|
Quantum of Phallus posted:It's a crime we never got Guillermo del Toro's Hobbit It exists in some other dimension alongside Jodorowsky's Dune.
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 00:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 20:51 |
|
|
King Vidiot posted:It exists in some other dimension alongside Jodorowsky's Dune. I was going to say I really want to see Jodorowsky's Hobbit
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 00:21
|
|
|
King Vidiot posted:It exists in some other dimension alongside Jodorowsky's Dune. Just watch the old cartoon Hobbit movie. About 70 minutes and it pretty much tells the same story as Jackson takes 9+ hours to do. It's why I didn't bother with the second two movies. I realized I was wasting my time and not really getting anything in return.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
The book itself is shorter to read than the movies take to watch and they're way better.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
3D can be awesome when 3D is done right, but most people do not know how to do it right. It's like motion controls. In the hands of a skilled developer they can be fun as hell, but most developers slap them on to bandwagon and have no idea what they're doing, making everyone loathe motion controls. My general test is this: If the director shot the thing in 3D or planned it for 3D, then I will see the movie in 3D as that's what they envisioned. If they had a 3D conversion after the fact they had no involvement or desire to see done, then I will see the movie in 2D. Basically I will see a movie in whatever format that it's creators designed it for, and wanted it to be in. This really goes for directors with IMAX hard ons too, except they only seem to shoot a half dozen scenes with IMAX so it feels like a rip. Fury Road is one of the rare exceptions where the 3D is kind of loving awesome even though it was unplanned, but they are a rarity. That said the 2D black & white director's cut looks probably more awesome than the 3D cut.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 01:09
|
|
|
Captain Rufus posted:Just watch the old cartoon Hobbit movie. About 70 minutes and it pretty much tells the same story as Jackson takes 9+ hours to do. It's why I didn't bother with the second two movies. I realized I was wasting my time and not really getting anything in return. I think everyone can agree the Hobbit should have been ONE loving movie. Jackson should have come back around, had almost a fun reunion movie that covered the Hobbit in a single film and then retired from LOTR with one "fun project" under his belt. Instead he turned them into 3 movie slogs that made Ian McKellen break down and sickened audiences with 60 fps bullshit. PS: I still hold if you want to make a really effective unnatural horror monster, here's what you do: 1) Shoot a film at 30 FPS 2) Double the framecount to convert it to 60 FPS 3) Make the monster run at 60 FPS while everything else still looks as if it's running 30 FPS Somehow I'm convinced that would make for a freaky as gently caress moving creature.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 01:15
|
|
|
Blazing Ownager posted:
I'm so confused
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
Blazing Ownager posted:
Do this with a character that looks "human" but is actually something else
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
Logan loving rocked. Go watch it!!!
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 01:36
|
|
|
logan was good but don't go in expecting to leave happy or satisfied, it has a very depressing and sudden ending
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
I was extremely satisfied. Best superhero film in a long time (not counting Lego Batman) and best xmen film since x2
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
when leaving a theater I heard a very rotund woman exclaim, "Well I liked it up until he loving died!" lmao
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 01:59
|
|
|
We had some tried-hard nerd yell out at both the beginning and end, like I felt so embarrassed for her.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 02:03
|
|
JB50 posted:Wasnt that more of the studios/execs idea? I thought he didnt even want to do the Hobbit. It's his version of F4ntastic Four. But he's the hack brought in to make the scary horrible version more friendly at the last minute. But instead of a stupid blonde wig it's CGI younger Legolas and elf dwarf romance.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5AsOEk-ZJU
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 02:33
|
|
|
Who's the guy to the right?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 10:24
|
|
|
Captain N, The Game American.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 10:34
|
|
|
Captain Beefheart
ScrubLeague fucked around with this message at 10:39 on Mar 10, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 10:34
|
|
|
THE BAR posted:Who's the guy to the right? Ryan Reynolds I think.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 10:36
|
|
|
Ryan Gosling, the Nazi Man.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 10:57
|
|
|
uh it's Chris evans
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 11:40
|
|
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:uh it's Chris evans Chris Elliott 
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 11:46
|
|
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:uh it's Chris evans Whoowee, boy's let himself go, hasn't he?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 12:19
|
|
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:It's a crime we never got Guillermo del Toro's Hobbit
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 16:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
Quite the Kongfire  Always gotta smile at the phalanx of smart phone people recording whatever crazy poo poo with little regard to personal safety.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 18:45
|
|
|
Harambe no, not again!
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 22:18
|
|
|
Its just setting you up for how much of a dumpster fire Kong is going to be. I would love if RLM did a short video on the Kong trailer because its really loving... odd. It does that weird thing where there's a mini-trailer before the trailer, then it starts out like a normal trailer, then about half-way through it completely switches to a different action-packed trailer, then its just scene after scene of bullets and fighting and I have no idea wtf is going on. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44LdLqgOpjo 1:16 is where the trailer should have ended but its just goes on and on with the action scenes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 22:45
|
|
|
a bone to pick posted:Its just setting you up for how much of a dumpster fire Kong is going to be. Yeah that is an insane trailer. Definitely disjointed and feels like three trailers mushed into one.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
a bone to pick posted:Its just setting you up for how much of a dumpster fire Kong is going to be. It's like two separate trailers in a row
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
achillesforever6 posted:Or Hellboy 3, or At the Mountains of Madness, or Justice League Dark, and I'm sure I'll be saying this when he is asked to do Dr. Strange 3: Shuma-Gorath gently caress 
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 23:31
|
|
|
Are there any good Lovecraftian productions out there? e: Like, not Cloverfield stuff.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 23:51
|
|
|
mng posted:Are there any good Lovecraftian productions out there? There's certainly been some direct lovecraft movies but... oh good? no not really.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
Jackson's Kong is the world's best HBO miniseries
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2017 00:09
|
|
|
That is an absolutely terrible trailer, but I didn't know John C. Reilly was in it! I actually kinda wanna see the movie now.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2017 00:25
|
|
|
counterfeitsaint posted:That is an absolutely terrible trailer, but I didn't know John C. Reilly was in it! I actually kinda wanna see the movie now. Just watch a bunch of brules rules or something.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2017 00:28
|
|
|
Baronjutter posted:Just watch a bunch of brules rules or something. ya dingus
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2017 00:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 20:51 |
|
|
Castor Poe posted:gently caress Fun fact; Del Toro gave up on Mountains of Madness when he saw Prometheus and decided his movie would be too similar. We could've had Guillermo Del Toro's At The Mountains of Madness, but instead we have Prometheus.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2017 00:43
|
|