Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
minusX
Jun 16, 2007

Say something hideous and horrible jumps out at you. Something so disgusting that it simply must die.
Ah! Oh!..So tacky! I can't...look...directly at it!

89 posted:

i posted this in the PS4 thread, but this might be a better place to post it.

About that Samsung UN40KU6300 40" 4K TV I just ordered....my PS4 Pro is in the living room. From what I've been reading, the longer the cable, the harder it is on a 4K HDR signal to be sent. Although, it seems some have had success with long cables (I think I could possibly get away with using a 35ft or maybe a 25ft cable).

But, my main problem is that I don't want to move my PS4 Pro from my living room. So, I figured I could get a HDMI switch. So it goes:

PS4 Pro HDMI Output
>
HDMI Switch
>
HDMI Switch 1 Output Goes to the Onkyo Reciever that has the Living Room 1080P TV AND HDMI Switch Output 2 Goes Straight to Bedroom 4K TV

I won't be using the 1080p TV while using the 4K one.

What HDMI Switch and what HDMI 2.0 cable should I get? I thought I had the right Switch picked out, but it only outputted 10GBps, and the 4K HDR needs at least 13GBps from what I've gathered.

Will these work?
Switch: https://www.amazon.com/Kinps-Select...hdmi+switch+2.0
Cable: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009K4J8RS/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A1DCPNQKKEISZB

Why are you having the system in a different room?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Endless Mike
Aug 13, 2003



Because he has another TV there.

89
Feb 24, 2006

#worldchamps
I didn't consider how far the PS4 controller might extend out. So I think I'm just gonna move the PS4 in my bedroom since I have my Xbox One in the living room and try that out.

sam16
Oct 29, 2007
Pillbug
So, uh, all the people who bought a Vizio smart tv? They were spying on you and selling off the data.

quote:

What did Vizio know about what was going on in the privacy of consumers’ homes? On a second-by-second basis, Vizio collected a selection of pixels on the screen that it matched to a database of TV, movie, and commercial content. What’s more, Vizio identified viewing data from cable or broadband service providers, set-top boxes, streaming devices, DVD players, and over-the-air broadcasts. Add it all up and Vizio captured as many as 100 billion data points each day from millions of TVs.

Vizio then turned that mountain of data into cash by selling consumers’ viewing histories to advertisers and others. And let’s be clear: We’re not talking about summary information about national viewing trends. According to the complaint, Vizio got personal. The company provided consumers’ IP addresses to data aggregators, who then matched the address with an individual consumer or household. Vizio’s contracts with third parties prohibited the re-identification of consumers and households by name, but allowed a host of other personal details – for example, sex, age, income, marital status, household size, education, and home ownership. And Vizio permitted these companies to track and target its consumers across devices.

Bolded the scary part. They were selling targeted data to third parties.

Butt Reactor
Oct 6, 2005

Even in zero gravity, you're an asshole.

sam16 posted:

So, uh, all the people who bought a Vizio smart tv? They were spying on you and selling off the data.


Bolded the scary part. They were selling targeted data to third parties.

Well I was considering a vizio 4k but gently caress that I guess.

Anyways for content I saw this Toshiba while perusing Best Buy today. Should I keep looking to see if there's a better 4K TV in the $300-400 range or should I go ahead and snatch this?

priznat
Jul 7, 2009

Let's get drunk and kiss each other all night.
Didn't LG and Samsung do similar things with viewing data? I am NOT saying it is fine for vizio because a bunch of companies do/did it, that is messed up.

I could swear there was something where there was a samsung backdoor for their teleconference capable tvs and people were advised the camera could just be on whenever and they'd never know (also true for pretty much anything with a camera on it these days sadly).

The Cameo
Jan 20, 2005


I'm pretty sure the Smart Interactivity=TV spyware thing came up years ago now. Watching the uproar happen over it, I'm having a real deja vu moment.

bull3964
Nov 18, 2000

DO YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND OF ME PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK.


The big difference in Vizio's case is that the data wasn't deidentified before handing it off to a third party. That's a gigantic no-no and the primary reason why they got fined as much as they did.

GreenNight
Feb 19, 2006
Turning the light on the darkest places, you and I know we got to face this now. We got to face this now.

Do we even know if they made more money than they were fined?

Endless Mike
Aug 13, 2003



GreenNight posted:

Do we even know if they made more money than they were fined?

You know this answer in your heart.

Auron
Jan 10, 2002
<img alt="" border="0" src="https://fi.somethingawful.com/customtitles/title-auron.jpg"/><br/>Drunken Robot Rage

GreenNight posted:

Do we even know if they made more money than they were fined?

Uh, a $2.2 million fine is a drop in the bucket compared to money Vizo makes.

GreenNight
Feb 19, 2006
Turning the light on the darkest places, you and I know we got to face this now. We got to face this now.

I meant the money made from selling the data, not their gross profits.

