|
I don't spend enough time thinking before posting to reach CI 
Somebody fucked around with this message at 22:11 on Sep 9, 2022 |
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 01:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 17:50 |
|
|
Risky Bisquick posted:Unlikely, and I don't spend enough time thinking before posting Fixed your post for you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 01:54
|
|
|
MA-Horus posted:The only justice that can be obtained is this world is from cold-clocking Nazis. I am 110% behind this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
Excelsiortothemax posted:I am 110% behind this. gently caress 'em up, buttercup.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:The MyDemocracy results are in and they sure don't mean anything!!! quote:4.4.1 Accountability We asked some lovely loaded questions and you won't believe what Canadians answered!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 02:02
|
|
|
really makes u think https://twitter.com/davidakin/status/824051111439060994
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/british-columbia/two-high-on-life-members-given-jail-time-1.3950447quote:Two members of the Vancouver-based 'High on Life' crew — who posted videos and photographs on social media last year of their tour of environmental disrespect through various U.S. national parks — will now spend a week in jail and have to pay stiff fines for their actions. When I first saw pictures of these loving dipshits I thought, these motherfuckers are probably from Vancouver.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 02:14
|
|
|
namaste faggots posted:http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/british-columbia/two-high-on-life-members-given-jail-time-1.3950447 Are they realtors?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 02:31
|
|
|
Maybe a goon political party is the answer
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 02:37
|
|
|
The Duggler posted:Maybe a goon political party is the answer You don't preview your posts, do you?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 02:38
|
|
|
Bad opinions about law/internet voting aside Trump is going to executive order immigration from some  If you're Muslim or look brown, getting through USCBP is going to become p hard/impossible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 02:46
|
|
|
quote:The Federal Court has rejected a lawsuit that sought to block $15-billion in exports of weaponized armoured vehicles to Saudi Arabia, a pariah on human rights, saying Canada’s foreign minister has broad authority to approve such shipments and that a judge cannot rule on the morality of the exports. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/court-rejects-lawsuit-to-block-15-billion-arms-deal-with-saudi-arabia/article33715211/ Sanctity of contracts: protected
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 03:50
|
|
|
lolquote:3.2.2 Sampling
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 03:50
|
|
|
not lol (like, she'll land on her feet, but how do you lay off kady) https://twitter.com/padams29/status/824077889851289602
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 03:51
|
|
|
mass mailing flyers: a foolproof polling practice
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 03:51
|
|
|
Imagine being an academic and this much of a partisan hack simultaneously: https://twitter.com/pmlagasse/status/824021903266430979 https://twitter.com/pmlagasse/status/824030693806247937 https://twitter.com/pmlagasse/status/824086123882446848 The report deals in methodological nihilism ("no non-mandatory survey in Canada is fully representative") and slices words extremely thinly ("Accordingly, albeit mindful of the caveats about representativeness expressed herein, the report findings refer to weighted responses as being reflective of those of Canadians at large."), but sure, let's just pretend this thing was never an attempt at gauging public opinion and you're silly if you thought it was.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 03:56
|
|
|
What an idiot. Any academic should be able to tell you garbage-in-garbage-out and collection and analysis of data from a poorly conceived and designed experiment is a waste of time. You don't interpret data from a lovely experiment because even if your findings are internally consistent to the data set it's not going to be applicable or relevant outside of it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 04:03
|
|
|
Maybe instead of mailing out cards to tell people to take an online poll, they could just mail out a card with a poll on it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 04:03
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Imagine being an academic and this much of a partisan hack simultaneously Oh, friend, those are in no way contradictory.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
Why does that report keep talking about making it clear which party is responsible for legislation? Do people feel strongly about this? If it really concerns you, do your loving research.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 05:31
|
|
|
Pop-o-Matic Trouble posted:Why does that report keep talking about making it clear which party is responsible for legislation? Do people feel strongly about this? If it really concerns you, do your loving research. Because if you have proportional representation and coalition governments form then it may be unclear who's actually proposing and passing bills, and therefore which coalition partner to hold accountable in the next election. If Canadians want to know who's responsible for legislation, that clearly means they don't want PR. Case closed!
