Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



I was reminded of the Children of Men opening, but I guess it isn't so unexpected either, considering genre &c.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCTgUq6hzUk

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Spatulater bro!
Aug 19, 2003

Punch! Punch! Punch!

Powaqoatse posted:

I was reminded of the Children of Men opening, but I guess it isn't so unexpected either, considering genre &c.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCTgUq6hzUk

Yeah that's definitely in line with the scene. Right before the explosion there's even lots of empty room in the right side of the frame for us to watch the explosion.

UNRULY_HOUSEGUEST
Jul 19, 2006

mea culpa

Spatulater bro! posted:

Yeah that's definitely in line with the scene. Right before the explosion there's even lots of empty room in the right side of the frame for us to watch the explosion.

It seems like you're kind of asking for a confluence of things, though; that the film generate shock out of line with associated genre convention that's wholly unsignalled by editing or camerawork setup. The softer, playful (forgive me) postmodern loving with convention in something like The Departed or Pulp Fiction doesn't count, which is understandable, as even their successful surprises can be swiftly reabsorbed into the general tone and expectations of the film. Being down on anything you can retroactively pick out the work towards setting up, however, seems a little ungenerous as they're surely there more for clarity after the fact rather than to brace a first time viewer in advance. So I'd ask if you're more concerned with the formalism of it, or just something genuinely capable of throwing the audience off kilter inside of a few seconds.

In which case, if I do name films with that quality, won't they cease to have the effect you're seeking? Here are two anyway: Fat Girl and Twentynine Palms.

edit: Actually, thinking about it, you most likely don't want to see those films above, as even if they conform to your conditions it's for extremely European arthouse ends, not exercising formal restraint in a genre film's opening gambits. If we're talking about just the absence of setup, like the restaurant thing you're describing, that happens in The Sopranos at least once, but not by the point where the fact of anyone in The Sopranos getting murdered is in itself surprising. But this is why I think viewer approach trumps that of the director. If your audience knows they're watching a crime film you're only ever skirting around expectations. Denying them half a second of setup to a sudden shooting might make it more impactful, but not all that much more.

UNRULY_HOUSEGUEST fucked around with this message at 19:06 on Feb 10, 2017

Allyn
Sep 4, 2007

I love Charlie from Busted!
The car crash in Punch-Drunk Love, maybe? It's been years since I saw it but I remember it being very sudden and out of place, right down to Barry largely ignoring it

Secret Agent X23
May 11, 2005

Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

Lobok posted:


Not sure why this example sticks out in my mind but Die Hard With a Vengeance has an opening scene that fits. Shots across New York of the city waking up, the hustle and bustle, traffic, "Summer in the City" playing to keep you jazzed and then---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLjzPwm4mUI

That kinda sorta reminds me of the opening scene of Casino:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMva00IO0zA

There's also Hitchcock's thingy with killing off his main character a third of the way through Psycho.

Cage
Jul 17, 2003
www.revivethedrive.org

Secret Agent X23 posted:

That kinda sorta reminds me of the opening scene of Casino:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMva00IO0zA

There's also Hitchcock's thingy with killing off his main character a third of the way through Psycho.
I cant believe I never noticed how abrupt and stupidly obvious the dummy in the car is. Been a while since I watched it from the beginning though, usually catch it on TV midway through.

Chubby Henparty
Aug 13, 2007


I don't know of this fits but it made me think of the random street shot in Run Lola Run where something else is happening, but your eye is drawn to 'hey, hot chick extra' walking past. It cuts away and when it returns she's blatantly replaced by someone considerably older. Not sure if it was for any thematic point but was awesome to be cleverly messed with like that.

Spatulater bro!
Aug 19, 2003

Punch! Punch! Punch!

