Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

The Muppets On PCP posted:

you mean the pmrc, which was founded by al gore's wife?


the great worker struggle of my butt

I thought it was a different group, but yea, looks like it was one in the same. So yea, I agree with Zappa.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ISil7IHzxc

"You are talking about words, and I don't believe there is any reason for words to be suppressed."

ate shit on live tv has issued a correction as of 21:35 on Mar 27, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zerg Mans
Oct 19, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 3 hours!

The Muppets On PCP posted:

the great worker struggle of my butt

having dealt with anal fissures and hemorrhoids for 8 days now, that is indeed a great worker struggle.

Gene Hackman Fan
Dec 27, 2002

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
would i vote for a clinton again? what difference would it make, they're just gonna gently caress it up all over again with something really stupid, like thinking there's some sort of hereditary clause that automatically gets blood relations on the ballot in all 50 states.

Zhulik
Nov 14, 2012

The Montreal Star

zegermans posted:

having dealt with anal fissures and hemorrhoids for 8 days now, that is indeed a great worker struggle.

Sounds like you're getting a taste of your own posting there

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Penisaurus Sex posted:

My personal belief is that politics only attracts weirdos with repressed sexual pathology and anxiety over being alone, specifically divorce.

No one well-adjusted and in a good place in life gets into politics.

Also it takes being self-sufficient already to be able to live well on politician money sans-bribes. And rich people aren't known for their infinite empathy

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

FactsAreUseless posted:

Like it's such a bafflingly easy thing to fix that it's especially dumb to defend or make excuses for it. All the Dems would have to do is own it. "The Democratic party is made up of individuals, and sometimes individuals aren't sure what our messaging should be when it comes to reconciling the left and the center of the Democratic party. Someone made a bad call, we're working to make better ones." There, done, and you haven't alienated anyone left or center.

The issue with this response is that so many democrat insiders have become absorbed by Optics that they are concerned about the Optics of admitting they made a mistake instead of doubling down/ignoring until it goes away. Which then leads to bad Optics ofc but hindsight is 20/20 yaknow

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

Neurolimal posted:

Also it takes being self-sufficient already to be able to live well on politician money sans-bribes. And rich people aren't known for their infinite empathy

Senators make something like ~200k/yr and house reps ~175k/yr

If you can't live on that, then perhaps you aren't cut out to represent the citizenry who are able to scrap by on an average of 45k/yr.

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

I'm sick of all these Democrats working with Trump
https://twitter.com/aseitzwald/status/846409742268424197

"owned leftists, look at this man who is doing something that 95% of his party agrees with" :smug:

Thoguh
Nov 8, 2002

College Slice

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

Senators make something like ~200k/yr and house reps ~175k/yr

If you can't live on that, then perhaps you aren't cut out to represent the citizenry who are able to scrap by on an average of 45k/yr.

Most politicians aren't congressmen or senators. Gotta start off with unpaid internships and then move in to poorly paid positions first.

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

Senators make something like ~200k/yr and house reps ~175k/yr

If you can't live on that, then perhaps you aren't cut out to represent the citizenry who are able to scrap by on an average of 45k/yr.

well there's the added expense of needing 2 homes, including in expensive DC market - many reps sleep in their offices to save money. it's not impossible, but for federal politicians that aren't millionaires it can be difficult to juggle until they've been there for awhile.

below that level, (state legislators), it gets bad. nebraska, for example, pays only $12,000 per year. new hampshire pays $100 a year. those rates effectively shut out people who aren't independently wealthy, since normal people can't take time off work to pass laws for a few months.

Concerned Citizen has issued a correction as of 00:16 on Mar 28, 2017

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme
although rhode island did elect a waitress as a state representative, and then her job fired her because she said something "anti-male" on facebook

Venuz Patrol
Mar 27, 2011

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

Senators make something like ~200k/yr and house reps ~175k/yr

If you can't live on that, then perhaps you aren't cut out to represent the citizenry who are able to scrap by on an average of 45k/yr.

they make way more than that when you factor in lobbying benefits

got any sevens
Feb 9, 2013

by Cyrano4747

logikv9 posted:

i voted for Kim dotcom

I vote Kim Possible

white sauce
Apr 29, 2012

by R. Guyovich

zegermans posted:

having dealt with anal fissures and hemorrhoids for 8 days now, that is indeed a great worker struggle.