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 05:54
|
|
|
Pop-o-Matic Trouble posted:Why does that report keep talking about making it clear which party is responsible for legislation? Do people feel strongly about this? If it really concerns you, do your loving research. I do! If you have too many veto points in a democracy it becomes very hard for voters to pin down who is responsible for decisions and apportion blame/plaudits. It's why, say, the Republicans can block all government action for five years and Obama gets blamed for gridlock, and why an empowered Senate in Canada could be dangerous. I'm very fond of there being a clear cause and effect relationship between one's vote and policy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 05:57
|
|
|
What about all those situations where the party in power, be it liberal or conservative, table the exact same bill as the last government word for word like all of those copyright bills that came up? Can they apply blame specifically to the industry representative that wrote the bill?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 06:05
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:not lol (like, she'll land on her feet, but how do you lay off kady) Boo
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 06:09
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I do! If you have too many veto points in a democracy it becomes very hard for voters to pin down who is responsible for decisions and apportion blame/plaudits. It's why, say, the Republicans can block all government action for five years and Obama gets blamed for gridlock, and why an empowered Senate in Canada could be dangerous. I'm very fond of there being a clear cause and effect relationship between one's vote and policy. We certainly dont get that under FPTP. And I cant remember for sure, but it was you that had the huge boner for the ranked ballot the Trudeau government wanted so badly but failed to get support for right? That system offers no fixes to the issue and its clear FPTP cant stay because there is no relationship at all between ones vote and policy due to strategic voting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 06:19
|
|
|
She's too respected not to get picked up somewhere. Maclean's probably.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 06:28
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:We certainly dont get that under FPTP. And I cant remember for sure, but it was you that had the huge boner for the ranked ballot the Trudeau government wanted so badly but failed to get support for right? That system offers no fixes to the issue and its clear FPTP cant stay because there is no relationship at all between ones vote and policy due to strategic voting. We absolutely get that under FPTP. You like this government? You get to vote Liberal at the next election. You don't? There are two alternatives on offer. Only one party has power right now, so it's very clear who to blame or reward. And no you're thinking of not me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 07:01
|
|
|
Thank you for giving the US Right a trial run environmental science gagging scheme. Now we're going to kill everyone with it 
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 13:03
|
|
|
We also gave you the trial run campaign against facts style via Rob Ford. You're welcome.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 13:13
|
|
|
American children of immigrants are still the same kind of citizen as the seventh-generation born-heres, right? C'mon America step up your game.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 14:03
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:American children of immigrants are still the same kind of citizen as the seventh-generation born-heres, right? For now. One of the things on Trump's to-do list is to get rid of birthright citizenship.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 14:06
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:American children of immigrants are still the same kind of citizen as the seventh-generation born-heres, right? again, this wasn't c51, and that part of c24 Jordan7hm fucked around with this message at 14:20 on Jan 25, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 14:16
|
|
|
apatheticman posted:She's too respected not to get picked up somewhere. Maclean's again? I'd rather her go back to CBC if she's going back to old employers. She's a treasure.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 14:20
|
|
|
Jordan7hm posted:again, this wasn't c51, and that part of c24 again, this was passed into law by a sitting Canadian government because they thought it was a good idea and we're right to bitch about it until it burns in flames
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 14:51
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:again, this was passed into law by a sitting Canadian government because they thought it was a good idea and we're right to bitch about it until it burns in flames But who do we apportion blame to for it? The old PM who passed it or the new PM who voted for it? Clearly we need to maintain an electoral system that allows us to so clearly see responsibility.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 15:14
|
|
|
Duck Rodgers posted:But who do we apportion blame to for it? The old PM who passed it or the new PM who voted for it? Clearly we need to maintain an electoral system that allows us to so clearly see responsibility. the Liberals voted against it e: there's enough bad stuff they've done that we don't need to start distorting facts. c51 and c24 are both bad, but they are nonetheless different, and mixing them up doesn't serve anyone's interests
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 15:44
|
|
|
Jordan7hm posted:the Liberals voted against it C-51 https://openparliament.ca/votes/41-2/395/ Trudeau: YES C-24 https://openparliament.ca/votes/41-2/210/ Trudeau: Didn't VOTE
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 16:17
|
|
|
I thought they had deported people under C-24 in 2016
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
Risky Bisquick posted:C-51 Yeah, he voted for C-51. No, he didn't vote for C-24. Also every Liberal who attended voted against it. He did vote to amend the citizenship clause. Trudeau's voting record was not very good.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 17:50 |
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:I thought they had deported people under C-24 in 2016 They've enforced the part of the bill that allows them to strip citizenship due to misrepresentation during the immigration process.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 16:35
|
|