|
yeah why don't you just win every single seat, democrats. god
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 03:50 |
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:yeah why don't you just win every single seat, democrats. god 
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:03
|
|
|
As if this outcome of this race was anything besides symbolic anyway? "If only the GOP House Majority was 43 instead of 44"--last remaining Progressive shuffled into the rail car
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
ma votes for republicans all the time, as opposed to most seats which haven't voted for a democrat in decades. same as why montana has had 2 two term dem governors in a row
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:07
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:yeah why don't you just win every single seat, democrats. god this just in, some democrats advocate for more democratic victories more on this stunning development after the break
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
its not a victory if you lose
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:10
|
|
|
Paracaidas posted:As if this outcome of this race was anything besides symbolic anyway? yeah the dems shouldnt try to win any election since individually each seat wont change anything paradox of the weep
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:yeah why don't you just win every single seat, democrats. god $0
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
Paracaidas posted:As if this outcome of this race was anything besides symbolic anyway? "why worry about one seat? it's not like it will ever make a difference anyways" "why should I vote? one vote will never make a difference anyways"
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
which seems like roughly correct investment for an 8 point race
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
lmao the dems are going to bitch about not having any money after showing that they have no loving clue how to use money and then wonder why no one wants to give them any
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:13
|
|
|
if Republican support of Trump begins wavering then, yes, every additional seat matters because it means needing one fewer Republican Representative that has second thoughts about Trump
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:13
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:which seems like roughly correct investment for an 8 point race "We aren't going to spend money on a -30 point race" "We aren't going to spend money on a -8 point race" what the gently caress are you gonna spend money on then? inflating dianne feinstein's victory margin?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:"We aren't going to spend money on a -30 point race" A big computer that tells us what to do
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
72 House Republicans won by 20% or less in 2016
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
the current state of the dnc
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
You're right! The other 43 seats will come up for vote at.... oh, yup. The exact same time that this one will. It'd have been really nice to get a win. It's circlejerkery to pretend that if ~10,000 people in KS-4 had voted the other direction, there would be any actual difference in their lives. In the meantime, Our Movement and other orgs can point to this result in midwestern primaries leading into 2018 as proof that their slate is competitive in 'safe' red seats.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:16
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:yeah why don't you just win every single seat, democrats. god whoa there now, let's not get ahead of ourselves there we should focus on winning a single seat first. baby steps
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/chuckschumer/status/851985491264237568
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:17
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:"We aren't going to spend money on a -30 point race" there were 27 seats under that margin in 2016 so i'd start with those
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:17
|
|
|
So $0?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:18
|
|
|
lose today, lose tomorrow, lose forever! DNC should be investing some money into burning down Fox News if they want to get some good ROI in rural areas tbh
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:20
|
|
|
lmao 2018 & 2020 are gonna own so much
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:there were 27 seats under that margin in 2016 so i'd start with those I'd probably be looking at the 15-20% races if this swing continues to hold up in GA-06 and trust the <15% races to just ride the wave
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
The replies give me hope
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:22
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:I'd probably be looking at the 15-20% races if this swing continues to hold up in GA-06 and trust the <15% races to just ride the wave Homeless Friend posted:lmao 2018 & 2020 are gonna own so much
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:22
|
|
|
GOOD TIMES ON METH posted:A big computer that tells us what to do *robby mook on a unicycle* here come data boi
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
Terror Sweat posted:Ted loving Cruz was campaigning, The goddamn Vice President was helping, the GOP was spending a shitload of money on ad buys. The gently caress is wrong with these people They are Democrats, I suspect.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
Red district Congressman are too scared to give townhalls because they're being shouted down by voters, but don't give any money to help flip districts. - The Dems 2017
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
idk dudes but if 2016 proved anything throwing money at the issue doesn't do much
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
we cant be caught trying to win elections, because then republicans will try too
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
difference between Dems and Republicans: Dems think they're winning at all cost when they carefully select which races to invest money into, sometimes venturing out and investing in a slightly pink district Reps think they're winning at all cost as they're disenfranchising anyone that might vote against them and jailing/murdering any young progressive leaders that are too popular
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
...the Democrats! https://twitter.com/samknight1/status/851990942718492672
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
buttigieg would've won KS-04 by charming all the men (and women, i guess)
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:27
|
|
|
Tom Perez last Thursday*
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:28
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:idk dudes but if 2016 proved anything throwing money at the issue doesn't do much It more proved that money can't polish a turd, also to never trust Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton with money
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:28
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:72 House Republicans won by 20% or less in 2016 How many of those have no incumbent? The 25 point swing is bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:28
|
|
|
the turd is kansas
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
i'm surprised they can run elections i would think those bigly tax cuts have caused the state government to be partially owned by koch
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 03:50 |
|
|
We could have won this seat. Unreal.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:32
|
|
