|
XK posted:Hey, FAU. We give you a lot of poo poo in this thread, but I just want to say I think you ended up making the right decisions, and those decisions have earned you respect from me. I feel the same way. FAU: you are right that the forums have to have rules (and that they need to be enforced), and mods should be held to the highest standard. More than anything, you owned up to making mistakes (like appointing an IK) and promptly walked them back. I absolutely respect when someone can publicly admit they were wrong and move on in a positive direction. Especially in the kind of hostile environment you entered.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 02:30 |
|
Ramc posted:My favorite part is the implication that his Expensive Attorneys not only make sure he doesn't break actual laws, but also advise him on SA forums rules Wrong. I made no such implications. The SA rules were obviously written by a complete moron. So they're easy enough to follow. What I mentioned about my attorneys pertains to illegal activities such as doxing.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:44 |
|
Sickening posted:RIP Moma, looks like you are about to be spending :tenbux: soon. It comes from CIG's coffers anyway. Hey reddit, Archive this! ________________$$$$ ______________$$____$$ ______________$$____$$ ______________$$____$$ ______________$$____$$ ______________$$____$$ __________$$$$$$____$$$$$$ ________$$____$$____$$____$$$$ ________$$____$$____$$____$$__$$ $$$$$$__$$____$$____$$____$$____$$ $$____$$$$________________$$____$$ $$______$$______________________$$ __$$____$$______________________$$ ___$$$__$$______________________$$ ____$$__________________________$$ _____$$$________________________$$ ______$$______________________$$$ _______$$$____________________$$ ________$$____________________$$ _________$$$________________$$$ __________$$________________$$ __________$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:44 |
|
D_Smart posted:I believe he has since deleted the post. I have the original bookmarked; and will send it along if you want. MeLKoR posted:Don't ban MoMA for poo poo that happened a year ago, man. No one likes him but no one gave a poo poo back then - otherwise they would have reported it to you - and no one gives a poo poo now.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:45 |
|
peter gabriel posted:MoMA should get a day probation for that belt he bought at the very least He has to live every day for the rest of his life with the knowledge that he kick started, of all things, a loving belt. I think that is punishment enough.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:45 |
|
XK posted:Hey, FAU. We give you a lot of poo poo in this thread, but I just want to say I think you ended up making the right decisions, and those decisions have earned you respect from me. same.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:45 |
|
D_Smart posted:There are NO rules on SA which prohibit what I did. Not a single one. Don't take my word for it though, here, go read all the rule pages quote:Please do not post others' personal information (phone number, addresses, emails, etc.). Try to stay out of other peoples' personal lives as well. Also you have a very dumb definition of doxxing.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:45 |
Ol Cactus Dick posted:He has to live every day for the rest of his life with the knowledge that he kick started, of all things, a loving belt. I think that is punishment enough. Plus he's got the everlasting shame of still having money in Star Citizen.
|
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:47 |
|
lazorexplosion posted:Welcome back Derek, wouldn't be the same without you Agreed. And that's the "line" that I was talking about. However to me, something as serious as doxing is not something that I take lightly.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:46 |
|
peter gabriel posted:Why was I not made aware of these rabbits before now? I have no idea what kind of bunny it is, but it's very cute!
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:47 |
|
Tokamak posted:Also you have a very dumb definition of doxxing. It's what happens when legal is done with it
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:47 |
|
perma-ban moma
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:48 |
|
D_Smart posted:I disagree. Just because Deloria was deserving of it, doesn't make it right. It's a fine line, and I have principles. MeLKoR posted:He should have posted it on his forum/blog and never mention it here. Someone else was bound to find it soon and after spreading a couple of hours on discord the effect would end up being the same. The scammer would be outed and that was the point.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:48 |
|
Wrecked Angle posted:I like this one further down because I love it when shitizens start trying to wrap their head around game mechanics which CIG has obviously given no thought to whatsoever. Some subsumtion (or however you spell it) AI NPC will take over and deliver you to your port of origin. That is of course if it fits in with their line of work and schedule. Three point oh will have this.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:49 |
|
MeLKoR posted:Don't ban MoMA for poo poo that happened a year ago, man. No one likes him but no one gave a poo poo back then - otherwise they would have reported it to you - and no one gives a poo poo now. And that's why I didn't ban him at the time.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:50 |
|
Saint Drogo posted:please everyone keep quoting Derek's latest unreadable tantrum in full, tia D_Smart posted:
yw
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:51 |
|
D_Smart posted:The SA rules were obviously written by a complete moron. So they're easy enough to follow.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:51 |
|
Berious posted:Fuzznot was fine. The thread tolerates much worse in gimmick posting. She deserved that probation but the thread turning on her was lovely. This thread needs drama or it will eat its own for example uncle Derek Are you on drugs or something?
