|
Pawn 17 posted:I liked this one better: goddamn that's savage e- lol say what you will but the dude is a next level troll
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 21:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 12:04 |
|
|
I was neither for or against trump but I do enjoy comedy and he's bringing that in spades so I'm enjoying my time in the Trump presidency so far.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:lol remember when Hillary said Pepe was a racist frog cartoon remember when some dude shouted PEPE during hillarys speech and rachel maddow turned it into some long segment about how trump and his supporters are unrepentant nazis
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:25
|
|
|
Reminder Hillary spent most of her political career preparing to become president while trump ran on a whim after Obama owned him at that one White House Correspondence dinner
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:46
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:lol like any of those groups won't commit mass suicide when the Republicans crush the Democrats in the 2018 midterms
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
bash the fash in this case means tattooing a Stahlhelm on the tip of his dick
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 23:33
|
|
|
CharlestonJew posted:Reminder Hillary spent most of her political career preparing to become president while trump ran on a whim after Obama owned him at that one White House Correspondence dinner I doubt that was the actual moment but holy poo poo I want to believe it was
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:goddamn that's savage It was cringe worthy how he stomped Jeb! and Liddle Marco Rubio in the primary fight.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:I doubt that was the actual moment but holy poo poo I want to believe it was You look at Trumps face here and tell me that is not the face of a man that wants to burn down Obama legacy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8TwRmX6zs4
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 01:35
|
|
|
BexGu posted:You look at Trumps face here and tell me that is not the face of a man that wants to burn downs Obama legacy: say what you will about trump, but he strikes me as a wrong motherfucker to gently caress with
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 01:36
|
|
|
In that he has money and holds a grudge, yes
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 01:41
|
|
|
Pawn 17 posted:I liked this one better: There it is. That's the LOL. Edit: whoops, thought I was in the 'lol everytime you remember trump is pres' thread. ballistics statistics fucked around with this message at 01:56 on Apr 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 01:50
|
|
God I fucking love Diablo 3 gold, it even paid for this shitty title
|
lol remember when some brainwashed D&D dork showed up outta nowhere and posted this disingenuous garbagezegermans posted:I think we should all bask in the fact that these two sentence fragments were right next to each other.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 02:14
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:the most brutal ownage ever recorded on live TV was Trump's "because you'd be in jail" snipe something that I heard on NPR shocked me after that. The quote goes " "It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country" "yeah because you'd be in jail" Which calls to the listeners mind the various unseemly activities that Hillary has been involved in and makes it an epic rhetorical own What NPR had done was seamlessly edit the thing to say " "It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge. "yeah because you'd be in jail" With no pause or anything Which completely and totally changes the meaning of the words, and calls to mind the idea of a zany dictator throwing his political opponents in jail. It was seriously chilling propaganda. It was weird.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 02:17
|
|
|
this is how to post in dnd. this is how its doneEnhydra lutris posted:Putin is a Lying Russian Swine [Pig]; he is inscrutable; and is devoid from Birth of Morals; Ethical Understanding; Faith in G-d; or Human Attachment. I hold him in Contempt; hearing his Name causes me to feel Dread; he has f*cked his own Mother; and he will bring Ruination to the World.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 02:20
|
|
|
Homestar Runner posted:lol remember when some brainwashed D&D dork showed up outta nowhere and posted this disingenuous garbage Lol he's CSPAM. Even d&d won't have him
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
canpakes posted:something that I heard on NPR shocked me after that. The quote goes I think the biggest takeaway from the election had little to do with the candidates themselves. The election finally laid bare for even the most idealist people in the country that the media is no longer the fourth estate and it is now as hopelessly corrupted as any politician you'll find in DC. Only the most partisan of ideologues now consider the media to be unbiased, and even they recognize that the media that caters to the side they aren't on is biased.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 02:36
|
|
|
