|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:posters in this very forum think its normal for questions like that to be in standard interviews at McAppHouse. the same way you learn everything else in programming: you spend a lot of your time working for free on non-work projects to advance your knowledge because on-the-job training basically isn't a thing or if you don't like getting hosed by the man, get a job where c++ knowledge is useful by not critical. we've had decent luck with hiring people with zero c++ knowledge to work on our obj-c++ and java-with-lots-of--jni-wrappers-for-c++-stuff codebases with the expectation that they'll start with working on things that only require superficially touching the c++ i am always amused in a depressed sort of way at how it seems to be basically guaranteed that the first line of c++ someone writes will contain a memory leak, and the second will contain a gratuitous shared_ptr. sometimes the gratuitous shared_ptr has a memory leak too.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 07:36 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 10:00 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:but then your code won't compile on platforms where CHAR_BIT isn't 8 Even better, uint8_t doesnt share uchars guarantees (allowed to alias, etc), so it might or might not be correct.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 07:51 |
|
got my first internship at an aerospace company this summer, and next semester I'll be starting an undergrad research position doing graphics front ends for big/fat/overweight data visualizations. and I still don't know a loving thing
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 08:09 |
|
when u think about it, does anybody really know anything?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 08:34 |
|
fart simpson posted:when u think about it, does anybody really know anything?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 08:52 |
|
Soricidus posted:maybe they'd have used the word constant if they had meant constant, instead of using a vaguely similar word to indicate a vaguely similar concept? You mean the way that it's nothing to do with the word "Character"? Maybe the word "Const" isn't a shortening of the word "Constant", or maybe it is. I'm tending towards the explanation that involves them being english words rather than completely random series of characters that just happen to coincide with words. Chalks fucked around with this message at 11:47 on Dec 12, 2016 |
# ? Dec 12, 2016 09:37 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:also i published that article, dont doxx me you have a "lead you array" that I think is supposed to be "astray" I'm not a fan of the many parentheticals but I guess medium doesn't have footnotes it's a good article. the overall idea (gender and sex as proxies) deserves to be spread more. your other points ("just trying to help" and "machine learning") are a little weak and I'd either omit them or develop them more (one seems an intractable problem as it's presented, the other doesn't make as strong a case as it, imo, should)
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 11:05 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:but then your code won't compile on platforms where CHAR_BIT isn't 8 yes, please keep your libraries buildable with Zeta-C and Symbolics C
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 11:37 |
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 15:07 |
|
fart simpson posted:when u think about it, does anybody really know anything? no imho
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 15:32 |
|
c tp s: i was just reading about how "CLRS is a great algorithms resource and reference" and i was all "the gently caress is that?" after googling it i realize that i already own it because it was on the list for one of my cs classes but i never even opened it lol
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 17:27 |
|
clrs is really tedious though
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 17:40 |
|
Spent more time than I should've during standup today explaining how terrible wysiwyg editors are and how awful it is to support "paste from word" functionality. So, now I need to find a wysiwyg editor but every single one I look at has something abjectly horrible about it. I don't even know which one to pick.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 18:24 |
|
What the gently caress for
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 19:12 |
|
The one on Wikipedia is not that terrible, although rather slow to start. I recall seeing a draft standard in W3C for one, idk. MrMoo fucked around with this message at 19:38 on Dec 12, 2016 |
# ? Dec 12, 2016 19:36 |
|
c tp s: blocking on IT kill me now
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 19:42 |
|
Symbolic Butt posted:clrs is really tedious though now imagine your prof teaches in the same way the book is written lol
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 19:56 |
|
c tp s: our horrifying shebboleth of a framework can't do anything in a simple and direct way and i am probably going to blow this deadline because the "architects" can't be arsed to answer questions in a timely fashion.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 19:56 |
|
AggressivelyStupid posted:What the gently caress for because product manager wants one and what he wants he gets
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 19:59 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:c tp s: our horrifying shebboleth of a framework can't do anything in a simple and direct way and i am probably going to blow this deadline because the "architects" can't be arsed to answer questions in a timely fashion. I would rather roll my own crypto than my own web framework Eventually every homegrown web framework inevitably does their own crypto anyway
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 20:04 |
|
gonadic io posted:I would rather roll my own crypto than my own web framework both are a bad idea, but at least crypto is fun to write. webdev is soul destroying.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 20:07 |
|
Finster Dexter posted:Spent more time than I should've during standup today explaining how terrible wysiwyg editors are and how awful it is to support "paste from word" functionality. Ive used this one a bunch of times in the past http://ckeditor.com/ Its kinda easy to use and pretty configurable
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 20:28 |
|
Soricidus posted:both are a bad idea, but at least crypto is fun to write. webdev is soul destroying. INTERNET EXPLORER!!!
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 20:45 |
|
Elias_Maluco posted:Ive used this one a bunch of times in the past http://ckeditor.com/ Wow, FckEditor sure cleans up nice
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 21:31 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:c tp s: our horrifying shebboleth of a framework can't do anything in a simple and direct way and i am probably going to blow this deadline because the "architects" can't be arsed to answer questions in a timely fashion. *puts on "well, actually" hat* this word doesn't mean what you think it means
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 22:00 |
|
Sapozhnik posted:*puts on "well, actually" hat* you're thinking of shibboleth. a shebboleth is of course one of the thousandfold spawn of shub-niggurath and an apt comparison for most frameworks.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 22:45 |
|
lmao it's actuallys all the way down.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 22:49 |
|
i've had to use one of their frameworks for something before and really it was a simple as adding an #include and updating my POM. not really that horrifying
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 22:49 |
|
c tp s 2: since the previous status, i have accomplished nothing and gotten no useful answers from anybody. my boss still wants a prototype on friday.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 22:59 |
|
current terrible programmer status: extern char *turds and extern char turds[] are not equivalent
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:12 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:current terrible programmer status: extern char *turds and extern char turds[] are not equivalent c and its descendants are all really good
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:17 |
|
today i got blocked on 3 separate tickets spent the afternoon not doing anything feels good
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:19 |
|
quiggy posted:c and its descendants are all really good now, I know this is intended to be a safe space for terrible programmers and their opinions, but
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:30 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:current terrible programmer status: extern char *turds and extern char turds[] are not equivalent 'course not. one's a pointer and one's an array. that tends to decay to a pointer most of the time. maybe. how could you possibly assume that they are the same thing, especially when adding linkage garbage into the mix? you have no one to blame but yourself
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:32 |
|
lol I thought arrays were literally just syntactic sugar for pointers (which was why bullshit like 1[foo] even works)
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:37 |
|
fun fact: amigados is written in BCPL
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:41 |
|
Bloody posted:lol I thought arrays were literally just syntactic sugar for pointers (which was why bullshit like 1[foo] even works) actually,
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:41 |
|
Bloody posted:lol I thought arrays were literally just syntactic sugar for pointers (which was why bullshit like 1[foo] even works)
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:41 |
|
arrays aren't even syntactic sugar for themselvesC code:
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:45 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 10:00 |
|
i wasted an hour figuring out why my graphics weren't working but once i figured that out it all worked lol now i have interleaved bitplane graphics so i can draw my little 16x16 tiles with one blitter operation instead of 4
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 23:56 |