|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:Shiretalk: the only reason the Shire was safe was because of centuries of protection by the Rangers. It's not that it is a backwater with no evil, its safety is an artificial creation. All I'm saying is that these shirefolk need to pay their way. Why are we protecting them for nothing? Some people are saying the alliance is obsolete. I don't know. We may have an alliance but what are they doing for us? It could be the worst military alliance in history. These guys are all short pacifists with hairy feet. When did they ever fight for us?
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 17:42 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 03:24 |
Kassad posted:Personally, I like the idea that half of Gandalf's magic is knowing how to make explosives. He's always packing a few homemade hand grenades. That's pretty much what it was in Bored of the Rings.
|
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 20:39 |
Kassad posted:He's always packing a few homemade hand
|
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 21:21 |
|
Nah, the acorns are for when he runs out of bags of gunpowder.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 21:55 |
|
Bendigeidfran posted:New Tolkien biopic's being planned, with the somewhat uncreative name of Middle Earth. Not sure if it'll get off the ground honestly. While I find Tolkien to be a very endearing person and would def. enjoy a good film about him, his estate is a bit...touchy about these things. The way I'd do a biopic is contrast the story of Tolkien and his wife with the story of Beren and Luthien as he's writing it. End it with a shot of the Tolkien's tombstones. Shmaltzy as hell, might get an oscar nod.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 05:58 |
|
Unorthodox but actually well-supported Tolkien theory: How much do you think that at least some of Tolkien's work is a mostly gentle parody of Northern European traditions? I think there is a conflict in Tolkien between the classically trained scholar and Roman Catholic who admired the sophisticated, urban culture of the Mediterranean, and the man who liked the northern countryside and its simple traditions. Even in-universe, Gondor wasn't a "Nordic" civilization, Tolkien described their architecture as "Egyptian", they were located at a Mediterranean latitude, and they were an urbanized civilization. Some of the objection to Aragorn seems to be that he was from the northern wilds, not an urbane Gondorian. And if the Hobbits are "English", then Tolkien seems to both admire them but also think they are lacking in knowledge of higher civilizations.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 16:21 |
A movie where Tolkien grades papers in silence for two hours.
|
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 18:48 |
glowing-fish posted:Unorthodox but actually well-supported Tolkien theory: It wouldn't surprise me if he had a thing for a certain level of archaic civilization—not too primitive, not too advanced. There's a certain romance to the aesthetic of the northern regions (Scandinavian architecture, Beowulfian mead-halls, viking ships, blizzards and snowy mountains, settlements few and far between with dense dark forests full of wolves) that I can easily imagine becoming a particular thing to fetishize above stuff like Rome or Athens or Egypt, purely for its atmosphere and (for him in particular) the way the languages sounded/looked. And given his affinity for the bucolic and the natural, and his implicit defense of the hobbits' ignorance of the outside world (while at the same time having other characters find it scandalous), I can see how his stuff really seems to "live" more comfortably in a world that isn't as advanced as it could be but has a dignity and a purity that other, more modern societies have lost. His whole premise, after all, is that ancient beauty fades away and can never be regained or made pure again no matter how grand the thing you replace it with. That biopic should be interesting if it goes in for a real deep dive on this stuff (unlikely, but who knows). He started out as a Classics scholar, all about Latin and Greek and Romance culture, but then Joseph Wright tutored him at Oxford and turned him on to Gothic and Old English, and the rest is history. Lots of highly personal individual stories to be told in there, I'd imagine.
|
|
# ? Dec 6, 2016 19:16 |
|
Alhazred posted:A movie where Tolkien grades papers in silence for two hours. With the occasional muttered, "Precious."
