|
http://www.psp-tv.com/r/NiteCrew This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
 |
|
500562 | 49.92% |
 |
|
139 | 0.01% |
 |
|
153 | 0.02% |
 |
|
500888 | 49.95% |
 |
|
940 | 0.09% |
| Total: | 1002682 votes | ||
|
 Rep
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 14:44 |
|
|
LastInLine posted:Yes, that would do a good job disenfranchising half the people in the country. Alternately, we could do voter ID laws, purity tests, and other Jim Crow-era tactics to disenfranchise the other half of the country. Dude did you even read my second paragraph or are you too loving dug in for Hillary to understand how my second paragraph would fix the country by massively increasing voter turnout and removing lesser of two evil voting and destroy corruption? There's no reason with the current electoral college for a dem to campaign in texas for prez and you are retarded to think otherwise. Nice meltdown, I'm a socialist and you know nothing about how democracy could work to actually help people matter in their votes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:28
|
|
|
loving 421, self owned you loving Berned scrub
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:29
|
|
|
Montasque posted:https://twitter.com/PeterHamby/status/796357379944235008 he's as vindictive as Nixon and as stupid as Reagan. could be a bad combination imo
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:29
|
|
|
TyrantWD posted:What are the Democrats supposed to learn from this? People who cared about the economy more voted Hillary in the exit polls. This wasn't an election lost on policy. Remember, a large part of the GOP donor class sat this election out, but that's not going to be the case in 2018 and beyond. With less money, and less bigotry, expect the same 4 years from now. I personally think my lesson from this is that Obama took it too far too fast. Dems not only lost the White House but also the senate and the house.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:28
|
|
|
Dog Jones posted:Man I can't believe these Hillary people blew it, what a bunch of worthless sycophantic incompetents. Goddamn what a disaster. Lol we told you but you cucks wouldn't listen...
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:28
|
|
|
Montasque posted:https://twitter.com/PeterHamby/status/796357379944235008 off to an amazing start
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:30
|
|
|
Vladimir Putin posted:I personally think my lesson from this is that Obama took it too far too fast. Dems not only lost the White House but also the senate and the house. We didn't even have congress to begin with.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:30
|
|
|
Turdfuzz posted:so hillary got more votes?? like we got a 2000 situation again?? am i understanding this right cuz i havent done any real research yet (n prolly never will lets be honest) I wanna say HRC winning the popular vote and Trump winning the electoral was the least likely scenario on 538. So in retrospect, we all should have seen this coming because LOL 2016.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:30
|
|
|
Mr. Jive posted:In hindsight it was completely loving childish to base an election strategy and national discourse around the notion that the majority white population would vote for the ideologically sound candidate because they should, because they would be bad people if they voted for Trump, because the left would shame them if they voted Trump, as if being shamed was the worst punishment they could receive lmao you can't shame the majority, they don't care
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:30
|
|
|
Montasque posted:https://twitter.com/PeterHamby/status/796357379944235008 DRAIN THAT SWAMP
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:31
|
|
|
some minor good news: david duke got only 3% of the vote. bad news: 60,000 people voted for david duke in louisiana
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:30
|
|
|
Pick posted:What else could they sell? "Whoops, never mind the previous president also from my own party, gently caress that guy?" If they wanted that, who could they choose but Bernie? I don't think he'd have held up under the scrutiny, ultimately. And you don't really get to be the change candidate twice in a row while maintaining essentially the same platform, by definition. We just had to elect the guy that is EXTREMELY likeable, that's it. Instead we got two unlikeable people to compete and well, look how well that turned out. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:31
|
|
|
C-SPAN Caller posted:There's no reason with the current electoral college for a dem to campaign in texas for prez and you are retarded to think otherwise. Nice meltdown, I'm a socialist and you know nothing about how democracy could work to actually help people matter in their votes. downballot, improving infrastructure/support for future campaigns
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:31
|
|
|
Montasque posted:https://twitter.com/PeterHamby/status/796357379944235008 Hell yeah! Doesn't it start with political opponents?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
Vladimir Putin posted:I personally think my lesson from this is that Obama took it too far too fast. Dems not only lost the White House but also the senate and the house. If by too far you mean "did loving nothing" and "installed a right wing health care system" and "created a way to kill people against sovereignty with drones" among many others you're the problem with liberals. Bernie would have won. Accept that Americans want hope and an actual left and you'll suddenly feel much better.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:31
|
|
|
lol oh word, America is bad? Weird wtf
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
My Linux Rig posted:Lol we told you but you cucks wouldn't listen... ?? No one told me poo poo, I called this exact scenario back in July in the DNC thread to much hissing and booing from Clinton retards.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:Glad the trumbpf thread hit 14880 pages 14088 
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
Karl Sharks posted:downballot, improving infrastructure/support for future campaigns Maybe actually being a good loving candidate would do all that, and fixing the system to not be poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
