|
It's also quite possible your developer/agitation scheme is responsible for some of the grain too. More/stronger agitation and higher development temperatures can definitely make grain more pronounced.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2017 02:47 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:31 |
|
MrBlandAverage posted:It's also quite possible your developer/agitation scheme is responsible for some of the grain too. More/stronger agitation and higher development temperatures can definitely make grain more pronounced. Wow that's good to know. Looking at my notes, I did 11:50 in ddx with 60 second initial agitation and then 5 second flips every 30 seconds. I didn't know that agitation would introduce more grain; I was under the impression it would just make it more contrasty. I have a couple more rolls to develop, so with knowing this, I think I will play with the agitation intervals a bit.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2017 02:52 |
|
Choicecut posted:Wow that's good to know. Looking at my notes, I did 11:50 in ddx with 60 second initial agitation and then 5 second flips every 30 seconds. I didn't know that agitation would introduce more grain; I was under the impression it would just make it more contrasty. I have a couple more rolls to develop, so with knowing this, I think I will play with the agitation intervals a bit. What temperature?
|
# ? Mar 22, 2017 03:11 |
|
MrBlandAverage posted:What temperature? Thermo said 69F just before putting it in the tank.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2017 03:33 |
|
Choicecut posted:I was also curious why there was so much grain on these. I like the way they look, but seemed super grainy. Is that just the result of the Ultrafine Extreme 400 cheap film? Probably not the cause, but I'm curious about what you scanned them with.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2017 04:19 |
|
akadajet posted:Probably not the cause, but I'm curious about what you scanned them with. a fender stratocaster
|
# ? Mar 22, 2017 04:49 |
|
Haha..A potato cut into the shape of a fender Stratocaster.. I'm scanning with an Epson v500 I picked up awhile back on the cheap.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2017 10:21 |
|
|
# ? Mar 22, 2017 23:01 |
|
Nws: http://i67.tinypic.com/53wt8x.jpg 32 sec exposure @ f5.6, window light. 13 secs dev Kinda wish i halved exposure and developed longer for more contrast but we didnt have time and it's a nice start for something new to me Sludge Tank fucked around with this message at 13:28 on Mar 26, 2017 |
# ? Mar 26, 2017 13:24 |
|
Sludge Tank posted:Nws: http://i67.tinypic.com/53wt8x.jpg The wet plate stuff is really amazing to me and someday I plan on wasting money in that area. Very, very cool dude.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2017 20:17 |
|
Not the most interesting shot but my first attempt at 4x5 was a success. Developed at home using the taco method in a paterson tank. I really need to get a focusing hood BANME.sh fucked around with this message at 17:35 on Mar 27, 2017 |
# ? Mar 27, 2017 17:15 |
|
BANME.sh posted:I really need to get a focusing hood Worth every penny: https://viewcamerastore.com/collections/btzs-focus-hoods/products/4x5-btzs-focus-hood-dark-cloth
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 20:21 |
|
Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr
|
# ? Mar 28, 2017 06:25 |
|
poo poo, I was all ready to buy a Pentax 645 from Japan on eBay. Now this thread has me thinking I should get a 6x7 instead. I have had great success shooting 35mm with my Pentax Spotmatic. I almost always prefer a 28mm lens. But now, I am now for more detail and sharpness in images like this. A 645 (or 645N) with a 45mm lens seems like one path. Even though I have gone without it for years, the idea of autofocus is appealing for the times when there are human beings or other live subjects in the frame. A Pentax 6x7 seems more in keeping with my current all-manual tradition. I would want a 55mm lens to feel equivalent to 28mm in 35, right? I've had a Yashica 124G for years, but have never taken to the TLR viewfinder or 80mm lens.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2017 17:15 |
|
ryangs posted:poo poo, I was all ready to buy a Pentax 645 from Japan on eBay. Now this thread has me thinking I should get a 6x7 instead. i love my pentax 67
|
# ? Mar 28, 2017 17:41 |
|
akadajet posted:i love my pentax 67 I'm so glad I got one and wish I would have a long time ago. I'm getting some great portraits of my family and I enjoy taking pictures with it so much more than any of my other film/digital cameras. I can't say it's improved my photography at all, but the slower process in taking images and developing my own film is great. Instead of 8000 garbage images to sift through, I only have 10 to 20 poo poo negatives. Choicecut fucked around with this message at 20:00 on Mar 28, 2017 |
# ? Mar 28, 2017 19:54 |
|
Thoogsby fucked around with this message at 03:26 on Mar 29, 2017 |
# ? Mar 29, 2017 03:20 |
|
Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr
|
# ? Mar 29, 2017 05:37 |
|
akadajet posted:i love my pentax 67 the P.E.N.T.A.X. 67 thread: I love my camera, that ain't oil (you use graphite you filthy plebs) ryangs posted:A Pentax 6x7 seems more in keeping with my current all-manual tradition. I would want a 55mm lens to feel equivalent to 28mm in 35, right? You more or less divide the focal length by 2 to get an equivalent 35mm focal length, so that's the closest option, but it's still not a totally perfect comparison because the 6x7 format is more square than the 35mm format. Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 05:58 on Mar 30, 2017 |