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 14:22 |
|
glowing-fish posted:Unorthodox but actually well-supported Tolkien theory: Where did he write that their architecture was Egyptian? I'm curious if he's just comparing it in greatness for it's time or in the way it was built. Things I have read though: If Shire folk are inspired by pre-industrial English shires like the one he grew up in, then I think he specifically admires them because they are in a way innocent because they are ignorant (and maybe even proud of it) of the kinds of methods that are used to build things the further east you go. They're innocent and petty, even their size displays them as being childlike. Beyond finishing Saruman's story, The Scouring of The Shire could have been written just to show the obvious fact that you can only protect the innocent from the world for so long. Data Graham posted:His whole premise, after all, is that ancient beauty fades away and can never be regained or made pure again no matter how grand the thing you replace it with. Hadn't read the thread in a while, this is a good sentence though and better than mine.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2016 18:59 |
|
extra stout posted:Where did he write that their architecture was Egyptian? I'm curious if he's just comparing it in greatness for it's time or in the way it was built. http://askmiddlearth.tumblr.com/post/86299381776/egyptians-in-middle-earth Was where I first read that. ETA: This is 17 years old, but someone wrote a long essay about why Middle-Earth is not meant to represent "medieval" Europe. http://middle-earth.xenite.org/2011/08/05/tolkiens-middle-earth-doesnt-look-like-medieval-europe/ glowing-fish fucked around with this message at 01:52 on Dec 19, 2016 |
# ? Dec 19, 2016 01:34 |
|
glowing-fish posted:http://askmiddlearth.tumblr.com/post/86299381776/egyptians-in-middle-earth "In the south Gondor rises to a peak of power, almost reflecting Númenor, and then fades slowly to decayed Middle Age, a kind of proud, venerable, but increasingly impotent Byzantium." - Letter 131 Further, the argument that the Rohirrim are not to bring to mind the Anglo-Saxons, because one is famous for horses and the other famous for ships, is just head-scratching. But I feel like the author has a very restricted sense of what "medieval" means. That Middle-Earth is not Arthurian in the vein of Malory - sure! But it is absolutely meant to evoke historical ideas. Events of Gondor recall the great migrations of peoples, Rohan's poetry calls on Anglo-Saxon themes and diction. "I am historically minded. Middle-earth is not an imaginary world… The theatre of my tale is this earth, the one in which we now live, but the historical period is imaginary." - Letter 183 As for being a "parody" of the North, I can't see it. Tolkien (again in 131) makes it clear that he's interested in constructing a mythology for England, in the vein of the Book of Invasions for Ireland or the Mabinogion for Wales. If you look at Hesiod or Homer or the writer of the Nibelungenlied, there's no parody in them, because before them there's nothing *to* be parodied. Tolkien was laying the foundations for a mythology, and you can't do that on parody or irony. "I was from early days grieved by the poverty of my own beloved country: it had no stories of its own … Do not laugh! But once upon a time (my crest has long since fallen) I had a mind to make a body of more or less connected legend, ranging from the large and cosmogonic, to the level of romantic fairy-story… which I could dedicate simply to: to England; to my country."
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 03:23 |
|
Friar John posted:"In the south Gondor rises to a peak of power, almost reflecting Númenor, and then fades slowly to decayed Middle Age, a kind of proud, venerable, but increasingly impotent Byzantium." - Letter 131 Wonderful! I always got a Siege Of Constantinople In 1453 vibe from Minas Tirith, and it's interesting to see a bit of Tolkien's thoughts on that.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 11:53 |
|
Friar John posted:Second link is factually wrong when it comes to "Tolkien never once conceded a medieval influence." If I could write half so well as even his casual missives...
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 18:30 |
Friar John posted:"I was from early days grieved by the poverty of my own beloved country: it had no stories of its own … Do not laugh! But once upon a time (my crest has long since fallen) I had a mind to make a body of more or less connected legend, ranging from the large and cosmogonic, to the level of romantic fairy-story… which I could dedicate simply to: to England; to my country." Tolkien's attitude along these lines is probably why I grew up without any reflexive suspicion of nationalism. His is just so expansive, so self-effacing, so loving. None of it is chauvinistic or supremacist in any way, he's just taking an aesthetic and dedicating himself to it purely as a matter of personal taste.
