|
Concerned Citizen posted:he posted her address when he tweeted his proof. of course, lena denies it and says she voted (warning: close-up picture of lena below): that's not a very cool nor good thing to do ED BALLS
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 18:33 |
|
|
i also don't care for lena dunham because who cares about *looks it up* an american actress e: rip
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Btw I tried actually googling "Lena Dunham nails on chalkboard" and the results were all alt-right blogosphere websites You can probably find it by going through Wikileaks Twitter. It also mentions Gloria Steinem.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:44
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Btw I tried actually googling "Lena Dunham nails on chalkboard" and the results were all alt-right blogosphere websites Here you go! Wikileaks posted:Dear Michael,
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:45
|
|
|
Less Lena Dunham (no Lena Dunham), More Danny Glover.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:45
|
|
|
'It's our time. I'm with her.'
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:i also don't care for lena dunham because who cares about *looks it up* an american actor i heard she was a canadian actor but converted so she wouldn't get any of the canadian diseases like dirty twonie shingles the hurty-gurty poutine squirties Gripe Quebecois goose cock
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
loquacius posted:I've gotten in trouble for going on anti-Dunham rants in the past, but it bothers me that we live in a world where Lena Dunham exists, is rich and famous, has fans and a healthy career, is dating a rock star, and still considers herself oppressed I don't care about her being rich, successful, or whatever. It is really easy to just not watch her stuff. What I do care about, and what I think is relevant to this being a dem autopsy thread, is someone like her being pushed as a democratic tastemaker and campaign surrogate. Because her experiences and views are so foreign to the average American that she might as well be from another species. So pushing somebody like her to the forefront reinforces the idea that is already held by a lot of people that the Dems are a party for coastal elites and not the whole country.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
lena dunham makes me believe in crisis actors
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
What I want for the press jockeys to do, if they're so concerned with stopping TRUMP, is to stop reporting on idiocy, and gossip and start doing serious work, and pushing the administration closer to a wall. Only reason I feel so shitposty-NOTHING MATTERS since the eighth is my perception these losers are not up to the task. They're crying on twitter about Hamilton electors, and Bill Clinton being tragically disappointed, or reporting on a celebrity-election thing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:I don't care about her being rich, successful, or whatever. It is really easy to just not watch her stuff. What I do care about, and what I think is relevant to this being a dem autopsy thread, is someone like her being pushed as a democratic tastemaker and campaign surrogate. Because her experiences and views are so foreign to the average American that she might as well be from another species. So pushing somebody like her to the forefront reinforces the idea that is already held by a lot of people that the Dems are a party for coastal elites and not the whole country. From the campaign that thought aligning as closely as possible with banks would make them popular.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:What I want for the press jockeys to do, if they're so concerned with stopping TRUMP, is to stop reporting on idiocy, and gossip and start doing serious work, and pushing the administration closer to a wall. Only reason I feel so shitposty-NOTHING MATTERS since the eighth is my perception these losers are not up to the task. They're crying on twitter about Hamilton electors, and Bill Clinton being tragically disappointed, or reporting on a celebrity-election thing. They're not going to, they're going to keep doing the bad things instead.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:49
|
|
|
Ace of Baes posted:Less Lena Dunham (no Lena Dunham), More Danny Glover. Donald ... (wait for it) ... Glover. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:I don't care about her being rich, successful, or whatever. It is really easy to just not watch her stuff. What I do care about, and what I think is relevant to this being a dem autopsy thread, is someone like her being pushed as a democratic tastemaker and campaign surrogate. Because her experiences and views are so foreign to the average American that she might as well be from another species. So pushing somebody like her to the forefront reinforces the idea that is already held by a lot of people that the Dems are a party for coastal elites and not the whole country. Yeah this election has made me realize more than ever that the unofficial and official surrogates for the Democratic party are utter poo poo, it's a bunch of hopelessly out of touch celebrities that know almost nothing about the lives of everyday Americans. They reinforce all of the bad qualities of the DNC basically by definition because they're rich and will never really care about economic issues which the overwhelming majority of people regardless of race or identity view as their top concern.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
tainted milkbags the Manitoba stripe being a subject people under the queen of england moosejaw moose jaw
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
Thanks!  Anyway "It's our time, I'm with her" is eerily similar to "It's Her Turn" but this would still be a better ad than any Clinton ad I actually saw on TV, unsurprisingly the entire email was ignored completely Thoguh posted:I don't care about her being rich, successful, or whatever. It is really easy to just not watch her stuff. What I do care about, and what I think is relevant to this being a dem autopsy thread, is someone like her being pushed as a democratic tastemaker and campaign surrogate. Because her experiences and views are so foreign to the average American that she might as well be from another species. So pushing somebody like her to the forefront reinforces the idea that is already held by a lot of people that the Dems are a party for coastal elites and not the whole country. Yeah, the fact that people take her seriously for some reason is probably a more important problem, I just personally have issues that she has had pretty much everything handed to her despite a complete lack of talent and still obviously thinks of herself as a victim although I guess that's only really a problem BECAUSE people take her seriously and are enabled by her
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:i'm not surprised that a vice reporter got fired for doxxing somebody Isn't doxxing someone revealing their identity? Or at least publishing something that is ostensibly private? I think it's watering down the term quite a bit if you can doxx public figures using their real names who already have several new articles out about their expensive house. Edit: Like, talking about the homes of celebrities is like normal news media stuff. I don't know the tweet in question but was it like coupled with an encouragement to do something stupid with the info, or as a piece of supporting evidence for the argument actually made? Double Edit: actually nevermind I don't care lol GlyphGryph has issued a correction as of 20:55 on Dec 20, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:the allegation was that she didn't vote in the primary, because tracey looked her up and saw she was registered independent. thus, he concluded that she must not have voted because new york has a closed primary. so the hate boner over a stupid but pretty pointless person is based on one guy's side of a story where he was actually in the wrong. So weird!
