|
Look, if they didn't send the last few packets somewhere they would just build up inside the doorbell until it was full.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 01:26 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2024 18:52 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 01:29 |
|
quote:[–]akesh45 [-1] 4 points 19 hours ago
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 01:29 |
|
Salt Fish posted:Look, if they didn't send the last few packets somewhere they would just build up inside the doorbell until it was full. in middle-school gym class i was yelled at for not walking during a cooldown and the gym teacher said "where do you think all that blood is going to go? hmm?"
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 02:05 |
|
I just managed to bully a client cert out of the help desk for my VPN app. They were going to call me on my "on-file" contact number with the passphrase to unlock the key for import. No worries guys, I managed to get it in one guess: CompanyName123 Gonna have some interesting conversations on Monday.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 02:30 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 02:59 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 03:50 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 04:27 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 05:18 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security mods
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 05:32 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 06:42 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security new thread title pls
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 07:53 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security spankmeister posted:new thread title pls mods plzz
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 08:32 |
|
spankmeister posted:new thread title pls
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 10:32 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 10:55 |
|
flosofl posted:I just managed to bully a client cert out of the help desk for my VPN app. They were going to call me on my "on-file" contact number with the passphrase to unlock the key for import. No worries guys, I managed to get it in one guess: CompanyName123 yeah, with HR whilst being sacked for violating corpsec policy!
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 11:00 |
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security spankmeister posted:new thread title pls
|
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 11:14 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 14:09 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security Security Fuckup Megathread - v13.3 - the s in iot stands for security also: quote:On January 6, 2017, Butte Highland Mining Company changed the focus of the business by acquiring all of the ownership interests of InterLok Key Management, Inc., a Texas corporation engaged in the business of developing and licensing its patented key based encryption methods. To better reflect the new business, the name was changed to Ironclad Encryption Corporation. Ironclad Encryption Corporation focuses on providing global freedom to execute electronic transmissions and store electronic data absent the oppressive intrusion of cyber-terrorism that causes destruction and loss. The company offers cyber security encryption so advanced, it operates without performance degradation or significant band-width usage. To learn more about Ironclad Encryption Corporation, please visit http://ironcladencryption.com. this seems vaguely familiar
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 16:44 |
|
patent filed in 1997 https://www.google.com/patents/US6157722
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 16:47 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 16:58 |
|
there is no way a headline like that would work now
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 17:32 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 18:09 |
|
OSI bean dip posted:this seems vaguely familiar iron clad, rock solid
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 20:44 |
|
fart touching
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 22:12 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 23:08 |
|
Also those guys chaos dunked on Matt
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 23:08 |
|
oh hey the thread changed titles between reloads thanks mods
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 02:13 |
|
OSI bean dip posted:Security Fuckup Megathread - v13.3 - the s in iot stands for security i'm the "in the news" section that isn't coverage of the company but coverage of other companies getting hacked also they all 404, which is also me
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 02:29 |
|
I read writeups about malware doing this kind of thing for C2 signaling years ago. Not exactly a new behavior though uncommon
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 04:17 |
|
Truga posted:the s in iot stands for security lol
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 04:22 |
|
abraham linkedin posted:i'm the "in the news" section that isn't coverage of the company but coverage of other companies getting hacked Versimilitude
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 04:32 |
|
OSI bean dip posted:Security Fuckup Megathread - v13.3 - the s in iot stands for security didn't one of the hucksters from your column have a shell company named that? EDIT: column lol what am I eighty, I mean your blog
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 04:41 |
|
LordSaturn posted:didn't one of the hucksters from your column have a shell company named that? I think it was a web journal actually
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:43 |
|
LordSaturn posted:didn't one of the hucksters from your column have a shell company named that? lol yeah. it really is just uncanny. they're different people as far as i can see. sitting on this for now
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:00 |
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:I read writeups about malware doing this kind of thing for C2 signaling years ago. Not exactly a new behavior though uncommon I'm pretty sure I've seen a full IP-over-DNS solution implemented a while back as a way to bypass certain captive portals.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:30 |
|
wolrah posted:I'm pretty sure I've seen a full IP-over-DNS solution implemented a while back as a way to bypass certain captive portals. it's built in to DD-WRT
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:45 |
|
i've had a lot of success just binding sshd to dns tcp
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:48 |
|
why do all AV providers feel the need to install MitM certs onto machines nowadays anyway
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 13:18 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2024 18:52 |
|
Westie posted:why do all AV providers feel the need to install MitM certs onto machines nowadays anyway The misguided notion that you're going to do a better job checking certs than the cert system itself. It does make retarded kind of sense, but it also always ends up with them doing a far weaker implementation. They're not 100% wrong. If they were to do a good job and provide an extra layer in the cert chain then on a long enought timeline they could provde value. They're never going to do that, though. The impulse is understandable. The execution is unconscionable.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 13:25 |