Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Blistex
Oct 30, 2003

Macho Business
Donkey Wrestler

Adam Vegas posted:

Personally my favourite aspect of the Great Leap Forward was the drive for iron, whereby peasants were organised into bringing all their pots/pans/other iron utensils to be melted down and used in industrialisation.

Except the vast majority of the items were made from low quality pig iron, and were completely useless in any industrial capacity. Not that the party ever told them that! Just let them continue giving up all their useful items for the good of collectivisation.

Mao.txt

Actually, they were supposed to mine and smelt ore by themselves, and had insane quotas to meet (while also trying to meet farming quotas). So to keep from being punished, they ended up having to melt down anything they had that was metal. So farmers were melting down their shovels and plows, and masons were melting down their barrows and trowels, etc. So due to the fear of not meeting their iron quotas, they were basically crippling all other industries. Naturally, the insane mix of different metals being melted down together in backyard kilns was not a good idea, and any iron they got was essentially useless and had to be taken to a real steel mill to be re-melted and separated.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

who do you think has done more? would china be polluting less had he not ended up in charge?

P-Mack
Nov 10, 2007

I ran into a story of a farmer who snatched a string of extremely rare iron Taiping coins from one of these furnaces and hid them. He revealed them when the Leap was over and was rewarded for saving a priceless piece of revolutionary history, but it was basically a 50/50 chance of getting sent to a camp. Who knows how many valuable artifacts got tossed in next to spoons and old nails and lost forever.

value-brand cereal
May 2, 2008

http://wildaid.org/news/breaking-news-china-announces-domestic-ivory-ban

quote:

BEIJING (30 December 2016) — The end of the world’s largest ivory market was announced today by the Chinese government as it released a detailed timetable for ending its legal ivory trade. Domestic ivory sales will be banned by the end of 2017 with the first batch of factories and traders to close their business by 31 March 2017.

Last year, President Xi Jinping made a public commitment to phasing-out the ivory trade, which may be falling out of favor with Chinese consumers. A recent survey by the conservation group Save the Elephants reported that ivory prices in eight mainland Chinese cities had fallen by half in a two-year period ending December 2015. Anecdotal evidence gathered by WildAid campaigners in China indicates prices may have decreased further this year: Market inquiries in May 2016 found raw ivory prices of around $450 to $900, representing a decrease of 57% to 78% compared with a2014 high of $2,100 per kilogram in mainland China. A ban was first proposed to the National People’s Congress by former NBA star, Yao Ming, who also led documentaries on ivory trade for state broadcaster CCTV in partnership with WildAid.

WildAid CEO Peter Knights said, “China’s exit from the ivory trade is the greatest single step that could be taken to reduce poaching for elephants. We thank President Xi for his leadership and congratulate the State Forestry Administration for this timely plan. We will continue to support their efforts through education and persuading consumers not to buy ivory.”

With China’s announcement, international attention is now shifting to Japan, which voted against all CITES proposals to protect elephants and has insisted its trade is not tainted by illegal ivory. However, a recent report by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) found that the nation’s elephant tusk registration system widely allows for poached tusks smuggled from Africa to be sold legally in the domestic market.

“Japan is the last man standing as a major legal destination for ivory.” Knights said. “If Japan joined the global community on this we could consign the abuses of the ivory trade to history.”

The international commercial ivory trade was banned in 1989, following a decade of out-of-control poaching that decimated African elephant populations from 1.3 million in 1979 to an estimated 609,000 by the late 1980s. As a result of the ban, poaching decreased significantly and ivory prices plummeted. But a "one-off" sale of ivory in 2008 and the legal domestic trade in places such as Hong Kong, China, Thailand, Vietnam and the US have allowed for the laundering of illegal ivory shipments from recently poached elephants.

Why do I get the feeling it's all talk and no action? It would be nice to positively affect elephant poaching though. I also get the feeling they want to shift faceloss to Japan, but that's just me.

Power Khan
Aug 20, 2011

by Fritz the Horse
The collectives were increddible, first farmers are forced into them, they cannot farm any more land than the plots that they get assigned, their ironwares and pots get confiscated and they can only eat in canteens, according to the workpoints that they earn. The state buys grains at such a low price that they have to run up debt to stay alive.