Homestar Runner posted:lol remember when some brainwashed D&D dork showed up outta nowhere and posted this disingenuous garbage Man, Sanders showed up late and unprepared as a protest candidate then pulled 40% That's great.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
Yea it would have been nice if the dnc would have been backing a capable candidate, he would not have had to come in to challenge the lovely one
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 02:55
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:I think the biggest takeaway from the election had little to do with the candidates themselves. The election finally laid bare for even the most idealist people in the country that the media is no longer the fourth estate and it is now as hopelessly corrupted as any politician you'll find in DC. Only the most partisan of ideologues now consider the media to be unbiased, and even they recognize that the media that caters to the side they aren't on is biased. I'm sort of with you but what happens when the media sides with the left because of something that isn't really considered controversial, like teaching evolution in schools or the existence of climate change? I think issues like abortion are tough because we're dealing with a moral issue. We simply can't agree on what the definition of murder is. But other issues like the ones I first mentioned shouldn't really be up for debate in this day and age.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 03:26
|
|
|
Hillary Clinton is back, and she's raw as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
Amarcarts posted:I'm sort of with you but what happens when the media sides with the left because of something that isn't really considered controversial, like teaching evolution in schools or the existence of climate change? I think issues like abortion are tough because we're dealing with a moral issue. We simply can't agree on what the definition of murder is. But other issues like the ones I first mentioned shouldn't really be up for debate in this day and age. If thw truth is really on their side, maybe they shouldn't transparently mislead and manipulate
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 03:59
|
|
|
Amarcarts posted:I'm sort of with you but what happens when the media sides with the left because of something that isn't really considered controversial, like teaching evolution in schools or the existence of climate change? I think issues like abortion are tough because we're dealing with a moral issue. We simply can't agree on what the definition of murder is. But other issues like the ones I first mentioned shouldn't really be up for debate in this day and age. They purposely edited the actual audio. Probably hunched over an audio booth. There are a million examples of similar things this election. Like when Hillary Clinton lost consciousness at the memorial event CNNs headline was something about "Hillary stumbles." It's about the language that is used t to completely change the meaning of things and virtually completely fabricate events, frame things in a deliberately dishonest way etc. Nobody is saying that equal time should be given to both sides of cultural wedge issues or whatever you're saying. canpakes fucked around with this message at 04:10 on Apr 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 04:07
|
|
|
It doesn't matter what's true lol it only matters what you can accomplish Republicans suck but dammit know what they're after and how they're gonna get it
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 04:09
|
|
|
canpakes posted:They purposely edited the actual audio. Probably hunched over an audio booth. There are a million examples of similar things this election. Like when Hillary Clinton lost consciousness at the memorial event CNNs headline was something about "Hillary stumbles." This wouldn't have been covered at all if not for a private citizen catching it in film, her entire entourage surrounded her to try to hide it as well to lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
Amarcarts posted:I'm sort of with you but what happens when the media sides with the left because of something that isn't really considered controversial, like teaching evolution in schools or the existence of climate change? I think issues like abortion are tough because we're dealing with a moral issue. We simply can't agree on what the definition of murder is. But other issues like the ones I first mentioned shouldn't really be up for debate in this day and age. they take the poo poo people who actually know anything at all say and gently caress it up so badly that mouthbreathers talking about how dinosaurs were too big to fit on Noah's ark start sounding like an equally credible counternarrative, that's 'what happens'
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 04:13
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:they take the poo poo people who actually know anything at all say and gently caress it up so badly that mouthbreathers talking about how dinosaurs were too big to fit on Noah's ark start sounding like an equally credible counternarrative, that's 'what happens' Also most reporters are profoundly ignorant of basic science
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
canpakes posted:They purposely edited the actual audio. Probably hunched over an audio booth. There are a million examples of similar things this election. Like when Hillary Clinton lost consciousness at the memorial event CNNs headline was something about "Hillary stumbles."
