|
should've asked why he's not using the mk iv
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 22:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 08:32 |
|
|
xzzy posted:Listing off their gear and settings is a giant red flag, the smarter move was to not engage them at all. I can see how it would come off as amateurish listing settings. I am still very much learning, so personally I find it useful when they are listed.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 01:05
|
|
|
I don't mind gear listing as long as it's purely for information. Captioning with exposure data, equipment, and if film the process used can be helpful for people just learning or exploring different styles.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 02:49
|
|
|
I tend to do it on Flickr to remind myself of what my film processing conditions were
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 03:45
|
|
|
That guy is up himself so he would be listing it for the wank factor but its normal on that page to post settings. God help you if you ask about their post processing though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 06:38
|
|
|
murk posted:I can see how it would come off as amateurish listing settings. I am still very much learning, so personally I find it useful when they are listed. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
xzzy posted:Listing off their gear and settings is a giant red flag, the smarter move was to not engage them at all. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 22:59
|
|
|
InternetJunky posted:I feel super self-conscious right now since I always post my gear/settings with my shots (outside of this forum). I had no idea people considered it a "red flag". Its their attitude thats the red flag. "This capture was created from scratch with my 5d mkiii with a similar approach to a colouring book, adding colours to the scene to achieve perfection" *giant blotches and halos everywherw* Vs Hey guys took my 5d out for a walk tonight, pretty proud of this shot. Settings were 1/125 f6 ... A lot of dudes are real wanky about it but that doesnt mean its wanky itself. If you link from flickr people can go to the page and its laid out nicely underneath, which saves you the effort too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 23:35
|
|
|
Gear tagging is useful when you want to google examples of photos taken with a certain sensor or a certain lens in certain scenarios. So it's not a hard and fast rule to avoid doing it. It's all about the guy's attitude, yeah.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
BANME.sh posted:Gear tagging is useful when you want to google examples of photos taken with a certain sensor or a certain lens in certain scenarios. So it's not a hard and fast rule to avoid doing it. It's all about the guy's attitude, yeah. It's also great for educational use / learning how someone possibly achieved the results they did. I think it bothers me more when people intentionally "hide" how they did something, like it's a magical secret and you're not allowed to see what I did because  it was all photoshop or something like that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2017 05:12
|
|
|
ianskate posted:It's also great for educational use / learning how someone possibly achieved the results they did. I think it bothers me more when people intentionally "hide" how they did something, like it's a magical secret and you're not allowed to see what I did because This is exactly what him and his friend do in that group with some trade secret bs. That facebook group is pretty bad
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2017 05:35
|
|
|
Hey guys took my 5d out for a walk today, 
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
unpacked robinhood posted:Hey guys took my 5d out for a walk today, Haha I saw that guy too when I checked out the gigapixel photo. Tons of people using their phone cameras on the press rafters.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 00:52
|
|
|
unpacked robinhood posted:Hey guys took my 5d out for a walk today, Saw this guy at the Rose Parade. SLR, iPhone, and GoPro. He put the phone away occasionally, but he must have gotten phone pictures of at least half the floats.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
Be a hero!
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
tk posted:Saw this guy at the Rose Parade. SLR, iPhone, and GoPro. He put the phone away occasionally, but he must have gotten phone pictures of at least half the floats. To be fair, the iPhone camera is pretty decent... but uhh, not compared to the other gear he's using as an ego-stroker. Also it looks like he might be just be rapid firing on auto with the 5D without even looking, and using his phone as the A cam. What a guy. Can't wait to see his 2000 photo Flickr gallery in HDR.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 03:35
|
|
|
Well if you want to shoot wide but are a pleb who doesn't own two bodies, why not whip out an iPhone? Saves you fussing with lenses and maybe missing some action while rooting in your bag. I wouldn't do it, but I can see the thinking. That gopro though.. that's another level.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 04:09
|
|
|
xzzy posted:Well if you want to shoot wide but are a pleb who doesn't own two bodies, why not whip out an iPhone? Saves you fussing with lenses and maybe missing some action while rooting in your bag. Yeah, and for all we know he could be livestreaming to FB or something, and grabbing extra BTS video with his GoPro, but all of this... #facepalm
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
It's probably instagram and snapchat.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
xzzy posted:Well if you want to shoot wide but are a pleb who doesn't own two bodies, why not whip out an iPhone? Saves you fussing with lenses and maybe missing some action while rooting in your bag. The gopro wasn't running. He had the setup ready to go for his end-of-parade BASE jump from the Snoopy balloon onto the float with the paper-mache Statue of Liberty on it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 16:57
|
|
|
murk posted:I can see how it would come off as amateurish listing settings. I am still very much learning, so personally I find it useful when they are listed. It really isn't.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 01:42
|
|
|
Click here to see what happens when you put 6x7 Lomo Rescale in the cartridge slot of a Super Gameboy
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
SMERSH Mouth posted:Click here to see what happens when you put 6x7 Lomo Rescale in the cartridge slot of a Super Gameboy lol what?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
He seems incapable of holding a camera level.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
Helen Highwater posted:He seems incapable of holding a camera level. When you're out taking photos with film from lomography that's purposefully designed to look defective, holding the camera level is going completely against your aesthetic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
OpenSkyMediaquote:Family Photography Price: $500 (w/o taxes). Includes digital negatives (anywhere from 300 - 1000) and 50 - 1000 processed photos. Here is an example of family portrait photography (on Flickr), including both posed and photojournalistc shots. Call to book a time.  DSC_7571 by jason shultz, on Flickr  DSC_9575 by jason shultz, on Flickr He also does wedding photography. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
drat, a lovely SEO web design company AND a lovely wedding photographer? How do they find the time?
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
Helen Highwater posted:OpenSkyMedia This is actually an inspiration to me. akadajet posted:lol what? 
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
xzzy posted:drat, a lovely SEO web design company AND a lovely wedding photographer? How do they find the time? He doesn't, that's why they're both lovely! 
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
have any of these photographers ever actually defined "Digital negatives"? I see it a ton
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 00:27
|
|
|
DJExile posted:have any of these photographers ever actually defined "Digital negatives"? I see it a ton I imagine that they are inverting and color reversing their jpgs (because we can all assume they are shooting jpg) and sending those to clients.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 07:43
|
|
|
1000 processed shots for $500 is a great deal.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
InternetJunky posted:1000 processed shots for $500 is a great deal. I charge by weight. 10 pounds of raw files for $99.95 (media not included).
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 21:54
|
|
|
thetzar posted:I charge by weight. 10 pounds of raw files for $99.95 (media not included). Stop fatshaming.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2017 21:59
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 08:09
|
|
|
I don't get it? What am I missing?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 09:55
|
|
|
guy is selling used softcore porno mags for 20 bux
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 16:31
|
|
|
Those books would be positively scandalous if the ladies at sunday mass were to catch a glimpse of them. I can only imagine this "f-stop" they speak of on this sinful pages is some sort of fornication stop, some sleazy dive that truckers and ethnics frequent where they carouse with ladies of easy virtue.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 17:26
|
|
|
i looked up both of those books (in incognito mode) and neither look like porno mags. this tony namour guy just wanted to learn how to shoot naked ladies, nothing wrong with that right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 08:32 |
|
|
i love it when a girl gets her heel stuck in her garter strap
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2017 19:25
|
|
