Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

speng31b posted:

I'm going to miss Harry Reid.

Me too, although I have to say, Schumer might be pretty decent in his role as minority leader. Yes, he's too pro-Wall Street and too pro-Israel, but Trump's going to be those things too no matter what, and there's not much a minority leader can do to block Trump's agenda on those fronts. But he's also a drat good attack dog, and he knows the levers of power in the Senate very well. So I'm hoping he'll carry on Reid's good work.

Plus, he's given Keith Ellison his endorsement for DNC chair, so that suggests to me that he can see which way the wind is blowing, and it's not in the third way Dems' favor.

Majorian fucked around with this message at 04:00 on Nov 12, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sharkopath
May 27, 2009

FuturePastNow posted:

And not to be a bitter Bernie supporter, either, but I'll trust the photos of him marching with Civil Rights protesters over the photos of Hillary interning for the Nixon admin as evidence of who would actually be stronger on race issues

Hillary won over minority voters in the primary because there's still lots of living memory of good the Clintons did during the 90s especially in the black community and Bernie was aloof and distant about social issues during that runup.

RaySmuckles
Oct 14, 2009


:vapes:
Grimey Drawer

Kilroy posted:

She could have selected Bernie as her VP and put a progressive in as the chair of the DNC. That would have won her the election handily IMO.

it was so obvious to so many people

instead we got Tim "Googles His Name to Find Out Who the gently caress He Is" Kaine

the excitement was palpable

reagan
Apr 29, 2008

by Lowtax

Mr Hootington posted:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/11/why_did_some_white_obama_voters_for_trump.html

A good Jamelle Bouie article about how it was in fact about white supremacy.

http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/donald-trump-is-the-leader-america-was-promised-1788791098

Or a good Tom Scocca article about how it was in fact the republicans destroying the belief in the government.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/opinion/im-a-coastal-elite-from-the-midwest-the-real-bubble-is-rural-america

or a good Patrick Thornton article about how white people suck because they segregate themselves. (oh and he is a white person who acknowledges he once sucked himself)

loving clueless.

Lime Tonics
Nov 7, 2015

by FactsAreUseless

Stereotype posted:

I think the best thing for a new Democratic party to do is promise unrelenting fire and brimstone to lawbreakers in the Trump administration. None of this bullshit ignoring of Bush era war crimes, if they want to rile up the base they need to take the Lock Her Up page from Trump's playbook and promise harsh retribution against any future transgressions.

As a benefit, it may give some of the more cowardly evil men eying up their seats next to Trump some pause.

Or, get this strange idea, they might actually listen to democrats instead of special interests.

What a radical idea, right?

PKJC
May 7, 2009

FuturePastNow posted:

And not to be a bitter Bernie supporter, either, but I'll trust the photos of him marching with Civil Rights protesters over the photos of Hillary interning for the Nixon admin as evidence of who would actually be stronger on race issues

I mean, I get this, but come on, people never change? It was a known thing that she was conservative in her youth. You can say Bernie had legit cred on fighting for minority issues literally his entire career without insisting Hillary needed to be ideologically pure in her early 20s to ever be allowed to have something other than R next to her name.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

FuturePastNow posted:

And not to be a bitter Bernie supporter, either, but I'll trust the photos of him marching with Civil Rights protesters over the photos of Hillary interning for the Nixon admin as evidence of who would actually be stronger on race issues

He's always had the chops at dealing with minority voters, but not the name recognition. And if this election has proven anything, it's that name recognition goes a loooong way to getting elected.

Squinty
Aug 12, 2007

GreyjoyBastard posted:

Serious question: what would it have taken for you to believe her sincerity on her leftish platform? What would she have had to do?

There's nothing. The last decade of her political career has been bankrolled by the New York banks and investment firms. She could never run fast enough to escape that.

Stereotype
Apr 24, 2010

College Slice

Xae posted:

The thing to remember about Bernie is that he is way, way to the left of the Electorate.

His signature issue, Single Payer, lost. No, list is the wrong word. It got eviscerated and lost by 60 points in Colorado. He didn't even get a majority of democratic voters to vote for it in a blue state.

Would Bernie have won is an interesting because it could go either way. The race was so close. 1% more Dem turn out and it is a clear win. But also remember than 1% less turn out is a huge loss.

But like all "What ifs..." it is impossible to prove or disprove.

Hmm the big thing about that point is that it is super wrong. People in Colorado are well versed in incompetent idiots coming to their state to take advantage of legal weed, they weren't about to turn that stream of transients into a firehose by promising to cure their bodies for free.

On a national level the proposal would recieve significantly more support.

We might have to teach them what "single payer" means though

Pollyanna
Mar 5, 2005

Milk's on them.


