|
Note how honeybees are the only pollinators called out, because they are the only ones that matter to General Mills
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 16:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 08:23 |
|
|
unbeelieveable
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 16:56
|
|
|
I wonder how many pesticides are sprayed on whatever they make cheerios out of.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 17:55
|
|
|
no pesticides just gallons of bee cum
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:i view all brands as hostile threats bent on enslaving me. Same but with premium porn sites
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:I wonder how many pesticides are sprayed on whatever they make cheerios out of. Article talks about that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:There is nothing stupider than someone who thinks they are immune to advertising. listen bub, its only 4000 ads a day that i see, its not like its pervasive and entrenched in every single aspect of my life. i still have my dreams
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 18:35
|
|
|
You got it better than me, my dreams have commercial breaks, sad!
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
Terror Sweat posted:Yeah I am also immune to advertising Thinking appeals to equality don't make you more likely to buy a product isn't the same thing as thinking you're immune to advertising.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 18:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 18:57
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:Thinking appeals to equality don't make you more likely to buy a product isn't the same thing as thinking you're immune to advertising. It basically does, if you are the type of person who likes appeals to equality.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 18:59
|
|
|
i hope immortal technique kicks his rear end again
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:It basically does, if you are the type of person who likes appeals to equality. Well again no, because only 47% of of people under 24 are more likely to buy something advertised that way, whereas way more than 47% believe in equality. And I'm just going out on a limb here, but maybe it's because they realize the appeals are opportunistic and meaningless, like this thread is about.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 19:21
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:There is nothing stupider than someone who thinks they are immune to advertising. I am because I often see zero ads per day. Just lol if you don't ad-block.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 19:21
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:There is nothing stupider than someone who thinks they are immune to advertising. I uh.... heh... don't own a television 
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 19:34
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:Well again no, because only 47% of of people under 24 are more likely to buy something advertised that way, whereas way more than 47% believe in equality. And I'm just going out on a limb here, but maybe it's because they realize the appeals are opportunistic and meaningless, like this thread is about. In which Jeb! Repetition learned about message segmentation (Hint: it's how Bud Light can advertise to gays and rednecks at the same time)
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I am because I often see zero ads per day. Just lol if you don't ad-block. don't read this post if you don't want to see ads 
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I am because I often see zero ads per day. Just lol if you don't ad-block. this guy never goes outside
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
No one is immune to all advertising, most people are immune to most advertising (because most advertising sucks)
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
whythedemocraticpartylostthe2016election.jpg I mean, that's loving breathtaking. the rich producer of an entertainment venue that only other rich people are even eligible to potentially attend is now going to shill for a financial institution that exclusively benefits the ultra-rich. if this was in a parody like The Onion people would complain that it was too on-the-nose.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
I support Made In Italy
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
learning about finance and investing is something only the 1% can do: fact
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 20:24
|
|
|
Meyers-Briggs Testicle posted:learning about finance and investing is something only the 1% can do: fact thinking that the difference between being well off and and not well off in this god forsaken country is due primarily to financial knowledge and not luck/station of birth/available jobs and their wages: silly
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
call to action posted:thinking that the difference between being well off and and not well off in this god forsaken country is due primarily to financial knowledge and not luck/station of birth/available jobs and their wages: silly the poor and destitute can be just like me, handsome famous singing man, as long as they watch CNBC financial reports every night at 7 PM EST and diversify their portfolio
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
call to action posted:thinking that the difference between being well off and and not well off in this god forsaken country is due primarily to financial knowledge and not luck/station of birth/available jobs and their wages: silly i didnt say that at all you mondo retard thinking that advocating for financial literacy means you support the system and everything that it entails: c-spam poster
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 20:42
|
|
|
Meyers-Briggs Testicle posted:i didnt say that at all you mondo retard the majority of people in this country can't cover a $500 unexpected expense, advocating for their financial literacy should be like fourteenth on your priority list after higher wages, affordable healthcare, affordable childcare, affordable education, smash racism/patriarchy, (a billion other things), financial literacy but if only they used a low expense ratio index fund to invest the extra -$100 in income they had, they'd be set, yessiree
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
call to action posted:the majority of people in this country can't cover a $500 unexpected expense call to action posted:advocating for their financial literacy should be like fourteenth on your priority list after ... 
