|
LinYutang posted:
comingafteryouall posted:
This is a dang cult.
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 06:04 |
|
|
you just figured that one out huh
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:19
|
|
|
Al! posted:you just figured that one out huh https://twitter.com/minxiexcx/status/800761553322536960
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:27
|
|
|
I would totally hug Hillary Clinton if I had the chance. I know I'd need a hug right now if I'd hosed up that badly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:28
|
|
|
docbeard posted:I would totally hug Hillary Clinton if I had the chance. I know I'd need a hug right now if I'd hosed up that badly. She doesn't deserve anyone's sympathy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:34
|
|
|
I wouldn't hug Hillary Clinton because I wouldn't want to smell like sulfur for the rest of the day. Maybe a nice little pat on the back.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:39
|
|
|
LinYutang posted:
Hillary is so good at speaking to women and people of color that some were so put off by her awesomeness that they decided to vote for Trump or stay at home.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:40
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:43
|
|
|
 punk rebel ecks posted:Hillary is so good at speaking to women and people of color that some were so put off by her awesomeness that they decided to vote for Trump or stay at home. They were so inspired that their turnout was like half as much as it was for Obama
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 15:59
|
|
|
loquacius posted:
Turnout was great and Hillary did run up the score! In California  (real talk: she is on pace right now to get the same amount of votes as 2012 Obama. It's just they're not where they need to be because gently caress the EC)
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
iospace posted:Turnout was great and Hillary did run up the score! There were ten million more eligible voters today compared to 2012. She's AT least short of 5 million votes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:09
|
|
|
iospace posted:Turnout was great and Hillary did run up the score! She didn't even bother to fight in the areas she should have. Instead she went to area's she'd already run and doubled down on praising creative professionals, taking huge donations for the wealthy, hanging out with Hollywood celebs, and calling people bigots. That's not the fault of the electoral college. That's the fault the candidate and what modern liberalism has become.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
Time to pin all of your lazy hopes and dreams on a court case! https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...omepage%2Fstory quote:Federal judges struck down Wisconsin’s legislative map on Monday as illegally partisan, an unusual ruling that will require the Supreme Court to once again consider whether political gerrymandering violates the Constitution.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:15
|
|
|
In hindsight, I should have known Hillary was going to lose when she said "Trumped Up Trickle Down"
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
Have you guys ever looked at congressional districts around Montgomery AL? Because it's pretty hilarious how they split that 60% black city up with all those squiggly little fingers. Like AL couldn't afford to have a single goddamn dem rep lmao.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
comingafteryouall posted:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Democrats in 2020: maybe this time white women will realize why republicans are racist sexist pigs and vote for us! *wins popular vote by 2.5% and lose EC by 70*
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:20
|
|
|
comingafteryouall posted:Time to pin all of your lazy hopes and dreams on a court case! Can't wait for this SC case to be decided 5-4 in favor of gerrymandering thanks to the keen legal mind of Trump's appointed justice
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:21
|
|
|
theres a will theres moe posted:Have you guys ever looked at congressional districts around Montgomery AL? Because it's pretty hilarious how they split that 60% black city up with all those squiggly little fingers. Like AL couldn't afford to have a single goddamn dem rep lmao. lol 
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:22
|
|
|
comingafteryouall posted:Time to pin all of your lazy hopes and dreams on a court case! lazy fuckers...using the court to challenge an unconstitutional thing...lazy fuckers
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:24
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Can't wait for this SC case to be decided 5-4 in favor of gerrymandering thanks to the keen legal mind of Trump's appointed justice this lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:30
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Can't wait for this SC case to be decided 5-4 in favor of gerrymandering thanks to the keen legal mind of Trump's appointed justice more like a monumental 11-4 decision once Trump finally succeeds where Roosevelt couldn't
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:lazy fuckers...using the court to challenge an unconstitutional thing...lazy fuckers I wasn't saying that about the people bringing the court case.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
Typo posted:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Liberalism can't fail, liberalism can only be failed!