# ? Mar 30, 2017 05:54 |
|
Speaking of P67, here's a photo from mine: Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr
|
# ? Mar 30, 2017 06:59 |
|
Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr
|
# ? Mar 31, 2017 07:36 |
|
I'm curious as to what you guys are using to lug around your medium format gear in. I'm probably being stupid, but I have a trip to Hawaii coming up in May and feel like I would enjoy having the 67 with me while there. I have a stop in Anaheim to take the kids to Disneyland on the way, so I would need to haul the XT-1 for candid moments, but wonder if I'm being silly trying to carry all that on a plane. I also have a bike trip to Washington/Oregon/Cali in July and would love to have the 67 or the Mamiya with me, but again I have no idea how to transport it securely since they are so big. I'm seriously in love with these cameras and the process of developing my own film. They are so much fun to shoot! I've burned through 12 rolls of film in like 2 weeks! Zag Somewhere in Ohio.... Choicecut fucked around with this message at 01:17 on Apr 1, 2017 |
# ? Apr 1, 2017 00:07 |
|
I usually take an MF camera with me when I travel in addition to my DSLR. I use a LowePro backpack that is cabin baggage compatible and that (just) fits two bodies, a few lenses, my laptop, a tripod and the usual accessories. I think that most larger bags will handle a big body like your Mamiya plus one or two smaller bodies and a reasonable selection of lenses and other stuff. I guess if you exclusively shoot with huge lenses across all your gear or you need something like a video stabiliser then it's going to get awkward but I haven't had a problem with carrying big cameras around in addition to regular sized options. You'll be glad when you finally get to put the bag down though.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 09:22 |
|
I can jam the RB67, both of its lenses, and a couple of 35mm/mirrorless cameras into my Naneu 217°F. Everything feels well-protected and secure inside it, and it can keep its contents relatively cool for a few hours in sweltering heat if you pack it in an air-conditioned room and keep it zipped up. Kind of a nice feature if you're traveling with film. It's a bulky bag, though.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 17:41 |
|
Right on. I have a 30L Lowepro hiking backpack, but the camera area just isn't working for the 67 and the XT1 together. The Naneu looks similar to the Tamarack Expedition I used to have. It was a great bag, but man was it huge and cumbersome when flying.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 22:49 |
|
I travel with a Domke J2 Journalist, and in a pinch it's just big enough for a Hasselblad, three backs, a Nikon F5, and two lenses for each, though the F5 has to travel unmounted. A big Nikon zoom would probably cut me to one. It's just small enough to fit under an airline seat. My shoulder hates me for it, though not as much now that I got the postal-style strap pad.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 23:06 |
|
Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 1, 2017 23:37 |
|
Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 3, 2017 07:29 |
|
elgarbo posted:
You've single handedly made me pause and look at potted plants every time I'm out.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2017 07:52 |
|
underage at the vape shop posted:You've single handedly made me pause and look at potted plants every time I'm out. As long as I'm making people aware, my artistic aims are being met.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2017 08:14 |
|
underage at the vape shop posted:You've single handedly made me pause and look at potted plants every time I'm out.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2017 09:58 |
|
Anyway, here's some dirt. Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr elgarbo fucked around with this message at 09:28 on Apr 4, 2017 |
# ? Apr 4, 2017 09:21 |
|
Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 5, 2017 08:45 |
|
Was out the lakes the other day and tried to do an 11x14 tintype. Same old developer problems. 11x14's are way harder than 8x10's. Getting there but at least dust isn't an issue anymore. Need to work on getting the developer to flow more evenly and stop it evenly as well. the misty streaks in the bottom half of the image are parts where the developer has either hit that area a second or so before the rest or where the water stop hasn't washed it off enough and it's just diluted the developer into the water and continued to develop a little slower. Stop water behaves super oily when it hits the plate. Sludge Tank fucked around with this message at 00:35 on Apr 6, 2017 |
# ? Apr 6, 2017 00:32 |
|
Thats really nice Sludge Tank, nailing the exposure. I can only imagine how difficult it is dealing with such a big plate, 8x10 was more than hard enough for me. Here's a couple of 6x9 cropped to 4x5, something I'm liking these days.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2017 11:11 |
|
|
# ? Apr 8, 2017 10:12 |
|
Inniswood
|
# ? Apr 9, 2017 17:01 |
|
Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 10, 2017 09:11 |
|
Kurnell by Michael Garbutt, on Flickr
|
# ? Apr 11, 2017 00:09 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:31 |
|
|
# ? Apr 11, 2017 03:49 |