|
Preet Brahaha was overseeing Price's investigation by the DOJ, and some insiders have pointed to that for his firing.
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 00:29 |
|
|
Thatim posted:Didnt he said Clinton would win? He said like 60% chance for her unless there was a major regional shift, which is exactly what happened.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
Thatim posted:Didnt he said Clinton would win? He gave Trump like a 33% chance to win or something where everyone else said it would never happen, and everyone took that to mean "Clinton will win" because people have a really hard time processing probabilities between 0% and 100%
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:This is hosed With the real rise of mainstream internet, I can absolutely see these views on the rise as plausible. You can self select your reality. Its a hell of a lot easier to be told that women are just sluts for chad dick than to accept that you are a sexless loser because you are creepy and attach to any girl that gives you a tiny amount of attention.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:he was the only poll that was like "hillary might lose" Dude was wrong too. Just because he didnt let his polls go to 99% by 'unskewing' doesnt make him right.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:This is hosed People are loving wusses, and want desperately some sort of authoritarian rigidity, it's not a surprise.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:Preet Brahaha was overseeing Price's investigation by the DOJ, and some insiders have pointed to that for his firing. I cant wait for this guy to get hosed on insider trading, but who knows, poo poo may never happen
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:This is hosed That has less to do with being an MRA and more with being evangelical. I would buy a 10% rise in evangelicalism among teens over the past 20 years. I think some of the preference for a single income household is coming from a more innocuous sentiment - that the current situation where a dual income is necessary for survival for a family is undesirable.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Louisgod posted:you get high too? I could spend the rest of my life in a guild navigator jar full of dab and never manage to perceive the world as unto Bill Mitchell
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Did the Combat Boot drop yet?
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:if i could make laws #1 with a bullet would be "you have to actually directly answer questions that you are asked unless it directly threatens national security" for everything???? lmebo imagine how absolutely bad scotus hearings would be, all these senators just floatin test cases in front of nominees to find out how theyd rule
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
Thatim posted:Hillary might lose still puts her as a winner. that's not how probability works
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
aware of dog posted:The tweet already got deleted, what'd it say? luckily i made screenshots for those of you just joining us, sarah mcbride is a trans woman who you might remember spoke at the democratic national convention last year. kurt schlichter writes for townhall.com   
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
Unperson_47 posted:do you think spicy goes home feeling like he did a good job and it's all worht it. do ou think he feels shame on any level or does he get off on being humiliated and looking like an incompetent clay thumb curing in the desert ssun Whoever said his wife bangs someone else every morning and then they lay in his bed and laugh at him on tv had it right
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
i think they might be hitting the point of diminishing returns with voter suppression. most of the people whose votes can be suppressed easily, it's already happened. when Dems retake state houses their absolute #1 priority must be rolling back suppression and disenfranchisement. this has to be done before anything else to lock in our gains.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
Thatim posted:Hillary might lose still puts her as a winner. If I tell you an unbalanced coin had a 51% chance of heads I'm not 100% wrong if it lands tails.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:for everything???? would be better than the constant stream of "i don't recall" or "i dunno"
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:for everything???? well, senator, in the case of Kramer v Kramer, I would
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
Didn't even take his ball when he went home.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
Like think about this. Lets say today diaper furries are a thing. Why? Well you can find a community that tells you that its not only okay, but cool and good. 20 years ago, there might be other people that think that, but they'd have no way of meeting and certainly wouldn't openly advertise it. Now you can just go out and find a community for any old weird poo poo and just have your beliefs that its normal confirmed and even strengthened.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
This administration, less than a hundred days in, is on course for at least two federal trials or plea deals. Reagan's record still of course wildy outpaces Trump.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
having one spouse stay at home is p often an economic aspiration that gets really weirdly gender coded because patriarchy
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:This is hosed A high school senior in 2014 wasn't a fuckin millennial. That's the next generation, who are proving themselves to be conservative as gently caress The oldest Millennials are 35-36 now ffs
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
Schnorkles posted:The first thing i do is wake up and check the president of the united states twitter to determine how dumb my day is going to be god bless the moment i wake up before i put on my spray tan i make a little tweet for you~
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:i think they might be hitting the point of diminishing returns with voter suppression. most of the people whose votes can be suppressed easily, it's already happened. lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:This is hosed Speaking for myself, I'm 33 and my wife makes almost 2x what I make. It owns.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:This administration, less than a hundred days in, is on course for at least two federal trials or plea deals. I really really really want to believe that something will come of this but it's very difficult to wholeheartedly buy into the fact that anything matters I want to believe
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:would be better than the constant stream of "i don't recall" or "i dunno" no it wouldnt
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:having one spouse stay at home is p often an economic aspiration that gets really weirdly gender coded because patriarchy nothin wrong with a stay-at-home spouse, just gets weird when it has to be a specific gender of spouse
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:no it wouldnt i just want republicans to actually answer questions okay, i'm not a lawsman
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
Jazerus posted:I think some of the preference for a single income household is coming from a more innocuous sentiment - that the current situation where a dual income is necessary for survival for a family is undesirable. yeah this one
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:i think they might be hitting the point of diminishing returns with voter suppression. most of the people whose votes can be suppressed easily, it's already happened. Probably accurate to at least some extent. And the more you attack the right to vote, the more you embolden third party groups to get people registered and up to date regardless.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:having one spouse stay at home is p often an economic aspiration that gets really weirdly gender coded because patriarchy i wish stay at home spouses were a thing, and that i was the stay at home spouse
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
eonwe posted:Lets say today diaper furries are a thing. yeah let's say that ha ha just as a hypothetical haha lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
Thatim posted:Hillary might lose still puts her as a winner. He called exactly how she would lose, he pointed out exactly which states she would need to lose due to a poor showing of support. His statistical analysis was spot on
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
How is there not video of this yet?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
Is there video of this anywhere? it sounds hilarious
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:37
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:i think they might be hitting the point of diminishing returns with voter suppression. most of the people whose votes can be suppressed easily, it's already happened. locking in gains is nice but way less important than enshrining equal access to the basic amenities privileges and responsibilities of civil society into law as firmly as possible locking in gains is a nice side benefit but lets not lose sight here
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 00:29 |
|
|
HEY NONG MAN posted:Speaking for myself, I'm 33 and my wife makes almost 2x what I make. 27, same, it rules
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2017 21:37
|
|
