|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Baby steps. She's 60+, and came to me with an earnest question. I didn't feel it the time to correct language. Especially when there's comics like the one you quoted still pushing that it's all the same, and it's all deviant. I was a little proud of her, really, because she's been becoming more conservative Christian as she gets older Oh for sure, I just recently found out that my mother-in-law was telling all her old folks at the old folks home about her transexual daughter-in-law and was like jfc.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:13 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 04:42 |
|
loquacius posted:There is wisdom in this post Calling rich people all the enemy regardless of their actual policies or goals is loving idiotic, just as much as demonizing all whites or all Christians. The majority of all three groups is in the Republican camp, but it is only the portions in the Republican camp who are the enemy and should be hated vehemently. Because if you try to purge everyone of these people out for sharing a trait with people who vote Republican, all you will do is swell the ranks of Republicans and make it even more impossible to win and establish a less atrocious society.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:17 |
All this defending of poor racists is making it hard to read the thread, also making me sort of nauseous.
|
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:18 |
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:All this defending of poor racists is making it hard to read the thread, also making me sort of nauseous. Man, just put Fulchrum and Loquacious on ignore. Saves the scrolling, filters out 95% of bad posts. I, of course, provide the other 5%.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:20 |
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Man, just put Fulchrum and Loquacious on ignore. Saves the scrolling, filters out 95% of bad posts. I ain't loving defending poor racists, don't bring in this both sides at fault poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:21 |
|
Fulchrum posted:I ain't loving defending poor racists, don't bring in this both sides at fault poo poo. also: neither is anyone else e: sorry mandatory lesbian, I couldn't resist this one
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:22 |
|
Guardian: "Ben Jennings on Brexit and political divisions – MPs have overturned two House of Lords amendments that aimed to protect the rights of EU citizens living in the UK and hand parliament a ‘meaningful vote’ on the final Brexit deal" Also Boaty McBoatface to go on its first Antarctic mission Telegraph: Scottish independence: Nicola Sturgeon fires starting gun on referendum Independent: Times: Mail: Mac on... Second Scottish referendum England and Jonathan Joseph thump Scotland to seal Six Nations title
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:28 |
|
The Copper Kaiser posted:
The only time I've seen a scientist come close to saying that science disproves God was when Lawrence Krauss said that the physical laws of the Universe exist in such a way that they can spring from nothing and don't require a creator. Adam4D is always strawman bullshit but this one is particularly blatant.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:34 |
|
The Copper Kaiser posted:
Fine. God did it. Sounds good. What does that have to do with loving anything after that? How does that help study a distant star, or analyze a genome, or fight a disease? Adam 4D apparently thinks scientists sit on their asses* dissing fundamentalist Christians all day without doing any work. *Kind of like Adam 4D!
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:43 |
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Man, just put Fulchrum and Loquacious on ignore. Saves the scrolling, filters out 95% of bad posts. Jesus, yeah. They are both moving goal posts around like it is the World Calvinball Championships. I lost interest in who was actual making an argument pages ago. Content:
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:50 |
|
I just wanna know what an alcoholic duck thinks about college students
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 21:56 |
|
Has Tinsley ever had his duck mouthpiece drink before? Or does he try to pretend he's a moral and upstanding teetotaler?
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:10 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Since it's clear I cannot lead you to the answer, evidently I will need to spell it out for you by showing how simply your argument carries over. #notallmen, eh Fulchy? Because there's a rhetorical reason that we don't specify "some rich people" or "some white people." And if you think through why you're so offended by the more universal term you'll understand why.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:10 |
|
Dear mods, please make replying to Fulchrum a bannable offense and also give me a pony. Thank you. Amen. On less annoying topics, we may have hit Peak Zombieanne Conway.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:15 |
|
Somfin posted:#notallmen, eh Fulchy? It hurts your head and makes you sad you can't just claim both parties are bad, man, and it's all the corporations who are keeping us down? And we've had five loving pages of people arguing #notallwhites. The universal term is all Republicans. It's also the actually correct term you loving idiot.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:17 |
|
Fulchrum posted:It hurts your head and makes you sad you can't just claim both parties are bad, man, and it's all the corporations who are keeping us down? And I'm done trying to help you. You're not even thinking before you write anymore. Take care, F-dog.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:23 |
|
Somfin posted:And I'm done trying to help you. You're not even thinking before you write anymore. Take care, F-dog. I'm not the one who keeps coming back to saying the poor racists are just misguided victims, so I'm pretty confident I'm not the one who is in need of help here.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:28 |
|
Tei posted:Magnetic fields can generate electricity, and electronic machines create a magnetic field. With this maybe can spy on somebody keyboard next room in a hotel with thin walls, so you can steal passwords without any contact with the hardware or the software. Yep, that's the basis for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_(codename) aka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Eck_phreaking Also using microwaves is a thing for surveillance: http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1274748 I'd hedge my bets KC and the Trumpshine Band read up on some technobabble to try and sound smart and latched onto the only word they were familiar with, though not for the correct use.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:35 |
|
HACKER PEOPLE
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:42 |
|
Well, I sure did enjoy scrolling past all those Fulchrum posts. It's a shame no-one changed his mind in the end but I guess that's because they gave up to easily.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:52 |
|
Fulchrum posted:I'm not the one who keeps coming back to saying the poor racists are just misguided victims, so I'm pretty confident I'm not the one who is in need of help here. Turn on your monitor
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 22:53 |
|
Popped up on my Twitter feed, not sure how recent it is: A commission, obviously. Hell if I'm going to the URL but it's probably sex tourism. Not sure what the point is in doing a commission done of "yourself" when at least 3/5 of the people being depicted are just a famous person you chose as your Twitter avatar. Garrison being who he is, I'd put good money on the second-from-left guy actually being morbidly obese (assuming it's not just another famous person I don't recognize) and second-from-right guy having serial killer looks.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 23:02 |
usenet celeb 1992 posted:Popped up on my Twitter feed, not sure how recent it is: I...wow. quote:The definitive single mens' guide to living the dream of a location independent lifestyle and making the most out of their lives quote:The Single Dude’s Guide to Life & Travel is a comprehensive guide on how to see the world, live the life of your dreams and not spend a ton doing it. There's a link list on the lower right of the site that is....an endless shaft of alt-right gold, tunnelling deep into the earth.