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:52 |
|
I just want to make it clear I did not write the SA rules
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:53 |
|
MeLKoR posted:Don't snatch the reward for putting up with him now that we can almost smell it. When the heat is on the first thing that jello-spined man is doing is melting himself down a drain don't even pretend he'll be here.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:53 |
|
Derek Smart posted:Once you outline the address or location of a person, within which a person can be placed at risk, YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE LAW.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:54 |
|
Tokamak posted:
This would be the part where you show me where I did any of the above. TIP: It's not "my" definition. Maybe take some time to actually read the resources, before engaging fingers to keyboard.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:54 |
|
TheLastRoboKy posted:When the heat is on the first thing that jello-spined man is doing is melting himself down a drain don't even pretend he'll be here. Then I'll mock his coward rear end, I know he'll be reading anyway. God drat, one year listening to his poo poo I better get something out of it in the end. MeLKoR fucked around with this message at 02:59 on Nov 24, 2016 |
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:57 |
|
remember when derek tracked down a literally severely retarded star citizen backer confined to life in a wheelchair and owned him? remember when that other citizen did a threat assessment and within about a minute derek got him fired? remember when moma bragged that he was one of what must be like a thousand people on the planet sad enough to kickstart a loving belt and posted a photo of the belt which was next seen around toast's waist, the same toast who derek said moma was? he is either an employee of cig who genuinely believes cig can do it and shills in his spare time, or he's paid specifically to try and undermine the points in this thread. both are unbelievably pathetic, and living in that reality constitutes sufficient punishment for daring to warlord with the warlord. also, an addendum to the sadness, no one itt even engages him anymore because his thoughts and opinions are of so little worth.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 02:59 |
|
D_Smart posted:This would be the part where you show me where I did any of the above.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:00 |
|
thatguy posted:Proceeds to post the address, name, email, and phone number of someone. We know that some of you are slow, but at the very least, try not to make it so drat obvious. That's why the word "context" exists. And that's why the law makes allowances for "intent" It would have served you well if you had actually bothered to read - and comprehend - the paragraph above what you excerpted. quote:“Doxing“ is a legal term that means revealing “documents” about a person. This can range from revealing the name of a person who uses an alias, but more commonly refers to revealing whatever the person doing it feels will harm, shame, humiliate, endanger, or put the person at some risk. Doxing is a form of stalking or threatening and is illegal under many different federal and state laws, depending on the exact facts and location. TIP: That article is about a FEDERAL employee and is NOT about a regular person. Hence 18 USC § 119 which I also mentioned in my 2013 blog article.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:00 |
|
Saint Drogo posted:please everyone keep quoting Derek's latest unreadable tantrum in full, tia That's part of the fun.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:01 |
|
Marching Powder posted:remember when derek tracked down a literally severely retarded star citizen backer not retarded
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:01 |
|
thatguy posted:You did all of the above. How are you even attempting to argue this? Nice try.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:02 |
|
Marching Powder posted:remember when derek tracked down a literally severely retarded star citizen backer confined to life in a wheelchair and owned him? remember when that other citizen did a threat assessment and within about a minute derek got him fired? Remember when people used proper capitalization? Learn to be a better poster you poo poo rag.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:02 |
|
D_Smart posted:This would be the part where you show me where I did any of the above. Posting someone's facebook is personal info. Making a big post about someone's personal life is 'getting into someone's personal life'. They also have a catch all clause because you aren't the first person to try and rules lawyer this stuff. Even by your own definition it is still doxxing, as you are posting their information to intimidate them.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:02 |
|
Hell wasn't that's him in the wheelchair part of why the thread came under scrutiny in the first placeFactsAreUseless posted:Link? In PMs, for preference. It does look like he deleted his post which is probably for the best, because even though everybody (including derek) let it slide at the time, it was not okay.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:03 |
|
I already know what MoMA is going to say when the souffle fails to rise, its gonna be alot of "I never claimed to know whether this would work out or not but at least I was open-minded about it" and "I was happy to take the risk going in " etc. The only good meltdowns are going to be the ones we poach from citizens in their native environment. moma is going to completely deprive us of his inner-meltdown out of spite. The only way to get entertainment out of him is forcing him to put skin in the game with a mod-challenge.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:03 |
|
MeLKoR posted:I'd suggest someone pay to have his account reinstated but I doubt he'd return anyway. Good thing I didn't
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:04 |
|
Wow Derek came back into the thread full force and doesn't seem to lifting off the gas, this should go well
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:04 |
|
D_Smart posted:I disagree. Just because Deloria was deserving of it, doesn't make it right. It's a fine line, and I have principles. We all know Derek. Warlord is going to warlord. We love you because you're the type of person who would do what you did. This thread wouldn't be the same without you. Great to have you back.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:04 |
|
c'mon guys how can you say threatening to call some kid in a wheelchair's dad in his home state could be interpreted as trying to intimidate someone?
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:04 |
|
Oh, yeah, also, keep MoMA. That post is ancient history by now, and he's settled in pretty well.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:05 |
|
What a delightful tapestry of characters this thread is, long may it thrive
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:06 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 02:30 |
|
Tokamak posted:Posting someone's facebook is personal info. Making a big post about someone's personal life is 'getting into someone's personal life'. Pointing out that the Facebook page of the Nigerian Prince is not in fact a Nigerian Prince is not doxxing the nigerian dude running the scam.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2016 03:08 |