it this but about your posting
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
welp, i got owned again
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
jony neuemonic posted:lmao work doubled the length of our support developer rotation behind my back and didn't tell me until i asked who was taking over this week. [tell] us about your new job search
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
meditech programmer checking-in
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 22:56
|
|
|
nern posted:meditech programmer checking-in OH MY GOD please explain MAGIC to me. it's loving incomprehensible!
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
Bloody posted:[tell] us about your new job search i left my previous job after less than a year so i'm stuck with this one for a while yet. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
lol com loving sucks so much my god
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
nern posted:meditech programmer checking-in hello, how many people have you killed with bad code
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
Bloody posted:lol com loving sucks so much my god
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:hello, how many people have you killed with bad code this also dont steal our trade secrets im sure my lovely posts are going to let you reverse engineer an amazing product lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 23:45
|
|
|
Bloody posted:lol com loving sucks so much my god you rang?
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
haha. had a call with a new provider system were brining on and they had their tech people on the phone responsible for parts of epic and they were confused when I was talking about API access. have a call later this week with their epic "integration team" which idk if that's some other clueless person in the hospital or if its someone from epic. cant wait.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:slashdot has a big post on US tech salaries and the majority of replies are employees proud of their lack of work-life balance and jealously of Indian outsourcing. i just looked it up. the majority of replies are saying that outsourcing indian devs sucks for the obvious reasons.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 00:20
|
|
|
Bloody posted:lol com loving sucks so much my god is this com automation or just plain vanilla com because honestly the regular poo poo isn't THAT bad... well ok structured storage looked like an utter pile of wank
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
its my project where im driving headless winword instances over com to scrape data hard to say if winword is hanging on a (hidden, of course) dialogbox or if the network accessed word documents are just taking forever to iterate through
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 00:34
|
|
|
hackbunny posted:you rang? uh, well, not so much "rang" as "dynamically generate vtbl entries to point at a chunk of asm that dynamically points to hackbunny at runtime"
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
Bloody posted:its my project where im driving headless winword instances over com to scrape data lol  why do you think they gradually switched to xml based documents Bloody posted:hard to say if winword is hanging on a (hidden, of course) dialogbox or if the network accessed word documents are just taking forever to iterate through headless word does hang on dialog boxes all the time, I remember it happened to me too last time I tried the same. headless word has never been a supported office automation scenario and it will cause all sorts of problems. the classic word document format is now documented too if that was stopping you so why not look for a nice library. one maybe that's based on a dom or a streaming api instead of word's weirdo range primitive
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:hello, how many people have you killed with bad code i wonder this myself from time to time. LeftistMuslimObama posted:OH MY GOD for flow control, there are only IF and DO 0 evaluates to true
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 01:54
|
|
|
i wrote an outlook integration job that on 50% of runs logs out "error during cleanup: COM interop probably failed. ignore." because it would continuously fail to release its sessions and shutdown cleanly
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Natalie Portman covered in hot grits it was so long before I discovered that "grits" wasn't the same thing as grit
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 02:39
|
|
|
nern posted:i wonder this myself from time to time. huh, i wonder why they decided to diverge from MUMPS and make 0=true. only having if and do isn't that different from mumps when you consider that mumps' else can be broken by nested scopes changing $t.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
Bloody posted:its my project where im driving headless winword instances over com to scrape data that's not com's fault its word's
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 04:18
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:that's not com's fault its word's swr
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 05:18
|
|
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:huh, i wonder why they decided to diverge from MUMPS and make 0=true. only having if and do isn't that different from mumps when you consider that mumps' else can be broken by nested scopes changing $t. semi-colons work for elses and you can use these to structure DO loops as do-while or do-until. yeah, nil is the only thing that evaluates false. oh, and MAGIC (and it's successor FS) is really big on the fact that there is always a current working value. at any point in the running of a program, there is a current value which is simply the value of the last evaluated expression. whether the current value is non-nil is the condition of many an IF or DO. to be perfectly honest, MAGIC isn't even half as hard to decipher as FS, the programming language at the core of meditech's more current software. the language consists of lists and two letter functions, basically. like @Wb - write body of window. there are tons of functions. and the documentation is terrible. and they often don't make sense intuitively and you can't name your code members (methods, basically) they are numbered 0 and up, so if you were to add one in the rest get renumbered and all your references are hosed. it's a mess. this is my first job after transitioning careers into software and I'm just in awe. gonna put my time in, keep learnin', and try to find something better (in every other way too; it's a long commute and they do not pay well at all). anyway... what's the typing like in MUMPS?
