|
Shin Godzilla's US release seems to have been successful- they added some dates, which is generally a sign that ticket sales are strong, so I can't imagine why they'd drag their feet on a home release. Unless they did something stupid when acquiring the rights from Toho which is entirely possible.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 07:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 07:06 |
|
Snak posted:I like Ghost in the Shell 2017. I want it to be good, but it's kind of a mess. It's really hampered by trying to be too many things at once. Like it borrows the plot elements from the original film, and the second season of the series, and also shoves an entirely new totally unnecessary and generic origin story plot into it. And because these elements are all fighting for focus and not really meshing together at all, none of them gets developed well, and none of the characters get any time to be developed. There's like 4 hours worth of story crammed into an hour and 40 minutes. It's pretty nice looking, though. The film is not an 'origin story'; it takes place exactly one year after the character's origin. The plot of the film is completely different from the 1995 version, except insofar as the good guys are chasing a bad hacker guy. The film did not need to be four hours long.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 07:56 |
|
SuperMechagodzilla posted:The film did not need to be four hours long. lmao
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 08:07 |
|
I fuckin' laughed.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 08:19 |
I'm frankly amazed that funi was allowed near shin godzilla, given that the last time they touched something anno created he was, reportedly, so personally upset by their translation they he demanded that they do it over from scratch
|
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 08:26 |
|
only watched a bit but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otpTZxJGKo quote:AVATARA is not a cartoon. It's a documentary about an Internet subculture who spend their lives immersed in an online 3-D voice-chat program called "Digitalspace Traveler." Through a series of 14 interviews, we uncover the history, art, identities, struggles and emotions of this unique internet community who, since as far back as 1996 have mostly devoted their lives to this software.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 08:49 |
|
Inane IMDB forums are back, baby!
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 11:21 |
|
Oh man, this is amazingquote:That all seems like pretty standard lawsuit stuff, but Brittle’s argument also features a fun twist. Apparently, his attorneys sent a cease and desist notice to Warner Bros. and the Conjuring producers before the release of The Conjuring 2, but the studio claimed that the supernatural horror movies are actually based on “historical facts” and not The Demonologist. However, Brittle says that argument doesn’t hold any water because the Warrens spent years lying about what happened in their many adventures, and the movies can’t be based on historical facts because ghosts aren’t real. In other words, a $900 million lawsuit against The Conjuring hinges on the fact that ghosts don’t exist.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 13:27 |
|
That's great.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 13:40 |
|
Oh man I wonder if some people I know might get called to testify.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 13:42 |
|
Wanna see that Raggedy Ann doll take the stand
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 13:44 |
|
This needs to go to the Supreme Court.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 13:57 |
|
plz dont pull out posted:This needs to go to the Supreme Court. In a five four decision ghosts aren't real
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 14:03 |
|
If only the republicans hadn't blocked Garland!!
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 14:05 |
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:In a five four decision ghosts aren't real But what about demons?
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 14:09 |
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:In a five four decision ghosts aren't real What's Gorsuch's position?
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 14:13 |
|
Schwarzwald posted:What's Gorsuch's position? As a lich he's pro ghost
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 14:15 |
|
The supreme Court ruling that ghosts are real sounds like the premise of a show that would be called "Ghost High School".
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 14:15 |
|
It's gonna be cool as poo poo when the Supreme Court rules that the Warrens were lying, therefore there stories are not fictions, and therefore Warner Bros claim that the stories are based on historical facts will be vindicated even though the stories aren't actually based on historical facts.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 14:39 |
|
It'll probably just get settled out of court
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 14:58 |
|
We've seen this "are ghosts real" court battle before. Peter: There are some things in this world that go way beyond human understanding. Things that cannot be explained. Things that some don't even want to know about! That is where we come in. Prosecutor: So what you're saying is that the world of the supernatural is your exclusive province? Peter: Kitten, I think that what I'm saying is that: sometimes, poo poo happens, someone has to deal with it, and who you gonna call?
