|
chitoryu12 posted:Also, found some footage of our other plane in flight: 
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 22:22 |
|
|
We need the X-32.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
The X-32 just looks so happy, like it really loves just being a plane.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:Yeah, we really shouldn't have bothered with that few phantoms or the frogfeet. Agreeing with all of this. Bacarruda posted:Buy mid- to late-block F-16s. They can carry HARMs (or can easily be modified to carry them). But not this. F-16s are too competent to be interesting. This entire outfit is based on plan Bs, get us some of those Polish Fitters or some other such nonsense if we wanna drop ARMs on some assholes. The more unreliable and single-role aircraft we have, the more goons we can potentially get into the air simultaneously, after all!
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 22:39
|
|
|
Quinntan posted:The X-32 just looks so happy, like it really loves just being a plane. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 22:48
|
|
|
power crystals posted:But not this. F-16s are too competent to be interesting. This entire outfit is based on plan Bs, get us some of those Polish Fitters or some other such nonsense if we wanna drop ARMs on some assholes. The more unreliable and single-role aircraft we have, the more goons we can potentially get into the air simultaneously, after all! Then there is only one choice for our SEAD mission. http://www.avrovulcan.org.uk/other_photographers/598_wideawake.jpg
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 22:54
|
|
|
We also apparently picked up a pair of these, I think. http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/4087/ Now if only they were 208s...
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
 Whattya mean we got the wrong uniforms? Tibet isn't a desert? Well it god drat oughtta be! U.S. Army Recruit Class of 2020 Reporting for Duty Like you whirly bird-flyboys, we too need a budget if we're gonna risk our asses every day. We have three levels of funding that would work quite nicely: Funding A - $1 Million Funding B - $500,00 Funding C - $250,000 After this initial kickstarter we, the professionals that we are, will be self sustaining. We're on route to the AO and need this info in ASAP if our money boys are gonna do...whatever it is they do.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:01
|
|
|
Funding A. If we're going to do this thing, we might as well do it right. Well, as right as we can under the circumstances. We'll get some fancy uniforms, and an ice cream machine for the break room, and
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:03
|
|
|
Option A
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:03
|
|
|
A mill is pretty much chump change, as long as they produce even a few solid pieces of intel we're way ahead there. I vote for funding option a
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
Option A
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
Big money for big troubles. Option A
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
poo poo, a mil is nothing Option A
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:27
|
|
|
Option A. Whats the odds of being able to get an old utility helicopter (an Mi-8 or the like) from that Soviet museum on the cheap for our new venture?
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:29
|
|
|
option A
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:31
|
|
|
sparkmaster posted:Option A. Many helicopter are available! Although some may need new paint... 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 23:45
|
|
|
Any Hind D's?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:05
|
|
|
Okay that Yak-38 looks inviting, if not for the suprise factor. How much is it? Also if the AS-4 kitchen is overed does this mean we might get a TU-16 or beter yet a TU-22m3? I have one suggestion for the future; we should realy get a dedicated recon platform, like the RF-4E for example. Small stuf like tank and such are a pain in the rear end to find otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
Show this to our pilots to get them off the ground faster: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBHMEqH1oRY Pretty sure Swedish is a made-up language.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
Lmao please no Yak-38
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:14
|
|
|
Yes, let's get a Harrier that ejects you without warning when one of the engines craps out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:17
|
|
|
Absolutely the yak 38! What could possibly go wrong? Funding option A
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
Its unanimous. Y'all just authorized a bunch of Basic Training rejects a slush fund of $1 Million. Won't let you down! Funding Voting Closed Phi230 fucked around with this message at 00:26 on Apr 8, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:20
|
|
|
How could we not buy the worlds largest production helicopter? Hell, we could probably contract it out to humanitarian organizations when its not needed by our goons. Might make decent cash.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:25
|
|
|
Dandywalken posted:Lmao please no Yak-38 Quinntan posted:Yes, let's get a Harrier that ejects you without warning when one of the engines craps out. Where's your sense of adventure and wonder. It really is a underdog amongst planes. And who doesn't love a underdog? Besides It could alway be used for pesky poeple. Purposfuly blew up that kitten orphanage? Now you can fly the Yak. BTW, I choose Funding option A
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:27
|
|
|
People have to love underdogs otherwise they're not underdogs. Nobody loves the Forger. The Forger was so bad that when the Soviets tried to use it in Afghanistan, they would damage themselves trying to take off, and when they didn't ruin themselves, they could only carry a pair of 100kg bombs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 00:53
|
|
|
No on the yak please.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 01:04
|
|
|
For the love of God and all that is holy do not buy a loving Yak-38. I'd be cool with buying some Su-22s though, especially if they have some of the more recent Polish upgrades. Alternatively, Su-24s (were there any in there?) would be more expensive but have more load carrying capacity, and with Kh-31s they'd be solid for anti-shipping missions.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 01:35
|
|
|
We need to buy that UN Helicopter and NOT repaint it. Could come in handy...
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 01:40
|
|
|
Popete posted:We need to buy that UN Helicopter and NOT repaint it. Could come in handy... You people are crooked and I like the way you think. Planning to run the mission tonight.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 02:12
|
|
|
Phoenix Command: The Commandering Become a mercenary today!
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 02:12
|
|
|
Looking at what the Hawk 209 can carry compared to what CMANO allows, there's some weirdness going on. Wiki claims all sorts of stuff like AMRAAMs, Sea Eagle anti-ship missiles, even torpedoes, but all that it has in CMANO is Sidewinders, unguided bombs and rockets. Should we try to give it all this stuff or should we just run with it as is?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 03:00
|
|
|
Quinntan posted:Looking at what the Hawk 209 can carry compared to what CMANO allows, there's some weirdness going on. Wiki claims all sorts of stuff like AMRAAMs, Sea Eagle anti-ship missiles, even torpedoes, but all that it has in CMANO is Sidewinders, unguided bombs and rockets. Should we try to give it all this stuff or should we just run with it as is? I'm not sure on the exact process for DB updates but I know there is a big monster thread at Matrix about DB additions. Could try there.  Wow. Mission is complete. We have dogfights. We have violence. We have enough rockets to choke a goat. I'm going to edit it all and get it up. poo poo went down like I never expected.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
poo poo went down good or poo poo went down bad? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
Oh boy, we hosed up.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
I was teasing earlier but realtalk this LP and the war machine talk is hella cool, watching those little dots fly at each other and get closer and closer to the C130s was really gripping in a way I didn't expect so I can only imagine how this mission is going to be (replace all our casualties with mirages and SLAM EAGLES)
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
...Mirages, you say? http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/2228/
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 04:17
|
|
|
Sounds like it's a good think we bought some more planes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 22:22 |
|
|
i'm glad we're at war with burma now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 04:47
|
|