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 06:14
|
|
|
nern posted:semi-colons work for elses and you can use these to structure DO loops as do-while or do-until. yeah, nil is the only thing that evaluates false. oh, and MAGIC (and it's successor FS) is really big on the fact that there is always a current working value. at any point in the running of a program, there is a current value which is simply the value of the last evaluated expression. whether the current value is non-nil is the condition of many an IF or DO. theres a treasure trove 4u if you filter on my posts itt. mumps is loosely and dynamically typed. internally there are strings and numbers but they're cast back and forth as needed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 06:33
|
|
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:theres a treasure trove 4u if you filter on my posts itt. I will definitely be perusing your posts. Epic sounds much better than Meditech Hahahah. (already knew we sucked, didn't know if it was an industry thing). I've only been in a training group for the past few months since I started. I have a twisted desire to get placed in one of the old school $T groups and just throw my mouse in the garbage. then I say, god, no, let me get thrown into a group working with the new web ehr stuff. but then I remember, no, you don't get to write code in anything that's not MAGI, FS, or MAT. maybe I can find the right dick to suck and get put in a group that actually works on the front end of that web her and write code in a REAL programming language... JavaScript. . . . . .... 
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 07:32
|
|
|
nern posted:FS, the programming language at the core of meditech's more current software. the language consists of lists and two letter functions, basically. like @Wb - write body of window. there are tons of functions. and the documentation is terrible. and they often don't make sense intuitively and you can't name your code members (methods, basically) they are numbered 0 and up, so if you were to add one in the rest get renumbered and all your references are hosed. never thought i'd say this, but i think i'd rather use mumps
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 07:37
|
|
|
what i'm getting from this thread is that the medical software industry is hella exploitative of people trying to break into dev roles
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 07:40
|
|
|
nern posted:REAL programming language... JavaScript. . . . . .... as much as i like to lol at javascript and web "development", the poo poo you and LMO describe sound like esolangs. after describing something like this nern posted:(methods, basically) they are numbered 0 and up, so if you were to add one in the rest get renumbered and all your references are hosed. i'm revoking your rights to using in reference to js.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 08:41
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:that's not com's fault its word's Yeah, the word com api is absolutely terrible. I've done work involving editing and generating documents via that API and holy crap you can do some wonderful things. We had code that deleted a particular line in a table embedded in the document. If the table didn't contain that line, the delete command still ran on the location it thought that element should be but instead managed to delete the end of the document. I don't mean it deleted some content from the end of the document, but it literally deleted what ever concept word has meaning "the document ends here". The document would literally scroll infinitely downwards until word exploded.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 10:49
|
|
|
nern posted:I will definitely be perusing your posts. Epic sounds much better than Meditech Hahahah. (already knew we sucked, didn't know if it was an industry thing). FS has named code members but I'm not sure if that is really enabled for everything. it also has about the same readability as regular expressions. I can truly say that writing JavaScript is the highlight of my day. maybe I need an intervention.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 12:11
|
|
|
Mahatma Goonsay posted:FS has named code members but I'm not sure if that is really enabled for everything. it also has about the same readability as regular expressions.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 12:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 20:09 |
|
|
Mahatma Goonsay posted:FS has named code members but I'm not sure if that is really enabled for everything. it also has about the same readability as regular expressions.  just find a better job
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 12:20
|
|
