|
D_Smart posted:Actually no, I don't give a poo poo about you. And I never did. - Like revoking keys, banning people for dissenting opinions and swindling those into buying ridiculous TACs for a game that was supposed to be released in 2012 (but running for the last mile in 2016)! Ok. -They didn't declare war. You're fighting windmills because you're a nutjub. They refunded you because you are a ridiculous person to deal wtih and didn't want you to be in the community anymore. They're well in their right to do so. -And on the employee/contractor point: LOL keep guessing. It's fun. But I do know this: Deep down inside, you really do like me. I know you care for me, senpai.
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 07:07 |
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:CIG allowing refunds is not the same as being compelled to give a refund in a court of law. Keep trying. belt a little tight? turning red? let it out a little. we dont judge.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
Brazilianpeanutwar posted:I wonder if Derek will ever do a "Chris/escapist" rant? July blog.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:CIG allowing refunds is not the same as being compelled to give a refund in a court of law. Keep trying. The important thing here is that you can't get to court for being refused a refund if CIG keep using this clever "granting refunds" tactic. They'll never lose until someone figures out a way round this whole getting your money back loophole.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:oh-oh. over at CIG/F42, a dozen devs cried out in fear Lol -edits a post to push a spin. Good job.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
You're fighting windmills because you're a nutjub. -get a mirror moma.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:CIG allowing refunds is not the same as being compelled to give a refund in a court of law. Keep trying. Wait, CiG is allowing refunds instead of throwing a tantrum until someone contacts the LA Attorney Generals Office? Lol. "Were giving you 'Permission' to have your money back. Its not a right, but a privilege we extend to only the worst Leavers."
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
EXPECTED RESULT I should have been able to walk out from elevator into Area 18. Would be nice to have the HUD working and change anything. Should not fall through map. NPC should be sitting still. Connect to server and try it for the first time after registering Camera view should cycle (pressing F4) as ship is braking (pressing Alt+x). I should have been able to progress to mission location I would not expect light to come from the barrel of the guns. Player should continue travelling forward without any rotational momentum I expect the color of any scene to remain consistent barring any changes from light sources. Should be able to equip and remove missile racks from Herald. should sit in the cockpit with a body Voice Prompt is Defeat Should have been able to select Olisar or Crusader Pushing to object away/continue walking Should at least start with basic components equipped. The radar sphere should always show as a center sphere and not be blown up all over the pilot cabin when in landing mode. The UI should be easy to understand. Buttons and commands should be self explanatory so far as possible. When I want to show that I'm ready I will be looking for a button that says "Ready". If that then changes to "Not Ready" that's fine, as long as I can see what it changes to. Logging out should take me either to the menu or the launcher, without crashing the game. Camera is in 1st person and the player is not invisible in the armor. I had to leave the server to fix this issue but it happened only once. use the med pen and my health should of reverted back to max health with no damage 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
better yet buy another idris for chris sake.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:- Like revoking keys, banning people for dissenting opinions and swindling those into buying ridiculous TACs for a game that was supposed to be released in 2012 (but running for the last mile in 2016)! Ok. lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:July blog. We've already done that joke, keep up sillybollocks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
pay no attention to all the scummy poo poo cig is doing with regards to payroll and employees, please enjoy this slapfight between dsmart and myself
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
The Titanic posted:I'm sure somewhere between this and r/ds and what Derek thinks he is is probably where the truth lies. I'm sure he likes the attention, be it positive or negative. Read Derek's Usenet days. He'll never stop. His Neural Net Brain won't let him.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
AP posted:I'm pretty sure you've sold more ship poo poo, I'd ask whatever your current "investment" total is and what the meltable value of your RSI fleet currently is, but you'd just avoid answering. Glad you're still concerned about me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:pay no attention to all the scummy poo poo cig is doing with regards to payroll and employees, please enjoy this slapfight between dsmart and myself I always seem to show up just in time for these. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
Also note to lurkers, if you're one of those ~25 wonderful people who currently provide me with a bug report each day. Don't write a tedious paragraph about stupid poo poo, I'll just skip you and you'll miss out on being laughed at. According to the incredibly accurate funding tracker, CIG is getting a minimum of $35k a day and you guys can't even produce a decent bug report for every $1k. I'm the only guy that actually reads these, nobody at CIG does, so try not to bore me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Read Derek's Usenet days. He'll never stop. His Neural Net Brain won't let him. I'm glad you somehow find the time to argue the futility of arguing with Derek, despite your busy Star Marine schedule
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Glad you're still concerned about me. Well if you aren't going to seek professional advice, I want you to know at least one random internet dude cares about your mental health.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
