|
loquacius posted:Which stereotype is the third guy back, I zoomed all the way in and I still can't make it out Jewish/British, maybe?
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 05:28 |
|
|
loquacius posted:Which stereotype is the third guy back, I zoomed all the way in and I still can't make it out
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:36
|
|
|
jBrereton posted:Yeah it's great when working people die, because they sometimes don't vote for a candidate who wants to destroy their jobs lol. Yeah dude. It's almost like I realized how loving horrible the thought was in my head. lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
quote:The second thing is that there’s a religious illiteracy problem in the Democratic Party. It’s tied to the demographics of the country: More 20- and 30-year-olds are taking positions of power in the Democratic Party. They grew up in parts of the country where navigating religion was not important socially and not important to their political careers. This is very different from, like, James Carville in Louisiana in the ’80s. James Carville is not the most religious guy, but he gets religious people—if you didn’t get religious people running Democratic campaigns in the South in the ’80s, you wouldn’t win. lol @ u idiots the democratic party is seriously gonna get owned lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:the democratic party is seriously gonna get owned lol  it already did
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
jBrereton posted:French, learn to blow up the image jeeze No frenchman could have a mustache like that!
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:lol @ u idiots they act like young people have never met/are friends with heavily religious people at school or work before 
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
Mariana Horchata posted:part of me just wants to eat chicken and waffles until i drop dead  
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:46
|
|
|
docbeard posted:What was the argument, out of curiosity? It was a share of a post from Perez's campaign's FB page, which I almost linked before discovering the only share on it is from my facebook friend lol It was basically a list of his accomplishments in the justice department
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:48
|
|
|
Never
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:50
|
|
|
Posting
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:50
|
|
|
tbf his time at the civil right's division was pretty impressive considering the smoking wasteland it was under GWB (and will be under Trump)
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:50
|
|
|
i think it is true that the democratic party's professional class is very heavily dominated by 20 to 30-somethings from an urban area on the coast. our staff should be as diverse as the electorate we want to capture, and not just in a racial sense. that said, there is no silver bullet and i don't think "religious illiteracy" is some sort of major obstacle.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:52
|
|
|
The Justice Department did Good Things under Holder e: also lots of Bad Things
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:53
|
|
|
zegermans posted:The Justice Department did Good Things under Holder counterpoint: nothing good has ever happened, and nothing good will ever happen
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:54
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:counterpoint: nothing good has ever happened, and nothing good will ever happen https://twitter.com/dril/status/473265809079693312?lang=en
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
Insanely good
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
etalian posted:It's amazing how many people in the South are fat. what's more amazing is that even in the skinniest states, 1 in 5 adults are still fat
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 18:08
|
|
|
Holder owned the poo poo out of a DEA agent lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
Shinjobi posted:Apparently a mine shaft collapsed today, and the only thing I could think about was how much I wanted it to happen in the US. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 18:37
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:lol @ u idiots two corthinerians and grab 'em by the pussy have proven beyond a doubt that it doesn't matter how much you suck at religion as long as you can appeal to something else they hold important
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 18:43
|
|
|
Fiction posted:they act like young people have never met/are friends with heavily religious people at school or work before Well young people are getting less and less religious, but you could take that as an argument that navigating religion will be less important as much as one that they'll be bad at it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 18:45
|
|
|
Glazier posted:I always forget Prince was from Minnesota and it tickles me when I hear him talk without putting on his Prince voice. ya doesnt matter how much allure or mystique we have we all came from pretty banal places~
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 18:52
|
|
|
[A decade now into Emperor Trump's reign] "Mommy whats a democrat?" "Jesus christ Sarah what the gently caress is wrong with you are you trying to get me killed??"  *mom covers up child's mouth and suffocates it when a Red Cap Neighborhood Patrol of Unamerican Activity (RCNPUA) comes roll coaling around in their red MAGA trucks mounted with .50 cals and rifle racks in the back past the house*
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 18:56
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:[A decade now into Emperor Trump's reign] *is homeless, living off dumpster food* this isn't so bad *finds closed down waffle house collapses to knees in despair* all is vanity
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
Agean90 posted:*is homeless, living off dumpster food*
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:03
|
|
|
The DNC should set up a site for weekly surveys/polling for everyone who's a registered democrat. It would only make sense considering they based their entire loving election on "poll" data and literally nobody that I know has ever been surveyed. If they're so data centric you'd think they'd want to get as much of it as they could to determine exactly what policies/topics that their base wants their candidates to pursue.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
I'm a registered dem and I got a lot of calls from unknown numbers that I never answered because I owe money all over town but they all stopped after the election so makes me wonder,...