|
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 18:35 |
|
Friar John posted:
In Letter 150, Tolkien said: "The toponymy of The Shire... is a 'parody' of that of rural England, in much the same sense are its inhabitants". In the text itself, the hobbits are repeatedly teased for their provincialism and lack of scale, for example, when Gandalf says (I'm reciting from memory) "They will sit on the edge of wreck and ruin and discuss the pleasures of the table and the doings of their relations of the twelfth degree". And externally, Tolkien has confirmed that there is some parody of English provincialism. That isn't to say he didn't love England, but I think there is this tension between the Roman Catholic classical scholar and the man who loved the English country-side.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 23:43 |
|
glowing-fish posted:In Letter 150, Tolkien said: "The toponymy of The Shire... is a 'parody' of that of rural England, in much the same sense are its inhabitants". The Hobbit ability to recover from the horrors of war, to delight in simple things (c.f. Thorin to Bilbo) is carefully balanced between parody and deep admiration for it. Like so much of the legendarium, there's that tension and balance between the extremes, so that provincialism should beware lest it becomes isolationist, much as urbanisation/industrialisation could produce both the glories of Gondor and the horror of Isengard.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:22 |
|
Saruman is also a clear parody of fascist strong men using the radio.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:35 |
|
Overall tho the parody and allegory in lord of the rings is quite spare and incidental and not overall important to the work IMHO. It's not a allegorical work at all.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:37 |
|
euphronius posted:Saruman is also a clear parody of fascist strong men using the radio. wan't he more of a caricature of all crooked politicians
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:40 |
|
Hogge Wild posted:wan't he more of a caricature of all crooked politicians The voice in particular was a reference to radio which was the twitter of its time for fascist populists to rable rouse.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:42 |
|
euphronius posted:The voice in particular was a reference to radio which was the twitter of its time for fascist populists to rable rouse. I thought the seeing stones were supposed to be references to radio? Something that gives you just a hint of the whole story, but enough to draw the wrong conclusions and take hasty action?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:55 |
|
I need to read Tolkien's letters, how do y'all prefer them? e: sp HIJK fucked around with this message at 16:45 on Dec 20, 2016 |
# ? Dec 20, 2016 16:27 |
|
glowing-fish posted:In the text itself, the hobbits are repeatedly teased for their provincialism and lack of scale, for example, when Gandalf says (I'm reciting from memory) "They will sit on the edge of wreck and ruin and discuss the pleasures of the table and the doings of their relations of the twelfth degree". I live to pull up exact quotations. This one is from when Theoden rides up to the gates of Isengard to find it a flooded, ruined wreck guarded by two well-refreshed and smoking hobbits; and Merry and Pippin are intrigued to find out that he seems to have heard of hobbits before. quote:‘For one thing,’ said Théoden, ‘I had not heard that they spouted smoke from their mouths.’ I remember how happy I was when I twigged that Merry was on the point of reciting what would become his own introduction to Herblore of the Shire, as reproduced in the Prologue section 2.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 20:36 |
|
Great article about Tolkien and "Nordicism" with a lot of direct quotes. https://www.tolkiensociety.org/blog/2015/11/taboo-tolkien-the-nordicist-claim-on-middle-earth/ tl, dr: Tolkien didn't like the "Nordic" idea applied to his stories because he found it inaccurate as a linguist, because it didn't match the plot of the story (Gondor is closer to being Italy than anything), and because he didn't like its racist overtones.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2016 16:49 |
|
It's a little late but somebody on Reddit posted this Christmas poem by Tolkein and I thought it was nice.quote:Grim was the world and grey last night:
|
# ? Dec 30, 2016 03:22 |
|
Related, here is a story Tolkien wrote about give-gifting (although for a birthday and not for Christmas):A Young JRR Tolkien posted:"A young man wished to purchase a birthday gift for a lady friend. After much meditation and consideration he decided upon a pair of gloves as being appropriate. As his sister had some shopping to do, he accompanied her to a ladies wearing apparel shop.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2016 16:56 |
|