AP posted:The important thing here is that you can't get to court for being refused a refund if CIG keep using this clever "granting refunds" tactic. They'll never lose until someone figures out a way round this whole getting your money back loophole. = p
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
intardnation posted:You're fighting windmills because you're a nutjub. I don't have any blogs and I'm not actively engaged in an attack or otherwise against Derek for the revocation of my LoD key (or anything similar). So , it's not the same.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
Squadron 42 Looking great. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNG_szaXNNU
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:- Like revoking keys, banning people for dissenting opinions and swindling those into buying ridiculous TACs for a game that was supposed to be released in 2012 (but running for the last mile in 2016)! Ok. This is a good point, if someone says something that upsets Derek he will ban their game key (and not refund) which is actually way worse than what CIG did to him and what he claims is the reason for his crusade. Could someone not on Derek's Posters I Have Been Defeated By List ask him to clarify how him doing it (and not refunding) is different and good? The answer could be right up there with Leonard Skinley and 42 has nothing to do with Hitchhiker's Guide it's just Sandi's lucky number in thread canon.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
drat the contractor thing is hosed up if true and given momas swift appearance it must be
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:16
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:I'm glad you somehow find the time to argue the futility of arguing with Derek, despite your busy Star Marine schedule I'm on lunch right now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:16
|
|
|
Xaerael posted:Squadron 42 Looking great.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:16
|
|
|
and I even gave the forums this I might be dumb with money
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Nice self doxx. Oh God what have I done?! 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I'm on lunch right now. You got some thoughts on the next great spaceship concept? I hear Reddit clamors for a small carrier
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:gonna buy even though I was the mastermind behind "the ends are bad" campaign during ME3 But who is the chairman and CEO of the company that makes mass effect ? It's important to me that I connect to him on a deep personal level
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
gonna be a new huge ship thing for $3000, comes with 4 smaller ships with new LE variants specifically for that ship
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:They won't; because anything short of what they've promised, and which Spergs have paid for, won't qualify as a "game" I'm willing to bet the final definition of what the game(s) will be may be startlingly different between backer and Chris Roberts. I don't get the feeling Chris is invested in this project puts the of playing director and collecting money. I bet her drop an MVP suddenly and fast if he wanted to, with no remorse or feeling like he missed a target. TheAgent posted:mvp bae, its whats new and fresh Like this!
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:24
|
|
|
I agree with Theagent here. They can cut back most personnel, planet landing and most promised features. That should get them running into 2018, then release 3.0 as the MVP. As long as the JPEG factory is running, they can linger for a couple more years, perhaps more. Edit: catte in winter, needs heater 
JugbandDude fucked around with this message at 21:33 on Jan 26, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:25
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:gonna be a new huge ship thing for $3000, comes with 4 smaller ships with new LE variants specifically for that ship
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:27
|
|
|
this will also be the start of the new "this ship will only be available for pledge/donation/sale now, and will not be able to be earned in game"
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:28
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I don't have any blogs and I'm not actively engaged in an attack or otherwise against Derek for the revocation of my LoD key (or anything similar). So , it's not the same. you are still here doing the same thing. Who knows who you are on the internet. You could have blogs and be doxxing people.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
If that isn't the huge red flag backers need to see then I dunno what is.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I don't have any blogs and I'm not actively engaged in an attack or otherwise against Derek for the revocation of my LoD key (or anything similar). So , it's not the same. Good point. You're actively engaged in an attack or otherwise against Derek for no reason. That's much more sensible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:I believe they'll put out a game, it'll be really bad but they'll squeak it out This is the funniest and most true post. Did you see the reaction to Star Marine. Most hyped, Most new, Most twitch based FPS on the market if you ask reddit. It's already providing more fun than any game out there. Independent article making GBS threads on SM comes out... "It's Alpha! Of course it's buggy and lovely, and boring, with missing features. Be Fair!"
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:this will also be the start of the new "this ship will only be available for pledge/donation/sale now, and will not be able to be earned in game" Can't wait to hear citizens explain how this doesn't mean Star Citizen is pay-to-win
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 07:07 |
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:You got some thoughts on the next great spaceship concept? I hear Reddit clamors for a small carrier That's all those idiots care about; pocket carriers for pocket carriers.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2017 21:32
|
|