|
So it's Tetris and Mean Bean Machine mixed together?
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 17:47 |
|
|
BisterdDave posted:So it's Tetris and Mean Bean Machine mixed together?  Even on the same puzzle board sometimes!
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
BisterdDave posted:So it's Tetris and Mean Bean Machine mixed together? I'm in. Looks fun as hell.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 03:36
|
|
|
King of Solomon posted:
Yeah I need this like, yesterday.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 03:39
|
|
|
Alteisen posted:You have no idea what you're talking about, ult gain adjustment would do gently caress all to Mercy, she simply cannot compete with how good Ana and Lucio are. Yeah, actually, I do. Part of the reason that Mercy is weak right now is because at its best her ult was insanely dominating because of how powerful it was and how quickly it charged. They made changes to her ult gain and didn't give her enough meaningful buffs in other areas to compensate. Part of the reason she's hard to buff is because even a minor change to her ult or her damage beam ends up having an incredibly large effect. Ana is dominant right now because Ana was kneejerk-overbuffed during her launch period when people were responding badly to her and the buff ended up making her healing numbers absurdly high. If they nerfed her ammo count or firing rate (two things they buffed) then it would matter a lot more. Lucio is a different story because the sheer utility he provides is so powerful he's never not going to be a must-pick unless they nerf him into uselessness or buff two of the other healing characters so much that somehow their utility eclipses Lucio's. He probably is an overdesigned character but so it goes. ImpAtom fucked around with this message at 03:54 on Dec 29, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 03:43
|
|
|
ShutteredIn posted:Yeah I need this like, yesterday.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 03:59
|
|
|
veni veni veni posted:This War of Mine is really good I don't know why so many people are snubbing it. because its not AAA. thats why. thats it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 04:27
|
|
|
homeless snail posted:You can buy it on Amazon for like $30 yeah i owned an import copy for a while sold it on when i got bored. its very good. not the tetris experience i wanted but great on its own merits as a fusion of two games.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 04:36
|
|
|
Can I still play Overwatch for fun without worrying about meta and balance?
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 06:14
|
|
|
Trillest Parrot posted:Can I still play Overwatch for fun without worrying about meta and balance? nah we don't play games for fun only ones with the best meta and biggest tournament purses
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 06:20
|
|
|
Imo it's fine to be into super-balanced competitive games with THRILLING METAS or whatever but those also tend to be the games I don't like. But if I were into metas I think it'd be kind of fun for there to be ideal teams that shift around over time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 06:59
|
|
|
Trillest Parrot posted:Can I still play Overwatch for fun without worrying about meta and balance? Yeah, absolutely. For like 90% of the playerbase the difference in characters isn't going to be significant enough to really impact things and indeed at different skill levels different characters tend to have strengths. (i.e: Bastion is unplayed at competitive level but still regularly gets PotGs at lower levels because Bastion is easily countered by strong teamwork which lower levels don't have.) Short of being good enough at the game that you're playing with focused teamcomps working together to the best of their ability you can play whoever you want and do fine.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 07:16
|
|
|
I am only level 25, but I don't think I've ever played a quick play match of Overwatch where anyone cared about balance or the meta. If I didn't play Ana 9 games out of 10 would not have a healer. Junkrat-Hanzo-Widowmaker-Bastion-Reaper comps are very, very common
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 07:31
|
|
|
I waited until this sale to finally pick up Inside but what a tremendous game. That final sequence is something else.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 07:39
|
|
|
rabidsquid posted:hey who wins you the game by being on your team in overwatch, i want them free winz boi At launch Lucio was absolutely a free win pick. Don't know about now since I haven't played since launch. 7 hours played as Lucio specifically, 61% win rate.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 08:39
|
|
|
Oh my loving god, its dr robitniks mean bean machine versus tetris. I'm going to buy a ps4pro and use it to play the hottest puzzle games bill clinton's first term
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 09:24
|
|
|
For Honor has a $220 US edition. Yowza. http://m.gamestop.com/product/ps4/games/for-honor-apollyon-collectors-edition-only-at-gamestop/140147 Doing this for new IPs seems a bit hosed.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 12:20
|
|
|
UnfortunateSexFart posted:For Honor has a $220 US edition. Yowza. Not really. Ubisoft seem to think For Honor is going to be their CoD or Overwatch by the way they've been trotting it about. It might do okay if they actually fix what's been wrong in the demo versions shown off thus far, but I really doubt it. You see Collectors Editions for all kinds of games pop up every now and then, not just the big moneymaker franchises. Ni No Kuni got one, Odin Sphere got an amazing one (granted, it is a remake), even Song of the Deep made a 5000-unit set consisting of a free 500-piece puzzle, a metal pin, and some art cards. I still need to take a crack at that puzzle myself, actually  .