glowing-fish posted:Related, here is a story Tolkien wrote about give-gifting (although for a birthday and not for Christmas): ᛚᛟᛚ
|
# ? Dec 30, 2016 17:03 |
|
Related to the idea of Tolkien and medievalism, I've been thinking of how much the somewhat homogeneous nature of fantasy art has shaped people's views of Tolkien. Its not like I object to painters like Ted Nasmith, as much as I object to how much that interpretation of Tolkien has become universal and colored people's readings of the original text. This is a great picture, and it doesn't contradict the text. Tirion is empty here because Eärendil reached it during a feast. But this picture also focus on an elvish city being all white, monolithic, military, and generally serious looking. Tirion is described as being built of white, but there is no reason that the elves couldn't have added other colors to the city! It being monolithic seems somewhat reasonable because it was a Noldor city, and the Noldor were a bit more militaristic. But still, based upon what we know about the Elves, how they love beauty, love having fun, and like naturalistic architecture, it seems fair to interpret an Elvish city not as a great big serious fortress, but as an organic collection of buildings, brightly colored, with elves going about their business. Like, we aren't really told about how the economy of Valinor works, but there is no reason Elves might not have "normal jobs", like you could talk through Tirion and there would be shops selling fruit and cookware and tools, and there might be dancers and musicians in the street. So instead of viewing it as SOLID WHITE MARBLE, it seems just as likely to imagine Tirion to look something like Valparaiso, organic, colorful and busy: (Although of course cleaner, and put together with more art than Valparaiso!) glowing-fish fucked around with this message at 19:31 on Dec 31, 2016 |
# ? Dec 31, 2016 19:29 |
i didn't know lisa frank did lotr fan art
|
|
# ? Dec 31, 2016 20:56 |
|
chernobyl kinsman posted:i didn't know lisa frank did lotr fan art That isn't fan art, that is official art, commissioned by the estate. I wouldn't say Lisa Frank if I was going to make a comparison, I would say Thomas Kincade. I mean, better than Kincade, but it has the same type of composition.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2016 22:50 |
|
I think the color of the city is more of an artistic choice to match the sky rather than a photograph of a real place.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2016 22:57 |
Also as much as I love love love Ted Nasmith's architecture and landscape art, he sucks total butt at people. I mean look at how loving big Eärendil is in that, he's like eighteen feet tall
|
|
# ? Jan 1, 2017 04:17 |
|
Growing up, I always preferred Ted Nasmith's realism style of LOTR art over Alan Lee and John Howe's more Impressionist style, but yeesh. That's not a great one. I'm a bit scared of going back to look at his other efforts now, lest my childhood get ruined
|
# ? Jan 1, 2017 23:32 |
I had the 1992 calendar, which was pretty fantastic—even if there was something off-putting about almost all of his characters, the backgrounds and landscapes and buildings were just breathtaking. I had no patience for the impressionistic Lee and Howe stuff when Nasmith art was in the offing: http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Tolkien_-_The_Centenary_Calendar_1992 I mean, look at May from that calendar: and compare it to this other view of Minas Tirith he did around that time; note how the rocks and snowy areas behind the tower are all perfectly rendered from a different angle, which blew my freaking mind: Unfortunately it seemed like everything he did afterwards was comparatively sort of ... like only a fraction of the detail work went into the overall setting, and that made the wonky characters less forgivable.
|
|
# ? Jan 2, 2017 00:47 |
|
Interesting to see that these days he almost exclusively does Game of Thrones fan art, because of course he does
|
# ? Jan 2, 2017 01:49 |
|
When it comes to Middle Earth art these days, my favorite is from an artist over on Deviantart who goes by Turner Mohan, there's a sense of believability to his stuff(but at the same time not held back by "realism" needlessly) while still retaining the inherent fantasy of the setting, especially love the way he draws the Orcs, and he did an absolutely lovely piece for the Blue Wizards
|
# ? Jan 2, 2017 12:35 |
|
I thought the movies were cool.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2017 21:25 |
the movies are fun if completely lacking any hint of subtlety and gratuitously over-the-top w/r/t their many action scenes but that's what happens when you put the guy who did braindead at the helm of your film
|
|
# ? Jan 2, 2017 22:46 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 03:24 |
Well, between him and the guy who made Fritz the Cat
|
|
# ? Jan 2, 2017 23:12 |