|
Alien³ (assembly cut) > Aliens. There, I said it.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:15 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 06:11 |
|
Tippis posted:Alien³ (assembly cut) > Aliens. Ok commando you've done it I'll watch it But if it sucks I'll hunt you down
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:25 |
|
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:25 |
|
peeps already imaging 4.0+ being here before citcon 2017 lol just lol
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:27 |
|
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:30 |
|
Upcoming Content and Mechanics Intended to be Implemented 3.0 Ship sales 3.1 Ship sales 3.2 Ship sales 3.3 Ship sales 3.4 Ship sales
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:32 |
|
this seems like a reasonable amount of content to come out this year - even though this is more content then they've done in the past 5 years. totally doable.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:33 |
|
What about 2.7?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:33 |
|
Blue Cross Blue Balls posted:I'm Andrew Maher!
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:33 |
|
When I hire people I hire them because they have an expertise in a particular field. Not because they have 90% expertise.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:50 |
|
hello
and in wtf news quote:SQ42 is cancelled. It has become a series of single player missions folded directly into Star Citizen. This acts as the tutorial and early character creation. Any other news about Squadron 42 is fake or uninformed. This change has been considered since late-2015 and the final decision was made mid-2016. and since this is all p dire have some more leaks from 100% confirmed sources
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 07:58 |
|
TheAgent posted:hello I find this all very believable. Especially the part about backers having to pay even more money to alpha test the software for them.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:03 |
|
Can't be. Some backers have already paid for two games. Including one of the games as the tutorial for the other is such a slam dunk case that every lawyer on earth would rocket into the stratosphere through the sheer amount of jizz they'd be uncontrollably spewing in anticipation of the case. Not even CIG is that dumb.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:10 |
|
Breetai posted:Can't be. Some backers have already paid for two games. Including one of the games as the tutorial for the other is such a slam dunk case that every lawyer on earth would rocket into the stratosphere through the sheer amount of jizz they'd be uncontrollably spewing in anticipation of the case. Not even CIG is that dumb. I don't think you understand backers. They will gladly pay again and they will try to convince you that this is a Good Thing.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:11 |
|
derek smart is sq42 going "poof" the big thing you were talking about blink twice for yes
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:22 |
|
TheAgent posted:hello well i am fully and totally torqued
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:30 |
|
TheAgent posted:hello This seems way to believable. Especially the part of SQ42. Dare I say, most expensive tutorial ever? Btw Agent, got any news on the AAA actors?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:32 |
|
gillian andersons velvet tones telling me how to mash the keypad to deploy landing gear rhys-davies all jocularly sending you on a fetch quest around a space station
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:33 |
|
The greatest part is that if it is true and SQ42 as a standalone game thing is canceled then they don't have to release anything until the full Star Citizen multiplayer persistent universe is completed, which will be Any Day Now. You see, this is a good thing because it will give Chris Roberts the time he needs to polish up the singleplayer portion of the game and story to be even greater.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:36 |
|
The Saddest Robot posted:I don't think you understand backers. I used to think statements like this were over exaggerating alot, then I ran into a Star Citizen thread on another forum about technology (but not necessarily games) and I just checked and there's a guy completely seriously, 100% un-ironically, saying that Star Marine as it stands could be a full fledged $60 game in it's own right.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:37 |
|
Crazy_BlackParrot posted:This seems way to believable. basically just skinning a AAA actors face on Dave, the mop guy
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:43 |
|
TheAgent posted:last I heard they were using stand ins to redo the mocap since the new import tools/rigs or whatever make it 50x easier I see, so no lawsuits or anything like that? lame.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:47 |
|
the more I think about it, sticking SQ42 directly into SC makes a lot of sense
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:47 |
|
TheAgent posted:last I heard they were using stand ins to redo the mocap since the new import tools/rigs or whatever make it 50x easier Which is how it should have been. There was no need to bring them in mocap suits other than vanity.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:49 |
|
Crazy_BlackParrot posted:I see, so no lawsuits or anything like that? lame. I'm just a guy with an overflowing inbox of madness and maybe a good leak or two once and awhile
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:49 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:All the aliens in Star Citizen are of the Star Trek School of Xeno Diversity. It's even worse, Chris have just taken racial stereotypes from earth and plastered it over space.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 08:58 |
|
The sheer nerve of this loving guy! I wish I was savvy enough to get into the competitive world of gorilla marketing.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 09:16 |
|
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 09:20 |
|
Huh thread just got good
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 09:31 |
|
Mods?!
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 09:37 |
|
Nice netcode boys.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 09:48 |
|
Breetai posted:Can't be. Some backers have already paid for two games. Including one of the games as the tutorial for the other is such a slam dunk case that every lawyer on earth would rocket into the stratosphere through the sheer amount of jizz they'd be uncontrollably spewing in anticipation of the case. Not even CIG is that dumb. Umm no, as long as CHRIS says its like this then its fine. You dont understand games development
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 10:02 |
|
Don't give this guy any more money
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 10:03 |
|
TheAgent posted:
Looking forward to them announcing the thing that made all the idiots irrationally furious about E:D is coming to Star Citizen - although given their past behaviour, I imagine they'll just lie and say it's "coming soon" then never release it. Star Citizen fans are such credulous idiots.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 10:20 |
|
Breetai posted:Can't be. Some backers have already paid for two games. Including one of the games as the tutorial for the other is such a slam dunk case that every lawyer on earth would rocket into the stratosphere through the sheer amount of jizz they'd be uncontrollably spewing in anticipation of the case. Not even CIG is that dumb. Pretty sure the original, like real original pitch, was that SQ42 was essentially a prelude to the Star Citizen MMO anyway, I rest my case.....
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 10:52 |
|
TheAgent posted:hello How gay we talkin' here also post the hate-mails.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 10:56 |
|
That would all be dandy but aren't they selling SQ42 separately since last year? What if somebody bought SQ42 but not Star Citizen, do they get nothing?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 10:59 |
|
Star Citizen: We built the plane but forgot how to fly it Star Citizen: In Development since Far Cry (2004)
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 11:06 |
|
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 11:08 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 06:11 |
|
Young Freud posted:Which is how it should have been. There was no need to bring them in mocap suits other than vanity. And if they had done the performance capture after nailing down models and design specifications. Also if they were in a good game with a decent script written by someone with talent.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2017 11:16 |