Ew gross

The Little Kielbasa
Mar 29, 2001

and another thing: im not mad. please dont put in the newspaper that i got mad.

logikv9 posted:

i voted for Kim dotcom

Kim Dotcom should definitely play the Internet on the upcoming American Gods show.

To stay on topic, I reject the DLC and all of its foul works. Also, Bernie Would've Won.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012
Concerned Citizen, I've legit backed you when people dogpiled and said you were a good poster so you know I'm not trying to be a dick here:

What, exactly, would have happened if they didnt photoshop the picture? It's not a democrat official or even a democrat period. It's one of a bunch of signs at a rally. No news channel was gonna go "Mr. Perez, what do you have to say about this unaffiliated man with this advert for another party, at this womens rally separate from the Democratic party?". This is without getting into the fact that the no-no word in question is one that has been steadily gaining popularity and acceptance for a while now, it's not like the poster said "FULL COMMUNISM NOW".

That's what is bothering people; if there was an actual argument for doing so then it would just be seen as a lovely move. As-is it looks like, internally, D's are still just as anti-socialism and fiscal leftism as they've always been.

ThndrShk2k
Nov 3, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Bread Liar

Penisaurus Sex posted:

It is very funny and weirdly poetic that a political party obsessed with technocracy and expertise is chock full of profoundly incompetent idiots who can barely dress themselves.
Well to be honest, smartphone app startups don't need to know much more than the code the platform accepts and what APIs are available per model, and the base doesn't need to know how their phones work, only that they got it for $1 with a 2 year contract and it plays this new game fast, but won't in 2 years when they introduce even more un-optimized garbage.


But they got a wardrobe suggestion app!

It gives only pantsuits

Zhulik
Nov 14, 2012

The Montreal Star
Hold on, guys, maybe forums poster Concerned Citizen is engaging in good faith and is merely misunderstood.

Bear with me as I extract another blistering take that this time 100% for sure will not be continued concern trolling, unlike every other post made to date.

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Zhulik posted:

Hold on, guys, maybe forums poster Concerned Citizen is engaging in good faith and is merely misunderstood.

Bear with me as I extract another blistering take that this time 100% for sure will not be continued concern trolling, unlike every other post made to date.

:justpost:

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

Neurolimal posted:

Concerned Citizen, I've legit backed you when people dogpiled and said you were a good poster so you know I'm not trying to be a dick here:

What, exactly, would have happened if they didnt photoshop the picture? It's not a democrat official or even a democrat period. It's one of a bunch of signs at a rally. No news channel was gonna go "Mr. Perez, what do you have to say about this unaffiliated man with this advert for another party, at this womens rally separate from the Democratic party?". This is without getting into the fact that the no-no word in question is one that has been steadily gaining popularity and acceptance for a while now, it's not like the poster said "FULL COMMUNISM NOW".

That's what is bothering people; if there was an actual argument for doing so then it would just be seen as a lovely move. As-is it looks like, internally, D's are still just as anti-socialism and fiscal leftism as they've always been.

typically (not sure about dnc), digital departments produce a lot of graphics/images that often need to go through vetting process before they're posted. in this case, it seems clear that the "capitalism is the disease, socialism is the cure" phrase was deemed as potentially distracting from the overall message, and perhaps giving ammunition to people who want to dismiss the resistance as being the product of radical left-wingers. obviously, the best option the dnc had was to try and find a different photo to work with if they could, but either they couldn't find an alternative with the right qualities to work or they were just lazy and decided to airbrush it instead.

if it were a socialist protest, or a trump demonstration, or a concert, they were trying to pass off as some resistance thing, yes i would think that was bad. in this case, i think it wasn't really a big deal since the photo itself gives a lot of prominence to some socialist guy that wasn't true of the actual march, and for the illustrative purposes of the graphic it wasn't really helpful. i guess if i were the socialist dude i'd be pretty annoyed, but beyond that i don't really see much of a problem. in fact, frankly i am surprised they didn't photoshop the 3rd party poster out entirely since it seems a bit counterproductive for a party to advertise another party's literature in their graphics.

you asked "what would happen if they didn't photoshop the picture?" probably nothing. but they're trained to be cautious, for better or worse, because saying the wrong things can reflect badly not just on the party but on their candidates. that means they're going to err on the side of caution and remove/crop out things that conflict with their message.