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
sensual pantsuit anthem
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
uhc malaise the alberta chafes (denim) the alberta chafes (plaid flannel) the alberta chafes (regular flannel) (rare) canadian pukesgiving
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
In the end Dunham encapsulates liberal lipoprotein, She is rich and successful and is all about virtue signaling rather than action. Like Sam Bee, where rails on racism then practices it herself (segregated schools), Dunman rails on oppression while practicing it herself. Trust fund baby with no job, truly in touch with the oppressed and underprivileged of the United States In the end, she is the Capital of the Hunger Games. Imperialist swine.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
Im gonna doxx Donald Trump. His middle initial is J, and hes about to move to 1600 Penn. Ave.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:so the hate boner over a stupid but pretty pointless person is based on one guy's side of a story where he was actually in the wrong. So weird! Shocker that a Hillbot just believes the lies of the elite with zero critical thought.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
oh someone said lena dunham, time to spend the next 5 pages talking about how much we hate her
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Ace of Baes posted:Im gonna doxx Donald Trump. Rude.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:Isn't doxxing someone revealing their identity? Or at least publishing something that is ostensibly private? decent enough point. doxxing would generally be used to describe revealing the identity behind an otherwise completely anonymous persona, so it wouldn't be standard doxxing in itself. the information was still publically available (he looked at voter records) but so is normal doxxing. however, what he did do was reveal her address to a wider range of people (who are generally not very pro-dunham to begin with!), something which nobody should interpret as a "good idea"
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:oh someone said lena dunham, time to spend the next 5 pages talking about how much we hate her this is basically a thread for talking about people we hate also subforum, also parent subforum
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:so the hate boner over a stupid but pretty pointless person is based on one guy's side of a story where he was actually in the wrong. So weird! He wasn't wrong about her not voting in the democratic primary, because she didn't.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:oh someone said lena dunham, time to spend the next 5 pages talking about how much we hate her Is this just the right amount of substantive, do you think?
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
like, hypothetically any schmook with an internet connection could probably find the home address of the owners of comet ping pong*. what makes it harmful is when somebody does it and makes it more widely available, i.e. actively distributes it, to a hostile community *they already got doxxed
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:decent enough point. doxxing would generally be used to describe revealing the identity behind an otherwise completely anonymous persona, so it wouldn't be standard doxxing in itself. the information was still publically available (he looked at voter records) but so is normal doxxing. Imagine being a journalist fired for revealing easily obtained public information. Oh by the way, here are the home addresses for the electors so you can deluge them with death threats.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:oh someone said lena dunham, time to spend the next 5 pages talking about how much we hate her She raped her sister.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:oh someone said lena dunham, time to spend the next 5 pages talking about how much we hate her ive spent the last 15 minutes thinking up canadian diseases like the littlest embolism thicke tongue (rip)
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:oh someone said lena dunham, time to spend the next 5 pages talking about how much we hate her I never would have brought it up if she didn't say something inconceivably stupid and if she was never a surrogate for Hillary, neither of those should have been the case.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
new phone who dis posted:Imagine being a journalist fired for revealing easily obtained public information. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:He wasn't wrong about her not voting in the democratic primary, because she didn't. he was wrong about being fired for telling the truth or whatever victim bullshit he said, he was fired for publishing her address, which is a dick move for a journalist to do.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:so the hate boner over a stupid but pretty pointless person is based on one guy's side of a story where he was actually in the wrong. So weird! Wait what was he wrong about? logikv9 posted:like, hypothetically any schmook with an internet connection could probably find the home address of the owners of comet ping pong*. what makes it harmful is when somebody does it and makes it more widely available, i.e. actively distributes it, to a hostile community poo poo I'm a doxxer I've been distributing and even helping build that DNC elector list.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:oh someone said lena dunham, time to spend the next 5 pages talking about how much we hate her it's not sexism to obsessively research the lives of feminists for any trace of hypocrisy or excess. it's just common sense
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
MaxxBot posted:I never would have brought it up if she didn't say something inconceivably stupid and if she was never a surrogate for Hillary, neither of those should have been the case. If "saying something inconceivably stupid" was a disqualifying characteristic for Hillary surrogate-hood, Bill Clinton would have eliminated himself early on.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 18:33 |
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:Funny or Die I choose death
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2016 21:01
|
|