|
Andorra posted:I'm just wondering, what would those stats be if Alaska wasn't included at all, neither its land or population? This is a rough estimate but: Alaska's population is about 66% urban and Alaska's land area is about 17.5% of the total US landmass. If you remove Alaska from the totals, then we get these figures: 80.9% of the population lives on 3.6% of the land when wholly excluding Alaska but keeping Puerto Rico and Hawaii as in the original figures. Thus 19.1% lives on the remaining 96.4% of the land. If you then subtract Hawaii and Puerto Rico as well as Alaska, and just deal with the 48 contiguous states, then it's 80.7% of the population living on 3.57% of the land. The separation between the 2% and 1.05% or so in the all country figures is meant to be, roughly, an attempt to delineate the population in the cities proper and inner dense suburbs versus the population in the less dense but still far denser than rural area outer suburbs. The data easily accessible when you're trying to factor out Alaska/Hawaii/Puerto Rico doesn't really let you calculate how that changes, though it probably lowers the cities/inner suburbs a bit and raises the outer suburbs a bit, as Hawaii and Alaska both have populations heavily concentrated in the few cities and their inner suburban areas.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2017 20:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 08:39 |
|
Atlas Obscrura posted:During World War II, the painter, illustrator, and cartoonist William Gropper offered his services to the U.S. Treasury Department and the White House’s Office of War Information. He received a “Citation in recognition of fine assistance” from the Treasury Department and personal thanks from Franklin Delano Roosevelt, for “giving pictorial form to specific war information objectives” through propaganda posters and paintings. It seemed logical that after the war, the State Department, too, would find value in the famous artist’s social-realist portrayal of American culture—a logic that would soon find Gropper trapped within the surrealist labyrinth of McCarthyism.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 01:36 |
|
Oil basins = Green Gas basins = pink The lines are pipelines. Not sure why the image doesn't have labels, here's the original: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/united-states-of-oil/ I had no idea there were such reserves in Appalachia.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 01:45 |
|
Count Roland posted:Oil basins = Green What did you think all the fracking was for?
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 02:30 |
|
Count Roland posted:Oil basins = Green Back in the 19th century, Pennslyvania was like Texas or Saudi Arabia is today, in terms of oil production. That's why you still have brands of oil-based products around like Pennzoil and Quaker State that reference Pennslyvania. There's even an Oil City, PA which was founded near where some of the first major oil well sites were drilled in the 1850s.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 02:35 |
|
The history of the early oil market is really interesting. Back in the day oil was transported in wooden barrels, so there was a huge market for coopers and lumber which usually deforested the area. Oil was also orrery much first come first served so there was a big rush to drink up the milkshake leading to crashes in the commodity price, ruining small operators and eventually leading to monopoly under Rockefeller. Pennsylvania *could* have been saudia Arabia has there been any sense of planning or management of the resource.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 02:41 |
|
Ron Jeremy posted:Pennsylvania *could* have been saudia Arabia has there been any sense of planning or management of the resource. with republicans in power it still can be!
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 07:36 |
|
Count Roland posted:I had no idea there were such reserves in Appalachia. Yeah. There was even a documentary about it and the socio-economic changes that it brought on the people who discovered it.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 11:49 |
|
https://twitter.com/sayed_ridha/status/847026878078627840
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 12:15 |
|
Yellow is Rojava, black is ISIS (whoof they're in trouble), red is Assad, green looks like generic "rebels," but what's the teal in the north? Based on this map it's listed as "FSA groups and Turkish troops in Northern Syria" but I'm not really sure who that is. Did Turkey just straight up invade that area so that the Kurds couldn't unify Rojava, or is more just them supporting local Turkmen militias?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 06:08 |
|
Duckbag posted:Did Turkey just straight up invade that area so that the Kurds couldn't unify Rojava, or is more just them supporting local Turkmen militias? It's a mix of both.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 06:12 |
|
Duckbag posted:Did Turkey just straight up invade that area so that the Kurds couldn't unify Rojava, or is more just them supporting local Turkmen militias? Mostly the first
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 11:56 |
|
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 15:46 |
|
How the hell does 'Cymry' count as 'other or uncertain' and not 'other peoples'? It literally means 'Welsh people' in Welsh.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 16:39 |
|
More accurately, "Country people". Yeah, Wales's name in Welsh is basically "Country".
