|
Kalli posted:Hell, there's Patriots fans who loathe the Bills more then anything. https://twitter.com/RobertKlemko/status/787689419281207296/photo/1
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 14:11 |
|
|
http://506sports.com/nfl.php?yr=2016&wk=14 condolences to whoever's stuck with a cbs late game
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
Parmesan Basil posted:Hmm. Parm Was Right. But nobody listened and now look Where We Are. I hope KC gets blown the gently caress out.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
Vertical Lime posted:http://506sports.com/nfl.php?yr=2016&wk=14 Fuuuuuck
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
go go go go ROSCOE! posted:I think being in the same company as the 2000 Ravens and 2015 Broncos w/r/t that particular stat is a good omen for the Chiefs but that's just me. Parm also thinks he's punishing other people by rooting for the Jags.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
shirts and skins posted:I don't think the Seahawks are doing it this year, Thomas is too important to the defense and the offense isn't good enough to balance out the dropoff on that end. do the cowboys have Dak doing the hold for field goals by any chance
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
BitterAvatar posted:Fuuuuuck Can you livetweet your inevitable psychotic breakdown you get from watching that game for us?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
Good luck, Chiefs. I hope the Raiders win, but if the Chiefs win the division I hope you get the #1 seed over the Pats. Hopefully no major injuries for either team.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LeviDamien/status/806597792323936256 Missing Karl Joseph will really help Alex's deep ball  I think the possibility of two missing DTs really makes the game look a bit easier. Does Osemele have a decent back up?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
go go go go ROSCOE! posted:I think being in the same company as the 2000 Ravens and 2015 Broncos w/r/t that particular stat is a good omen for the Chiefs but that's just me. '85 Bears are in that discussion as far as points too I think I saw. The problem is the way KC is going about it is significantly different from any of those teams. All of those defenses were just suffocating, KC's about the bendiest bend but don't break defense ever.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
KC Fans do you think it's possible you guys cut Smith at the end of the year, swallow some cap money hit, and take a shot on Romo? I've been amusing myself with the possibility because from what I've read it wouldn't be a major hit.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
Cheap Trick souvenirs posted:KC Fans do you think it's possible you guys cut Smith at the end of the year, swallow some cap money hit, and take a shot on Romo? I've been amusing myself with the possibility because from what I've read it wouldn't be a major hit. No. Smith could be gone if there was a decent replacement in the wings, but there isn't. We're not going to sidegrade to broke-rear end Tony Romo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
Good Will Hrunting posted:Nick Perry is out this week, we can finally stop pretending the Packers have a shot at winning, let alone making the playoffs. Counterpoint: Earl Thomas is gone. Green Bay should be able to get some pressure on that Seattle o-line. I think it will be a close game and the Packers win if Rodgers plays the way he has the last month.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:06
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:Does Osemele have a decent back up? Yes, we have a really deep o-line.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
Cheap Trick souvenirs posted:KC Fans do you think it's possible you guys cut Smith at the end of the year, swallow some cap money hit, and take a shot on Romo? I've been amusing myself with the possibility because from what I've read it wouldn't be a major hit. Jay Cutler
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:No. Smith could be gone if there was a decent replacement in the wings, but there isn't. We're not going to sidegrade to broke-rear end Tony Romo. If Romos health was not an issue it would be a major upgrade
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
Cheap Trick souvenirs posted:KC Fans do you think it's possible you guys cut Smith at the end of the year, swallow some cap money hit, and take a shot on Romo? I've been amusing myself with the possibility because from what I've read it wouldn't be a major hit. Andy Reid loves..well he pretty much loves all players from what I can tell. But he's positively glowing about Alex Smith. Dorsey has control over personnel decisions but I'm sure Andy has a lot of input. It's fun to think about but no, it'll never happen. e: Yeah if, and I admit it's a big if, Tony Romo is capable of staying on the field there's absolutely no doubt he's an upgrade, what in the world?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:09
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:Parm also thinks he's punishing other people by rooting for the Jags. Parm is the kind of guy who sees someone change lanes on the highway without signalling, so he tailgates them for several miles waiting for the chance to cut them off in retaliation.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:13
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:e: Yeah if, and I admit it's a big if, Tony Romo is capable of staying on the field there's absolutely no doubt he's an upgrade, what in the world? The big thing for idiots now is insisting that Romo is not good and has never been good because Prescott is also good and Dallas didn't immediately bench him for Romo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
schweens posted:Counterpoint: Earl Thomas is gone. Green Bay should be able to get some pressure on that Seattle o-line. I think it will be a close game and the Packers win if Rodgers plays the way he has the last month. They will get some pressure up front but from the outside there's no way unless Peppers drinks some of Russell's magic water.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
Although it's a small sample size, the difference between Earl Thomas and Steve Terrell at free safety doesn't seem to be as big as the difference between Kam Chancellor and Kelcie McCray at strong safety. Terrell got burned early in his games against TB and Carolina, but settled down afterward. When Kam is out, the defense looks lost, and our TE coverage falls apart. I don't think Seattle is going to fall apart without Earl Thomas - he's a stud, no doubt and will probably be in the HoF someday, but as long as other injuries on defense don't mount, the team can mitigate his loss. I have no idea what to think about the Green Bay game, considering GB seems to be all over the place this year. If it was a few weeks ago, when GB's secondary was basically guys on the street, I'd just say "Wilson to Graham and Baldwin all day" and not worry about it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:21