|
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 23:06 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Hey, I'm not the one who suggested Ed Wood despite Glen or Glenda actually conflating transvestitism and transsexualism, claiming one is just a less advanced form of the other. Wow, I guess it's a good thing I didn't mention the movie "Glen or Glenda" at all then!
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 23:53 |
|
Improbable Lobster posted:Does anyone even use the term transvestite anymore? Outside of the Rocky Horror Picture Show? Yes. In fact there's a transvestite comedian of no small amount of fame.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 23:54 |
|
usenet celeb 1992 posted:Popped up on my Twitter feed, not sure how recent it is: If I remember right from when it was originally posted, it's pretty much entirely sex tourism. MRA sex tourism.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 23:55 |
|
usenet celeb 1992 posted:Popped up on my Twitter feed, not sure how recent it is: It's been posted before, there were some good edits. nobodyssweetheart posted:
nobodyssweetheart posted:I agree. Not enough. It still seems lacking. I'll try again.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 23:56 |
|
MikeyTsi posted:Wow, I guess it's a good thing I didn't mention the movie "Glen or Glenda" at all then! Oh gee, what could have made me think that when talking about cross-dressing, transgenderism and Ed Wood, you'd be referring to the only Ed Wood movie actually about transgenderism and cross-dressing.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 23:57 |
|
MikeyTsi posted:Yes. In fact there's a transvestite comedian of no small amount of fame. Probably lives in a cave.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2017 23:58 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Oh gee, what could have made me think that when talking about cross-dressing, transgenderism and Ed Wood, you'd be referring to the only Ed Wood movie actually about transgenderism and cross-dressing. Because I specifically mentioned one movie and not the other? Don't be dense.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:10 |
|
usenet celeb 1992 posted:Popped up on my Twitter feed, not sure how recent it is: What does climate change and caricatures of SJWs have to do with single dude travel? Or the second amendment? Pretty sure carrying a gun on you to other countries would be a bad idea.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:10 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Oh gee, what could have made me think that when talking about cross-dressing, transgenderism and Ed Wood, you'd be referring to the only Ed Wood movie actually about transgenderism and cross-dressing. "Transgenderism" is not a word dude (outside of focus on the family's website). Being transgender is not a religion or a philosophy. "Transgender" is an adjective in front of words like "person", or "woman", or "man". If you're going to post like crap, at least crap in real words.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:14 |
|
MikeyTsi posted:Because I specifically mentioned one movie and not the other? You didn't mention one movie, you said to watch an Ed Wood movie. He only made one movie that's relevant.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:14 |
|
Starshark posted:Well, I sure did enjoy scrolling past all those Fulchrum posts. It's a shame no-one changed his mind in the end but I guess that's because they gave up to easily. I unfortunately can't keep posting non-stop until the heat death of the universe usenet celeb 1992 posted:Not sure what the point is in doing a commission done of "yourself" when at least 3/5 of the people being depicted are just a famous person you chose as your Twitter avatar. If I was the kind of guy who commissioned a politically-themed Ben Garrison portrait of myself, but I had the option of instead presenting myself to the world as Jeff Bridges, I know what I'd pick Also the best part of the picture is still the "down" arrow on Borat/Boris' arm, the only way Garrison could think of to signify that Borat is not, in fact, pulling Osama out of the trash can MikeyTsi posted:Don't be dense. askin a lot there
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:16 |
|
cis autodrag posted:"Transgenderism" is not a word dude (outside of focus on the family's website). Being transgender is not a religion or a philosophy. "Transgender" is an adjective in front of words like "person", or "woman", or "man". If you're going to post like crap, at least crap in real words. How about instead of jumping down my throat you just give me the correct goddamn term of issues relating specifically to transgender?
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:16 |
|
Fulchrum posted:How about instead of jumping down my throat you just give me the correct goddamn term of issues relating specifically to transgender? Why would I give the benefit of the doubt to someone who uses terminology from the Focus on the Family website?
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:18 |
|
cis autodrag posted:Why would I give the benefit of the doubt to someone who uses terminology from the Focus on the Family website? You don't even know the correct term, do you?
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:24 |
|
Jesus Christ PMs are a thing.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:25 |
|
Not because you were hoping to use appropriate terms, mind you. You were worried someone might yell at you.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 04:42 |
|
Fulchrum posted:You don't even know the correct term, do you? If you had reading comprehension you would have understood that there is no word that means what you want it to mean. "Being transgender" is the closest you're going to get pal.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2017 00:26 |