Concerned Citizen has issued a correction as of 23:05 on Mar 27, 2017

Breakfast All Day
Oct 21, 2004

the suck zone: abuelitalites demsplain literal left erasure

anime was right
Jun 27, 2008

death is certain
keep yr cool

Concerned Citizen posted:

typically (not sure about dnc), digital departments produce a lot of graphics/images that often need to go through vetting process before they're posted. in this case, it seems clear that the "capitalism is the disease, socialism is the cure" phrase was deemed as potentially distracting from the overall message, and perhaps giving ammunition to people who want to dismiss the resistance as being the product of radical left-wingers. obviously, the best option the dnc had was to try and find a different photo to work with if they could, but either they couldn't find an alternative with the right qualities to work or they were just lazy and decided to airbrush it instead.

if it were a socialist protest, or a trump demonstration, or a concert, they were trying to pass off as some resistance thing, yes i would think that was bad. in this case, i think it wasn't really a big deal since the photo itself gives a lot of prominence to some socialist guy that wasn't true of the actual march, and for the illustrative purposes of the graphic it wasn't really helpful. i guess if i were the socialist dude i'd be pretty annoyed, but beyond that i don't really see much of a problem. in fact, frankly i am surprised they didn't photoshop the 3rd party poster out entirely since it seems a bit counterproductive for a party to advertise another party's literature in their graphics.

you asked "what would happen if they didn't photoshop the picture?" probably nothing. but they're trained to be cautious, for better or worse, because saying the wrong things can reflect badly not just on the party but on their candidates. that means they're going to err on the side of caution and remove/crop out things that conflict with their message.

no one cares you dweeb

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

anime was right posted:

no one cares you dweeb

hey no need for namecalling

Ace of Baes
Jul 7, 1977
Remember all the misleading pics of Hillary campaigning then they'd zoom out and itd be an empty warehouse.

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.
Considering that photo is actually full of socialist signs even post edit I am not actually sure it wasnt of a socialist protest group on the whole despite your assertions otherwise

ThndrShk2k
Nov 3, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Bread Liar

Concerned Citizen posted:

alternative: they shouldn't do anything. they should ignore it and move on, because it's a dumb invented controversy
Source your quotes

"We shouldn't do anything. They should ignore it and move on, because it's a dumb invented controversy" - HRC

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

Ace of Baes posted:

Remember all the misleading pics of Hillary campaigning then they'd zoom out and itd be an empty warehouse.

Even Hillary men didn't seem to have any genuine excitement or belief in her very sad focus group tested message.

FactsAreUseless
Feb 16, 2011

GlyphGryph posted:

Considering that photo is actually full of socialist signs even post edit I am not actually sure it wasnt of a socialist protest group on the whole despite your assertions otherwise
It was actually a mainstream Democratic protest... the Democrats just haven't realized it yet.

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.

Ace of Baes posted:

Remember all the misleading pics of Hillary campaigning then they'd zoom out and itd be an empty warehouse.

Yeah but trump made low effort lies about his crowd sized and didnt even bother to make his lies plausible and people believed him, it cheapens all the work we put in

Thoguh
Nov 8, 2002

College Slice

FactsAreUseless posted:

It was actually a mainstream Democratic protest... the Democrats just haven't realized it yet.

The actual resistance is a bunch of radical leftwingers that the bad Dems want to take credit for rather than being the other way around.

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

GlyphGryph posted:

Considering that photo is actually full of socialist signs even post edit I am not actually sure it wasnt of a socialist protest group on the whole despite your assertions otherwise



there's one sign there that's explicitly socialist, one other that uses socialist imagery (by the rich for the rich and a pig(?)), one that touches on some economics stuff, and then a bunch about civil rights, uteruses, and pussies.