GimpChimp posted:

It seems like you're kind of asking for a confluence of things, though; that the film generate shock out of line with associated genre convention that's wholly unsignalled by editing or camerawork setup. The softer, playful (forgive me) postmodern loving with convention in something like The Departed or Pulp Fiction doesn't count, which is understandable, as even their successful surprises can be swiftly reabsorbed into the general tone and expectations of the film. Being down on anything you can retroactively pick out the work towards setting up, however, seems a little ungenerous as they're surely there more for clarity after the fact rather than to brace a first time viewer in advance. So I'd ask if you're more concerned with the formalism of it, or just something genuinely capable of throwing the audience off kilter inside of a few seconds.

In which case, if I do name films with that quality, won't they cease to have the effect you're seeking? Here are two anyway: Fat Girl and Twentynine Palms.

edit: Actually, thinking about it, you most likely don't want to see those films above, as even if they conform to your conditions it's for extremely European arthouse ends, not exercising formal restraint in a genre film's opening gambits. If we're talking about just the absence of setup, like the restaurant thing you're describing, that happens in The Sopranos at least once, but not by the point where the fact of anyone in The Sopranos getting murdered is in itself surprising. But this is why I think viewer approach trumps that of the director. If your audience knows they're watching a crime film you're only ever skirting around expectations. Denying them half a second of setup to a sudden shooting might make it more impactful, but not all that much more.

Good thoughts. I've seen Fat Girl, and I agree with your edit.

I'd say I'm more concerned with the formalism of it. As startling and unexpected as the explosion in Children of Men is, it's true to the form of the scene. Another example would be the startling moment in Dog Soldiers with the animal corpse dropping into the fire. It's shocking, but not formally incongruent.

I guess what I'm envisioning is a filmmaker expressly subverting expected formal conventions as a sort of cinematic slight of hand. With the intent of scaring the poo poo out of the audience. "They think they're seeing this kind of scene, but it's actually this kind of scene."

From Dusk Till Dawn almost fits the bill, but that's more on the whole film level rather than the individual scene level, so I wouldn't exactly call it shocking. It's also ruined if you've seen even one second of the trailer.

Purple Monkey
May 5, 2014

:phone:Hello
I would think a better example from Psycho is Arbogast's death, you would think the above shot would be just to establish what the second floor looks like, but then Norma Bates comes charging out of one of the rooms

Hockles
Dec 25, 2007

Resident of Camp Blood
Crystal Lake

The bus scene from the first Final Destination is the first thing that comes to mind.

Babysitter Super Sleuth
Apr 26, 2012

my posts are as bad the Current Releases review of Gone Girl

How have none of you brought up Jaws yet?

Secret Agent X23
May 11, 2005

Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

Purple Monkey posted:

I would think a better example from Psycho is Arbogast's death, you would think the above shot would be just to establish what the second floor looks like, but then Norma Bates comes charging out of one of the rooms

I see what you're getting at. But I think that in terms of overall story strategy, Marion's death is more, shall we say, "disruptive," because at that point we're left with no characters to identify with. Her story's been carefully set up, we've been following her for forty minutes or whatever, and then...wham! All we're left with is the creepy guy, so it's sort of like we have to start all over again. When Arbogast gets killed, we still have Sam and the sister (whose name doesn't come to mind immediately) to hang our hats on.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Babysitter Super Sleuth posted:

How have none of you brought up Jaws yet?

Actually my mind originally went to the infamous Sam Jackson scene in Deep Blue Sea.

Spatulater bro!
Aug 19, 2003

Punch! Punch! Punch!

Lobok posted:

Actually my mind originally went to the infamous Sam Jackson scene in Deep Blue Sea.

I would say this is the closest so far. The scene has the feel of a typical "rally the morale" scene just before a big showdown, and then nope. Too bad the dogshit CGI ruins the whole thing.

MacheteZombie
Feb 4, 2007

Lobok posted:

Actually my mind originally went to the infamous Sam Jackson scene in Deep Blue Sea.

