|
Kalli posted:Releasing Revis ruins their cap right? I think he's set the stage to uh 'gracefully' retire in the offseason to free the Jets from that. They are on the hook for 6M next year for him no matter what and there is ZERO chance he's going to walk away from that. When has Revis ever walked away from a red cent?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:20 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 13:34 |
|
Intruder posted:Ryan "48 on the wonderlic" Fitzpatrick showed his smarts by scamming one last payday out of a team Yeah there's no point in releasing him now unless they need the roster spot.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:22 |
|
fartknocker posted:
You're the best, don't ever let anyone tell you different
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:25 |
|
No Butt Stuff posted:Yeah there's no point in releasing him now unless they need the roster spot. Of course there is a point. Send a message the disgraceful way in which he's playing is not going to be tolerated.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:24 |
|
This press conference on the McKnight case is something else. http://www.katc.com/story/33941581/jpso-to-hold-press-conference-update-on-joe-mcknight-case
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:29 |
|
mcmagic posted:Of course there is a point. Send a message the disgraceful way in which he's playing is not going to be tolerated. If thats the bar then the Jets wouldn't be able to field a team.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:31 |
|
swickles posted:If thats the bar then the Jets wouldn't be able to field a team. There is a difference between bad play and players mailing games in.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:33 |
|
Somehow, someway, the Bears are still in the playoff race
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:35 |
|
mcmagic posted:This press conference on the McKnight case is something else. I tuned in and the first thing I hear is "black on black crime" also "TWO adult males behaved in unacceptable conduct"
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:43 |
|
That rear end in a top hat is going to get away with it isn't he
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:44 |
|
Only Playoff scenarios for 4 teams this week: Cowboys: * Clinch division with a win * First round bye: Win + Seahawks loss or Lions Loss/Tie * #1 seed: Win + both of the above. Seahawks: * Clinch division with win and Cardinals loss or tie * or tie with Cardinals loss Patriots: * Clinch division with win & Dolphins loss or tie * Tie & Dolphins loss * First round bye: Win & Dolphins loss/tie & Steelers loss or tie Raiders: Clinch playoff birth with: * win + Broncos loss or Dolphins loss/tie * Tie + Dolphins loss & Ravens tie/loss OR Steelers tie/loss
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:50 |
|
go go go go ROSCOE! posted:That rear end in a top hat is going to get away with it isn't he Just let deflategate go friend
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:57 |
|
Blarfk posted:First step on the path to an all-white jury acquitting him lol god loving drat it
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:57 |
|
Intruder posted:Ryan "48 on the wonderlic" Fitzpatrick showed his smarts by scamming one last payday out of a team It depends on his contract. If the contract guarantees his salary (which it is for 2016), then he gets paid either way. Lots of guys have per-game salaries, though. If you cut one of those guys, you save their remaining salary against the cap. This money basically becomes rollover credit for next year's cap. Cutting someone mid-season is basically the same as cutting them before June 1st in the following year. Their current bonus/obligations continue to count toward this year's cap, and then the remaining money accelerates onto next year's cap. So there's no financial incentive to cut Revis now, but there could be a coaching reason. He's owned a $2M roster bonus if he's still on the team on the 2nd day of the league year next year, so I strongly doubt he'll remain with the team that long.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 17:58 |
|
Just dropping in to say gently caress Jeff Fisher
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:02 |
|
mcmagic posted:This press conference on the McKnight case is something else. The parish sheriff adjusts his waistline and pulls his pants up further under his enormous gut "I'm sure he didn't mean ta hurt that boyah"
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:08 |
|
The fact that he's only being charged with manslaughter is horseshit.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:13 |
|
Kalli posted:Only Playoff scenarios for 4 teams this week: Geez, I can't believe the Cowboys can already clinch a #1 seed...not that it'll happen because Detroit takes on Chicago, but still. Oh and the McKnight thing is so loving hosed.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:16 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:The fact that he's only being charged with manslaughter is horseshit. I'm surprised he is even being charged with that, considering the obvious and also the fact that Louisiana has that stand your ground law which basically says you have the right to shoot someone for walking towards you in a menacing way
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:17 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:The fact that he's only being charged with manslaughter is horseshit. If the eyewitness reports are true its straight up 2nd degree but honestly, it's better this than what it looked like was happening before.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:24 |
|
Cheap Trick souvenirs posted:If the eyewitness reports are true its straight up 2nd degree but honestly, it's better this than what it looked like was happening before. Yeah, based on the eyewitness report he executed a man who was no longer a threat (if McKnight ever even was a threat).