Tir McDohl posted:

Oh def. more than loving anything dems need to score victories locally, and in off-year elections. I don't know how we get people to vote more than once every four years but dammit I was guilty of that and this election is gonna get me off my rear end in 2018.

We relied too much on being able to get the presidency relatively frequently.

The Democrats will never be anything but useless. The Dems are incompetent, and the Reps are evil. That's practically a law of physics by now.

Fateful Encounter
Feb 28, 2016
In addition to hearing about Mondale, I'd like to ask how much in common does this election have with 1928?
The morning after His Accidency was elected, I was freaking out about how certain it is that Trump ends up causing another Great Depression. In that vein, I just read a WaPo article that compares Trump to Hoover as Presidents that took office in an era of stagnant wages and absurd economic inequality. Hoover also promised to levy tariffs, which ended up sparking a trade war and economic collapse.

I guess I'm wondering how likely it is that history repeats, and whether we'll be lucky enough to get another FDR out of this

Xae
Jan 19, 2005

Stereotype posted:

Hmm the big thing about that point is that it is super wrong. People in Colorado are well versed in incompetent idiots coming to their state to take advantage of legal weed, they weren't about to turn that stream of transients into a firehose by promising to cure their bodies for free.

On a national level the proposal would recieve significantly more support.

We might have to teach them what "single payer" means though

Single Payer is one of those issues that polls really well when you talk about it vaguely.

Also if you poll about "nationalizing healthcare" or "federal government takeover of hospitals" you'll see the support go even lower.

It is so far outside of the mainstream of thought people haven't registered any deep feelings about it yet.

But as soon as details start getting nailed down the support plummets.

You can try to hand wave it if you want, but 60 points isn't some margin of error thing.

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014


I mean yes, what-ifs are impossible to prove or disprove but let's compare:

A) A candidate who an awful lot of people had serious trust issues with, even people who agreed with their platform

B) A candidate who even people who hate their platform thought was fundamentally honest and genuine

gee

We'll never know how B would have done but A failed miserably

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

He's the dog that caught the car.

Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling



Tir McDohl posted:

You're part of the problem

That may be so, but I'm not seeing how. HRC was held to immense double standards compared to any male politician you can think of, but fortunately Trump provides the most current as well as the most striking example. Her minor issues were suddenly un-loving-believably important and an awful lot of people discovered an awfully strong need for ideological purity and an actually perfect candidate. A woman whose worst crimes were being a career politician and being dumb with online security was regarded as worse than a confessed sexual assaulter, a demonizer of immigrants, of women, of Muslims, of just about everyone under the sun in fact, who promised things both wildly unconstitutional and totally impossible anyway - and lost. Women are held to an incredibly higher standard than men, women who are seeking any sort of power are at an instant disadvantage, and if you sincerely honest-to-god don't think that a candidate identical in every other way except male would have almost certainly got the extra half-million votes in the right states to win, I don't know what to tell you.

Now, if people like me start saying this stuff and then acting like there are no other issues in the Democratic Party then yeah, we'd be a huge problem. There are plenty of other issues that need to be assessed and addressed, and I'm certainly not smart enough to even identify them all, let alone fix them. I don't know how you get Dems out at midterms, or get them enthused about a candidate, or whether and how to unite disparate interests, or what you do now that GOTV seems to be utterly meaningless. We also face an enormous challenge in growing credible candidates for future elections because the intended places in a Clinton administration obviously don't exist. These are all issues which need to be looked at and acted on - but ultimately, I'm confident saying that a man otherwise equal would have been able to get the 150,000~ votes spread across PA, WI, and MI to change the result.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

Great, we can add midtown traffic to the list of stuff that'll be ruined for 4 years.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

PKJC posted:

The second part yes, the first no, I'm not sure why anyone thinks Bernie would have accepted VP nod even if it were offered (which it should have been if it wasn't but I don't remember her shortlist). Like, go be VP and do basically nothing while there was massive uncertainty even in the polling on the prospect of Dems getting to 50 in the Senate and risk someone less progressive ending up in his seat, or hold his seat and try to get ranking chair on a committee and be able to spend his days trying to actually affect the changes he championed the whole primary. For him to be willing to accept an offer at being VP he would have to believe back in July that a) Hillary right now will absolutely lose, at a time when polling wrong as it ended up being wasn't pointing that direction and b) Bernie being the VP would absolutely turn that around and guarantee her victory. Bernie seems like a confident guy but not an arrogant one.
Hmmm, fair enough and frankly I didn't want Bernie as VP anyway. But, she definitely should have put some progressive on the ticket with her.

AVeryLargeRadish
Aug 19, 2011

I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW HOW TO NOT BE A WEIRD SEXUAL CREEP ABOUT PREPUBESCENT ANIME GIRLS, READ ALL ABOUT IT HERE!!!

"We're so awful."