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 16:48 |
|
TinTower posted:More accurately, "Country people". better than what you lot call us. Though it was a good warning to the rest of the world to the character of the English people that one of the first things they did as a people was to show up in someone else's country and label them all 'foreigners'.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 17:01 |
|
Germanic tribes did that poo poo everywhere. There's Wallonia, Wallachia and I'm pretty sure there's one in Switzerland, though I can't remember the specific name right now.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 17:36 |
|
Fun fact: the only named place on this map is the small town of Sarrin, because its grain silos are the original cause of this map. Back in 2015, these silos were an incredibly resilient stronghold of Daesh and it took the YPG months to clear them out, leading to a meme that grain silos are some sort of super defense infrastructure. Which, what with them being huge towers of thick concrete looking over flat farmland, is not that far-fetched. Also, grain-production-syria.jpg
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 17:36 |
|
Phlegmish posted:Germanic tribes did that poo poo everywhere. There's Wallonia, Wallachia and I'm pretty sure there's one in Switzerland, though I can't remember the specific name right now. Valais/Wallis
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 17:39 |
|
Baron Corbyn posted:Valais/Wallis In the German language, there is also the more general term "Welschland", which apparently used to be a generic term for territories where Romance languages were spoken (mostly France and Italy). Presumably the Polish name for Italy, "Włochy", is derived from this.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 17:45 |
|
Baron Corbyn posted:Valais/Wallis e: See also how the Germanic William/Wilhelm becomes Guillaume in French, but Latin Victor keeps its V. Ofaloaf fucked around with this message at 18:11 on Mar 30, 2017 |
# ? Mar 30, 2017 18:04 |
|
Deutsch, Dutch, and all that stuff originally meant "of the people". So Deutschland is "the country of the people" and Deutsch is "the language of the people".
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 18:14 |
|
Well, "language".
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 19:30 |
|
I know we already moved beyond the discussion of world map projections, but I only just discovered this image, and I gotta share. Screw the Mercator haters. source
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 04:24 |
|
The river Humber is the wedge between York East and Lincoln, so this map works as timeline of the decline of the Kingdom of Northumbria.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 05:58 |
|
Echo Chamber posted:I know we already moved beyond the discussion of world map projections, but I only just discovered this image, and I gotta share.
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 13:00 |
|
Just read The man in the high castle
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 23:26 |
|
ekuNNN posted:Just read The man in the high castle I'm guessing the lack of a Mediterranean sea is on purpose?
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 00:32 |
|
The Nazis nukes the sea out of existence and it's now farmland. Africa is also basically just Skull Mountain: A mountain made of skulls.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 00:35 |
|
I've always liked/hated how all these fractured United States alt-histories always keep the Mexican and Canadian borders the same like nothing happened. You can't possibly think that Canada wouldn't carve off Maine or Mexico wouldn't take a bite off the southwest if they were reduced to tiny rump states with no Federal Military to protect them. How would 1800's Washington State with it's population of six lumberjacks avoid being annexed by British backed Canada?
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 00:38 |
|
galagazombie posted:I've always liked/hated how all these fractured United States alt-histories always keep the Mexican and Canadian borders the same like nothing happened. You can't possibly think that Canada wouldn't carve off Maine or Mexico wouldn't take a bite off the southwest if they were reduced to tiny rump states with no Federal Military to protect them. How would 1800's Washington State with it's population of six lumberjacks avoid being annexed by British backed Canada? Well in this specific instance, there's massive Japanese and German armies on hand to stop Canada and Mexico from doing anything, and also to keep Canada from being meaningful opposition to either power.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 00:40 |
|
So how come canada didn't get conquered?
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 00:44 |
|
Peanut President posted:So how come canada didn't get conquered? Yeah I'm curious about this too, Canada fought against Germany in World War II so presumably they would have also been conquered.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 00:51 |
|
Peanut President posted:So how come canada didn't get conquered? Canada surrenders early and becomes a neutral zone, forever at risk of being invaded by the Japanese or Germans anyway. America on the other hand kept fighting to the bitter end, so gets split into the 2 occupied territories and the neutral buffer country in the middle. You'll notice of course that since Newfoundland and Labrador never had time to join up with Canada after the war, the Germans own it since they own the UK directly. So Canada is pretty well hemmed in by the Japanese Pacific States on the west and the German US and Newfoundland on the east.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 01:05 |
|
Because Dick didn't really care or talk about it. http://bigthink.com/strange-maps/the-map-in-the-high-castle-ii Relevant bits: quote:In Philip K. Dick's original novel, the references to geography are deliberately, tantalizingly scant. Can a map —especially a fictional one — be too precise? quote:Most of the story is set in the Pacific States of America, a Japanese puppet state on the West Coast. The exact nature of Japanese domination is never discussed, and there is just one reference to the extent of the PSA's territory: You also get alternative maps Opening credits: Original cover: Different cover: The one shown that forgot about Canada, so they decided to make it free: Probably the most reasonable map: Probably the best:
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 01:07 |
You can tell it's fantasy because Italy has something remotely resembling an actual empire.
|
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 01:37 |
|
Echo Chamber posted:I know we already moved beyond the discussion of world map projections, but I only just discovered this image, and I gotta share. I like this map. If you continued even further south it'd turn into that old Powers of Ten video...
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 01:51 |
|
HookShot posted:You can tell it's fantasy because Italy has something remotely resembling an actual empire. Also draining the Mediterranean would probably create hundred of miles of salt flats and brackish malaria swamps rather than farmland. Plus it might reroute the gulf stream and freeze half of Europe.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 01:54 |
|
To be fair, Dick's writing is very coherent for someone with schizophrenia who is self-medicating with methamphetamine and LSD.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 01:58 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 08:39 |
|
Duckbag posted:Also draining the Mediterranean would probably create hundred of miles of salt flats and brackish malaria swamps rather than farmland. Plus it might reroute the gulf stream and freeze half of Europe. The salt haboobs would be horrendous.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 02:02 |