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:25 |
|
The sad thing is if he wasn't a football player we would have never heard about this and Gasser probably wouldn't have been chargedChichevache posted:(if McKnight ever even was a threat). Uh you saw how black he was right?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:28 |
|
Gynecolojustice posted:I'm surprised he is even being charged with that, considering the obvious and also the fact that Louisiana has that stand your ground law which basically says you have the right to shoot someone for walking towards you in a menacing way Not to cause a giant derail here, but how does this practically work? Could you conceivably just randomly shoot someone and, as long as there were no witnesses around, tell police they were approaching you in a menacing way and get away with it?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:32 |
|
Blarfk posted:Not to cause a giant derail here, but how does this practically work? Could you conceivably just randomly shoot someone and, as long as there were no witnesses around, tell police they were approaching you in a menacing way and get away with it? As long as your victim is Black and you aren't you'd almost certainly get away with it.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:33 |
|
Skwirl posted:As long as your victim is Black and you aren't you'd almost certainly get away with it. Also if you are wealthy and your victim isn't, you will probably beat it
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:35 |
|
In this dude's case he used to work for the sheriff's office or something apparently so I'm shocked he's being charged at all
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:37 |
|
Blarfk posted:Not to cause a giant derail here, but how does this practically work? Could you conceivably just randomly shoot someone and, as long as there were no witnesses around, tell police they were approaching you in a menacing way and get away with it? You do realize you just basically described the Trayvon Martin case, right?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:41 |
|
Intruder posted:In this dude's case he used to work for the sheriff's office or something apparently so I'm shocked he's being charged at all You got it backwards. The guy who raised McKnight used to work for the sheriff's office.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:42 |
|
Intruder posted:In this dude's case he used to work for the sheriff's office or something apparently so I'm shocked he's being charged at all He did? I thought it was McKnight that had the connection to the sheriff's office. Wasn't he raised by someone that used to work for them? Edit: Beaten like this white guy beating the manslaughter charge.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:42 |
|
Jets and San Fran is gonna be the best game of the season just watch
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:42 |
|
whypick1 posted:You do realize you just basically described the Trayvon Martin case, right?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:42 |
|
Kalli posted:Releasing Revis ruins their cap right? I think he's set the stage to uh 'gracefully' retire in the offseason to free the Jets from that. IR - Checking account full
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:44 |
|
Intruder posted:The sad thing is if he wasn't a football player we would have never heard about this and Gasser probably wouldn't have been charged gently caress, and he's Cam Newton black and not Russell Wilson black. Gasser is never going to get a
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:48 |
|
Another hilarious indication of how terrible that Colts roster is :quote:This was Luck's fifth career four-touchdown, zero-interception game, and his first since the season opener against Detroit. He has gone 3-2 in those games, which seems like the most Andrew Luck stat ever. from quick reads
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:49 |
|
Ugh god tff please stop "interpreting" laws
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:49 |
|
quote:'This is not about race,' said a defiant Normand, who banged on his podium multiple times while delivering his remarks, during which he fired off racial and homophobic slurs when describing the way his staff had been attacked by members of the public.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:50 |
|
Amy Pole Her posted:Ugh god tff please stop "interpreting" laws Are you the fin lawyer Crazy (I think you are) and if so what is your take on this, I'd like to see an educated opinion.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:50 |
|
I was only referencing Louisiana stand your ground law, which is different than Florida, and Trayvon Martin. I'm like 99% sure we have an actual criminal defense (or prosecutor) who posts here. I'll let him explain the likely reasons he's being charged with MS. I'm a contracts attorney. From the point of view that you believe the eyewitness account, this looks egregious as poo poo. But I've seen, personally, a few cases that have looked horrible until you read the documents. If no one speaks up I'll pull the court docs, review, and give my opinion.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:54 |
Normand said the witness told 3 different stories in one hour, so he/she doesn't seem to be very reliable. So you can stop talking about the eyewitness now
|
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 13:34 |
|
Lord Waffle Beard posted:Normand said the witness told 3 different stories in one hour, so he/she doesn't seem to be very reliable. So you can stop talking about the eyewitness now No eyewitness is completely reliable and stories change constantly, even when the person isn't lying. A story that never changes and is exactly the same every time is suspicious as gently caress and possibly a lie.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:58 |