lol I just got a sad email from the director of NASA about preserving earth science's funding through demonstrating their excellent track record sent from his iphone, so of course he's still in bed
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:33
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6CVvNRQcvE
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:33
|
|
|
LolC-SPAN Caller posted:If by too far you mean "did loving nothing" and "installed a right wing health care system" and "created a way to kill people against sovereignty with drones" among many others you're the problem with liberals. Lol Bernie would have lost too, just face it, no one wants a Democrat in office again
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
crazy cloud posted:lol oh word, America is bad? Weird wtf oh man what
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:33
|
|
|
so does this mean infowars and wikileaks are going to be pro-america from here on out?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:33
|
|
|
Montasque posted:https://twitter.com/PeterHamby/status/796357379944235008 Yea, Omarosa being a person of importance is p. hosed up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
C-SPAN Caller posted:Dude did you even read my second paragraph or are you too loving dug in for Hillary to understand how my second paragraph would fix the country by massively increasing voter turnout and removing lesser of two evil voting and destroy corruption? This isn't a meltdown and I never believed Hillary had a chance (my state went 95% for Trump and I'm a white straight male so it's all academic to me). My point is that the system worked just fine when electing a black guy named Barack Hussein Obama twice. No reform necessary, just a standard right-of-center Democrat with an optimistic message and some charisma. There isn't any broken system to fix, the Democrats just ran a terrible, unlikeable candidate and rightly lost due to hubris.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:33
|
|
|
God drat, how long until the debt ceiling needs to be raised?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
C-SPAN Caller posted:If by too far you mean "did loving nothing" and "installed a right wing health care system" and "created a way to kill people against sovereignty with drones" among many others you're the problem with liberals. Yeah man, we came close to getting Sanders and instead ended up with Trump. What a loving coup for the right
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
Karl Sharks posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPeopleTwitter/comments/5bzkw2/barry_obama/d9slwjg/ quote:[Black People Twitter] mods be like:
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:33
|
|
|
Scrub-Niggurath posted:off to an amazing start I'm excited for Trump purging the Republican party, starting with "Lehman bros" kasich
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
Guys, what if instead of trying to appeal to the anxiety and distress of rural whites about their changing place in America and maybe tossed them a bone or two to get them onboard, we instead just shamed the gently caress out of them to get them to see the only morally right thing to do is vote for our candidate? That sounds like it'll really amp up voter turn out during this extremely critical election. Shame will do it. Shame will win the election. (a candidate with no shame whatsoever and who positively revels in his shamelessness goes on to win the election) WHAT COULD HAVE POSSIBLY GONE WRONG WITH OUR SHAME PLAN!?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:33
|
|
|
Omarosa, a person who played a reality TV star baddy, is threatening Senator Lindsay Graham. I'm having problems computing this one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
My Linux Rig posted:Lol Lol nice troll but the polls and excitement say otherwise, Hillary couldn't turn people out, bernie could turn out olds that vote D no matter what as well as the Youngs that would have handed it over on a silver platter.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
Montasque posted:https://twitter.com/PeterHamby/status/796357379944235008  anybody got a spare MAGA hat I can borrow? I'm pretty sure straight white guys aren't going to be in the first round of cullings but better safe than sorry, right?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:35
|
|
|
change my name posted:lol I just got a sad email from the director of NASA about preserving earth science's funding through demonstrating their excellent track record it's ok. newt is going to push for building a moon base and that's very much Trump's thing so NASA is going to be drowning in funds very soon
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:35
|
|
|
Not a Step posted:Guys, what if instead of trying to appeal to the anxiety and distress of rural whites about their changing place in America and maybe tossed them a bone or two to get them onboard, we instead just shamed the gently caress out of them to get them to see the only morally right thing to do is vote for our candidate? That sounds like it'll really amp up voter turn out during this extremely critical election. The primary source of "anxiety and distress of rural whites" is that black people and Latinos and Muslims exist and want civil rights.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:36
|
|
|
Alright guys. Jokes over. ... Guys?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:36
|
|
|
Annual Prophet posted:so what's the over-under on 1:10 odds against the Wall 1:100 odds against Mexico paying for a Wall 1:1 odds of increase Coal production 2:1 odds in favor of an immigration/migration freeze 2:1 odds in favor of economic populism forcing an end to at least a trade agreement or two 1:3 odds against an increase in domestic manufacturing 4:1 odds of an ACA repeal 1:10 odds against Daesh having much in the way of oil to take 1000:1 odds in favor of the Supreme Court from Hell
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 14:44 |
|
|
I ate a 6 hour probation yesterday when it looked like it was going to be closer than expected and I posted that the democrats shouldn't have nominated such a poo poo candidate. I still put this on the democrats for nominating such a poo poo candidate. Deez Nuts could have beaten Trump, but no, it was her turn.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 15:36
|
|