I saw that movie so many times. "You ate my bird" cracks me up every time, and when LL Cool J axes his way through the ovens to escape was kinda neat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwTEdFFD0Hw

Sam Jackson scene because

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz1J9PUcMQ0

MacheteZombie fucked around with this message at 20:39 on Feb 10, 2017

syscall girl
Nov 7, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
Fun Shoe

Cage posted:

I'm sure you've seen it, but what about Marvin in Pulp Fiction? That any closer to what you're looking for?

Brad Pitt's character's death in Meet Joe Black is similar.

Allyn
Sep 4, 2007

I love Charlie from Busted!

Spatulater bro! posted:

Are there any movies that surprise or shock the audience by subverting conventional film language? To explain what I mean here's an example taken from my imagination: Two people are sitting in a restaurant having a conversation. The formalities of the scene - the music, the compositions, etc - all suggest that it's a standard two-shot over-the-shoulder dialogue scene wherein two people are simply relaying exposition to each other and to the audience. But out of absolutely nowhere a gunman appears and shoots one of them. The film gave no hints or foreshadowing, via musical cues, setup shots or any other film technique, that this was about to happen.

I don't think I've ever seen a movie that does this. It seems that filmmakers feel obligated to telegraph what's about to happen. Or at least that something is about to happen. Especially in horror movies. You can always tell when the purpose of a scene is for narrative exposition and when the purpose is to get down to business. The chatty car ride to the cabin? That's to get to know the characters. The scene with a couple getting naked in the dark lake? That's when someone's going to die.

I'd love to see a movie that turns this on its head.

Okay i haven't seen it so I can't guarantee it, but its reputation precedes it for this: what about Takashi Miike's Audition?

david_a
Apr 24, 2010




Megamarm
Honestly Top Secret was the first movie I thought of :v:

Custard Undies
Jan 7, 2006

#essereFerrari

My first thought was a scene from the Heath Ledger movie "Two Hands".

Two kids walking and talking and then something happens out of nowhere.

regulargonzalez
Aug 18, 2006
UNGH LET ME LICK THOSE BOOTS DADDY HULU ;-* ;-* ;-* YES YES GIVE ME ALL THE CORPORATE CUMMIES :shepspends: :shepspends: :shepspends: ADBLOCK USERS DESERVE THE DEATH PENALTY, DON'T THEY DADDY?
WHEN THE RICH GET RICHER I GET HORNIER :a2m::a2m::a2m::a2m:

Spatulater bro! posted:

Are there any movies that surprise or shock the audience by subverting conventional film language? To explain what I mean here's an example taken from my imagination: Two people are sitting in a restaurant having a conversation. The formalities of the scene - the music, the compositions, etc - all suggest that it's a standard two-shot over-the-shoulder dialogue scene wherein two people are simply relaying exposition to each other and to the audience. But out of absolutely nowhere a gunman appears and shoots one of them. The film gave no hints or foreshadowing, via musical cues, setup shots or any other film technique, that this was about to happen.

I don't think I've ever seen a movie that does this. It seems that filmmakers feel obligated to telegraph what's about to happen. Or at least that something is about to happen. Especially in horror movies. You can always tell when the purpose of a scene is for narrative exposition and when the purpose is to get down to business. The chatty car ride to the cabin? That's to get to know the characters. The scene with a couple getting naked in the dark lake? That's when someone's going to die.

I'd love to see a movie that turns this on its head.

In a different way, the last shot of Full Frontal does this. Similarly, Mulholland Dr and Inland Empire both subvert audience expectations via the technical filmmaking elements (as opposed to the story).

Lester Shy
May 1, 2002

Goodness no, now that wouldn't do at all!
I don't know if it's exactly what you're looking for, but the shotgun scene (and the rewind which immediately erases it from the movie) in Funny Games plays with this idea a little.

MrJacobs
Sep 15, 2008

Spatulater bro! posted:

I would say this is the closest so far. The scene has the feel of a typical "rally the morale" scene just before a big showdown, and then nope. Too bad the dogshit CGI ruins the whole thing.

