|
Space Flower posted:pfft, promo art always does that Sorry Corals posted:But, also, yes
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 14:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:23 |
|
|
 Why is this manga so cute? I think it's the idol costumes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) This is bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 14:49
|
|
|
posting crimes
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
A Doomed Purloiner posted:This is bullshit. I'm going to need him and everyone else to curtail the henty a little bit. I don't think it's too much to ask. D_T can afford the unban, it's only 10 dollars, I'm sure he spends alot more than that on his vita games.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
you cant cut back on henty! you will regret this!
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:00
|
|
|
Sorry Corals posted:you cant cut back on henty! I'll build a park and a library right next to the nuclear power plant to make up for it. Also I'm increasing the industrial tax again.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:03
|
|
|
Her breast, singular. Amputit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:04
|
|
|
Matoi Ryuko posted:I'm going to need him and everyone else to curtail the henty a little bit. I don't think it's too much to ask. D_T can afford the unban, it's only 10 dollars, I'm sure he spends alot more than that on his vita games. Thank you for the communication, matoi. What it seems like to me (for most of us, though I can't speak for all) it isn't "oh no we can post lewds anymore!", it's "wait, that was what got him a ban?" If we had more clear communication prior to this, I don't think this reaction would have happened. So please, next time could we get that post before it happens?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
Also probably the idea that "two gay teenagers in love kissing" is bannable seems a little bs to most of us, as a decent number of us read comics or watch anime where those relationships are part of the hook.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:13
|
|
|
Is it really a herculean effort to just link something and tag it nws if you can't figure out if it's nws on your own
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
i dont need a warning shot.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
I think his point of contention is age + titillation factor = no. As opposed to a blanket ban on couples.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:17
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:I think his point of contention is age + titillation factor + poster history = no.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:18
|
|
|
Sorry Corals posted:i dont need a warning shot. good *fires mganum*
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:19
|
|
|
haha, fair point dark titsanime died as he lived: posting giant hooters
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:20
|
|
|
Sorry Corals posted:i dont need a warning shot. Srice posted:Is it really a herculean effort to just link something and tag it nws if you can't figure out if it's nws on your own
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:21
|
|
|
d_T's ban and 6 hour was just a warning shot, he's not exiled from the thread or banned from adtrw or anything. His warning shot just has to be heavier than others, because of his history.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:21
|
|
|
Okay, if that's the rule, then please say it instead of letting other people guess what you want. We can't conform to rules if you don't tell us what they are.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:23
|
|
|
Rodenthar Drothman posted:I, for one, would appreciate it. If you have to ponder if something is worksafe or not, why not just err on the side of caution and manually link it
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:23
|
|
|
A ban should never be a "warning shot"
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:23
|
|
|
Rodenthar Drothman posted:I, for one, would appreciate it. you wait for the top of a new page, dont even timg it, and take your licks
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:25
|
|
|
AlsoAnoHito posted:A ban should never be a "warning shot"
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:26
|
|
|
Rodenthar Drothman posted:I, for one, would appreciate it. I can't see everything that happens. I work 8 hours a day, 6 days a week, and then I also sleep 8 hours a day too. If you no one uses the report feature then there's going to be stuff I miss.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:26
|
|
|
Even if it's some rando I don't know. Do I care if he specifically gets banned? Naw. But it's the precedent it sets that's irksome.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
AnoHito posted:A ban should never be a "warning shot" It is in d_T's case. 10 dollars isn't alot of money.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
Rodenthar Drothman posted:Even if it's some rando I don't know. The precedent has been set: Don't be d_T and you'll be fine.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
Rodenthar Drothman posted:Even if it's some rando I don't know. It's easily avoided by just manually linking any pictures that could be seen as nws aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAaAA
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
Matoi Ryuko posted:I can't see everything that happens. I work 8 hours a day, 6 days a week, and then I also sleep 8 hours a day too. If you no one uses the report feature then there's going to be stuff I miss.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
It's not a big deal and it's cool that the mod just nws tags the image when he could just delete it entirely. 6 hour probations are not something to get really mad about. Personally, I don't think the occasional thirsty post is a big deal assuming it's not something really problematic but that's more of a problem with the culture on sa than with matoi whos just doing his job. That said the mod is a horrible monster and I think we should rise up against him.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
Srice posted:It's easily avoided by just manually linking any pictures that could be seen as nws aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAaAA
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
Rodenthar Drothman posted:The problem is when that's a moving variable, man. Are swimsuits nws? This is some stupid GBS level pedantry, man.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:31
|
|
|
Rodenthar Drothman posted:I understand that. So, again please put in the rules thread the rule what you want, instead of leaving us guessing. Now that it's been posted here, the anime chat people who read it should know, but still. The rules haven't changed at all. d_T broke the rules and got popped for it. Seems pretty open and shut to me.  Sorry Corals posted:you wait for the top of a new page, dont even timg it, and take your licks
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:32
|
|
|
Srice posted:This is some stupid GBS level pedantry, man. Yeah. It's basically: Does the picture intend to titillate? If so, that's bad. Lewd jokes can be fine, but don't go overboard and post from the ecchi folder basically Also as Srice said, as long as it isn't porn or overly egregious, you can  tag and link it. It isn't hard.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:41
|
|
|
But yes, Matoi, you should have said something along the lines of "Don't post stuff like this" instead of 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:43
|
|
|
AnoHito posted:A ban should never be a "warning shot" Oh noooo 10 WHOLE DOLLARS
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:44
|
|
|
I don't think fanart is as difficult as we're making it sound.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 15:57
|
|
|
I'm shaking my head at all of you right now
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 16:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 16:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:23 |
|
|
Rodenthar Drothman posted:The problem is when that's a moving variable, man. Are swimsuits nws? If you have to ask the question, link it. If you don't link it and get other probed, don't cry about it. This really does not seem hard to understand.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2017 16:06
|
|
