|
I adore their complete inability to do a single audio/video transition properly.
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 22:30 |
|
|
Can this get any worse?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
The credits for community content flew past at light speed.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
who put holy crap in there dear lord
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
oh my loving god justin behind those two get a screengrab
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
What worries me most is, is no one looking at the twitch comments?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
dot se? isnt that a swedish site then?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Atheist Sunglasses posted:who put holy crap in there someone who is currently being fired
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
MedicineHut posted:loving copy paste please. Greetings Citizen. This past week has been a very busy one, with everyone across the company heads down with the push to get Star Citizen Alpha 2.6 released to you. The help of the Evocati has been invaluable, identifying bugs for us to smash and giving us critical game balance feedback. We had hoped to able to go to Live today but there are still some final UI elements that need to be finished and we still have a few serious bugs being tracked down and fixed. We're circling a PTU candidate which will go to the Evocati later today, and, if this is successful, we will be pushing it out to a wider PTU test over the weekend so we aren’t too far off! If you’re interested in the remaining tasks and how we tracked from last week please visit the project schedule page for a more detailed breakdown. Today is our Holiday Livestream, where we will dive a bit deeper in what’s in 2.6, including showing the bigger Star Marine map in an epic faceoff between our US and EU studios! There’s a huge amount of new functionality and content in 2.6. It represents a good portion of the last 4 months of the work that the entire company has been doing in our main development branch and moves us significantly closer towards 3.0. Star Marine, the dedicated FPS game mode, is the big headline, but we also revamped the whole flight model in Star Citizen. This makes it more accessible for new players, but maintains nuance and complexity for veteran pilots. Eight new ships are flyable in 2.6, including the massive Caterpillar, which is a sight to behold! Arena Commander has been given some love too, with tweaks to the scoring, new pickups and VFX. There is a completely new front-end and UI that improves lobby flow for Arena Commander and Star Marine and introduces the ability to customize loadouts for your character and ships, as well as check out where you stand on the Community leaderboards. Finally, there are quite a few new missions in the mini PU, a ship graveyard to explore and a bar in Grim HEX to hang out in! In anticipation of today's Live Stream, I did want to address one thing that I have been seeing speculation on in the forums: whether or not today's Live Stream will feature the Squadron 42 Vertical Slice. After we made the decision before CitizenCon that the Squadron 42 vertical slice wasn’t ready to be shown publically, we spent some time on reviewing how far off we were and what we wanted to achieve in order to be comfortable showing a full chapter of S42 gameplay. After all the effort we expended for CitizenCon, we didn’t want to spend additional developer time polishing intermediate solutions if it wasn’t going towards the final product. A slick demo isn’t that helpful if it pushes back the finished game, so we decided that the priority should be completing full systems over getting the vertical slice into a showable state. Item 2.0, Subsumption AI, Subsumption Mission System and asynchronous Object Container Streaming are all core systems that will power Squadron 42. In addition, there is some significant low level animation and lighting tech that we need to finish up to realize the goal of real time player interactions and conversations at a level that would previously only be possible with pre-rendered cinematics. We want moving around and talking to the crew to be as fluid and look as good as pre-rendered cut scenes from other games. Finally, we wanted to be able to focus the team on getting 2.6 out the door and knew we didn’t have much time left in the year to do this (as hard as it is to believe CitizenCon was only 9 weeks ago, which isn’t very long in development terms). One of the lessons we learned from the last CitizenCon was that by attempting to show both the VS and Homestead, we overloaded our pipeline. Even with a team of our size, working on two big deliverables for the same release window becomes problematic because things can take longer or turn out more complicated than expected, and when there are tricky-to-solve bugs or performance issues, we need to assign our top developers, which usually ends up being longer than we like and takes them away from core tech development, pushing back the schedule on later releases. Last year’s release of 2.0 and the 3.0 preview at Gamescom worked so well, because there was a clear priority and everyone came together with a singular focus to deliver them on the ascribed dates. Since CitizenCon we’ve been working towards 2.6 as our priority, with Squadron 42 core tech being second priority, followed by 3.0 development. Almost all Squadron 42 core tech is also needed for 3.0 and the aspects that aren’t, like Networking, have their own team who don’t get distracted by Squadron as it’s a single player game. So while it may be disappointing not to see something this year on Squadron 42, I believe it’s the best choice for the long term good of both Squadron 42 and Star Citizen. It’s critical that we focus on finishing up the core systems we’ve designed to handle the needs of both games, as without them, other parts of the development team are blocked from finalizing key gameplay. It is all of your support and patience that allows us to make difficult decisions like this and we greatly appreciate it as it is allowing us to create what we believe will be a very special set of games in Squadron 42 and Star Citizen. One thing that I think helps to understand the challenges of working on such a big complex project in the open is the visibility into our internal schedules. Sharing the 2.6 schedule was an experiment that a lot of people internally were very worried about but now everyone agrees it was the right move as transparency helps build trust. As such we will be applying the same visibility to 3.0 and ultimately Squadron 42, although it will take a little time to get them ready for public consumption. We are still in the process of finalizing sub tasks and getting updated bids on the tasks from the appropriate team members, and this in turn has been slowed down by their focus on getting 2.6 finished. For now, please join us for the live stream to have some fun with the devs and let’s celebrate all the great stuff we have now in Star Citizen 2.6, as there’s a lot of it! -- Chris Roberts
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
TheLightPurges posted:oh my loving god justin behind those two get a screengrab 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Sound can't escape Ben's gravity!
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
uhhhh what the hell is even happening
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Ok, fell off my chair at how this is falling apart like there ships
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
LastCaress posted:Can this get any worse?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Mute Ben.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
I haven't seen a live Starcitizen stream before, but this is awesome. I am laughing my rear end off
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
This loving stream, holy poo poo this loving stream. WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW MOMA?!
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Ben looking more awful than ever
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
oh my god this is unraveling before our very eyes
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
how could this get even worse
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
A surprise single player release is still a possibility
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
this is a disaster.like even more than usual. and i say that every time. The people with the hot mics are snickering at ben lol ITS SANDI
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
lol people trusted these idiots with 140 million
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
I thought it couldn't get worse than the CRobbers playing his own game, but here we are.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
please someone be making a full recording of this stream, it is unbelievably terrible even by CIG's standards
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
what the hell happened? did the video cut out and then ben and sandi snickering with her mic still on.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Best loving stream.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
 yep.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
desperately hoping for some hot mic nonsense as clearly the wrong thing is activated
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
jesus gently caress
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnHmskwqCCQ
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
Goodness. The sound problems. I guess you can't be toooo hard on them for the sound, even poo poo like Valve's The International and Riots Invitational had major sound problems. But they fixed that poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
holy poo poo this stream
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
Someone said "scary"
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
Sandi just whispered ben is scary lol. hot mic
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
This is so much better than any of us could have ever dreamed of, outside of Chris and Sandi taking a dump on a huge pile of backer's money.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
It's like ben's in a hostage video and he's about to be beheaded any second, loving hell this is so amateur!
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
mics are hot and you can hear sandi whispering WTF?!
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
Did he eat the mike?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 22:30 |
|
|
you can hear sandi omfg. please say something disrespectful
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2016 20:33
|
|