Considering the year and how the scene plays, there is pretty much no way it could have looked better without throwing a lot more money at it, which wasn't ever going to happen on a shark movie.

Hat Thoughts
Jul 27, 2012

Spatulater bro! posted:

Are there any movies that surprise or shock the audience by subverting conventional film language? To explain what I mean here's an example taken from my imagination: Two people are sitting in a restaurant having a conversation. The formalities of the scene - the music, the compositions, etc - all suggest that it's a standard two-shot over-the-shoulder dialogue scene wherein two people are simply relaying exposition to each other and to the audience. But out of absolutely nowhere a gunman appears and shoots one of them. The film gave no hints or foreshadowing, via musical cues, setup shots or any other film technique, that this was about to happen.

I don't think I've ever seen a movie that does this. It seems that filmmakers feel obligated to telegraph what's about to happen. Or at least that something is about to happen. Especially in horror movies. You can always tell when the purpose of a scene is for narrative exposition and when the purpose is to get down to business. The chatty car ride to the cabin? That's to get to know the characters. The scene with a couple getting naked in the dark lake? That's when someone's going to die.

I'd love to see a movie that turns this on its head.

When the girl interacted with the onscreen text in Detention it kind of weirded me out

bows1
May 16, 2004

Chill, whale, chill

Spatulater bro! posted:

I would think, if done well and sparingly, a movie like this could create a hell of a lot of tension by keeping it up. The audience would be on their guard even through the most seemingly mundane scene.

What about something like the final scene of the sopranos

Escobarbarian
Jun 18, 2004


Grimey Drawer
God drat if that isn't one of the tensest scenes in film/TV history despite literally nothing happening

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



bows1 posted:

What about something like the final scene of the sopranos

Escobarbarian posted:

God drat if that isn't one of the tensest scenes in film/TV history despite literally nothing happening

It's an amazing cap on a fantastic six seasons. I can't imagine it ending any other way.

Well I can, but my imagination says it would be worse & in this case I trust it.

WeAreTheRomans
Feb 23, 2010

by R. Guyovich
I feel like there's at least a few points in Jacob's Ladder (especially the Director's Cut) that achieve this. But then by the end, you're completely disoriented and ready for almost anything to happen, up to and including Satan materialising in front of you and dragging you down to Hell

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



WeAreTheRomans posted:

I feel like there's at least a few points in Jacob's Ladder (especially the Director's Cut) that achieve this. But then by the end, you're completely disoriented and ready for almost anything to happen, up to and including Satan materialising in front of you and dragging you down to Hell

But if you've made your peace, then you'll see it's really an angel freeing you from the earth.

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD
Sep 14, 2007

everything is yours

Spatulater bro! posted:

Are there any movies that surprise or shock the audience by subverting conventional film language? To explain what I mean here's an example taken from my imagination: Two people are sitting in a restaurant having a conversation. The formalities of the scene - the music, the compositions, etc - all suggest that it's a standard two-shot over-the-shoulder dialogue scene wherein two people are simply relaying exposition to each other and to the audience. But out of absolutely nowhere a gunman appears and shoots one of them. The film gave no hints or foreshadowing, via musical cues, setup shots or any other film technique, that this was about to happen.

I don't think I've ever seen a movie that does this. It seems that filmmakers feel obligated to telegraph what's about to happen. Or at least that something is about to happen. Especially in horror movies. You can always tell when the purpose of a scene is for narrative exposition and when the purpose is to get down to business. The chatty car ride to the cabin? That's to get to know the characters. The scene with a couple getting naked in the dark lake? That's when someone's going to die.

I'd love to see a movie that turns this on its head.

See the movie Walker.

DeimosRising
Oct 17, 2005

¡Hola SEA!


Walker is so loving weird it makes Cox's other movies seem tame, and yet it's not even an exaggeration of the actual events

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD
Sep 14, 2007

everything is yours
Walker has one particular moment in it that has freaked me out than anything in any Lynch movie.