:same:

fknlo
Jul 6, 2009


Fun Shoe

Fojar38 posted:

He's the dog that caught the car.

I've seen a lot of "how obvious it was that Hillary was going to lose if you'd get out of the echo chamber", but stuff like

quote:

The questions reflect what Mr. Trump’s advisers described as the president-elect’s coming to grips with the fact that his life is about to change radically. They say that Mr. Trump, who was shocked when he won the election

shows that almost loving nobody, not even Trump himself thought he'd win.

e:

quote:

His aides say he has also expressed interest in continuing to hold the large rallies that were a staple of his candidacy. He likes the instant gratification and adulation that the cheering crowds provide, and his aides are discussing how they might accommodate his demand.

Jesus christ

Internet Kraken
Apr 24, 2010

slightly amused

Has anyone told him he's allowed to bring all that tacky golden furniture with him to the White House?

Kilroy posted:

Hmmm, fair enough and frankly I didn't want Bernie as VP anyway. But, she definitely should have put some progressive on the ticket with her.

What was wrong with Kaine's voting record exactly?

Jack2142
Jul 17, 2014

Shitposting in Seattle

Kilroy posted:

Hmmm, fair enough and frankly I didn't want Bernie as VP anyway. But, she definitely should have put some progressive on the ticket with her.

Yeah Kaine seemed like a poor choice no matter how much people tried to hype him up during the convention.

Xae
Jan 19, 2005

FuturePastNow posted:

I mean yes, what-ifs are impossible to prove or disprove but let's compare:

A) A candidate who an awful lot of people had serious trust issues with, even people who agreed with their platform

B) A candidate who even people who hate their platform thought was fundamentally honest and genuine

gee

We'll never know how B would have done but A failed miserably

B) and had huge problems gaining minority votes. And was a socialist, which is still a four letter word in half the country. And was far to the left of most democrats.

Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling



HorseRenoir posted:

I doubt it. Not even counting the amount of differences between the American populace between 1980 and now, Reagan was able to do what he did because he was extremely popular and Trump is not that. He is one of the most unpopular presidential candidates ever and barely won against one of the other most unpopular presidential candidates ever with pitifully low turnout, and even then he couldn't win the popular vote. At least half the country hates him and this is his honeymoon period, his popularity will sink even lower when he inevitably fails to deliver on his impossibly vague and grand promises and the economy tanks. He can try to blame Obama for his failures, but Obama's approval numbers are sky-high and I don't see them falling any time soon.

I'd like to say Trump is going to show us just how low a President's approval rating can go, but why would anything nice ever happen?

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

FuturePastNow posted:

And not to be a bitter Bernie supporter, either, but I'll trust the photos of him marching with Civil Rights protesters over the photos of Hillary interning for the Nixon admin as evidence of who would actually be stronger on race issues

Bernie went on a march. Clinton actually went undercover to enforce brown v. board.

Both were ironically prototypical of their supporters - facebook slacktivist vs. doers.

Stereotype
Apr 24, 2010

College Slice

Xae posted:

Single Payer is one of those issues that polls really well when you talk about it vaguely.

Also if you poll about "nationalizing healthcare" or "federal government takeover of hospitals" you'll see the support go even lower.

It is so far outside of the mainstream of thought people haven't registered any deep feelings about it yet.

But as soon as details start getting nailed down the support plummets.

You can try to hand wave it if you want, but 60 points isn't some margin of error thing.

I disagree, it is more a fear of unknown / communism thing, not really that the more they become acquainted with the idea the more they hate it.

The fact that the name has such a strong impact on its palatability means that no one understands what the hell it is. "Medicare-for-all" is something people like, because they know what Medicare is and it is a Good Thing That Helps People They Know (though they likely don't understand what IT is either). "Socialized medicine" or "National Takeover" are despised because people can only think of rationing and some tall creepy russian doctor with dead eyes covered in blood holding a scalpel as their physician.

If people understood it was "You pay the same as you do now except in your taxes instead of to that company you hate and all your doctors and hospitals and everything else is identical (except that insurance companies are all rolled into one single NHS type federal bureau with less overhead)" maybe they wouldn't be so scared? Probably not. People are stupid.

speng31b
May 8, 2010

Jack2142 posted:

Yeah Kaine seemed like a poor choice no matter how much people tried to hype him up during the convention.

Kaine was fine, if you need your VP to energize your ticket then you're hosed anyhow

Hollismason
Jun 30, 2007
An alright dude.
So it seems that Trump is heavily invested in DAP. Any possibility that his family also has invested a tremendous amount in oil etc.. so when he does remove restrictions he makes millions.


Like what's the return on like a 1 million dollar investment in a company that owns 25% of the DAP? I am not good at finances.

Sharkopath
May 27, 2009

Xae posted:

B) and had huge problems gaining minority votes. And was a socialist, which is still a four letter word in half the country. And was far to the left of most democrats.

I think Bernie could have actually regained the minority vote over time but him starting late in the run and flubbing it out the gate didn't help him.

And then all the scandal coupled with incredibly long lines at many polling stations depressed minority turnout anyways.

Jack2142
Jul 17, 2014

Shitposting in Seattle

Xae posted:

B) and had huge problems gaining minority votes. And was a socialist, which is still a four letter word in half the country. And was far to the left of most democrats.

Didn't we just learn minorities don't matter though?

Seriously though Bernie might not be a smoking gun, but maybe with the backing of the party behind him he would have had alot more resources to reach out beyond his "base"

Jack2142 fucked around with this message at 04:19 on Nov 12, 2016

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

fknlo posted:

Jesus christ

Well the bully pulpit is definitely a thing but lol

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

FuturePastNow posted:

I mean yes, what-ifs are impossible to prove or disprove but let's compare:

A) A candidate who an awful lot of people had serious trust issues with, even people who agreed with their platform

B) A candidate who even people who hate their platform thought was fundamentally honest and genuine

gee

We'll never know how B would have done but A failed miserably

it's only day three and i am already tired of sanders supporters trying to relitigate the 2016 election

Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling



fknlo posted:

shows that almost loving nobody, not even Trump himself thought he'd win.

I don't have it to hand, but y'all see that picture of him on election night right as he wins some big state? His team is going wild (understandably) and he himself looks like his soul has just left his mortal body.

Xae
Jan 19, 2005

Stereotype posted:

I disagree, it is more a fear of unknown / communism thing, not really that the more they become acquainted with the idea the more they hate it.

The fact that the name has such a strong impact on its palatability means that no one understands what the hell it is. "Medicare-for-all" is something people like, because they know what Medicare is and it is a Good Thing That Helps People They Know (though they likely don't understand what IT is either). "Socialized medicine" or "National Takeover" are despised because people can only think of rationing and some tall creepy russian doctor with dead eyes covered in blood holding a scalpel as their physician.

If people understood it was "You pay the same as you do now except in your taxes instead of to that company you hate and all your doctors and hospitals and everything else is identical (except that insurance companies are all rolled into one single NHS type federal bureau with less overhead)" maybe they wouldn't be so scared? Probably not. People are stupid.

Guess what the Republicans, Health Insurers, Drug Company, Hospitals, Device Makers and the AMA are going to be running adds 24/7 calling it?

Democrats are not going to be able to out-market a 3 trillion dollar segment of the economy.

Spacebump
Dec 24, 2003

Dallas Mavericks: Generations

This is hilarious. It will also be something many Republicans will think shouldn't be an issue. (Unless a Democrat did it.)

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Stereotype posted:

I disagree, it is more a fear of unknown / communism thing, not really that the more they become acquainted with the idea the more they hate it.

The fact that the name has such a strong impact on its palatability means that no one understands what the hell it is. "Medicare-for-all" is something people like, because they know what Medicare is and it is a Good Thing That Helps People They Know (though they likely don't understand what IT is either). "Socialized medicine" or "National Takeover" are despised because people can only think of rationing and some tall creepy russian doctor with dead eyes covered in blood holding a scalpel as their physician.

If people understood it was "You pay the same as you do now except in your taxes instead of to that company you hate and all your doctors and hospitals and everything else is identical (except that insurance companies are all rolled into one single NHS type federal bureau with less overhead)" maybe they wouldn't be so scared? Probably not. People are stupid.

Yeah we should just use Medicare for all with healthcare. its considered a right next to guns. Also for everyone engaging Xae, he is just the typical third way person who lost us the election.

Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 04:23 on Nov 12, 2016

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Mnoba posted:

Unless Oprah was calling Trump a racist I imagine.
I don't need Oprah to tell me that, and anyway she isn't saying it.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Mister Adequate posted:

I don't have it to hand, but y'all see that picture of him on election night right as he wins some big state? His team is going wild (understandably) and he himself looks like his soul has just left his mortal body.

I wonder if anyone has told him that he can resign like immediately after taking the oath

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

Jack2142 posted:

Yeah Kaine seemed like a poor choice no matter how much people tried to hype him up during the convention.

Hey he helped Clinton win VA by like 4 votes

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006

haveblue posted:

Great, we can add midtown traffic to the list of stuff that'll be ruined for 4 years.

Does his tower not have a helicopter pad to just marine one into?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Canemacar
Mar 8, 2008

Donald Trump is a troll the likes of which the world has never known before. He actually pulls off the crazy poo poo people say they would do if they ever won the lottery and got their "gently caress you" money. He is the Ken M of politics.

I have to respect that.

  • Locked thread