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
Serf posted:more like a monumental 11-4 decision once Trump finally succeeds where Roosevelt couldn't last time the Court changed number of justices was an act of Congress, and the Republicans have the majority they need to do it again lol president trump will appoint scalias replacement and also the next 92 new justices
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
Typo posted:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ did you actually read that article? It was a history piece basically, it was going into how 'feminism' as a blanket isn't actually always a 'sisterhood' and went into the very long history of minority feminist issues being put to the side by the white leadership of other feminist groups. It's not like she's inventing the concept of 'white feminism' being a status quo supporting group. I thought we were all for talking about how that's a problem? Why is it when we talk about the actual people supporting that stuff it's bad?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
Fullhouse posted:last time the Court changed number of justices was an act of Congress, and the Republicans have the majority they need to do it again lol looking forward to Chief Justice Peter Thiel to rule over the courts eternal sustained by the blood of the young who are offered to him during the summer solstice
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:40
|
|
|
peter thiel is going to die of a previously undiscovered blood-borne infection lmao
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:42
|
|
|
Phobophilia posted:peter thiel is going to die of a previously undiscovered blood-borne infection lmao what a blood slut
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:did you actually read that article? It was a history piece basically, it was going into how 'feminism' as a blanket isn't actually always a 'sisterhood' and went into the very long history of minority feminist issues being put to the side by the white leadership of other feminist groups. It's not like she's inventing the concept of 'white feminism' being a status quo supporting group. I thought we were all for talking about how that's a problem? Why is it when we talk about the actual people supporting that stuff it's bad? can we not do this again
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
goblin blood
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
Fullhouse posted:can we not do this again I don't know man, is the thing supposed to be just that someone posts a headline of an article that's a completely accurate look at the history of how the status quo is accepted by minority groups due to people in the majority shutting out other voices and ignoring their issues and then we jerk off about 'identity politics' being terrible?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
Phobophilia posted:peter thiel is going to die of a previously undiscovered blood-borne infection lmao No he'll die when someone cuts off his ring on his finger and throws it into mount doom.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 17:01
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:I don't know man, is the thing supposed to be just that someone posts a headline of an article that's a completely accurate look at the history of how the status quo is accepted by minority groups due to people in the majority shutting out other voices and ignoring their issues and then we jerk off about 'identity politics' being terrible? actually i think economic justice is more important and in fact subsumes social justice SPIN THE WHEEL O DEMOCRAT SAMSARA ONCE MORE
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 17:01
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/801080921181081600 (I'm not supporting neo-liberal poo poo here, but it is a good question)
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 17:02
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:I don't know man, is the thing supposed to be just that someone posts a headline of an article that's a completely accurate look at the history of how the status quo is accepted by minority groups due to people in the majority shutting out other voices and ignoring their issues and then we jerk off about 'identity politics' being terrible? Maybe there's a better way to frame that discussion than saying "White women think white men are their saviors" Like, I dunno, a headline like "Minority Women's Issues Are Still Ignored"
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 17:02
|
|
|
also Thiel's body may die but his black smoke soul is just gonna jump in the first white dude it finds when it bursts forth from his body.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 17:02
|
|
|
Al! posted:actually i think economic justice is more important and in fact subsumes social justice SPIN THE WHEEL O DEMOCRAT SAMSARA ONCE MORE Or you could work towards them both at the same time?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 17:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 06:04 |
|
|
Al! posted:actually i think economic justice is more important and in fact subsumes social justice SPIN THE WHEEL O DEMOCRAT SAMSARA ONCE MORE Economic justice and social justice aren't compatible. You advance social justice by selling off the working class and middle class as fast as possible to corporations and then throwing in with upper class social liberals. And any attempts at economic justice will drive off those upper class social liberals and corporate partners and dilute the minority vote. So choose, either gently caress the middle class and working class, or be a racist/sexist/homophobe.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2016 17:04
|
|