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 13:04
|
|
|
You're forgetting the best one, the Dead Island severed zombie lady torso.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 13:13
|
|
|
Sakurazuka posted:You're forgetting the best one, the Dead Island severed zombie lady torso. Of course, who could forget that fine collector's piece  . I'd mention The Last Guardian's as well, but let's be honest; everyone's been eyeing that game since it was first announced and they were gonna sell regardless.Incidentally the Trico statue is gorgeous as hell.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 13:15
|
|
|
Friendly reminder to not buy Ubisoft games at launch.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 13:59
|
|
|
Tensokuu posted:Friendly reminder to not buy Ubisoft games.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 14:05
|
|
|
I'll buy anything I like. Not For Honour though it looks eh
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 14:09
|
|
|
I preordered The Division with Season Pass and that turned out to be a really good idea (eventually) so gonna preorder more Ubisoft games imo
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 14:18
|
|
|
I wish i could be so thrilled by mediocrity that playing The Division, much less pre ordering it seemed like even an acceptable use of my time and money
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 14:51
|
|
|
Overwatch is amazing. I don't understand the love for 1 hit kill twitch shooters like Call of Duty, Battlefield, and TitanFall, all three of those games are exactly the same as each other.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:05
|
|
|
Unlike Overwatch where you get stunned so often it might as well be one hit kill.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:08
|
|
|
The division really wasn't a bad game. The loot grind aspect was bad.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:09
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:Overwatch is amazing. I don't understand the love for 1 hit kill twitch shooters like Call of Duty, Battlefield, and TitanFall, all three of those games are exactly the same as each other. I feel the same way even though I think you are being a bit dismissive. Titanfall has fantastic movement mechanics (and huge robots), Battlefield has large scale battles and the historical setting and CoD has the space thing going for it as well as massive brand recognition. Overwatch is miles more fun though and oozes style and personality in a way those other 3 just can't match.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:13
|
|
|
veni veni veni posted:The division really wasn't a bad game. The loot grind aspect was bad. If they hadn't made that boneheaded decision I would've got into the game way more than I did, but my brother played it for a week first and that hosed us.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:15
|
|
|
What I really like about the current version of the Division is that the loot grind is more reasonable now and the gameworld scales to your gear level. In addition to this is that you do not need to do group content or buy the DLC in order to get the highest gear score, just simply playing the game on your own, running missions, or killing enemies around the city will get you upgrades at a reasonable pace.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:17
|
|
|
I personally would have just rather had it not be a loot game because the genre is trash. It would have been an allright co op shooter.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:42
|
|
|
loot games are good
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:43
|
|
|
I don't get them. They feel like the definition of insanity.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
pick up the loot. if it's better than what you have, use it. if not, sell it that's it
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 16:00
|
|
|
The appeal of a loot game is the bigger number and cooler looking gear, the end. If you're not about that compulsion loop that's cool they're not for everyone. The Division at launch went from a really good shooter with great skill synergy in co-op while levelling up to a mess of idiotic design decisions at max level. It also has a unique post-disaster response setting where the FEMA analogue came in, had to leave, and now it's just chaos. It's legit good now and the latest dlc is a really good single life hard mode where you have to survive resource scarcity, the cold, and enemies.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 16:06
|
|
|
They are so absolutely mindless though. Let's do the same thing over and over to get an item that is the same thing I already have except the numbers are bigger so now I can repeat the same content ive already done at a "harder" difficulty". It's such lazy game design. Edit: not that it isn't fine if you enjoy it. I just feel like I'm losing my minds playing them. veni veni veni fucked around with this message at 16:09 on Dec 29, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 16:07
|
|
|
Loot games are fun when they are accessible. It sucks when you play late and the grind for better gear is long and tedious.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 16:09
|
|
|
Yeah, uh, the loot grind in the Division is basically dead as things stand. While you won't get a poopsock optimal build going, a couple of hours can see you fully kitted out - at that point you're just playing the game like you would any other.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 16:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 17:47 |
|
|
Yeah but, why not just make well designed encounters instead of relying on tacking bigger numbers to everything?
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 16:16
|
|