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
Dr_0ctag0n posted:The DNC should set up a site for weekly surveys/polling for everyone who's a registered democrat. It would only make sense considering they based their entire loving election on "poll" data and literally nobody that I know has ever been surveyed. Yeah it's a real great idea for the dems to get policy positions from online polling not like those have ever been hosed with
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:08
|
|
|
jarofpiss posted:I'm a registered dem and I got a lot of calls from unknown numbers that I never answered because I owe money all over town but they all stopped after the election so makes me wonder,... I got a few Bernie phone bank calls during the primary but they were more of people just asking if I knew where to vote
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:09
|
|
|
Fallen Hamprince posted:Yeah it's a real great idea for the dems to get policy positions from online polling not like those have ever been hosed with "Do we really want to make our 2020 campaign slogan 'Hail Satan'?" "The online polling data was very clear."
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
Dr_0ctag0n posted:The DNC should set up a site for weekly surveys/polling for everyone who's a registered democrat. It would only make sense considering they based their entire loving election on "poll" data and literally nobody that I know has ever been surveyed. the dnc does a lot of polls, except they're scientific polls and not dumb online polls.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
Hillary-science polls this past election hopefully won't crop up again
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:13
|
|
|
Fallen Hamprince posted:Yeah it's a real great idea for the dems to get policy positions from online polling not like those have ever been hosed with Yeah let's pull them from landlines, that's a better idea. I just don't see how it would hurt when compared to the bullshit data we went off of this entire election season with hillfolk getting high on farts. If not by online poll/survey then at least call all the people on the register, I know they have my number. Make the polls based on like 100,000 rather than like 1,000 old people who watch MSM and have a land line.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:13
|
|
|
Dr_0ctag0n posted:Yeah let's pull them from landlines, that's a better idea. they poll cell phones as well - it's 2016 - and they work to make sure demographics are balanced. polling 100k people on a regular basis is incredibly impractical. they pull from samples of the voter file using standard statistical techniques.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
New Dem platform:
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:the dnc does a lot of polls, except they're scientific polls and not dumb online polls. If scientific means everyone thinking Clinton had a 90% chance and it fell apart in the last hour to a crushing defeat then maybe it's the dumb poll. Online polls showed that nobody gave a gently caress about Clinton even as far back as the primary and the dems ignored them only to fail.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:Thanks, Sean Hannity. Remember when we elected Obama and that emboldened the terrorists? the lack of a 9/11 scale attack on obama's watch is just proof that he's in league with them 
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:18
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:the dnc does a lot of polls, except they're scientific polls and not dumb online polls. I honestly don't trust anyone in the party to ask the right questions or effectively analyze the data of any sort of real opinion poll built to guide policy. That's something even actual professional social scientists often have trouble doing well. Scientific polling isn't the same as good polling.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 05:28 |
|
|
Dr_0ctag0n posted:If scientific means everyone thinking Clinton had a 90% chance and it fell apart in the last hour to a crushing defeat then maybe it's the dumb poll. or maybe it's that 1. polls are a snapshot in time and have difficulty accounting for late movement and 2. that they have margins of error and there are various assumptions that can result in methodology errors that can't be accounted for. moreover, you're talking about election polling which depends on predicting both vote share and whether or not a person will turnout - very different than attitude surveys. quote:Online polls showed that nobody gave a gently caress about Clinton even as far back as the primary and the dems ignored them only to fail. i think the fact that we don't have presidents bernie sanders and ron paul show that online polls are utterly useless
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 19:21
|
|