|
Regalingualius posted:...90% of what? Of malaria cases? Probably? Maybe?
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 06:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 16:48 |
|
|
Regalingualius posted:...90% of what? 90% of 100%
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 07:08
|
|
|
JGdmn posted:I see no onions on that chart. The onions are mentioned in the bottom text. There are some toppings they did not put on the "graph".
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 08:44
|
|
|
All the slices of that pizza are the same size and there's several data points assigned to each of them. Why the hell would you think it was meant to be a pie chart?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 09:12
|
|
|
lot at this really loving stupid scatter plot
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 10:02
|
|
|
 These are some of the weirdest dildos I've ever seen
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 10:29
|
|
|
Ah, the Singaporean Holophonor...
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 10:32
|
|
|
No ring.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 10:50
|
|
|
Tumblr of scotch posted:
Oh, my child, you should take a look at my browser history.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 12:35
|
|
|
Tumblr of scotch posted:
I've got a tinder date tonight, hopefully she'll be down to try the Korean elastic truth.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 16:25
|
|
|
FrozenVent posted:I've got a tinder date tonight, hopefully she'll be down to try the Korean elastic truth. No flared (word) base. I wouldn't try if I were you.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 16:33
|
|
|
Tumblr of scotch posted:
I actually really like these, but I'd like them a lot more if I thought they were drawn according to any sort of logical system for all those shapes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 16:38
|
|
|
That book is apparently meant to be an authority of some sort. Please at least tell me that graph is presented in the book as a joke.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 16:58
|
|
|
Count Roland posted:I actually really like these, but I'd like them a lot more if I thought they were drawn according to any sort of logical system for all those shapes. Swedish is accurate though
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
Antti posted:That book is apparently meant to be an authority of some sort. Please at least tell me that graph is presented in the book as a joke. I think it might be the original graphic, "enhanced" with some less serious examples.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 19:56
|
|
|
Antti posted:That book is apparently meant to be an authority of some sort. Please at least tell me that graph is presented in the book as a joke. Count Roland posted:I actually really like these, but I'd like them a lot more if I thought they were drawn according to any sort of logical system for all those shapes. catfry posted:I think it might be the original graphic, "enhanced" with some less serious examples. zedprime has a new favorite as of 20:12 on Mar 7, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
The Australian is pretty accurate for what it's worth.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
I started getting angry about how simplistic the American chart was and then... holy poo poo. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
Letmebefrank posted:Swedish is accurate though So is the Canadian one, including with a bit of divergence at the end, so when the deal is done there's always some sort of followup question. I couldn't point to any part of the chart and say why its accurate though. I want a legend, or a scale or something. The Italian and Finnish ones are great.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
My one experience with Koreans in a business capacity followed that graph eerily closely.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
Count Roland posted:So is the Canadian one, including with a bit of divergence at the end, so when the deal is done there's always some sort of followup question. The difference between the Canadian and American ones matches with my experience, too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 23:24
|
|
|
i'm the Israeli Crunch
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 00:26
|
|
|
Finnish, Dutch, and Polish are also on point. But I suspect it's just because those graphs are more like ink-blot tests.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
I remember reading a book about modern Chinese government where the author said that the PRC tends to be very reasonable in trade negotiations and open to compromise on most geopolitical issues as long as they don't attract much popular attention back home, but once the news gets out, they go into full blustering national pride mode and it's impossible to get anything done until the media frenzy dies down.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 00:52
|
|
|
I always liked how this one business communication (lol) textbook I had would contradict its own message over and over. "People are people everywhere, and there's a great deal of variance of practices between different cultures and groups within a country, as well as differences of practices within cultures or groups" one chapter later... "Korean people negotiate like this, doo do doo doo doo, but French people negotiate like this, doo doo do do doo."
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 00:53
|
|
|
Antti posted:That book is apparently meant to be an authority of some sort. Please at least tell me that graph is presented in the book as a joke. Here's the book as a 600 page pdf: http://www.utntyh.com/alumnos/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/When-Cultures-Collide.pdf     
Kennel has a new favorite as of 01:25 on Mar 8, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 01:14
|
|
|
canyoneer posted:I always liked how this one business communication (lol) textbook I had would contradict its own message over and over. Lmao, sounds exactly like the French.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 01:36
|
|
|
I take it back, its an authoritative management book because its looney and people probably describe it as "it says what international managers are really thinking," and partly because of the ink blot effect where white people can still look at it and say, yep just like those Australians to be all thanks mate.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 01:58
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 09:01
|
|
|
Tumblr of scotch posted:
Ah thanks for posting this, I've seen these a while ago in a powerpoint in a company talk about how to talk with the people from the Indian company that manage our IT infra, and was specifically asked not to share it because of copyright stuff. But now it's out there, eh. Maybe a bit strangely formatted, but this chart seems quite clear to me?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 09:17
|
|
|
Kennel posted:Here's the book as a 600 page pdf: Wait so it's like literally every other company structure? But friendly. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 09:20
|
|
|
I reckon a second edition is in order.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 09:28
|
|
|
Kennel posted:Here's the book as a 600 page pdf: Beautiful! Also please mods change my name to "boss, but friendly"
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 10:22
|
|
|
Foxhound posted:Wait so it's like literally every other company structure?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 10:49
|
|
|
Go Human Beings woo!
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 13:47
|
|
|
Carbon dioxide posted:Maybe a bit strangely formatted, but this chart seems quite clear to me? the wedges have the wrong centerpoint, so the size of the slice does not correspond to its value. c.f. "KS fees" and "Shipping & Logistics" which have the same value but have wedges of slightly different sizes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 13:51
|
|
|
Pitfalls: autism
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 14:39
|
|
|
 Google Trends for "International Men's Day"
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 14:50
|
|
|
Pakled posted:I remember reading a book about modern Chinese government where the author said that the PRC tends to be very reasonable in trade negotiations and open to compromise on most geopolitical issues as long as they don't attract much popular attention back home, but once the news gets out, they go into full blustering national pride mode and it's impossible to get anything done until the media frenzy dies down. That tends to be true about diplomacy in general. JFK and Khrushchev for example were only able to back out of brinkmanship during the Cuban missile crisis once they sidelined official channels, press releases and cabinet members, and made a personal deal brokered in secret by Bobby K.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 17:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 16:48 |
|
|
TinTower posted:
Googling it right now.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2017 18:33
|
|