|
I wish they'd keep their "what people are saying about Chapo" segment at the end of the show rather than opening with it. It's all still good, I just like the real content up front.
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 11:17 |
|
|
Whats the episode where they make fun of arthur chu
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
Cornflakes posted:"fake plastic trees is about the war on christmas" Nice name. It'd be a shame if someone were to... https://twitter.com/bakedalaska/status/804118016778612736 cuck it. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/failsons-of-weimar-america/ Also I skimmed the article and it's just another variation of "you see, the problem is the culure."
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 06:18
|
|
|
Mods change my name to poison gmo cereal
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
gentle pete posted:Whats the episode where they make fun of arthur chu Ep 20, during the opener.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 06:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 06:37
|
|
|
The Narrator posted:The saga reaches its next predictable phase Slapnuts are at it again
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 06:44
|
|
|
patton is whipping from A. Wyatt Mann Nazi to Maoist Red Guard in a matter of days. horseshoe theory is real
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 06:45
|
|
|
im also permabanned poster radiumstomper88 >_>
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 09:17
|
|
|
Rhesus Pieces posted:Same. I think anyone who follows or has ever interacted with the Chapo boys is automatically blocked by Chu. Nope, I bet it's somehow gamergate related, I follow a lot of people that make fun of brave gamers on the frontlines.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 09:56
|
|
|
"give your money to women" isn't strict findom, it's more like a kind of individually motivated gender reparations program proposed by multiple grifters on twitter, based on a weird twisting of silvia federici's writing about uncompensated and unrecognized women's work as the basis of capitalism to be about sending women money as a kind of wokeness indulgence. more here: https://medium.com/@ericawest/give-women-your-money-radical-feminism-in-an-age-of-choice-2d4a0bb40dae#.aag2kmn2b i'm personally a little bit skeptical of anyone who doesn't read federici &c. arguing for a radically redefined definition of "labour" to include gender-role-specific tasks like housework or child-rearing as arguing for a specific radical change to force a new understanding of what a "working class" consists of, to brute-force gender pay equity, and to liberate women from the concept of marriage and romantic relations as a means to achieve some kind of financial security. the ultimate goal is a destruction of traditional patriarchal gendered relations and a restructuring of labour relations under capitalism in order to create *university degree guy cough* a dialectic that's more likely to resolve in the end of the capitalist order and achievment of an autonomous marxist society. or something like that. i'm not an expert. anyway it's pretty clear that that's not what the GYMTW thing is about, and the only thing in that erica west piece that's really a bit shocking to me is the odd question at the end that's like "what on earth would this program look like, and who'd pay for it? the state? individual men?" federici explicitly states, several times, that the point isn't that women would then proceed to get paid but specifically that they could refuse the pay and thus the work, forcing a total reworking of gender relations. i have my own problems with this too, again, personally (i think it's based pretty heavily on antiquated gender roles [irony racism: ey, that's italy for ya, spicy meataball]; i i tend to think that outside of a workplace environment where your emotions are your surplus labour the idea of "emotional labour" is often rendered pretty slippery in a way i suspect is mostly designed to work as a nuclear button for arguments; i think the idea of replicating labour relations in the home so that women can, on an individual or Spike Lee's Chi-raq style basis, go on vagina strike is faulty because it just creates a smaller, specific labour market subject to the same kinds of inequalities we see in capital writ large), but i could probably be pretty easily convinced to not have those problems any more with the right arguments. especially since federici's argument is a hell of a lot more focused on the endgame of a more just and equal society in a marxist tradition than tricking guys in warby parker glasses into saying "So sorry on behalf of all men for the emotional labour you faced online today" while paypalling you $50 to help fund you tweeting about how palestine isn't a real instance of settler colonialism because zion was there the whole time https://twitter.com/chiefelk/status/654881575906050048
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 10:23
|
|
|
the short version of that post is that "give your money to women" isn't even a proper sexual findom thing, it's just about as pure a grift as you can run on gullible twitter performative wokeness people
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 10:29
|
|
|
you've got a way better handle on it than I do, but even still, I'm pretty sure that many of the woke performance artists of Twitter are getting chubs when they send money to Chief Elk while apologizing profusely.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 10:33
|
|
|
those people have a priapism because some part of their brains severely misunderstands the contextual use of the words "gently caress white guys" here's a good interview with silvia federici btw... she's very smart and has, like i said, a pretty contiguous political program https://viewpointmag.com/2015/04/15/witchtales-an-interview-with-silvia-federici/
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 10:36
|
|
|
The stuff about uncompensated housework kind of sounds like the "Wages for Housework" movement by Selma James in 1970's Italy, except with a white guilt paypal angle. hoo boy, those tweets though... you'd think a self-described indigenous rights activist would have sympathy for a people forced and displaced from their homes and corralled into meager encampments by a military power who claims it's their divine right to do so.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 10:50
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:Brings back memories~~ this guy looks like dark felix 
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 11:04
|
|
|
VStraken posted:Anybody recall/got links to Matt's quote about civility politics? It was pretty early on (somewhere around the first ten eps) and I think there was at least a tweet or article somewhere that quoted him, and it sounded something along the lines of "we live in a crumbling empire on a dying planet, a politics of civility is neither productive nor meaningful" I think he was quoting Amber's article The Necessity of Political Vulgarity.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 11:39
|
|
|
I was not prepared for that flawless David Frum burn/Gaetan Dugas reference in episode 22.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 11:53
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:The stuff about uncompensated housework kind of sounds like the "Wages for Housework" movement by Selma James in 1970's Italy, except with a white guilt paypal angle. Lauren Chief Elk has made tweets making some arguments against miscegenation so she's not all there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 12:53
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:The stuff about uncompensated housework kind of sounds like the "Wages for Housework" movement by Selma James in 1970's Italy, except with a white guilt paypal angle. Yeah, same movement. James and Federici worked on it together in Italy iirc. quote:hoo boy, those tweets though... you'd think a self-described indigenous rights activist would have sympathy for a people forced and displaced from their homes and corralled into meager encampments by a military power who claims it's their divine right to do so. twitter poisons people's minds and embiggens the boldest frauds
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:26
|
|
|
blamegame posted:im also permabanned poster radiumstomper88 >_> #lifemustgoon
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:47
|
|
|
Brinstar Brew posted:this guy looks like dark felix Buddy,
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:01
|
|
|
I Before E posted:Buddy, lol, is it actually felix?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
you: the guy she told you not to worry about :
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:46
|
|
|
Brinstar Brew posted:lol, is it actually felix? Yep
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
https://newrepublic.com/article/139092/jamie-raskin-fierce-funny-message-dispirited-democrats "They can put Goldman Sachs back in charge of the Treasure Department, but we are still here. They can try to dismantle the EPA, but we are still here. They can put a fox in charge of every hen house—they can put the Joker, the Riddler, and the Penguin in charge of Gotham City—but we are still here, and we’re not going anywhere." [Patton Oswald must have ghost written that part.] “America is a good country. We are not a racist country. We are not an alt-right country... The alt-right is alt-wrong, but the USA is all right.”
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
here I thought more people woulda at least had their memories jogged by emoprog but hey that just mean they're getting out there
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 20:13
|
|
|
Brinstar Brew posted:you: to be fair there are tons of dudes out there that rock the Chechen gangster look, it's an easy mistake to make.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
Brinstar Brew posted:this guy looks like dark felix That's Roosh V, idiot.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:19
|
|
|
Am I the only one who's really enjoying Patton Oswalts hard left turn towards complete socialism?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
If Kurt sees a swear or cuss he will instantly implode https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/804431630307717120
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
Al-Saqr posted:Am I the only one who's really enjoying Patton Oswalts hard left turn towards complete socialism? I'm seeing a growing number of dems on twitter who weren't Hillary diehards who are waking up and coming around after the election. Its definitely enough of a shakeup to change peoples minds.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
Al-Saqr posted:Am I the only one who's really enjoying Patton Oswalts hard left turn towards complete socialism? Was it Will who mentioned the choice between socialism and barbarism on the election postmortem? That phrase stuck with me and I'm seeing that thought go around in liberal circles on Twitter. Granted there still are Hillary diehards but I'm not seeing as much of it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/deep_beige/status/804440122959810561 Eichenwald is great because he treats his twitter profile pic like tinder
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/311366/bubba-love-sponge-may-have-general-petraeus-sex-tape/
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
what a weird loving country this is, that the fulcrum upon which history pivots is a guy named "Bubba the Love Sponge." he probably has a tape of Obama admitting that he was born in Kenya.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Jesus Christ, Mad Dog Mattis is gonna be Secretary of Defense.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
lmao https://twitter.com/dongoehubaire/status/804443461827051521 https://twitter.com/dongoehubaire/status/804443601182789632
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
They need to do way to instein mothers that no vote Hilly https://twitter.com/kcgreenn/status/804487260758560768 Sushi in Yiddish fucked around with this message at 01:51 on Dec 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 11:17 |
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:https://twitter.com/deep_beige/status/804440122959810561 Hahhaa holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 00:47
|
|