In that other book about the cultural revolution, there's a chapter how the people would subvert the system at the end of the great leap and black markets sprung up. An unskilled worker could make there more money in a day than a farmer made in a month in the collectives at the time we're talking about.

My favourite story is that of a dude who refuses to stray from the party line, he's so destitute that he has to live in a repurposed latrine, has no cloth and is on the verge of starvation.

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

JaucheCharly posted:

My favourite story is that of a dude who refuses to stray from the party line, he's so destitute that he has to live in a repurposed latrine, has no cloth and is on the verge of starvation.

*Pokes head out of latrine hole like Oscar the Grouch* Mao was right!

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

value-brand cereal posted:

Why do I get the feeling it's all talk and no action?

Because it's all talk and no action but good for making idiots think China cares about the environment.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
fojar who is your worst person ever i'm genuinely curious

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Jose posted:

fojar who is your worst person ever i'm genuinely curious

I don't really have one because I'm not sure how you can quantify badness beyond saying "Yep, that person is bad." K/D ratio?

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

Fojar38 posted:

I don't really have one because I'm not sure how you can quantify badness beyond saying "Yep, that person is bad." K/D ratio?

i guess i just look at those beijing pollution photos

Automatic Slim
Jul 1, 2007

pentyne posted:

Mine was how how the insane crop figures kept escalating. Who knows if one province actually had a good year and good local party officials and reported 1000 tons of wheat versus 800 tons the previous year, because once they announced their number suddenly the next province in line started yelling "WE PRODUCED 2000 TONS OF WHEAT" and so on with each place topping the previous reported number and then everyone going back and "adjusting" up their previous statements to try and win the face battle for best province.

This sounds eerily familiar.

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
Actually mao was not like 100% culpable for newly liberated chinese serfs being complete loving idiots

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

Modest Mao posted:

Actually mao was not like 100% culpable for newly liberated chinese serfs being complete loving idiots

this

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
I think an interesting thing about Mao is that he was seen as a moderate in the party, i.e. not that bloodthirsty and not that dogmatic

vanity slug
Jul 20, 2010

i think mao was 70% bad, 30% bad

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Jeoh posted:

i think mao was 70% bad, 30% bad

hmm nah he did good stuff and was less bloodthirsty than rivals

like dengxiaoping lived?? how is possible

he hosed up the country real bad though I guessI just like him pre 1958

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->
mao was actually really bad and a cancer on the human race

his personal success caused agony for millions that will resonate for centuries

Meme Poker Party
Sep 1, 2006

by Azathoth

Fojar38 posted:

mao was actually really bad and a cancer on the human race

Also several races of bird.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->
mao combined the cold indifference of stalin with the jaw-dropping incompetence of hitler and the death tolls of both

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
like americans like their founding fathers even though most had slaves and demanded indian genoicde to make way for white settlers

nation state is based on killing, enslaving, imprisioning, ethnically cleansing what came before but every country likes their own national daddy

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Fojar38 posted:

mao combined the cold indifference of stalin with the jaw-dropping incompetence of hitler and the death tolls of both

lol no

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
god why have you brought me back into this thread do I have to explain this all again

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

tell me more about how mao zedong is basically the same as george washington

Kaiju Cage Match
Nov 5, 2012




My favorite Mao fuckup is the one where he ordered a sparrow extermination campaign because he said the birds were eating crops but WHOOPS it turns out the sparrows ate pests that ate the crops and the pests ate more crops without the sparrows keeping them in check.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Modest Mao posted:

god why have you brought me back into this thread do I have to explain this all again

it is not the threads fault that you have consistently bad and incorrect opinions about chinese governance

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Fojar38 posted:

tell me more about how mao zedong is basically the same as george washington



charismatic leader who needed to be in power in order to hold fledgling country together

Military leader whose brilliant use of guerilla warefare secured victory in a civil war

Mao was more of a political thinker

george washington had slaves and hunted escapees ruthlessly

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Modest Mao posted:

charismatic leader who needed to be in power in order to hold fledgling country together

Military leader whose brilliant use of guerilla warefare secured victory in a civil war

Mao was more of a political thinker

george washington had slaves and hunted escapees ruthlessly

lol

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
americans and I guess western europeans like to say stalin killed more than hitler, mao more than hitler.

