|
That sounds like a good move by the Panthers if this were 1967.
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 02:54 |
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:gently caress no https://twitter.com/BlackBlueReview/status/827238606230138882 Relax.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
Why shouldn't the Panthers draft at RB? They've already taken years off his career with him power running.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:Why shouldn't the Panthers draft at RB? They've already taken years off his career with him power running. because they need an offensive tackle and a safety and it's probably going to be easier to get a useful running back than either of those two positions.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:Why shouldn't the Panthers draft at RB? They've already taken years off his career with him power running. Drafting one is fine, but not in the 1st in 2017.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
Oher is still not through concussion protocol so they probably should draft a tackle and then a RB or two somewhere in the middle rounds if they want to fix that part of their team.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 21:27
|
|
|
Draft Cam Robinson sign eric berry allahu ackbar
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 21:39
|
|
|
Eddie Lacy is going to be a Panther next year.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 21:39
|
|
|
MrLogan posted:Eddie Lacy is going to be a Panther next year. This is the correct answer.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
MrLogan posted:Eddie Lacy is going to be a Panther next year. Great kelvin and him can go to golden coral together
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
MrLogan posted:Eddie Lacy is going to be a Panther next year. I wouldnt care. He can be fat and do what mike Tolbert used to do. Be fat and . break some tackles on swing passes once or twice a game. Get a loving tackle you cunts fuuuuuuuu
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2017 23:21
|
|
|
KC needs a ILB, OG, RB, WR, QB, DT That's in order of need, you could shuffle the last 4 around but Chiefs need a starting ILB and OG immediately after some thought: 1. ILB 2. OG 3. QB 4. DT 5. RB 6. WR Pron on VHS fucked around with this message at 01:06 on Feb 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 01:01
|
|
|
Bills needs: WR, LB, S, RT, CB*, G/C, QB* *Italics note positions where the degree of need is determined by the Bills decisions on impending/possible free agents. Not really in order of need, but let's break it out. WR- Robert Woods is set to become a free agent and there is reason for concern about Sammy Watkin's ability to stay healthy for 16 games. The depth chart below those two is comparable to the Eagles in terms of talent. LB- We're switching back to a 4-3, and Zach Brown, who would be a natural fit, is an impending free agent and figures to cash in big on a career year. Preston Brown is decent, Reggie Ragland will be back, but that's about it. Jerry Hughes, Shaq Lawson, and Lorenzo Alexander(if he's retained) will probably be DEs in a 4-3. S- Corey Graham is kind of old, and Aaron Williams almost died. Everyone else is garbage. CB- Stephon Gilmore is a free agent and figures to make big bucks. Ronald Darby regressed, and Nikel Robey-Coleman, while good, is a midget and thus probably shouldn't be playing outside. RT- Seantrel Henderson has Crohn's and committed the unforgivable crime of smoking weed. Also, he's not very good. Jordan Mills is like him, except without the weed or the potential. Cyrus Kouandjio played surprisingly okay at LT while Cordy Glenn was hurt, but it would be unwise to bet on him as a full-time starter just because of that. G/C - Richie Incognito is awesome but old. Eric Wood is also getting old. Our depth is a bunch of warm bodies. QB - If we don't cut Tyrod Taylor, this isn't a need at all. But we will, because it's the dumbest thing the Bills could possibly do. Hopefully they at least pull an E.J. and pick up a pick or two by moving back and still snagging their
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 02:26
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:Great kelvin and him can go to golden coral together gently caress I needed that laugh
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 03:39
|
|
|
hah. the bears need : offense : 3 wrs, QB, Lt, rt, te (set at lg, c, rg, RB) defense: 2 safeties, couple linebackers and God knows what else. few down linemen?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 03:41
|
|
|
49ers need either: or  Because they still don't have a defensive coordinator. Coldforge fucked around with this message at 04:23 on Feb 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 04:18
|
|
|
Coldforge posted:49ers need either: did anyone play iron man for the niners last year cuz seriously the depth is so bad it's surprising if no
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
The 49ers do need everything on both sides of the ball that's correct. Raku posted:did anyone play iron man for the niners last year DeForest Buckner blew nearly every other DL out of the water in terms of snaps played. He was in on basically every single one AND special teams
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 05:02
|
|
|
Theoretically the Niners do have a couple decent DEs and CBs on defense, and a good RB and maybe one and a half O-linemen (not sure if Staley still counts at his age) on the offensive side. It's really hard to tell by watching games, because the poo poo on the field just covers everything.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 05:09
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/CharleyCasserly/status/827536445359407104
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 16:49
|
|
|
Casserly isn't alone in that opinion. With more mocks popping up with Watson in the late first it seems we've fully entered the post championship cool down period: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000782360/article/move-the-sticks-notes-teams-divided-about-deshaun-watson quote:Teams are split on Deshaun Watson -- some believe he would be a good late first- or early second-round pick, while others think he is a long-term project who should be a middle-round pick. Of course, all of these folks said they wouldn't be surprised if he went much higher than that -- however, they believe choosing him that high would be a mistake. It will be interesting to see how the QB section of the board looks after the combine. Someone like Mahomes or Allen could really jump up the board if they impress. I'm still on the Kaaya bandwagon
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
I don't really get how any of these QBs can be rated higher than Watson. Sure, he might not be worth a top 10 pick, but what makes other one season wonders worth more than a guy who's shown he can do it all for this long a duration? NFL evaluation drives me crazy
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 23:13
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:I don't really get how any of these QBs can be rated higher than Watson. Sure, he might not be worth a top 10 pick, but what makes other one season wonders worth more than a guy who's shown he can do it all for this long a duration? I think with Watson, it's a concern that he's maxed out; he hasn't really shown any improvement over his career, what you see right now is basically what you'll get from him three years from now. The other guys (Kizer, Mahomes, even Trubinsky who I'm not a fan of) have a lot of potential to improve, and aren't really worse than Watson right now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2017 23:59
|
|
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:Drafting one is fine, but not in the 1st in 2017. You realize the leading rusher in the NFL this year was taken 5th overall, right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 18:39
|
|
|
Doltos posted:You realize the leading rusher in the NFL this year was taken 5th overall, right? the best running back was taken in the 3rd though
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 18:51
|
|
|
Tom Brady was drafted in the 6th lol at drafting a qb in the 1st
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
Doltos posted:You realize the leading rusher in the NFL this year was taken 5th overall, right? You being purposely obtuse here?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
Metapod posted:Tom Brady was drafted in the 6th lol at drafting a qb in the 1st Whoa r u serious?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 19:29
|
|
|
Every year, every loving year we have to go through this: The only position you never take in the first regardless of how good the player performs is kicker/punter. Everything else is completely up to the whims of fate and for every X position that does well in Y round, there's 20 others that you never hear about. Draft RBs in the first.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 19:33
|
|
|
Trent Richardson forever destroyed the concept and it will take 3 or 4 hall of famers to bring it back into Smart Town on spicy web sights like this one
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 19:42
|
|
|
Doltos posted:Every year, every loving year we have to go through this: The only punter in the Hall of Fame was a first-round selection.  The Panthers shouldn't take a RB in the first not because "lol no RBs in the first" but because they need help at other positions more.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
oldskool posted:The only punter in the Hall of Fame was a first-round selection. Please take a RB in the first, so the Browns don't. I think that would upset me more than a QB at #1.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 19:58
|
|
|
Doltos posted:You realize the leading rusher in the NFL this year was taken 5th overall, right? and the 2nd leading rusher , who didn't even start for 3 games, was in the 5th round. behind a way worse offensive line
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:and the 2nd leading rusher , who didn't even start for 3 games, was in the 5th round. behind a way worse offensive line Yeah I had Jordan Howard in fantasy  Also Chicago's line was rated #1 in DVOA this year for run blocking. I know, stats, but I think the Cowboy's offensive line isn't that heads above Chicago's when it comes to run blocking. Either way saying a fifth round RB did great this year ignores DeAndre Washington, Paul Perkins, Wendell Smallwood, Jonathan Williams, and Alex Collins, all of which didn't do nearly as well as Howard and cost the same resources to get on their respective teams. And here's another question. If you knew the season Jordan Howard was going to have, would you take him before the 5th round? If yes, does the spot he's taken in even matter?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2017 21:48
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:and the 2nd leading rusher , who didn't even start for 3 games, was in the 5th round. behind a way worse offensive line No poo poo. Don't draft an RB in the top five.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Chicago's line being #1 in dvoa for run blocking is yet another reason dvoa is garbage edit: ha when I went and looked them up, they even do the left end/tackle/middle etc rankings and the bears, whose best three linemen are the interior guys, had a drastically worse rating on the interior. sure. mastershakeman fucked around with this message at 01:41 on Feb 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
warcrimes posted:No poo poo. Don't draft an RB in the top five. Disagree
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2017 04:28
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MikeMayock/status/828978735638519808
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 16:01
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/1043TheFan/status/829046281364525062 Lol yes pls
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 20:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 02:54 |
|
|
gently caress NO gently caress ME
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 21:13
|
|