|
whole thread played itself lmfao
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 19:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 09:38 |
|
|
Thoguh posted:Y'all are really garlicy about this whole Booker thing. I'm cumin.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 19:59
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:yes, i agree. i think booker is bad for a lot of reasons, but i think he genuinely cares about poverty.  Yeah, like voting to lower drug prices? He only cares about himself.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:re: prescriptions i honestly don't know much about it, casey's office apparently put out this statement to jezebel: "You don't understand my lovely vote, I actually voted for the resolution before I voted against it" The public loves it when democrats say this
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:05
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Twitter sucks but the whole RT (user name): (poo poo) format is a really common way to do things so people can't just delete their garbage It also looks like you're endorsing the opinion out of context because you don't know how to quote tweet. If you're really worried about somebody deleting their tweets, you an always screencap it, embed the image and it won't count against the character limit at all. E: I also just checked, and quote tweeting doesn't count against character limit. It's only if you're copy-pasting a hyperlink.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:re: prescriptions i honestly don't know much about it, casey's office apparently put out this statement to jezebel: Perfect enemy of good, etc.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
Like, I'm not a huge fan of Booker (and of that particular vote) either, but it's like y'all are constantly shocked when politicians turn out to be politicians.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:11
|
|
|
MizPiz posted:Maybe we can teach people how to take screenshots after the "record videos horizontally" reeducation campaign. The phone is designed to be held vertically. It is no surprise everyone records and takes pictures vertically.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:14
|
|
|
Grondoth posted:The phone is designed to be held vertically. It is no surprise everyone records and takes pictures vertically. Hence the need for a reeducation campaign.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Like, I'm not a huge fan of Booker (and of that particular vote) either, but it's like y'all are constantly shocked when politicians turn out to be politicians. Certain people have an ideological expectation of office holders serving the public interest instead of private interests. Wow. Incredible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
Grondoth posted:The phone is designed to be held vertically. It is no surprise everyone records and takes pictures vertically. It's called disabling the camera until the phone is in the correct orientation
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
It's funny how vertical-oriented television never really took off. (Rotate your goddamned camera. Not A difficult thing to do)
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:39
|
|
|
They should just install the camera sideways
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:They should just install the camera sideways What a waste of screen space
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:42
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:What a waste of screen space don't sign your posts 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:42
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:44
|
|
|
drat owned
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:45
|
|
|
phones are legitimately a thousand times harder to hold sideways. Why cant they just install the camera so that it takes landscape pics when held vertically 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
The Nastier Nate posted:When was the last time an incumbent democrat got primaried by a progressive? I can't think of one. Established republicans were afraid of the tea party and now the trumpists. No democrat is afraid of Bernie Sanders. If a supporter of The dems successfully primaried Lieberman in 2006, but then he ran as a centrist independent in the general and won anyway. could be a lesson there, 2006 was a democratic wave election and the leftist challenger still lost to Lieberman.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:47
|
|
|
JeffersonClay posted:The dems successfully primaries Lieberman in 2006, but then he ran as a centrist independent in the general and won anyway. could be a lesson there, 2006 was a democratic wave election and the leftist challenger still lost to Lieberman. I'm reasonably sure there was strategic voting by the Republicans on that one, combined with a bunch of apathetic people voting for the incumbent.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:48
|
|
|
redneck nazgul posted:I'm reasonably sure there was strategic voting by the Republicans on that one, combined with a bunch of apathetic people voting for the incumbent. These factors are not unique to the 2006 Connecticut senate election. Primarying centrist incumbents is by no means a silver bullet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
JeffersonClay posted:These factors are not unique to the 2006 Connecticut senate election. Primarying centrist incumbents is by no means a silver bullet. It does seem relatively risk-free though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
Lieberman was the de facto republican in that race because the republican was awful
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
he got 9.6% of the vote
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
lieberman aka the insurance company that got elected to office
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:lieberman aka the insurance company that got elected to office and then the dems offered him the vice presidency
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
Also, Ned Lamont was a leftist in the same way Hillary was.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
JeffersonClay posted:The dems successfully primaried Lieberman in 2006, but then he ran as a centrist independent in the general and won anyway. could be a lesson there, 2006 was a democratic wave election and the leftist challenger still lost to Lieberman. i think the lesson is to purge the state parties of rats who will support their independent spoilers (blooooooomberg)
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
Aurubin posted:Also, Ned Lamont was a leftist in the same way Hillary was. To be fair, Lieberman makes pretty much anyone look like Bernie.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
Fiction posted:i think the lesson is to purge the state parties of rats who will support their independent spoilers (blooooooomberg) Weird how your philosophy is both infallible and has never won anything
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
lieberman won because connecticut is very democratic, but not very progressive
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:lieberman won because connecticut is very democratic, but not very progressive
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
zegermans posted:Weird how your philosophy is both infallible and has never won anything Don't be so Morton's steak seasoning.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:lieberman won because connecticut is very democratic, but not very progressive See also: Hillary winning the MA primary
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:lieberman won because connecticut is very democratic, but not very progressive Yeah...it sucks. Like looking up my local contacts for Dems: involved in corruption scandal, often votes with Republicans. Great!
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ericgarland/status/819992482477907969 Countdown until some stuffy centrist says this is bad because blah blah blah decorum blah blah blah we must respect the office of the presidency
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Side note, Eric Garland is one of the dumbest people alive
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:36
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I'm cumin. *naked black guy with his dick flopped in a bowl of pudding* ahm fuckin dis custid
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:39
|
|
|
zegermans posted:Weird how your philosophy is both infallible and has never won anything i'll take "the democratic party before the nineties" for 800 alex
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 09:38 |
|
|
zegermans posted:Weird how your philosophy is both infallible and has never won anything
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 21:42
|
|
