|
Dizz posted:https://twitter.com/maddow/status/841795163664089089 Fully expecting something like "We've got his tax returns from 1972-74" PS: how many hours till "9pm ET" for a bad (and sick!) foreigner?
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 01:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 18:04 |
|
|
ozza posted:Fully expecting something like "We've got his tax returns from 1972-74" 47 minutes
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 01:13
|
|
|
ozza posted:Fully expecting something like "We've got his tax returns from 1972-74" one hour didn't they already get his tax returns for a year? weren't they basically "he claimed a bajillion dollars in losses and never has the pay taxes again"
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 01:13
|
|
|
Arrhythmia posted:one hour you do a pretty good imitation of a copy editor for the grey lady https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 01:17
|
|
|
Ooh they've got them from 2005.... This could be not-nothing!
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
Rachel's been drawing lines from the Russian "Fertilizer King," the head of Deutsche-Bank/Cyprus Bank, etc. to Trump, his cabinet, and to Jared. She's pointing out bits of the "un-substantiated dossier" that are now essentially "substantiated." I wouldn't be surprised if when the most damaging leaks hit, they come straight to her. This could be the beginning of the very best lols of all. Attack of the killer lols.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 01:42
|
|
|
ozza posted:Fully expecting something like "We've got his tax returns from 1972-74" She said they're from 2005 so yeah, kinda.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
proof of concept posted:Yep! lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
check a calendar, it's not insignificant fed (and state) taxes are due in almost a month
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
here's a lol  oh btw these polls were conducted yesterday 
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:02
|
|
|
lmao he is still beating her by five miles Bigly lols all around.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:04
|
|
|
Homestar Runner posted:here's a lol His favorable number has gone up from 38% a couple weeks ago 
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
lmao
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/vrunt/status/841817129544495105 also disappointed to find out this thread isn't still with her
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/davidshepardson/status/841810979595902978 lol edit: Daily Beast has a run-down of Trump's 2005 taxes, site they sourced is non-functional for me at least: http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/03/14/report-trump-s-2005-taxes-revealed.html https://www.dcreport.org/2017/03/14/taxes/ Kumo fucked around with this message at 02:17 on Mar 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:08
|
|
|
Real cool of them to not look at the tax return leaks beforehand so they can potentially own themselves live on stream when nothing is found.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:21
|
|
L
|
how many millions did trump spend on candles in 2005????
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:23
|
|
|
Kumo posted:https://twitter.com/davidshepardson/status/841810979595902978 white house press releases that read like they are written by angry teens 
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:23
|
|
|
Did this reveal anything or wut
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:23
|
|
|
Soundboz posted:Did this reveal anything or wut Doesn't look like it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:24
|
|
|
Yeah, it's loving nothing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:26
|
|
|
Dizz posted:Real cool of them to not look at the tax return leaks beforehand so they can potentially own themselves live on stream when nothing is found. They found them in Al Capone's vault
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:28
|
|
|
It's nothing, and it was stupid to make a medium-sized deal about it. Although David Cay Johnson is on and is hilarious; he's basically saying Donald may have leaked this on his own, and also may have sent the racy Melania pics to the NY Post http://nypost.com/2016/08/01/melania-trumps-girl-on-girl-photos-from-racy-shoot-revealed/
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
rachel maddow is almost more annoying than the orange babboon president right now
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
Maddow is a hack
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:30
|
|
|
some jolly folks over at Wesleyan Media, who just to share the joy of lols to us all (god bless 'em), decided to do an analysis on policy discussion in advertisements run by the respective Trump / Clinton campaigns their findings: more lols for the lol god  ^ the white bar refers to actual policy discussion, whilst the dark grey bar refers to mindless personal attacks / smearjobs   which reminds me of this ol' chestnut SSNeoman posted:The woman did everything right. She ran the campaign literally as well as it could possibly go. I cannot find a single flaw in the way she ran it besides lol 
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:30
|
|
|
Homestar Runner posted:some jolly folks over at Wesleyan Media, who just to share the joy of lols to us all (god bless 'em), decided to do an analysis on policy discussion in advertisements run by the respective Trump / Clinton campaigns I hilariously incompetent campaign that lost multiple safe blue states. People made fun of Trump's rallies but at least he got how you had to do lots of intense campaigning in hopes of converting safe states/swing states.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
Homestar Runner posted:some jolly folks over at Wesleyan Media, who just to share the joy of lols to us all (god bless 'em), decided to do an analysis on policy discussion in advertisements run by the respective Trump / Clinton campaigns I dunno poo poo about the ads but I watched the debates and he was general as poo poo about and policy and didn't say anything overall. She wasn't any better but wasn't that much worse
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
Bulgogi Hoagie posted:rachel maddow is almost more annoying than the orange babboon president right now
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
MSNBC Exclusive: Tax Law benefits the rich!!! 0__0
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
Honestly I never got the outrage for Trump as paying as little taxes as legally possible. It's what anyone would do. Who cares? It's tax policy that sucks.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:48
|
|
|
It's been almost half a year since the election and this thread still can't stop talking about Hillary, at this point Donald Trump is more likely to stop bringing it up at every opportunity first.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:52
|
|
|
Guy Mann posted:It's been almost half a year since the election and this thread still can't stop talking about Hillary, at this point Donald Trump is more likely to stop bringing it up at every opportunity first. did you cry on election day
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:54
|
|
|
Lurk Ethic posted:Honestly I never got the outrage for Trump as paying as little taxes as legally possible. It's what anyone would do. Who cares? It's tax policy that sucks. People seriously believe he's not paying taxes at all, or as much as he's legally supposed to, or hoping to see that he's getting paid off by someone. It's a lol because anyone with a brain wouldn't put poo poo like that on papers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:54
|
|
|
Bulgogi Hoagie posted:https://twitter.com/vrunt/status/841817129544495105 nobody actually liked hillary hth
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:56
|
|
|
thathonkey posted:nobody actually liked hillary hth lmbo
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 02:57
|
|
|
proof of concept posted:They have the power to raise the price of our gasoline by $5/gallon any time they want No they don't. They've been trying to get OPEC to cut back production and get the prices raised but prices are actually going down. Any cutback by OPEC, assuming they can actually convince these cash-strapped countries to go along, is quickly offset by more North American shale deposit mining. The idea that they have that power is a relic from the 70s 80s and 90s. They can barely control the production of their own members much less actually cut back enough to nudge global prices.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 03:02
|
|
|
Bulgogi Hoagie posted:did you cry on election day i was in a newsroom talking a producer out of suicide. if i could go back in time i would tell him it's actually worse but funnier than he thought lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 03:02
|
|
|
It's true
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 03:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 18:04 |
|
|
Play posted:No they don't. They've been trying to get OPEC to cut back production and get the prices raised but prices are actually going down. Any cutback by OPEC, assuming they can actually convince these cash-strapped countries to go along, is quickly offset by more North American shale deposit mining. OPEC ended up being a pretty ineffective cartel due to how all the members countries would always screw each other over when one of them got into a cash crunch.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2017 03:11
|
|