|
I didn't need a watermark to convince me not to steal them. I think his camera is physically incapable of getting a face in focus.
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:49 |
|
|
quote:After taking on more events this year, I am trying to upgrade my camera to offer better photos of all the events I shoot. Ok, so how about you spend that event money and upgrade your own poo poo oh wait youre doing the events for exposure right?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 17:50
|
|
|
Do not take cell phone shot or any other type of screen shot of the photos on this website. All photos are protected under COPY RIGHT LAWS.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 00:22
|
|
|
murk posted:http://www.mikegoodall.net/portfolio Maybe if he shot less rodeos and more highschool volleyball he could get some kickstarter backers on reddit 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 06:47
|
|
|
I get that typically high school football is a nightmare of bad lighting to shoot in, but jesus christ that front page photo is such a blurry drat mess
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 13:29
|
|
|
It's like he chose the photo to show just exactly how bad he could be at this.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 03:55
|
|
|
You have to admit though, if you were looking for a photographer who could perfectly focus on the right butt cheek of an out-of-frame football player, he's your go-to guy!
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 05:28
|
|
|
DJExile posted:I get that typically high school football is a nightmare of bad lighting to shoot in, but jesus christ that front page photo is such a blurry drat mess If I got useable stuff from a pitch-black night high school football game back in 2008 with a rebel xt and 70-200 f/4 this dude has no excuse.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 14:08
|
|
|
I don't understand how he missed focus and has motion blur in a shot of a little kid walking a horse in midday sunlight. A Rebel on full auto should nail that shot with zero trouble.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 05:54
|
|
|
Hes still got 37 hours and $2443 to go.. might happen. Did you see that for $1000 backers you get: Pledge $1,000 or more 8x10 Prints for 1 year I will send you up to 3 8x10s of yourself from every event I shoot of you until the end of 2017
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 13:26
|
|
|
murk posted:Hes still got 37 hours and $2443 to go.. might happen. Did you see that for $1000 backers you get: well holy poo poo i'm in
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
It almost feels worth the $1 payment that won't ever be taken to give the guy a reality check.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 14:17
|
|
|
guy should have at least used indiegogo or whichever one lets you cash out even if you don't reach your goal he'll never see that $57 lol
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
He also do couples, at weddings. http://mikegoodall.net/weddings/skelton-patterson/skelton-patterson/ui/EH3PRN2PH7-NF7-GJMXP5
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 10:34
|
|
|
erephus posted:He also do couples, at weddings. holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 13:48
|
|
|
What on earth is happening with that guys hair? Did he just bring his camera to friends wedding? A lot of those look like the bride and groom and posing for pictures in a different direction. aricoarena fucked around with this message at 17:29 on Nov 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 16:04
|
|
|
aricoarena posted:What on earth is happening with that guys hair? He genuinely looks like he's wearing a hair net 
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 16:14
|
|
|
He's at the balding stage where he doesn't want to admit to himself that he's balding
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 17:53
|
|
|
Based on some of the other pictures in that album he should have given up that fight about 10 years ago because drat dude, babies come out of the womb with more fuzz than that. Every single one of those photos belongs in this thread too. How desperate would you have to be to pay for garbage like that?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 19:41
|
|
|
My favourite is the one of the groom facing away from the camera, pissing against that tree. The groom's hair isn't really the photog's fault, but slapping that big watermark all over the photos that are out-of-focus or show one or both of the people with a dumb look on their faces is entirely the photog's fault.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
erephus posted:He also do couples, at weddings. "There's something stuck in my teef."
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 20:10
|
|
|
ExecuDork posted:both of the people with a dumb look on their faces is entirely the photog's fault. Naw, those are just candids. The couple will cherish those unscripted moments their entire life! "HAW HAW honey, remember when you looked like you were getting ready to spit at our wedding? That was the best!"
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
That's amazing. You'd think that just by chance you'd eventually get a photo that is both in focus and doesn't have the subject pulling an incredibly awkward face, I feel like this guy is intentionally weeding out any decent shots he accidentally takes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
they're basically tim and eric wedding photos, I'm cringing looking at those
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
Thats the definition of a bowl cut. Not cause they cut his hair with a bowl, his hair looks and is shiny like one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
 Thx old man now i'm triggered too quote:I need funds for camera and lighting equipment, for studio space, and to cover my own living expenses while I work on this project. ofc
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 14:50
|
|
|
I like how putting his name in a search engine doesn't reveal a single photograph attributed to him.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 17:04
|
|
|
Well yeah, he needs camera equipment first A camera is equipment 
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 17:26
|
|
|
  quote:Here is a HDR image I shot at Wellington Point a couple weeks back. Sunset was rather bland, hence why I went the HDR route quote:It's called Extreme HDR, I guess you havent heard of it... A dude pointed out that if it was hdr, he wouldnt be clipping (mitchel is the commenter) quote:Hahaha it's called Extreme HDR, I know there is clipping in there, but love the effect just like many other shooters do
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 15:53
|
|
|
Jesus. That's some kind of self-parody it must be...
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 16:12
|
|
|
I'd like to see a couple of Mitchell's photos to compare them against someone defending those atrocities.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 17:03
|
|
|
HDR dudes page: https://www.facebook.com/fastlanephoto/?pnref=lhc Dude telling him hes an idiots page (mitchel) https://www.facebook.com/pg/MitchellConlanPhotography/posts/?ref=page_internal HDR dude has some bad and weird stuff but he must keep his extreme hdrs somewhere else. underage at the vape shop fucked around with this message at 17:40 on Nov 17, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
they both abuse awful photography gimmicks. mitchel loves to crush his blacks in just about every photo he takes
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 17:50
|
|
|
gently caress. Hdr guy knows a woman at my work, who is very likely to become my boss. I regret calling him out on the fact the effect isnt even consistent in the clouds of the bridge photo. Atleast I held onto the wiked sik burn of I can see why youve been stuck freelancing for the past decade. Trolling dudes in your own city has consequences
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2016 07:45
|
|
|
PASSION passion by Laurek Photography, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2016 21:39
|
|
|
The saddest camera review video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvWZfGF3jCc
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 02:51
|
|
|
YouTube: You.... are watching... Nates... Road... in VA... Homer: Blog... YouTube: Blog... Homer: Yeah, lay it on me, Nate! YouTube: In the review of.... the Homer: Mmmhmm YouTube: Vi.. Homer: Vivitar... YouTube: Vi... Homer: Vivitar... YouTube: ta.. Homer: Vivitar... YouTube: r... Homer: Come on, come on, don't you realize this is costing me money!! YouTube: We must consider... many... things.... The webcam... Homer: D'oh, not the webcam! YouTube: Is listed on the... back Homer: Oow... YouTube: At 3... Homer: 3.1 Megapixels!!! YouTube: point... Homer: D'oh, this is ridiculous!
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
You know he spent like a week pouring through his exhaustive 8 bit music collection to find the perfect clip to pair with his personality and prepare the viewer for what they're about to see.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 15:59
|
|
|
He also has a review of a leather belt on his channel.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 16:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:49 |
|
|
murk posted:
My wife walked in on me laughing and in tears because of that wedding set, then she saw the photos I was laughing at and exclaimed "Why the hell would anybody publish those? They can't be real." So I showed her the whole "professional" site as proof, then had to explain this thread. Apparently we're all assholes for making fun of the guy and we should all feel bad. But I don't.  They are bad photos that somebody potentially paid for, and he should have never posted those in public, especially not in a portfolio.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2016 17:21
|
|
