|
paranoid randroid posted:lol and a ban on federal funding for abortion, because gently caress you i guess They literally ban federal money for abortions every session For like the last thirty years
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 16:45 |
|
|
Epic High Five posted:When do we start seeing EU countries propping up leftist movements with money and weapons and consultants? At this point they'd have to be pretty cucked to imagine we aren't a huge existential threat to their way of life France is on the edge of electing someone from what might as well be their nazi party Hungary turned away refugees Poland turned away refugees Greece has a nazi party in power Germany's insistence that everyone just has to tighten their belts and cut programs is why Europe is in the mess they're in They ain't gonna save us dawg.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:When do we start seeing EU countries propping up leftist movements with money and weapons and consultants? At this point they'd have to be pretty cucked to imagine we aren't a huge existential threat to their way of life lol the EU isn't leftist
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
skaboomizzy posted:They literally ban federal money for abortions every session gotta tick all them boxes on the purity checklist
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
mormonpartyboat posted:naw dogg title of document: C:\Users\JRSHAP~1\AppData\Roaming\SoftQuad\XMetal\7.0\gen\ECTITL~1.XML Our medicaid repeal bill is apparently MS-DOS compliant, sweeet.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
shocker the plan is "make plans cover far, far, less and offer a negligible reduction in cost"
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
Maybe China will finally go back to being communist. ... ... 
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:31
|
|
|
aaaaaaaand here's the "old people just die i guess" part SEC. 135. CHANGE IN PERMISSIBLE AGE VARIATION IN HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM RATES. Section 2701(a)(1)(A)(iii) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(a)(1)(A)(iii)), as inserted by section 1201(4) of Public Law 111–148, is amended by inserting after ‘‘3 to 1 for adults (consistent with section 2707(c))’’ the following: ‘‘or, for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, as the Secretary may implement through interim final regulation, 5 to 1 for adults (consistent with section 2707(c)) or such other ratio for adults (consistent with section 2707(c)) as the State involved may provide’’. a reference to this: (1) In general With respect to the premium rate charged by a health insurance issuer for health insurance coverage offered in the individual or small group market— (A) such rate shall vary with respect to the particular plan or coverage involved only by— (i) whether such plan or coverage covers an individual or family; (ii) rating area, as established in accordance with paragraph (2); (iii) age, except that such rate shall not vary by more than 3 to 1 for adults (consistent with section 300gg–6(c) of this title); and (iv) tobacco use, except that such rate shall not vary by more than 1.5 to 1; and mormonpartyboat fucked around with this message at 00:34 on Mar 7, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
lol that healthcare plan.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:I'm sure Angela "Austerity" Merkel will be right on that there is your answer. besides why is this thread convinced yurop is not coming right behind you? pissbabby is goddamn symbol now. and there are experienced and competent politicians using his tactics.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
CortezFantastic posted:https://twitter.com/NPR/status/838887470351659008 Going right after the individual market. And poor people. And people. mormonpartyboat posted:https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/838889108722315264 Aaaaand it's a nothing but aspirations list. lame
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:33
|
|
|
skaboomizzy posted:They literally ban federal money for abortions every session this seems different? its looks like it bans giving medicare money to states if that state allows some of that money to go to a prohibited entity, regardless of if that money is going towards abortions or not
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:34
|
|
|
I'm not saying they're leftist, I'm saying that regardless of their personal politics they're hosed if Trump gets everything he wants and dissolves NATO and the EU They wouldn't be doing this because they agree with it, what do they care if it isn't in their own country, but because it would destabilize an immediate threat. I dunno maybe name your leftist fringe group the Roma Murder Party and shop it around to EU billionaires and MPs
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:34
|
|
|
Can someone link the worst parts of this new plan
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:34
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Press release aside, apparently there's an actual law this guy saw? "gosh", says republican dipshit congressman chuck ballsley, "i've got a great idea. what if we just say we're doing what we were elected to do, but have it actually happen four years from now so that the horrible consequences are put off until after we're re-elected?"