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:Almost everyone is profoundly ignorant of basic science "Is the earth round?" Gets about 20pct "no" no matter where and when it's asked
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
Amarcarts posted:I'm sort of with you but what happens when the media sides with the left because of something that isn't really considered controversial, like teaching evolution in schools or the existence of climate change? I think issues like abortion are tough because we're dealing with a moral issue. We simply can't agree on what the definition of murder is. But other issues like the ones I first mentioned shouldn't really be up for debate in this day and age. No one has an issue with the media reporting on facts that the left have on their side. The problem is when they obfuscate truth in favor of a political agenda, or even worse simply don't report things that are potentially damaging to whatever side they cater too. This isn't a left only issue, Fox News and similar outlets do it for the right. When I was a kid I could watch Peter Jennings or people like him report the news. That's all it was, the news. No one gave a poo poo what he personally thought about the issues because it wasn't his job to craft a narrative, it was his job to be an outlet for information. Over the past twenty years information has become entertainment, and none of the main sources of journalism seem to remember why they were important. It's pundits and talking heads all the way down now, but never before has it become this obvious to people who wouldn't normally pay attention. Look at CNN and MH370. They had wall to wall coverage about a plane crash, with any and all theory about what happened, when the only facts that actually mattered to anyone was a plane was flying over the ocean and then disappeared. Another example is MSNBC and CNN pushing a narrative that the Antifa protests over Milo may have been a right wing false flag. Normal people don't know who Antifa is, but to people who do it was one of the most ridiculous things they could have said.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
Unbiased objective fact based reporting is not only dead but it's rotting corpse has been dug up, fondled, desecrated and reburied. #It'sstillherturn2020
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
Commercial news is not in the business of 'reporting facts', or informing the audience, or anything. Nobody at MSNBC gets paid based on how well-informed a global citizen they make their average viewer; they're entertainment there to get eyeballs, and what gets attention is conflict and confusion. There's actual real scientific controversies going on right now calling into question whether the research that gets treated with the most credibility is the best or merely that handled by those who know how to game the system but you're never going to hear anything about journal impact factor on CNN because it's a bunch of boring academics slapfighting and there's no broad characters or narrative tension. There's crazy research breakthroughs going on all the time but you state a fact and show a neat sciency picture if you can and it's over. Some troglodyte yelling about the Scopes monkey trial, though, that's a fun story with a clearly digested plot arc they're confident in their ability to tell Joe Sixpack between commercial breaks, and while they're totally on the side of Science that that dude's a goofy throwback, the net effect of a bunch of smarmy well-groomed media pricks loving up basic factual points to beat on some poor bible-thumper and rebroadcasting snippets of his paranoid ranting is to convince a load of people who never really had cause to give the issue much thought that evolution a dumb lie the Man is telling to suppress the underdog truth. That guy keeps getting ratings so people start covering him in detail and bringing him on for interviews, some bottom-feeders looking to outflank the competition start 'covering the controversy' to pander to the other market, and the foundation of modern medicine is forevermore an unsettled issue to the people who vote on federal science funding. It doesn't matter what 'side' commercial media ostensibly takes, it is always allied against truth and understanding, it will always introduce vagueness into the straightforward and make irreconcilable eternal battles of trivial disputes. If any issue is resolved, anything is known for certain, that's money out of their pockets. They cannot be used for good. A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 05:37 on Apr 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
Accretionist posted:That's hosed up. I have never gloated harder in my life then I did over the fact that I refused this condescendingly "magnanimous" deal and was vindicated then got the bonus lols watching the Hilldog toxxers writhe and flail trying to squirm out of their toxxes when the tables were so hilariously, gloriously reversed lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
I miss the liberal tears thread, that poo poo was loving golden too we'd get the occasional idiot that wandered in to debate and they had no idea it was just a bunch of bridge trolls, alas it was too beautiful for this world (and too many people started serious posting in it anyway)
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:they take the poo poo people who actually know anything at all say and gently caress it up so badly that mouthbreathers talking about how dinosaurs were too big to fit on Noah's ark start sounding like an equally credible counternarrative, that's 'what happens' You're right, I think. And like an inverted scientific method, where you get closer to the truth through fact checkin and gathering information, you wind up with an ever regressing stream of retarded nonsense like carbon dating being bullshit because fossils can only be 6000 years old. One time I listened to a guy at a bus stop talk for over 20 minutes about how the loch ness monster was a plesiosaur and how the Roman empire used velociraptor hides for their shields.  I wouldn't have jumped to the conclusion he was a creationist dupe except a) he mentioned the time differential between the bible and science and b) his insistence that Buddhism is a religion based on idolatry, because golden buddhas, duh.VikingSkull posted:I miss the liberal tears thread, that poo poo was loving golden too
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
cda posted:Hillary Clinton is back, and she's raw as gently caress. The Internet Is Losing It's Mind Over Hillary's Fierce New Look. It's a pantsuit YAASS
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 05:50
|
|
|
Zippy the Bummer posted:I have never gloated harder in my life then I did over the fact that I refused this condescendingly "magnanimous" deal and was vindicated i present a hero, ladies and gentlemen
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 05:55
|
|
|
Bernie literally predicts the future. Way to give up and let Hillary get the nomination you spineless cowards.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 06:20
|
|
|
ChesterJT posted:I was neither for or against trump but I do enjoy comedy and he's bringing that in spades so I'm enjoying my time in the Trump presidency so far. gently caress you : toot:
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 06:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 12:04 |
|
|
Hillary's disaster of a campaign was possibly the most hilarious pop culture event of the last decade
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 06:37
|
|