Unless you make up some pretty non standard definitions of kill it's just not really in the data

and it's like the most boring 'did u kno' historical trivia as if killing more people than hitler was a sign of anything at all ?

like the nazis on a personal level murdered about 12 million people in labor camps etc not to mention the attempted ethnic cleansing in eastern europe of about 20mil slavs.. How many others did their war machine kill in combat, civilians, etc?


having some extraordinarily bad science inform your agricultural reform campaign compounded with people being incapable of reporting farming yeilds accurately... eh it's not really murder unless you're white dude living in a place that never saw war who just really wants to make a point

Modest Mao fucked around with this message at 00:52 on Jan 4, 2017

Meme Poker Party
Sep 1, 2006

by Azathoth

Modest Mao posted:

Military leader whose brilliant use of guerilla warefare secured victory in a civil war

This is false for both of them lol.

raton
Jul 28, 2003

by FactsAreUseless
Please don't quote Modest Mao if you're going to talk to him in the first place.

If you go by negative impact Genghis Khan was the worst person in history, then Mao, then Stalin, then Hitler. Mao, Stalin and Pol Pot are especially vile because their great crimes were committed against their own people.

If you were to make some kind of XY plot where Y is "amount of harm" and X is "vileness of that harm" and tried to adjust the scales so they made sense Mao's rectangle would have easily half again as much area as the next contender.

Pham Nuwen
Oct 30, 2010



Sheep-Goats posted:

If you were to make some kind of XY plot where Y is "amount of harm" and X is "vileness of that harm" and tried to adjust the scales so they made sense Mao's rectangle would have easily half again as much area as the next contender.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjHORRHXtyI

Ichabod Tane
Oct 30, 2005

A most notable
coward, an infinite and endless liar, an hourly promise breaker, the owner of no one good quality.


https://youtu.be/_Ojd0BdtMBY?t=4
Someone get AO back in this thread, I'm edging real bad

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747

Sheep-Goats posted:

Please don't quote Modest Mao if you're going to talk to him in the first place.

If you go by negative impact Genghis Khan was the worst person in history, then Mao, then Stalin, then Hitler. Mao, Stalin and Pol Pot are especially vile because their great crimes were committed against their own people.

If you were to make some kind of XY plot where Y is "amount of harm" and X is "vileness of that harm" and tried to adjust the scales so they made sense Mao's rectangle would have easily half again as much area as the next contender.

stalin was likely politically motivated to take grain from the ukraine when they had a famine... and? how is he even making the list

besides ghengis khan this is just 3rd grade american history lesson on who the enemy is from 1960 lmao

Adam Vegas
Apr 14, 2013



Modest Mao posted:

charismatic leader who needed to be in power in order to hold fledgling country together

Military leader whose brilliant use of guerilla warefare secured victory in a civil war

Mao was more of a political thinker

george washington had slaves and hunted escapees ruthlessly

Sounds like Mao...isn't that Modest!

Ha ha ha ha

LentThem
Aug 31, 2004

90% Retractible
Kids are precious

Just kidding who gives a poo poo about kids

The Great Autismo!
Mar 3, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Modest Mao posted:

charismatic leader who needed to be in power in order to hold fledgling country together

Military leader whose brilliant use of guerilla warefare secured victory in a civil war

Mao was more of a political thinker

george washington had slaves and hunted escapees ruthlessly

ayyyyy lmao

ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
Modest Mao doing more work rehabilitating Mao than even the CCP can muster.

Relevant Tangent
Nov 18, 2016

Tangentially Relevant

Modest Mao posted:

charismatic leader who needed to be in power in order to hold fledgling country together

Military leader whose brilliant use of guerilla warefare secured victory in a civil war

Mao was more of a political thinker

george washington had slaves and hunted escapees ruthlessly

george washington faithful to his wife
mao washing his dick in whatever unlucky peasant happened to get hauled up that day

Riot Bimbo
Dec 28, 2006


Imo mao was bad and did nothing good

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

GoutPatrol
Oct 17, 2009

*Stupid Babby*

LentThem posted:

Kids are precious

Just kidding who gives a poo poo about kids


I've seen enough kids not wearing helmets on scooters to know this is true

  • Locked thread