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
there is so much badness i dont know how to start processing it, then refuting it to all my crazy stupid trumpsters on facebook
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:Can someone link the worst parts of this new plan mpb has already done that for you its really just all of it in general
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
that bill is so doa lmao
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:They wouldn't be doing this because they agree with it, what do they care if it isn't in their own country, but because it would destabilize an immediate threat. This isn't the way that human beings think about stuff
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
I want to see a legit comprehensive economic analysis of how this is going to affect Insurance Carrier's bottom line. If it's bad for insurance companies, then we will likely see some enormous push back from the industry. If it's beneficial or neutral, then all hope is lost, it will pass easily.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
it's going to piss off the lunatic caucus in the house and there's no way the senate goes along with it
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:I'm not saying they're leftist, I'm saying that regardless of their personal politics they're hosed if Trump gets everything he wants and dissolves NATO and the EU The EU is dead if Le Pen wins.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
also the cbo score is going to be loving atrocious
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
I thought the CBO was specifically barred from analyzing GOP healthcare plans
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
u wont have insurance u will just have healthcare bux that we dispense out for you for being a healthy individual dont get sick or die or we'll have to deduct the healthcare buxes away from you and u will be ineligible for the healthcare bux program should your healthcare bux reach zero 
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/838889979501760514 bahahahahahahahahahahahaha
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
Stop waiting for Superman folks.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
Trump to America after he nukes Syria https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5e5SP4LE5M
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
Schnorkles posted:that bill is so doa lmao it's (hopefully) telling that republican senators have already spoken out against it when they've been happy to be corralled along with whatever bullshit the white house is up to until this point
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ThePlumLineGS/status/838896448183894016
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
oh they're not even going to keep the good things SEC. 134. INCREASING COVERAGE OPTIONS. Section 1302 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(3), by inserting ‘‘and with respect to a plan year before plan year 2020’’ after ‘‘subsection (e)’’; and (2) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(5) SUNSET .—The provisions of this sub-section shall not apply after December 31, 2019, and after such date any reference to this subsection or level of coverage or plan described in this sub-section and any requirement under law applying such a level of coverage or plan shall have no force or effect (and such a requirement shall be applied as if this section had been repealed).’’. that section is Essential health benefits requirements and contains all the requirements for (among other things): (a) Essential health benefits package - In this title, the term “essential health benefits package” means, with respect to any health plan, coverage that— (1) provides for the essential health benefits defined by the Secretary under subsection (b); (2) limits cost-sharing for such coverage in accordance with subsection (c); and (3) subject to subsection (e), provides either the bronze, silver, gold, or platinum level of coverage described in subsection (d). (b) Essential health benefits (1) In general - Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary shall define the essential health benefits, except that such benefits shall include at least the following general categories and the items and services covered within the categories: (A) Ambulatory patient services. (B) Emergency services. (C) Hospitalization. (D) Maternity and newborn care. (E) Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment. (F) Prescription drugs. (G) Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices. (H) Laboratory services. (I) Preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management. (J) Pediatric services, including oral and vision care.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
Also hahahaha that healthcare plan sucks dilz
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
Venuz Patrol posted:it's (hopefully) telling that republican senators have already spoken out against it when they've been happy to be corralled along with whatever bullshit the white house is up to until this point its doa and i think house leadership knows it. they're gonna rely on the suicide squad to blow it up so they can say "well gosh we tried" and hope that their base doesn't eat them alive
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
Schnorkles posted:also the cbo score is going to be loving atrocious Didn't they pass a rule earlier that forbade the CBO from saying anything about it? Or did I just imagine that?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
TyrantWD posted:The EU is dead if Le Pen wins. Pepe Le Pwn
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
mormonpartyboat posted:oh they're not even going to keep the good things Something that insurers have been gunning for forever. Gonna just wait to process all of this, and see how it shakes out the next couple of days. But it's pretty bad.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
TyrantWD posted:The EU is dead if Le Pen wins. if you want to imagine the future, picture trump pissing on a human face forever
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:its really just all of it in general it really is the stuff that seems benign at first glance is just the really evil poo poo buried behind a few extra contortions
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
TyrantWD posted:The EU is dead if Le Pen wins. does she have a chance of winning?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 16:45 |
|
|
Epic High Five posted:When do we start seeing EU countries propping up leftist movements with money and weapons and consultants? At this point they'd have to be pretty cucked to imagine we aren't a huge existential threat to their way of life it goes beyond this (though i could imagine china giving it some thought); the election revealed that our process as a whole is subject to manipulation and is, in some measure, up for sale, even to outsiders if policies (and even the highest office) in a very powerful and wealthy country are on the auction block, everyone is going to weigh the risk of getting in on the bidding
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 00:40
|
|