CharlieFoxtrot
Mar 27, 2007

organize digital employees



The trailer for Red Eye starts off with romantic comedy cliches before revealing its real nature as a thriller. I'm trying to remember if the actual movie does the same thing, but the posters and whatnot didn't disguise it

Looten Plunder
Jul 11, 2006
Grimey Drawer
I feel like there are plenty of these moments in Coen Bros films and Jeremy Saulnier films.

The Cohens for example, make you think like you're watching a quirky comedy but then there are massive bursts of violence out of nowhere. I know it's not actually the Coen's but it's certainly an homage to them; The pilot of Season 1 of Fargo when his wife dies is completely unexpected.

Ditto for Saulnier. Blue Ruin's premise is about subverting our expectations of action movies/thrillers.

Leave
Feb 7, 2012

Taking the term "Koopaling" to a whole new level since 2016.
In shows where there's a cliffhanger season finale, when the next season picks up right where the cliffhanger left off, do they film that little bit at the time of the cliffhanger? I'm mostly curious how they get the actors to look exactly the same, since if they don't film it then, they have to come back months later.

Snak
Oct 10, 2005

I myself will carry you to the Gates of Valhalla...
You will ride eternal,
shiny and chrome.
Grimey Drawer

Leavemywife posted:

In shows where there's a cliffhanger season finale, when the next season picks up right where the cliffhanger left off, do they film that little bit at the time of the cliffhanger? I'm mostly curious how they get the actors to look exactly the same, since if they don't film it then, they have to come back months later.

It depends on the show. Sometimes they are filmed back to back, and sometimes they aren't. Sometimes you can tell it was, because the actors look different starting in the second episode of the next season.

I just realized you mean the little bit. Sometime they film the whole two-parter back to back. I'm not sure about your specific question.

syscall girl
Nov 7, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
Fun Shoe

Looten Plunder posted:

I feel like there are plenty of these moments in Coen Bros films and Jeremy Saulnier films.

The Cohens for example, make you think like you're watching a quirky comedy but then there are massive bursts of violence out of nowhere. I know it's not actually the Coen's but it's certainly an homage to them; The pilot of Season 1 of Fargo when his wife dies is completely unexpected.

Ditto for Saulnier. Blue Ruin's premise is about subverting our expectations of action movies/thrillers.

That hammer to the dome made me quit watching Fargo season 1 just out of shock.

I've since watched both seasons twice but that was just not what I was looking for at that particular moment. Yich

Leave
Feb 7, 2012

Taking the term "Koopaling" to a whole new level since 2016.

Snak posted:

It depends on the show. Sometimes they are filmed back to back, and sometimes they aren't. Sometimes you can tell it was, because the actors look different starting in the second episode of the next season.

I just realized you mean the little bit. Sometime they film the whole two-parter back to back. I'm not sure about your specific question.

It's hard to explain what I mean, but I have an example. Supernatural spoilers ahoy!

At the end of Supernatural season six, Sam, Dean, and Cass are in a standoff. I don't recall exactly what happens, but when season 7 starts, they're still in the standoff, same spots and all. Did they film the finale of season six and the first few minutes of the seventh season all at once?

Snak
Oct 10, 2005

I myself will carry you to the Gates of Valhalla...
You will ride eternal,
shiny and chrome.
Grimey Drawer
Possibly? It's also possible they filmed the entire first episode of season 7 at the same time as the season 6 finale. Some shows do that.

Some shows also don't even know what's going to happen as they haven't decided how the cliffhanger is going to resolve.

Leave
Feb 7, 2012

Taking the term "Koopaling" to a whole new level since 2016.

Snak posted:

Possibly? It's also possible they filmed the entire first episode of season 7 at the same time as the season 6 finale. Some shows do that.

Some shows also don't even know what's going to happen as they haven't decided how the cliffhanger is going to resolve.

Oh, okay! Thanks a ton.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

got any sevens
Feb 9, 2013

by Cyrano4747
Who shot Mr Burns?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply