|
bows1 posted:Best 3D movies? I liked Hugo and Avatar. The Adventures of Tin Tin is really good.
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 12:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 18:41 |
|
|
The Great Gatsby used it pretty well, and I thought Prometheus also really stood out for good 3-D photography (and managing to be dimly lit without being too dark to see clearly.)
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
All of the Laika movies have terrific 3d. It really added to the experience in Coraline.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
This is my 4000th obligatory Coraline post, still the best use of modern 3D almost a decade later.Enos Cabell posted:All of the Laika movies have terrific 3d. It really added to the experience in Coraline. edit: lol drat scooped for not f5ing
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 21:06
|
|
|
DeimosRising posted:This is my 4000th obligatory Coraline post, still the best use of modern 3D almost a decade later.  Coraline is the one movie that really makes me want to buy a 3dtv.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
Say what you will about 3d in post, but Jurassic Park is the best 3d movie I've seen and I've seen most of them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 21:41
|
|
|
regulargonzalez posted:Say what you will about 3d in post, but Jurassic Park is the best 3d movie I've seen and I've seen most of them. It's still an absolute travesty that the utterly gorgeous new transfer of the film that was done for the 3D Blu-ray release is only available on that 3D Blu-ray. C'mon, Universal, you fuckers, put that onto a normal Blu-ray for the rest of us.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
Timby posted:It's still an absolute travesty that the utterly gorgeous new transfer of the film that was done for the 3D Blu-ray release is only available on that 3D Blu-ray. C'mon, Universal, you fuckers, put that onto a normal Blu-ray for the rest of us. Out of curiosity, is it possible to 1) play a 3d Blu ray disc in a regular Blu ray player? 2) choose not to have a 3d Blu ray disc play back in 3d? I honestly have no idea.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2016 07:50
|
|
|
regulargonzalez posted:Out of curiosity, is it possible to Yes on 2, no on 1. You also need a TV that does 3D. I appreciate the attempt to finally make 3D work in a home format but it's a little too costly.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2016 09:07
|
|
|
It's also just not that awesome outside of huge cinema sized screens. I dig that my TV has it, but I can't see me using it that often. I think the ability to play 2 player games and using offset glasses so you only see your own player is a more interesting use of the tech, but I'm hardly a gamer.
|
|
#
?
Dec 3, 2016 09:40
|
|
|
ive never seen fast and furious do i just start from movei 1 and jump in
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2016 18:14
|
|
|
Empress Brosephine posted:ive never seen fast and furious do i just start from movei 1 and jump in You have to at least see 1 to get the lay of the land but 2-4 are up to you depending on how much you want to understand all the back story and relationships before 5. Originally I only saw 1-2 in theatres and then when I got back into the series with 5 I didn't feel like I had really missed out (but I did end up seeking out 3 & 4 eventually).
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2016 18:27
|
|
|
the proper viewing order is 3 1 2 5 7 6 4 you really get an appreciation for the thematic density that way
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2016 18:30
|
|
|
Don't post my phone number dick
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2016 18:32
|
|
|
klondike 5: too fa5t too furiou5
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2016 18:34
|
|
|
thank you for this fast lesson
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2016 19:53
|
|
|
I thought the 3D in Resident Evil Afterlife was pretty cool at times. Jackass 3D and Avatar were awesome in the theater though!
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 04:50
|
|
|
I wish theaters would set up kind of a repertory for 3-D flicks. Home 3D viewing is still way costly and has several drawbacks, so it'd be good to be able to catch stuff I missed like Cave of Forgotten Dreams or Jackass 3-D as they were meant to be seen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
With 4K passive 3D, the only drawback to home 3D is the screen size now at least. And the fact the films rarely seem to go on sale. I don't think they suffer from the darkening that you get in the theater either, which is good.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:With 4K passive 3D, the only drawback to home 3D is the screen size now at least. And the fact the films rarely seem to go on sale. I don't think they suffer from the darkening that you get in the theater either, which is good. I have an active 3D Tv that's 60" and it looks good. But I've only watched two and never thought of it again.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
This is probably a dumb question. If I have never seen the Star Wars movies, what order should I watch the series in? By release date or sequentially?
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 03:37
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:This is probably a dumb question. THX-1138 American Graffiti Star Wars '77 The Empire Strikes Back Raiders of the Lost Ark Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade This way, you see six movies, but you end up seeing six great movies.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 03:42
|
|
|
wrong thread
Tenzarin fucked around with this message at 03:51 on Dec 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 03:48
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:This is probably a dumb question. Release date. My reasons: 1) that's how they were made 2) so that Vader and lightsabers and Yoda and the Force can actually be cool for at least a little while 3) so you understand that Ewan McGregor is doing a biopic-esque impression of someone the entire time and not just acting like that for the sake of it 4) it's great to have an opportunity to see an original work and then see other things that were based off of it, rather than the other way around
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 03:48
|
|
|
Release date times a million. But even better, release date but skip the prequels.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 03:52
|
|
|
Watch 4-6, 7 if you want skip all the prequels ignore anyone who says otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
Maxwell Lord posted:I wish theaters would set up kind of a repertory for 3-D flicks. Home 3D viewing is still way costly and has several drawbacks, so it'd be good to be able to catch stuff I missed like Cave of Forgotten Dreams or Jackass 3-D as they were meant to be seen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 03:55
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:This is probably a dumb question. There is no reason to see the prequels. Watch the original trilogy and if you want more Star Wars watch the one that came out last year and watch the one that comes out next week.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
Dont forget the xmas special.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:Dont forget the xmas special. I thought we'd all made a mutual pack to forget that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 04:16
|
|
|
She didn't grow up watching Star Wars tapes on loop, she probably won't understand why you all hate the prequels. Watch them in release order, and if you really end up liking them then rewatch the original 3 to recontextualize.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 04:49
|
|
|
I make a point of getting drunk at the office Christmas party and then shuffling back to my cube to watch as much of that special as I can manage. I usually get one or two commercial breaks in and then skip to the cartoon before turning it off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 04:52
|
|
|
DeimosRising posted:She didn't grow up watching Star Wars tapes on loop, she probably won't understand why you all hate the prequels. Watch them in release order, and if you really end up liking them then rewatch the original 3 to recontextualize. They just aren't good movies, though. Like, disregarding that they are bad star wars movies and "ruin star wars", they also aren't good movies and aren't enjoyable to watch. I'm not going to ever recommend that anyone watch them. Just like I'm not gonna recommend that anyone should watch Trancers 6. Like if someone said "Snak, I've never seen Trancers, which ones should I watch?" I'd say "Watch the first 5. The star of the franchise said that 4 and 5 should be burned, but watch them anyway for the experience. Don't watch 6."
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
Egbert Souse posted:THX-1138 You missed the ones with Jonathan Ke Quan and Warwick Davis Heightist much?
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Snak posted:They just aren't good movies, though. Like, disregarding that they are bad star wars movies and "ruin star wars", they also aren't good movies and aren't enjoyable to watch. I'm not going to ever recommend that anyone watch them. Just like I'm not gonna recommend that anyone should watch Trancers 6. Like if someone said "Snak, I've never seen Trancers, which ones should I watch?" I'd say "Watch the first 5. The star of the franchise said that 4 and 5 should be burned, but watch them anyway for the experience. Don't watch 6." There are rifftrax for all seven star wars, only 2 or 3 are worth watching without some bitter old guys making fun of them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
syscall girl posted:You missed the ones with Jonathan Ke Quan and Warwick Davis It's evened out. George Lucas' first two movies, the first two Star Wars, and the odd numbered Indys
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 05:26
|
|
|
Just watch em in release order & u can come to your own conclusions about the series like everyone else. Well, except younger ppl who might've only seen the new ones or none at all or only the newest one.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
I support the 4,5,1,2,3,6,7 ordering. I have OCD about watching every episode of things and this way the story makes the most sense, all the twists are maintained, and if you are marathonning them while drinking you'll hit peak drunkenness during the worst of the movies and wake up in the good ones again.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 11:37
|
|
|
6 should go between 5 and 1, no? Unless you really hate Return of the Jedi that much.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 12:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 18:41 |
|
|
No. Watch in release order. For any and every movie/book/tv series.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2016 12:50
|
|