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 14:59 |
|
There's a really great property law case about whether a house is less valuable than advertised because it's haunted, I'll see if I can dig it up if anyone is interested in the wonderful field of Ghost Law. The judge spends the entire opinion making terrible puns.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 15:32 |
|
Tuxedo Catfish posted:There's a really great property law case about whether a house is less valuable than advertised because it's haunted, I'll see if I can dig it up if anyone is interested in the wonderful field of Ghost Law. The judge spends the entire opinion making terrible puns. It's apparently Stambovsky v. Ackley, which is a solid ghost law name quote:Stambovsky v. Ackley, 169 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991), commonly known as the Ghostbusters (D.P. László Kovács) ruling…
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 15:38 |
|
The cinematographer of Ghostbusters is listed and not Reitman?
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 15:42 |
|
Just applied for an apartment. It's a little high for ladyeye and me but it's workable. If I get it we move in May first
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 15:45 |
|
Hat Thoughts posted:only watched a bit but Badass. BENGHAZI 2 posted:Just applied for an apartment. It's a little high for ladyeye and me but it's workable. If I get it we move in May first Goongrats
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 15:57 |
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:Just applied for an apartment. It's a little high for ladyeye and me but it's workable. If I get it we move in May first My boy's growing up :') On the topic, I have an interview for a full time job at a community college! I gotta get a haircut so I don't look homeless!
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 17:27 |
Budgie Jumping posted:I read this post and I've rarely wanted to wedgie a poster more. Did you not watch it, because he says some pretty lovely stuff in it.
|
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 17:49 |
|
Hat Thoughts posted:only watched a bit but The first interviewee's avatar is a talking guitar. Edit: Holy poo poo, the party room. Just disembodied heads and floating seahorses and poo poo slowly rotating in place at one another above a dance floor in the void while the phrase "Lets Party Tonight" circles around the room. Safety Factor fucked around with this message at 18:15 on Apr 4, 2017 |
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:04 |
|
Today I found out that, in the eyes of the internet, sleeping in the same bed as your infant or toddler is tantamount to child endangerment because you might roll on it in the night. I mean... you're wrong? HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Badass. Like a proto-Lasagna Cat Sex Survey.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:26 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:
Speaking of which, the Night Mind episode on this is Night Mind as gently caress.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:28 |
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:when she gets mad she gets really antagonistic and also childish Hmmm. SuperMechagodzilla posted:The film is not an 'origin story'; it takes place exactly one year after the character's origin. Barman Begins is not an origin story as Bruce Wayne was conceived several years before the events of the film and is in fact already a child.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:39 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:Today I found out that, in the eyes of the internet, sleeping in the same bed as your infant or toddler is tantamount to child endangerment because you might roll on it in the night. Older infants and toddlers are probably okay, but it's pretty widely known that sleeping with a newborn is a big no-no. Not just due to the risk of you rolling on them, but any blankets, sheets and pillows pose suffocation risks.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:39 |
|
Baron von Eevl posted:Hmmm. Do you know happens when we fall down Bruce? We get ourselves a drink.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:41 |
|
Spatulater bro! posted:Older infants and toddlers are probably okay, but it's pretty widely known that sleeping with a newborn is a big no-no. Not just due to the risk of you rolling on them, but any blankets, sheets and pillows pose suffocation risks. Yeah, there's a reason SIDS rates have fallen pretty dramatically, and it's this and back sleeping.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:42 |
|
Baron von Eevl posted:Hmmm. I'm a 27 year old dude who has some mental health issues and I don't pretend to be mature and reasonable when I do it Now take the opposite of that and that's her
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:45 |
|
Detective No. 27 posted:Do you know happens when we fall down Bruce? We get ourselves a drink. It's even better than that... that dumb line is "Why do we fall?" "because we're loving hammered".
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:52 |
I didn't think the line was that dumb because it's similar to something my dad used to tell me when I was a kid.
|
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:54 |
|
Spatulater bro! posted:Older infants and toddlers are probably okay, but it's pretty widely known that sleeping with a newborn is a big no-no. Not just due to the risk of you rolling on them, but any blankets, sheets and pillows pose suffocation risks. Can't find the article so my use of 'infant' might have been wrong, but it was a father taking a photo of the mother sleeping with her two very young kids and the internet did its thing. It was ridiculous. People are just... brimming with loathing. Baron von Eevl posted:Yeah, there's a reason SIDS rates have fallen pretty dramatically, and it's this and back sleeping. SIDS. Now there's some nightmare stuff for ya.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:55 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 07:06 |
|
Here's my advice: don't have kids.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2017 18:55 |