Mirificus posted:

Colostomy Bag posted:

Apparently this game is unsinkable.

ArfJason posted:

Its insane but the admin of this website made an announcement saying that doxxing is bad. Hmm, I wonder where I've heard that?

ArfJason posted:

Its insane but the admin of this website made an announcement saying that doxxing is bad. Hmm, I wonder where I've heard that?

his nibs posted:

They've just been debating whether 2.7 is real

Wrecked Angle posted:

The most important thing to establish straight away is that whether or not 2.7 is actually a thing, it will not delay landmark release 3.0 in any way.

Wrecked Angle posted:

The most important thing to establish straight away is that whether or not 2.7 is actually a thing, it will not delay landmark release 3.0 in any way.

his nibs posted:

They've just been debating whether 2.7 is real

Tokamak posted:

his nibs posted:

They've just been debating whether 2.7 is real

Colostomy Bag posted:

Apparently this game is unsinkable.

Galarox posted:

Ok everyone here is the book: How it works: Star Citizen. Clicky the link to download, it's a PDF



Link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/eqnozuu9bvnlao6/How%20it%20Works%20-%20Star%20Citizen.pdf?dl=1

ewe2 posted:

It certainly hasn't been on its maiden voyage.

Wrecked Angle posted:

The most important thing to establish straight away is that whether or not 2.7 is actually a thing, it will not delay landmark release 3.0 in any way.

quote:

With the complete Stanton-star systems in the Alpha 3.0 the card size should even grow. But all these basic work costs much more time than originally planned.

...

On the question of the status of Update 3.0 grins Roberts and raises both hands defensively, "I will no timetable or an assessment for an appointment to issue, but there is still much to do. For 3.0-Star Citizen is something like a complete game with all the important corners. "

Then he goes into detail:" The main ingredients are all in work, but there are still a lot of minor things that need to be made, for example, air traffic controls over landing zones. There are only a certain number of landing zones and it can not land a thousand people at once. Therefore, to a meaningful system to be written, like a real airport. . Such things are not necessarily difficult, but a programmer needs for maybe three or four weeks, "

Even things like boarding and security talks on Roberts:" At the moment, each a door open to a spaceship. With Item 2.0, you can close the doors of your spaceship. Then, when someone wants in, he must chop or break the door. "
"So there is still this or that detail, and a multitude of other little things that all must be brought together," Roberts concludes. That does not sound like a release in the near future.

"We've looked at 3.0 and said. We need that and that and that and then we found: drat, that's more than has so many complete game. Therefore, we develop a detailed plan for all tasks and subtasks. If that is done, we will share this plan with the community. This is expected to be the case at some point in January, depending on when the production team the information gets from the project managers. "

quote:

Chris Roberts: "There will be the opportunity for players to build their own homes or outposts" How is that possible, it leads immediately afterwards technically made "freight - ie crates or boxes, which are made for example in the cargo hold of a Freelancer - is stored in a persistent database.

quote:

In addition, it is very difficult to find good network programmers in the games area. Meanwhile, we have a good team, but for a long time we had a few people who have worked on it. And then added that we make a game that has a level of detail and accuracy such as Crysis, but as a multiplayer game and a much larger scale. "

quote:

In this project, things go very fast, even if it does not appear outwardly as if it would go ahead quickly. One constantly has the feeling: We need to finish getting this thing, we need to crank it out, people waiting on it. The community is awesome, but you already feel that they have a huge appetite for everything they can get. And if times a while nothing comes, then they are a bit grumpy. "

Roberts adds:" People say, 'I want to have it now, I do not care if it is not working properly' And if you do them then. would show or give, they say: 'Hey, that works not at all, which does not look good "But apart from that it annoys me sometimes, I think that we have a very passionate, caring community that. provides us with valuable feedback. "

quote:

Ever seems Update 3.0 and the associated features to have had a significant impact on the displacement of the single-player campaign at 2017.

Chalks posted:

What an important distinction.

Cao Ni Ma posted:

lol if cig backed itself into a corner with 3.0 being nowhere close to release and having to dump a 2.7 in between to buy themselves time

Colostomy Bag posted:

How many life rafts would Lesnick consume? Not just body mass, but all WC paraphernalia.

his nibs posted:

https://www.twitch.tv/theastropub

Raskolnikov posted:

o9

ManofManyAliases posted:

Are you kidding? Seriously, do you believe the own bullshit coming out of your mouth? You were FORCED to deliver BC3000.

LOD is literally an extension of every one of your games - ever.

D_Smart posted:

Nice try, clueless Sally. You guys have mastered revisionist history.

Fact. I never released BC3K. The publisher did.

Fact: As I never released BC3K - nor gave the publisher permission to do so, since my contract prevented it; gave me a massive amount of seed money - because 'Derek Smart was right'

Fact: All games are derivatives. Making different games in the same IP, is how you make money. In most forms of media; be it books, movies or games. But you would know that if 1) you were a gamer 2) not making a pointless jab

Fact: I have made more games than Chris Roberts; and I didn't scam - nor beg anyone - for money to make them.

Your turn.