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
I feel fine doubling down on the notion that, if you can't handle a $500 expense, it's probably because you don't make enough money instead of a lack of self-flagellation on the altar of John C. Bogle (if you'll notice, the post that started this tangent was regarding Morgan Stanley, who I'm pretty sure is going to "educate" you into assuming as much debt as possible instead of how to balance a checkbook)
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
call to action posted:I feel fine doubling down on the notion that, if you can't handle a $500 expense, it's probably because you don't make enough money instead of a lack of self-flagellation on the altar of John C. Bogle (if you'll notice, the post that started this tangent was regarding Morgan Stanley, who I'm pretty sure is going to "educate" you into assuming as much debt as possible instead of how to balance a checkbook) why dont you read the article first https://www.morganstanley.com/articles/lin-manuel-miranda
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
That picture is 99% funnier now that I know it's advercontent for morgan stanley.
an actual dog has issued a correction as of 21:27 on Mar 20, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
call to action posted:I feel fine doubling down on the notion that, if you can't handle a $500 expense, it's probably because you don't make enough money sure, maybe if you presuppose that people aren't utterly brainwashed by capitalism and pitted against a predatory financial industry trying to claw every dollar (especially future-earned dollars) out of their hands the majority of americans can't cover a unexpected $500 expense, but you can bet they'll buy that new car or put a vacation on a CC balance. poor people, middle class people, and rich people are all equally stupid. there are people living in $500k houses that can't cover a $500 expense, this isn't a living wage thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
an actual dog posted:this guy never goes outside It's been cold as gently caress so v  vFinancial Literacy is important. But it's also broad, and diversifying your portfolio is hardly the most important aspect of doing that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 21:57
|
|
|
VOTE YES ON 69 posted:sure, maybe if you presuppose that people aren't utterly brainwashed by capitalism and pitted against a predatory financial industry trying to claw every dollar (especially future-earned dollars) out of their hands Luckily Morgan Stanley doesn't give a flying gently caress whether you put that vacation on credit or up your rear end, all they want is the fees on your retirement fund. I read the article and all I saw was "save more" aka "give us more money to charge a fee on", not "be less materialistic" or "here's a cheap way to fix your fridge" - and anybody that can't read between the lines on why Morgan Stanley doesn't talk about that latter part of financial education (being frugal) is a maroon call to action has issued a correction as of 22:03 on Mar 20, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 22:00
|
|
|
There was a news story about a postal worker who would give 50/week to a US debt office to help pay down the national debt. He'd been doing it for numerous years. Financial Literacy would be about informing him that the Federal Government Budget isn't comparable to his personal house hold budget, and he would be served better just putting that money into a savings account or T-Bills, if he ostensibly wants to help the national-debt. I'm sure Morgan Stanley would gladly advise him about all his options.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
call to action posted:Luckily Morgan Stanley doesn't give a flying gently caress whether you put that vacation on credit or up your rear end, all they want is the fees on your retirement fund. I read the article and all I saw was "save more" aka "give us more money to charge a fee on", not "be less materialistic" or "here's a cheap way to fix your fridge" - and anybody that can't read between the lines on why Morgan Stanley doesn't talk about that latter part of financial education (being frugal) is a maroon wow dude you might be too woke for this thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 22:18
|
|
|
Meyers-Briggs Testicle posted:wow dude you might be too woke for this thread Man, I sure try but hopefully I'll be woke enough to defend Morgan Stanley soon just like my hero deray
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 22:21
|
|
|
For years, I drove down a not popular anymore highway to go from a small town with a state college in it to a dying ex-industrial town with a community college in it. I'd see trailer parks and trailers and hitchhikers and hitchhikers with crutches and dead buisnesses and towns it didn't seem anyone lived in and basically just a goddamn wasteland that no one has cared about for years. But on the billboards? Aside from churches and mcdonalds there was also that god drat FEED THE PIG sign. That loving FEED THE PIG ad campaign. I can't be the only one who remembers it: some dude in pig makeup would eat things and it was designed to get people to try and save more money. And sure, people don't save as much as they should even if they do have money. But all I could think of whenever I saw it was how goddamn condescending it was. I'd drive by little houses in the middle of nowhere that kept having more and more furniture for sale every week until eventually they were for sale, I'd go into a town that as far as I could tell was a gas station, a place to do rodeo, and a loving courthouse that nailed everyone for the sudden drop to 30 from 50 coming around a corner, or go past the restaurant that I never saw anyone in and there some gruesome leering pig-man would be telling me to save more, to put your money in banks, to just plan your life better! Don't worry about systemic problems with how our society has shaped up, you just gotta get a handle on your finances, you dumb poo poo! Which is the best corporate america and global finance can say to all those run over by their endless march. "Things are great! You're just to goddamn stupid to take part in this."
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
Meyers-Briggs Testicle posted:learning about finance and investing is something only the 1% can do: fact it'd be less disingenuous if LMW had decided to provide free financial advice to all of the common-folk as a completely altruistic gesture of goodwill towards his fellow man. dude got paid to be in a morgan stanley advertisement. it isn't a huge intuitive leap to understand that this kind of celebrity endorsement of a product that realistically does not benefit the average beleaguered U.S. citizen is just an attempt to continue to cash-in on, and extend, his 15 minutes of fame. even if he didn't get quid pro quo paid to do the advertisement, the nature of this exposure is still intended to benefit and promote his overall brand. anyway i'll take a large strawberry limeaid i guess. here is the woke brand as mecca https://staywoke.clothing/  it's like when you say the same word over and over until it loses all meaning, if it became website merchandise
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2017 02:36
|
|
|
         STOP
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 08:23 |
|
|
Commerz posted:
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2017 04:17
|
|