|
|
|
I agree that in small sample sizes he hasn't looked too Terrellble, but the limited times I've seen him in action previously were very not positive. Maaaaybe three years of Carroll coaching has helped his game. He's going to need it. How mobile is Rodgers right now? How good is the o line? If Terrell can at least be decent, the Hawks are really healthy on front 7 and the pass rush should mitigate the deep threat...except that Rodgers has a knack for taking a few subtle steps away from pressure and nailing you with an off balance dime. Of course, weather conditions may take away the deep threat pretty much entirely so 
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
In 2015 the Chiefs had 0% odds to make the playoffs and they won a playoff game for the first time since 1993. This year they twice have had 1% odds to win the game and won. Get on the bandwagon, this is the 2015 Royals all over again.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:NO MORE hotshot assistant who have no HC experience. They need someone with some level of gravitas. I wouldn't even fire Bowles unless they can get a coach with a proven track record. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:38
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:https://twitter.com/LeviDamien/status/806597792323936256 Playing in Arrowhead, in cold weather, with a good group of players missing vs the Chiefs clean injury report, in a prime time game does not look good for the Raiders That being said: R, B.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
PLEASE
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
seiferguy posted:I have no idea what to think about the Green Bay game, considering GB seems to be all over the place this year. If it was a few weeks ago, when GB's secondary was basically guys on the street, I'd just say "Wilson to Graham and Baldwin all day" and not worry about it. Their secondary is still not good and the only semblance of a pass rush basically disappears when Perry is out. Mike Daniels needs to go full-on Mike Daniels to create any sort of pass rush up front and maybe you'll show him enough attention that somebody else can get home. shirts and skins posted:How mobile is Rodgers right now? How good is the o line? If Terrell can at least be decent, the Hawks are really healthy on front 7 and the pass rush should mitigate the deep threat...except that Rodgers has a knack for taking a few subtle steps away from pressure and nailing you with an off balance dime. Rodgers seemed ok last game - not himself but not as gimpy as other times in his career. The deep threat is negligible and hasn't been part of the Packers game plan all year. If the Packers want to win this game they'll throw short passes in rhythm and run the ball very little. Jared Cook is probably a really favorable matchup for us and I hope to not see Richard Rodgers out there much at all, but Mike loves him for some reason.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
Why would you think he'd be any better than Bowles?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Why would you think he'd be any better than Bowles? Well he's an offensive coach so he'd at least suck in a different fashion. I think Haley could possibly be a pretty decent hire in the right situation. I kinda doubt the Jets are the right situation though. Not indicative of his coaching but I noticed last week he's gone full mountain man with a huge beard.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
I'd love to see Todd Haley and the NYC media together, it would be wonderful viewing
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:Well he's an offensive coach so he'd at least suck in a different fashion. I think Haley could possibly be a pretty decent hire in the right situation. I kinda doubt the Jets are the right situation though. If we're talking about a lateral move I would just as soon give Bowles another year. I think that is what they are going to do too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
I feel like I'm dooming him but after thinking about what jobs are going to open up I kinda like Haley to the Jags. Either he fixes Bortles or we get more gifs, pretty much no way to lose.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:53
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Why would you think he'd be any better than Bowles? Haley came up with the Jets and is a solid offensive guy. His father was a Jets guy. It's not the worst fit to allow him to develop a QB.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
Wherever Haley goes he leaves a trail of well-developed WRs but I dunno how much of a QB guru he is
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 22:56
|
|
|
How many of Haley's issues in Kansas City can you really lay on him, and how much is the result of Bill Belichick's master plan to destroy the AFC West?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
Simplex posted:How many of Haley's issues in Kansas City can you really lay on him, and how much is the result of Bill Belichick's master plan to destroy the AFC West? His GM was Pioli and QB was Cassel
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
Throw The loving Ball
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 23:04
|
|
|
Remember when last week's thread title was the browns can't lose in their bye week? Well, they did https://twitter.com/MaryKayCabot/status/806569615329525766
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
Simplex posted:How many of Haley's issues in Kansas City can you really lay on him, and how much is the result of Bill Belichick's master plan to destroy the AFC West? The man was actually going insane toward the end in KC (well probably, that or Pioli really is as much of a monster as I imagine him to be). He wouldn't talk on the phone because he thought it was bugged, he wouldn't meet with reporters on Chiefs property outside of mandated press conferences. Even assuming he was just paranoid as hell this is the work environment Scott Pioli engendered. Haley did a lot of things wrong in KC (not firing the OC he couldn't get along with his first year until halfway through preseason, installing a man who literally fell asleep during games as a puppet OC later on, etc). But I don't dislike him with anywhere near the passion I dislike Scott Pioli.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 14:11 |
|
|
Grittybeard posted:I feel like I'm dooming him but after thinking about what jobs are going to open up I kinda like Haley to the Jags. I won't touch him after he tainted himself with the Steelers. Jags are far too good for a slimebag like that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 23:13
|
|