Breakfast All Day
Oct 21, 2004

GlyphGryph posted:

Considering that photo is actually full of socialist signs even post edit I am not actually sure it wasnt of a socialist protest group on the whole despite your assertions otherwise

nein nein nein there are only TWO leftists in the united states and their names are both Bernard and they are brothers. also racist misogynists and they voted for trump

ThndrShk2k
Nov 3, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Bread Liar
Also the photoshop thing was 100% straight from corporate buttcovering moves 101 combined with free marketing.
There's no empathy for the message as the message is too controversial, but part of the message is good.

My only problem is they're co-opting the PSL message while censoring the full intent. Co-opt and dismiss.

Dems strategy 2020: Co-opt all 3rd parties and dismiss every one of the third party base voters as extreme.


Should've just photoshopped the dude out entirely.

Also do they have the copyright for that photo?

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Concerned Citizen posted:

you asked "what would happen if they didn't photoshop the picture?" probably nothing. but they're trained to be cautious, for better or worse, because saying the wrong things can reflect badly not just on the party but on their candidates. that means they're going to err on the side of caution and remove/crop out things that conflict with their message.

this hypercautiousness and sheer terror of actually attaching themselves to anything of substance is precisely why Hillary is languishing in ignominious defeat in a forest somewhere while Bernie is the most popular American politician of this century

voters are very dumb, but they are smart enough to know when they're being sold an oversculpted, sanitized product that's been stripped of all nutritional value.

FactsAreUseless posted:

It was actually a mainstream Democratic protest... the Democrats just haven't realized it yet.

GodFish
Oct 10, 2012

We're your first, last, and only line of defense. We live in secret. We exist in shadow.

And we dress in black.
There are enough pussy hats in the photo for me to believe its the Womens March and not a socialist event. Dems still worthless though.

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.

Concerned Citizen posted:

well there's the added expense of needing 2 homes, including in expensive DC market - many reps sleep in their offices to save money. it's not impossible, but for federal politicians that aren't millionaires it can be difficult to juggle until they've been there for awhile.

Why not stay at a hotel or rent an apartment?

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

https://twitter.com/kasie/status/846486568860893185

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

GodFish posted:

There are enough pussy hats in the photo for me to believe its the Womens March and not a socialist event. Dems still worthless though.

Socialists - both PSL and DSA - attended the Women's March with signs

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)
Yeah the DSA was all over the Women's March

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.

Concerned Citizen posted:

typically (not sure about dnc), digital departments produce a lot of graphics/images that often need to go through vetting process before they're posted. in this case, it seems clear that the "capitalism is the disease, socialism is the cure" phrase was deemed as potentially distracting from the overall message, and perhaps giving ammunition to people who want to dismiss the resistance as being the product of radical left-wingers. obviously, the best option the dnc had was to try and find a different photo to work with if they could, but either they couldn't find an alternative with the right qualities to work or they were just lazy and decided to airbrush it instead.

if it were a socialist protest, or a trump demonstration, or a concert, they were trying to pass off as some resistance thing, yes i would think that was bad. in this case, i think it wasn't really a big deal since the photo itself gives a lot of prominence to some socialist guy that wasn't true of the actual march, and for the illustrative purposes of the graphic it wasn't really helpful. i guess if i were the socialist dude i'd be pretty annoyed, but beyond that i don't really see much of a problem. in fact, frankly i am surprised they didn't photoshop the 3rd party poster out entirely since it seems a bit counterproductive for a party to advertise another party's literature in their graphics.

you asked "what would happen if they didn't photoshop the picture?" probably nothing. but they're trained to be cautious, for better or worse, because saying the wrong things can reflect badly not just on the party but on their candidates. that means they're going to err on the side of caution and remove/crop out things that conflict with their message.

Its weird how their "caution" always seems to take the form of actively going out of their way to poo poo on the left while co opting their gains.

Weird, that.

  • Locked thread