Ciaphas
Nov 20, 2005

> BEWARE, COWARD :ovr:


I'm thinking about an upgrade on my five year old 50" 1080p LED. I'm not au fait with what's current, except knowing that the PS4 Pro (which I don't have yet but am thinking about for Nioh, among others) does good work with TVs that support 4k and HDR. About HDR, is that a technology that's implicit to 4k TVs or do I have to specifically search for it?

Also, is OLED somehow worth the massive markup over LED panels? I haven't actually gone and looked at any TVs yet, mind, I'm just thinking about it ATM.

uwaeve
Oct 21, 2010



focus this time so i don't have to keep telling you idiots what happened
Lipstick Apathy

Ciaphas posted:

I'm thinking about an upgrade on my five year old 50" 1080p LED. I'm not au fait with what's current, except knowing that the PS4 Pro (which I don't have yet but am thinking about for Nioh, among others) does good work with TVs that support 4k and HDR. About HDR, is that a technology that's implicit to 4k TVs or do I have to specifically search for it?

Also, is OLED somehow worth the massive markup over LED panels? I haven't actually gone and looked at any TVs yet, mind, I'm just thinking about it ATM.

Once you go true black, etc. You'll known pretty much instantaneously if it's worth it when you look at LCD and OLED side-by-side. The OLED black is perfect and the off-axis black and contrast is great compared to the other thread sweetheart, the KS8000. It's going to be a personal call based on the value of that difference. I own the KS8000 but wish I had an OLED. Being a cheap gently caress, I just suppress the disappointment whenever I see dark gray instead of black, or the contrast washes out near the sides when I'm not directly in front of the TV.

Another way to put it is that I think the difference is worth it while my wife does not, and here we are.

pzy
Feb 20, 2004

Da Boom!

sam16 posted:

So, uh, all the people who bought a Vizio smart tv? They were spying on you and selling off the data.

The really scary part is all the dumbass comments on that post

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

Ciaphas posted:


Also, is OLED somehow worth the massive markup over LED panels? I haven't actually gone and looked at any TVs yet, mind, I'm just thinking about it ATM.

If you care about picture quality? Absolutely.

If you don't care about picture quality? Absolutely.

Ciaphas
Nov 20, 2005

> BEWARE, COWARD :ovr:


uwaeve posted:

Once you go true black, etc. You'll known pretty much instantaneously if it's worth it when you look at LCD and OLED side-by-side. The OLED black is perfect and the off-axis black and contrast is great compared to the other thread sweetheart, the KS8000. It's going to be a personal call based on the value of that difference. I own the KS8000 but wish I had an OLED. Being a cheap gently caress, I just suppress the disappointment whenever I see dark gray instead of black, or the contrast washes out near the sides when I'm not directly in front of the TV.

Another way to put it is that I think the difference is worth it while my wife does not, and here we are.

If the KS8000 series is the thread darling for non-OLEDs, what is it for OLEDs? I might stop at Fry's this weekend and do a side by side. I know they have the KS8000, at least.

Endless Mike
Aug 13, 2003



LG is the only OLED company currently so it's whether you want a curved or flat screen LG

KS
Jun 10, 2003
Outrageous Lumpwad
Short notes on the LG 2016 models. All are 4k. Widely considered to have the same picture quality and all support HDR. All 3 come in 55" and 65"

B series: flat.
C series: curved, 3d capable
E series: flat, 3d capable, thinner.

Part numbers are OLEDXXY6P where XX = size and Y = B,C,or E.

There's also a G series but it's super pricey.

GreenNight
Feb 19, 2006
Turning the light on the darkest places, you and I know we got to face this now. We got to face this now.

Anyone ever buy from this place?

http://www.ebuyusa.com/prodinfo.phtml?id=2880&

LG OLED65E6P - ~$1800

Edit: nevermind, people have had issues with them: http://www.avsforum.com/forum/197-lcd-flat-panel-great-found-deals/2196937-ebuyusa-2.html

GreenNight fucked around with this message at 01:38 on Feb 9, 2017

Ciaphas
Nov 20, 2005

> BEWARE, COWARD :ovr:


Thanks, Fry's has the LG OLED55B6P as well, so I can do a compare and contrast to see whether OLED is worth $700. I'm guessing not, frankly, because the only things I do on the TV are PS4, Wii U and the odd PC game over Steam Link. Barely ever watch movies or TV anymore.

bull3964
Nov 18, 2000

DO YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND OF ME PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK.


In that case, I think you might be better off waiting to see what some of the 1080p Sony TVs with HDR might bring. Might be further savings since you don't really need 4k.

Rastor
Jun 2, 2001

Endless Mike posted:

LG is the only OLED company currently so it's whether you want a curved or flat screen LG

LG Display (technically a sub / separate company from LG) also sells OLED panels to Panasonic and Sony now


So you don't have a choice of panels but you do have a choice of what badge is on the front.

Endless Mike
Aug 13, 2003



To my knowledge there's no Sony or Panasonic OLED TVs you can purchase today.

Rastor
Jun 2, 2001

Panasonic launched the CZ950 / Viera CZ952 in mid 2015, but you're right that the Sony Bravia A1E isn't something you can drive home with until later this year.

sellouts
Apr 23, 2003

There are, at best, a handful of posters in the this thread who are willing and able to pay for the Sony OLED when it comes out. Just so everyone is prepared.

bull3964
Nov 18, 2000

DO YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND OF ME PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK.


I don't think they've announced pricing yet. The Z9D is still their flagship though, so I think it will slot under that.

I would consider the Sony for superior motion processing so I wouldn't have to worry that every loving streamer box outputs 60p for some reason. But the lack of 3d is a no go for me. The C6 3d is so.loving.good. Better than any theater experience. Gobsmacking good to the point where I've increased my 3d library by about 60% since I bought it.

I will consider buying the 3d regular bluray over the UHD version at this point if the content warrants it.

Watched Kubo and the Two Strings in 3d last Friday and it was just captivating.

GreenNight
Feb 19, 2006
Turning the light on the darkest places, you and I know we got to face this now. We got to face this now.

There will be no 3D TV's at all in the next few years.

bull3964
Nov 18, 2000

DO YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND OF ME PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK.


GreenNight posted:

There will be no 3D TV's at all in the next few years.

Likely, but I'm going to enjoy it while it lasts.

Rastor
Jun 2, 2001

bull3964 posted:

I don't think they've announced pricing yet. The Z9D is still their flagship though, so I think it will slot under that.

It hasn't been possible to get a straight answer out of Sony. Some of their representatives have said the Z9D is the flagship, others have painted a picture more like this:



I think there is some attempting to protect pride and sales of existing Z9D stock going on. It is true that the Z9D still comes in the largest sizes and delivers the highest brightness levels, but only OLED delivers OLED contrast/black levels.

bull3964
Nov 18, 2000

DO YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND OF ME PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK.


Yeah, I don't think Sony wants to give up crowing about peak brightness anytime soon, so the Z9D is going to feature prominently.

I just think they had a sudden realization that they aren't going to be able to make the tech much cheaper soon, so they need OLED to fill the premium but not stratospheric price range.

qirex
Feb 15, 2001

I'd guess they'll come out around $2500 street for the 55", $3500-4000 for the 65". Wouldn't shock me if it was more, though.

bull3964
Nov 18, 2000

DO YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND OF ME PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK.


$2500 is the price that Samsung just announced for their QLED 55" display.

They're loving nuts. That's $500 more than the street on a 55" B6.

Rastor
Jun 2, 2001

QLED has some interesting characteristics; I don't dig the weird pentile subpixel arrangement they've gone for.



Some of the people who have seen it reported a sparkling/aliasing sort of effect on moving objects. Maybe you'll never ever see it from couch distance though.

bull3964
Nov 18, 2000

DO YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND OF ME PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK.


No matter how they want to spin it, it's still just an LCD. It's also old tech. My 2013 model W900A used the same fundamental tech, just in an edge lit configuration.

They just decided to give it a new name to confuse the market when people are comparison shopping OLED.

qirex
Feb 15, 2001

bull3964 posted:

No matter how they want to spin it, it's still just an LCD. It's also old tech. My 2013 model W900A used the same fundamental tech, just in an edge lit configuration.

They just decided to give it a new name to confuse the market when people are comparison shopping OLED.

QLED is better. Is two more!

dexefiend
Apr 25, 2003

THE GOGGLES DO NOTHING!
I might buy a OLED 65" B6P tonight...

It is the right choice ... right?

Edit: Ugggg. The Sony 930D eroded my confidence. Time to think some more.

dexefiend fucked around with this message at 00:53 on Feb 10, 2017

5 Second Poser
Sep 10, 2007

Don't You Wish You Were Me?
For what it's worth, I got the OLED 65" C6P, and have had it for a few weeks now. I'm still putting things together in terms of the entertainment center, so I haven't watched a ton on it, but it is an amazing TV. Got it from Cleveland Plasma, and the whole process with them was good. The thing that really swayed me to go with the C6 rather than the B6 is the fact that the chipset in the B6 isn't the same as the other models. So when the HDR Game update that came out a bit ago, the B6 didn't get that update at the same time.

Like was said in this thread when I was looking into TVs a month and a half ago, the black is amazing on it, the curve is barely noticeable, and it's just such a great picture. I highly recommend it. Can't wait to get the entertainment center and surround sound set up and really enjoy it. I'm not much of a 3D fan, but I'm looking forward to at least giving it a try with this TV.

Ciaphas
Nov 20, 2005

> BEWARE, COWARD :ovr:


Dumb questions I just thought of and haven't reflected on, can you save significantly by going for 1080p TVs or is their era coming to a close (and 4K common enough that there's no effective savings anymore)? Is it still possible for those to have HDR support? (ed: answer seems to be no)

The more I think the more I realize I have almost no use for 4K, but I've seen the difference between non-HDR and HDR and that looks quite spiffy.

Ciaphas fucked around with this message at 02:36 on Feb 10, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Don Lapre
Mar 28, 2001

If you're having problems you're either holding the phone wrong or you have tiny girl hands.
Is it possible for a 1080p panel to be hdr, sure but nobody is going to make it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply